Abstract
The global environmental issue of soil contamination with antibiotic-resistance genes has garnered increased attention in recent years due to its impact on ecosystems and human health. Despite this recognition, researchers face challenges in comprehensively understanding the mechanisms underlying the production and dissemination of soil resistance genes, particularly in relation to their implications for human health. This lack of understanding poses a barrier to the development of effective and precise control strategies. Biochar, a sustainable material, exhibits favorable adsorption properties characterized by its large pores and specific surface area. Therefore, we propose to explore the potential application of biochar addition in soil resistance gene management. In order to establish a solid research foundation in this area, in this paper we review the mechanisms underlying the generation and accumulation of soil resistance genes over the last decade, along with their transmission pathways and interfacial interactions. Biochar may help repair soil resistance genes by affecting factors like antibiotic levels, environmental conditions, enzymatic activity, and gene migration mechanisms, opening up new research possibilities.
Graphical Abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42773-024-00319-0/MediaObjects/42773_2024_319_Figa_HTML.png)
Highlights
-
The sources, transmission routes and effects on human health of soil ARGs are summarized, and the mechanism of soil ARGs control by biochar is discussed on the basis of the positive effects by biochar.
-
The ways in which biochar affects soil ARGs are analyzed in several directions (soil physicochemical properties, heavy metal content, antibiotic content, microbial structure and enzyme activity) in an attempt to provide a basis for the next studies.
-
The mechanisms of biochar in the regulation of antibiotics and heavy metals for soil ARGs removal are systematically and comprehensively described, while also prospecting the potential application of biochar in soil ARGs removal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) are considered as emerging pollutants and serious environmental problems (Maurya et al. 2021). According to the ‘Frontiers 2017’ report published by the United Nations Environment Program, antibiotic-resistant (AR) impact on the environment emerged as one of the six significant environmental issues worldwide. Accumulation of ARGs in environmental bacteria leads to resistance transfer to prevalent pathogens or the direct generation of new pathogens (Lin et al. 2021).
The global abuse of antibiotics is a direct cause of the continued emergence and rapid spread of ARGs and ARB (Fang et al. 2022). Antibiotics that cannot be fully metabolized by the actives are excreted into the environmental media (Li et al. 2023), and soil is considered to be the largest reservoir for ARB and ARGs (Ondon et al. 2021). Antibiotic residues in the soil environment exert selective pressure on microbial communities, leading to the development of resistance. This, in turn , promotes the diffusion of ARB and ARGs through horizontal gene transfer (HGT), thereby impacting the environmental health of soil ecosystems (Hashmi et al. 2017; Xiao et al. 2023), which poses a threat to both agricultural product safety and human health (Li et al. 2023; Zhi et al. 2019). The type and abundance of ARGs in agricultural soils vary according to soil types, and soil contaminants such as organic and chemical fertilizers (Wei et al. 2022), heavy metals (HMs) (Wang et al. 2021b), hydrocarbon (Sazykin et al. 2021) and untreated sewage sludge (Buta et al. 2021). These factors can significantly increase the abundance of ARGs and ARB in agricultural soils, thereby impacting AR (Kaviani Rad et al. 2022). Moreover, various soil-related properties including pH, texture, total nitrogen content, climate factors, and organic carbon play crucial roles in shaping the sources and fate of antibiotics and ARGs within soil ecosystems (Wang et al. 2020). The bacterial bioavailability of antibiotics is directly influenced by soil properties, thereby impacting the formation of ARGs (Wu et al. 2022a, b). The challenging removal, facile generation, and transmission of ARGs have garnered significant attention in the context of soil ARGs treatment; however, no efficient control technology has been explored to date. Revealing the mechanisms underlying the detrimental effects of ARGs on plants and humans, as well as their transmission and removal in soil, while exploring targeted and cost-effective treatment strategies, are pivotal steps towards effective pollution management in the future.
During the past years, biochar has been proposed as a tool for improving soil properties (Islam et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021b), developed as a functional material due to its cheap and sustainable properties (Liu et al. 2015), and its application in agriculture (fertilizer), climate change (carbon sequestration), environmental remediation (adsorbent) and materials science (functionalization) are receiving increasing attention. During recent years, biochar has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing soil properties (Islam et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021b), garnering escalating attention from the scientific community (Bolan et al. 2021; Xiao et al. 2018b). The utilization of biochar in environmental applications involves the mitigation of heavy metals (HMs) and organic contaminants in soil, along with the enhancement of soil fertility (Guo et al. 2020). The integration of biochar into soil improves its structural integrity by incorporating organic, inorganic, and mineral constituents (Lehmann et al. 2011). Furthermore, the porous structure and high specific surface area of biochar create conducive environments for microorganisms by offering nutrient-rich and water-retentive conditions (Lehmann et al. 2011; Shao et al. 2022). Furthermore, the presence of numerous functional groups in biochar enhances its ability to remediate pollutants through mechanisms such as hydrogen bonding, π–π bonding, and electrostatic interactions (Tang et al. 2021). These inherent characteristics collectively contribute to biochar’s strong adsorption capacity for pollutants.
Due to the unique characteristics of ARGs and their environmental contamination, biochar has been identified as a reliable adsorbent (Chen et al. 2023; Tang et al. 2021) that, when added to soil, enhances soil fertility and exerts a beneficial influence on ARGs, which are challenging to manage. Therefore, further research into the precise mechanisms through which biochar influences resistant bacteria in soil is a worthwhile endeavor. Due to its cost-effectiveness and sustainability, biochar has been widely studied as a versatile material with various applications in agriculture, climate change mitigation, environmental remediation, and materials science, attracting increasing interest from the scientific community. Biochar’s utilization in environmental contexts includes the stabilization of heavy metals and organic pollutants in soil, as well as enhancement of soil fertility. The addition of biochar to soil improves its structural stability by incorporating organic, inorganic, and mineral components (Lehmann et al. 2011). Furthermore, the porous structure and high specific surface area of biochar create conducive environments for microorganisms by offering nutrient-rich and water-retentive conditions (Lehmann et al. 2011; Shao et al. 2022). Additionally, the presence of various functional groups in biochar enhances its ability to remediate pollutants through mechanisms such as hydrogen bonding, π–π bonding, and electrostatic interactions (Tang et al. 2021). Together, these intrinsic qualities imbue biochar with a strong ability to adsorb pollutants.
The terms “biochar” and “antibiotic resistance gene” have been found to co-occur in 257 academic papers published between 2016 and 2023, as visualized in Fig. 1a using CiteSpace (Hu et al. 2021). The keyword clusters identified in CiteSpace provide insights into the prominent areas of research and emerging trends in the application of biochar for processing antibiotic resistance genes, with larger clusters indicating a greater volume of literature on the subject. The predominant cluster of antibiotic resistance genes is situated within the primary category of composition, encompassing bacterial community, biochar, and soil, suggesting a strong correlation between the impact of biochar on soil ARGs and the composition of bacterial community and soil structure. Additional significant keywords such as adsorption, abundance, heavy metal, and aqueous solution were identified as primary factors influencing the removal process. The quantity of literature pertaining to biochar and antibiotic resistance genes over the previous eight years is illustrated in Fig. 1b. It is evident that research in this domain has been receiving increasing attention.
a A timeline map depicting the keyword network within the fields of biochar and antibiotic resistance genes was analyzed, with a Modularity Q value greater than 0.3 indicating a significant cluster structure and a Weighted Mean Silhouette S value exceeding 0.7 suggesting a strong cluster. The literature data utilized in this study was sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection, using the search terms: topic: (“biochar and antibiotic resistance gene”); document: (Article or Review); language: (English); b illustrates the annual frequency of publications pertaining to keywords “biochar” and “antibiotic resistance gene” over the past eight years
This review initiates by analyzing the origins, dissemination, and contamination pathways of ARGs in soil. It explores the mechanisms of action, outlines the characteristics of biochar, and examines various viewpoints to clarify the numerous ways in which biochar impacts ARGs. Several mechanisms have been proposed for the biochar-mediated modulation of soil ARGs, including (1) inhibition of HGT through the influence of biochar on microbial community structure, such as providing habitat and carbon sources for microorganisms, (2) reduction of antibiotic concentrations by means of adsorption and decomposition mechanisms of biochar to attenuate the generation and dissemination of ARGs, (3) mitigation of ARGs diffusion and abundance due to the influence of biochar's presence on the selective pressure caused by HMs, (4) the potential of biochar to decrease the prevalence of ARGs by mitigating co-selective pressures through alterations in soil characteristics and the presence of pollutants such as HMs and organic substances, and (5) the influence of biochar on microbial function mediated by its modulation of enzyme activity, resulting in a noticeable effect on ARGs. Finally, the potential and challenges of biochar in regulating soil ARGs are discussed, highlighting its significant implications for future efforts to mitigate ARGs pollution in soil environments.
2 Occurrence, transfer and risk of ARGs
2.1 The occurrence of ARGs
Antibiotic misuse is a primary contributor to the contamination of ARGs. There are five main mechanisms of action through which antibiotics operate: peptidoglycan biosynthesis, nucleic acid synthesis, protein synthesis, metabolism, and disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane (Kohanski et al. 2010). Antibiotics have the capability to exert their effects through various mechanisms concurrently. Common mechanisms contributing to bacterial antibiotic resistance include reduced antibiotic uptake, enzymatic inactivation through mechanistic changes, evasion of antibiotic targets through the synthesis of alternative proteins, and activation of efflux pumps.
Table 1 provides a comprehensive overview of the primary mechanisms of resistance exhibited towards various classes of antibiotics. The predominant forms of resistance identified include intrinsic and acquired resistance. Bacteria possess inherent capabilities to resist certain antibiotics as a result of their distinctive structural and functional attributes, which may include the lack of specific antibiotic targets, thereby conferring resistance to particular antimicrobial agents. Moreover, antibiotic resistance can be acquired through two main genetic mechanisms: chromosomal gene mutations linked to the antibiotic’s mode of action and the uptake of resistance determinants encoded by exogenous DNA through HGT. The former is predominantly passed on to progeny through vertical gene transfer (VGT), while the latter enables rapid dissemination of ARGs. HGT-mediated uptake of exogenous DNA plays a crucial role in bacterial evolution, frequently driving the emergence of antibiotic resistance (Abushaheen et al. 2020; Blair et al. 2015; Johnston et al. 2014; Munita and Arias 2016).
2.2 The transfer of ARGs
HGT facilitates the transfer of genetic material between bacteria of different species through mechanisms including DNA transformation, conjugation, and bacteriophage-mediated transduction, largely mediated by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) (Yin et al. 2020). Figure 2 illustrates three mechanisms by which ARGs are transferred via HGT. These mechanisms include conjugation, transformation, and transduction, which involve the transfer of genetic elements between donor and recipient cells, the uptake of naked DNA, and the utilization of phages as DNA carriers, respectively (Soucy et al. 2015). Among these mechanisms, conjugation is identified as the primary pathway facilitating the horizontal dissemination of ARGs (Virolle et al. 2020). Various research studies have explored the correlation between soil pollutants and the conjugation of ARGs in bacteria, examining regulatory mechanisms such as intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, membrane permeability, and cell–cell contact (Yu et al. 2020a, b). Nevertheless, the influence of soil composition on these three transport pathways remains inadequately understood. Soil composition can influence soil microbial communities, bacterial growth, and other factors related to coupling (Cai et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2023). The cell initiates a protective response to reduce membrane permeability and mitigate the absorption of harmful substances. Conversely, pollutants can enhance HGT of ARGs by causing an increase in membrane permeability and damage. Numerous studies have illustrated the ability of biochar to adsorb plasmids or directly deactivate bacteria, thereby effectively impeding the transmission of ARGsin soil (Fang et al. 2022). This underscores the potential of biochar as a viable approach for addressing soil ARGs contamination.
HGT facilitated by MGEs plays a crucial role in the widespread dissemination of ARGs in the environment. Plasmids, extrachromosomal DNA fragments capable of autonomous replication, exert a significant influence on the distribution and propagation of ARGs through conjugation within host cells, thereby facilitating the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (Orlek et al. 2017; Svara and Rankin 2011). Plasmids demonstrate the capacity to cross barriers between different species and genera, displaying an increased rate of transfer and aiding in the dissemination and persistence of antibiotic resistance in environmental settings that may not be directly affected by antibiotic use (Hughes and Datta 1983). In a study conducted by Mohsin et al. (2021), plasmids IncFII and IncQ harboring the tet (X4) gene were identified in E. coli strains originating from various infection sources, including poultry, chickens, game birds, and slaughterhouse effluent. Additionally, Oladeinde et al. (2019) demonstrated that the IncK2 plasmid, isolated from Salmonella enterica Serovar Heidelberg strains, facilitated the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes, enabling the acquisition of antibiotic resistance. While the current literature concerning phage and transposon-related transduction and transformation studies is, it is essential to acknowledge their crucial roles. The notable variations in the abundance of ARGs within various components of the soil-lettuce system exhibited a strong positive correlation with intI1 and intI2, as demonstrated by Wen et al. (2021). The occurrence of ARGs in agricultural soil and fresh vegetables has been documented in specific regions of phage-encapsulated DNA. These phages contain small segments that serve as vectors for the dissemination of ARGs to bacteria. Although soil-derived phages may endure in vegetables, their abundance is expected to decrease gradually over time (Larranaga et al. 2018).
2.3 The risk of ARGs
The dissemination of ARGs can transpire between plant-associated microorganisms and their external milieu, predominantly originating from soil (Chen et al. 2017). The act of cultivating plants in soil is linked to the existence of ARGs, whereas the utilization of biochar has the potential to influence antibiotic-resistant soil populations by modifying microbial community structures (Shao et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2022a, b). The rhizosphere soils are identified as key sites for the presence of ARGs, MGEs, bacterial communities, and interactions with antibiotic residues (Shen et al. 2021). Additionally, the soil-root interface constitutes a complex and interconnected ecosystem. Research on the MGE profile in the soil–plant continuum has revealed that increased levels of MGEs may promote the spread of the resistome through HGT (Wang et al. 2021a). Plant roots are acknowledged as important reservoirs of ARGs. Crop plants grown in polluted agricultural settings can uptake and store pollutants in their tissues, potentially acting as vectors for the transfer of contaminants into the food chain (Christou et al. 2019). Research has shown that the spread of ARGs and pathogenic bacteria through the consumption of raw vegetables is a notable pathway, and the presence and variety of ARGs in edible plant components are linked to soil-based ARGs (Cerqueira et al. 2019; Mao et al. 2015). The application of poultry manure has been demonstrated to significantly enhance the abundance of ARGs in samples of deciduous trees, soil, and root endophytes. The ARGs originating from both soil and manure play a vital role as a reservoir of resistance determinants in vegetables. The composition of the microbial community has a significant impact on the plant microbiome, with specific bacteria originating in the soil and later transferring to vegetable tissues, where they establish colonization as root and leaf endophytes. ARGs can be transferred to plant tissues via internal pathways, with shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) potentially serving as bacterial hosts for ARGs, thereby influencing their presence in lettuce root endophytes, leaf endophytes, and leaf bulbs (Zhang et al. 2019). The movement of ARGs from soil to plant roots and surfaces plays a significant role in the spread of resistance among organic fertilizers, plants, and bacteria. Additionally, bacterial populations, including ARB, have the ability to migrate between the rhizosphere and leaf levels. ARGs are first introduced into the rhizosphere soil through a bottom-up process before being assimilated by endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria that are linked with plants (Wang et al. 2022a, b). Previous research has demonstrated the presence of sul1, sul2, tetC, and tetG in endophytes located in roots and leaves, as well as in leaf-like structures of lettuce cultivated in soils rich in fats (Chen et al. 2017; Fang et al. 2015); the study conducted by Jauregi et al. (2021) revealed a substantial increase in the absolute abundance of MGEs and ARGs in plant samples following the application of manure in soil. Specifically, the absolute abundance of MGEs in lettuce plants ranged from 1.08 × 108 to 2.56 × 109 copies g–1, while the absolute abundance of ARGs in wheat grains ranged from 4.04 × 109 to 1.47 × 1010 copies g–1. Moreover, the absolute abundance of MGEs in both plant types exhibited a significant increase, suggesting a heightened risk of antibiotic resistance transmission in the crops under investigation.
3 Characteristics of biochar and its mechanism of remediation of soil ARGs
3.1 Basic properties of biochar
Biochar is a complex carbonaceous material composed predominantly of coalescing aromatic rings and some polymeric aliphatic hydrocarbons, along with various other functional groups such as oxygen (Yang et al. 2019). Figure 3 illustrates that the fundamental properties of biochar are influenced by factors such as pyrolysis temperature, basic characteristics, and primary mechanisms of action. The characteristics of biochar are primarily influenced by the source material used for its production, the conditions of pyrolysis such as temperature and duration, retention time, heating rate, and other factors as noted by Tu et al. (2022) and Liao et al. (2022). The application of biochar has been shown to provide significant ecological and economic advantages by improving soil fertility, increasing crop productivity, and effectively mitigating heavy metals and organic contaminants in the soil, ultimately enhancing overall soil quality as demonstrated by Singh et al. (2022) and Zhang et al. (2021). Biochar has the capacity to modify the abundance, composition, and activity of soil microbial communities through soil aeration and the provision of essential nutrients and water (Razzaghi et al. 2020; Singh et al. 2022). Biochar is produced through the thermal decomposition and stabilization of organic materials such as agricultural solid waste, residual sludge, straw, woody materials, and livestock manure under high temperature and oxygen-limited conditions. In addition to carbon, biochar consists of a variety of elements that form specific structures and play a role in determining its physical characteristics. The chemical composition of biochar is essential, as it influences the functions and potential applications of this material.
3.1.1 Physical properties
The adsorption capacity of water and nutrients in soil is enhanced by the high specific surface area of biochar’s pore structure, as noted by Uzoma et al. (2011). This characteristic is influenced by various factors including the composition of the raw material, heating temperature, and heating rate, as highlighted by Pandey et al. (2020). Higher heating rates have been found to promote increased porosity, while increasing pyrolysis temperatures results in the gradual removal of simple molecules such as ethylene and esters from the outer surface of the feedstock, facilitating the development of biochar's structure and pore area, as discussed by Lian and Xing (2017) and Xiao et al. (2018a). When the pyrolysis temperature reaches a certain threshold, aliphatic alkyl and ether groups undergo detachment, leading to the release of volatile compounds such as cellulose and hemicellulose (Kim et al. 2013). Consequently, this process facilitates the creation of micropores, thermal condensation within the material, and a rapid increase in the specific surface area of biochar (Li et al. 2019a, b). The biochar is comprised of a mixture of open and contracted gas-phase nanopores, along with residual macropores (Gray et al. 2014; Lawal et al. 2021), which limit the total specific surface area and impede the attainment of maximum adsorption capacity (Lawal et al. 2021). As a result, biochar produced through low-temperature pyrolysis of biomass exhibits improved adsorption properties. Changes in the surface properties (Jiang et al. 2021), electrochemical characteristics, and π–π electron donor–acceptor interactions of biochar further impact its adsorption efficiency (Klupfel et al. 2014; Sorrenti et al. 2016; Zhao and Zhou 2019).
The particle size of biochar is influenced by the characteristics of the original biomass, the type of pyrolysis system utilized, and the specific process conditions employed. These factors not only dictate the potential applications of the biochar but also impact its transport and interactions within the environment. Consequently, the handling, storage, and transportation of biochar dust are critical considerations with significant implications for human health and safety, as highlighted by previous research (Aller 2016; Amonette and Joseph 2009a; Brewer et al. 2014). Biochar typically exhibits higher solid density compared to virgin material, with solid density increasing as pyrolysis temperatures rise which increases as the pyrolysis temperature rises. Additionally, the presence of micropores in biochar contributes positively to its overall density. The bulk density of biochar, however, is not influenced by pyrolysis temperature but rather by the raw material utilized, with a direct correlation between the bulk weight of prepared biochar and the raw material used (Byrne and Nagle 1997; Kazemi Shariat Panahi et al. 2020).
3.1.2 Chemical properties
During the pyrolysis of biomass to produce biochar, various physicochemical processes occur, leading to the formation of a diverse array of biochar compositions. The predominant component of biochar is carbon, with the proportion of stable and unstable carbon forms contingent upon the specific pyrolysis temperature and mineral composition of the initial biomass (Mašek et al. 2013). Carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen are among the most prevalent elements in biochar, typically comprising the primary structural components (Aller 2016).Pyrolysis facilitates the elimination of H and O, resulting in a change in the proportion of elements in the biochar (Crombie et al. 2013), and the O/C and H/C ratios are directly related to polarity, aromaticity, and biodegradability, with lower ratios at higher pyrolysis temperatures leading to increased aromaticity and carbon stability and reduced polarity, which is the key to removing organic pollutants. The process of pyrolysis facilitates the removal of hydrogen and oxygen, resulting in a shift in the elemental composition of biochar (Crombie et al. 2013). The relationship between the ratios of oxygen to carbon (O/C) and hydrogen to carbon (H/C) and the characteristics of polarity, aromaticity, and biodegradability is well-established in the literature. Elevated pyrolysis temperatures have been shown to decrease O/C and H/C ratios, resulting in heightened aromaticity, improved carbon stability, decreased polarity, and enhanced efficacy in the removal of organic pollutants (Oliveira et al. 2017; Suliman et al. 2016). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of biochar is determined by its surface negative charge, which is influenced by the pyrolysis temperature and the presence of functional groups carrying a net negative charge (Ahmad Bhat et al. 2022). Biochar produced at lower temperatures tends to have a higher CEC (Al-Wabel et al. 2018), with variations also observed based on the original biomass source. Furthermore, biochar derived from biomass with higher ash content, such as manure biochar, may exhibit a greater CEC (Ro et al. 2010). The electrical conductivity (EC) of a substance is defined as its ability to conduct an electric current, a property that is influenced by the concentration of dissolved salts in water (Laghari et al. 2016). It has been hypothesized that the increased EC of biochar can be attributed to the presence of Na+, K+, and Mg2+ ions (Mukherjee et al. 2011). Research indicates that biochar produced from livestock manure as its primary source material displays elevated EC values due to its significant salt content, potentially posing toxic effects on young plants with excessive application (Song and Guo 2012). The amphiphilic characteristics of biochar’s surface, attributed to the presence of oxide minerals, lead to a pH-dependent fluctuation in electric charge. As demonstrated by Kazemi Shariat Panahi et al. (2020), the surface of biochar is positively charged in acidic environments and negatively charged in alkaline environments. Furthermore, the pyrolysis temperature employed in biochar production is positively associated with the pH of the resulting biochar, suggesting its alkaline nature can be leveraged to ameliorate soil acidity and impact the movement of metal ions within the soil matrix. The pH of biochar is significantly correlated with oxygen content, as indicated by previous research linking biochar alkalinity to the presence of oxygen-rich functional groups such as diketones, quinones, gamma-pyrrolidone, and chromium (Montes-Morán et al. 2004; Mukome et al. 2013). Biochar derived from locust wood or pine typically exhibits slight acidity or neutrality, with acidic biochar serving as a potential soil amendment for alkaline soils (Laghari et al. 2016).
The chemical reactions taking place on the surface of biochar are largely influenced by its surface functional groups, as noted by Xiao et al. (2018a). The feedstock utilized in the production of biochar contains a high abundance of oxygen-containing functional groups, including phenols, carbonyl groups, carboxylic acids, alcohols, and heterocycles. These functional groups play a significant role in determining the distribution of functional groups found in cellulosic and lignin biomass, which are predominantly composed of carboxyl groups; some of these functional groups persist in the biochar even after undergoing pyrolysis (Lian and Xing 2017; Zhao and Zhou 2019). The electrostatic interaction is dependent on the specific functional group that is present. At higher pyrolysis temperatures, the increase in oxygen-containing functional groups in biochar can be linked to a rise in ion exchange capacity due to a greater concentration of positively charged functional groups on the surface (Zhang et al. 2017). Conversely, this correlation remains consistent at lower pyrolysis temperatures (Banik et al. 2018). The quantity of functional groups diminishes as the pyrolysis temperature rises (Yang et al. 2018), and the functional groups present on the surface of biochar can generally be categorized into two groups: (1) electron donors, such as NH2, OH, O (C=O) R, or OR, which contain α or π electrons; and (2) electron acceptors, such as (C=O) OH, NO2, or (C=O) H groups, which contain empty orbitals (Amonette and Joseph 2009b; Kazemi Shariat Panahi et al. 2020). Cryogenic biochar typically exhibits a diverse array of functional groups, including a significant presence of alkyl C–H and C=C bonds, as well as hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, and methyl groups (Yang et al. 2018; Trigo et al. 2016).
3.2 Mechanisms of removal of soil ARGs by biochar
The incorporation of biochar into agricultural soils has been shown to improve soil properties, as it is frequently utilized for the mitigation of organic contaminants in soil through mechanisms such as direct immobilization and modulation of soil metabolic processes. Biochar can effectively immobilize organic pollutants through various interactions, including electrostatic interactions, pore filling, π–π electron donor–acceptor interactions, and hydrophobic interactions (Xiao et al. 2018a). The adsorption efficiency of biochar in soil primarily relies on its inherent properties, the characteristics of organic pollutants, as well as the structure and properties of the soil. Additionally, other environmental factors that govern pollutant transport also play a crucial role. Currently, extensive research is being conducted on the modification of biochar, encompassing metal salt/metal oxide modification, organic modification, acid/base modification, loading oxidizing agents and other approaches (Chen et al. 2018). Table 2 provides a comprehensive summary of relevant studies involving modified biochar for controlling ARGs.
In the realm of soil remediation, it is essential to thoroughly assess potential adverse effects and conduct toxicity testing before proceeding with the additional utilization of biochar. Specifically, the incorporation of heavy metals (HMs) into biochar via feedstock, organic pollutants, and the pyrolysis process has the potential to create environmentally persistent free radicals that may negatively impact soil health (Odinga et al. 2020; Xiao et al. 2018a). The extended presence of these contaminants poses a significant toxic hazard to soil microorganisms, consequently affecting soil organisms and plant life.
The incorporation of biochar into soil has a diverse range of impacts on the abundance of resistance genes, as illustrated in Fig. 4. It can directly influence bacterial populations and their genetic characteristics, such as gene duplication and transfer (Ejileugha 2022), as well as alter microbial composition (Cheng et al. 2021), heavy metal concentrations, soil physical properties (Hu et al. 2022), chemical properties, and co-selection pressures (An et al. 2018). The synergistic actions of these mechanisms lead to a decrease in both commensal and pathogenic bacteria harboring antimicrobial resistance genes, thus efficiently managing the proliferation of resistance genes and antibiotics in agricultural crops and soil (Jiao et al. 2018).
The specific ways in which biochar affects ARGs abundance in soil are as follows.
3.2.1 Biochar alters ARGs abundance by affecting microbial diversity and activity
The bacterial community composition plays a significant role in determining the content of resistance genes in the environment, with human activities contributing to the evolution and proliferation of ARGs in microbial communities. This, in turn, facilitates the exchange of ARGs between bacteria. The addition of biochar to soil has been shown to impact the microbial community and its function in agricultural soil (Cole et al. 2019). The application of biochar has been found to have an impact on the relative abundance of soil bacteria. In particular, higher concentrations of cornstalk biochar have been shown to be associated with a reduction in the relative abundance of ignavibacterium and acidobacteria (Fan et al. 2020). The addition of biochar to agricultural soil has been shown to stimulate the growth of functional bacteria, leading to their dominance within the microbial community. This enhancement of bacterial stability serves to counteract perturbation effects (Liu et al. 2020b).
Possible mechanisms for adding biochar to improve microbial diversity and activity in soil are as follows.
-
1. Biochar can serve as a porous habitat that may protect microbial growth and predators. Its porous structure contributes to a high surface area and enhanced adsorption capacity, enabling it to offer a protective environment for less competitive microbes against protists. Additionally, microorganisms can utilize biochar particles as favorable habitats for colonization, growth, and reproduction (Warnock et al. 2007).
-
2. Offering a carbon source and mineral nutrients to microorganisms is essential for their growth and metabolism. Unstable carbon can act as a substrate for microbial processes, impacting microbial populations and community dynamics by providing energy in the form of carbohydrates. The ash found in biochar plays a dual role in stabilizing microbial metabolites through the formation of organic-mineral bonds and supplying necessary inorganic nutrients for microbial growth (Dai et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2020).
The study conducted by Wang et al. (2019) revealed that soil subjected to long-term fertilization exhibited a greater level of bacterial resistance compared to unfertilized soil, attributed to the diverse HGT mechanisms employed by bacteria. Elevated concentrations of macrolide-resistant bacteria in such environments can promote HGT among microorganisms in agricultural fields, leading to an escalation in the prevalence of macrolide ARGs. For example, a study by Gao et al. (2020) demonstrated notable changes in the microbial community structure in soil contaminated with pig manure, showing positive relationships among proteobacteria, firmicutes, and bacteroidetes, along with an increase in the overall abundance of ARGs and antibiotics. Additionally, enterococcus and sphingobacter were found to be positively associated with these changes, while other bacterial taxa that exhibit positive correlations with different environmental factors may serve as potential reservoirs for the migration of ARGs, as suggested by Berendsen et al. (2021). Crops also influence the microbial community, thereby affecting the abundance of ARGs and MGEs in soil. (Jauregi et al. 2021) revealed that wheat soil exhibited a higher absolute abundance of ARGs and MGE genes compared to lettuce soil. Moreover, the researchers pinpointed various factors that influence the microbial community's composition, as well as the dispersion and destiny of MGEs and ARGs in soil. These factors include the types of crops, the time elapsed from plant growth to harvest, the types of roots, and the amount and makeup of rootstock. The results indicated that bacteria were responsible for approximately 79.76% of the variability in ARGs. Other factors, such as antibiotics, HMs, and soil nutrients, may exert influence on the abundance and composition of ARGs by altering the community structure and activity of agricultural soil bacteria (Yang et al. 2021a). Moreover, soil animals function as hidden reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), as demonstrated by the discovery of various antimicrobial substances and antibiotic gene clusters in the gastrointestinal tract of soil animals following the use of organic fertilizers (Zhu et al. 2022). Furthermore, both plant-derived and fecal-derived biochar have notable impacts on the abundance of ARGs by influencing soil bacterial communities and gut properties (Ding et al. 2019).
3.2.2 Biochar affects microbial community structure by altering soil physicochemical properties, resulting in changes in ARGs abundance
Biochar exerts a significant influence on various soil chemistry parameters, such as soil pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), total carbon (TC), carbon–nitrogen ratio (C:N ratio), and soil organic carbon (SOC) (Sun et al. 2022). These changes in soil physicochemical properties and nutrient availability have been documented in previous studies (Warnock et al. 2007). The lasting effects of biochar on soil properties are expected to persist, potentially impacting microbial communities through their influence on physicochemical processes within the soil (Fan et al. 2020). Soil pH is a significant factor in this process (Sheng and Zhu 2018), as the incorporation of biochar results in an elevation of soil pH. This, in turn, leads to an increase in the population of gram-negative bacteria (Aciego Pietri and Brookes 2009); the microorganisms in the soil aid in the oxidation of the surface of biochar particles, resulting in an augmentation of negative charge density and consequently enhancing the CEC of biochar-amended soil as time progresses (Cole et al. 2019). This process induces changes in ionic equilibrium, promotes microbial adhesion, and stimulates the growth of soil microorganisms, thereby increasing both diversity and activity levels (Huang et al. 2022); the enhancement of soil nutrition content has been shown to positively impact the diversity and growth of the soil microbial community (Song et al. 2020); the improved water holding capacity of the soil has been found to influence the biota within the soil (Cole et al. 2019); the physicochemical properties of biochar have been shown to impact soil nutrient levels through increased adsorption on the biochar surface (Herrmann et al. 2019); changes in pH resulting from this process can alter the availability of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, rendering them more accessible to microorganisms (Ding et al. 2016); alterations in soil organic matter content can directly or indirectly influence the composition and activity of the microbial community, particularly fungal populations (Herrmann et al. 2019). Elevated pH levels can also impact microbial enzyme activity and biomass, thereby influencing the dynamics of soil organic matter (Maestrini et al. 2014).
The physicochemical characteristics of environmental media play a crucial role in influencing the enrichment, migration, and transformation of ARGs (Lin et al. 2021). Soil parameters such as pH, CEC, OM, and OC have been found to have a significant impact on the abundance of ARGs, leading to variations in their distribution within the soil matrix. Metagenomic analysis has revealed a significant and positive correlation between the abundance of tet and sul genes and soil properties, particularly pH and SOM (Guo et al. 2018). The microbial community's structure and abundance of ARGs can be influenced by the physical and chemical properties of the environment, as demonstrated by Chand et al. (2023). Specifically, OM, pH, TN, and TP are identified as key factors in this interaction in various soil types, such as clay, silt, and sand, as highlighted by Wang et al. (2020). The distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in paddy fields, particularly in areas where organic manure has been applied, is predominantly shaped by the physicochemical characteristics of the soil. TN and OM are important properties that have the ability to influence bacterial community structure and modify antibiotic concentrations, thereby impacting the presence and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (Qing et al. 2022; Tang et al. 2015).
3.2.3 Biochar influences antibiotic content at source and thus ARGs abundance
AR has been primarily attributed to the induction of antibiotics, resulting in their persistence in the environmental medium (Zhou et al. 2020). The release of antibiotics into the environment has been shown to influence the regulation of ARGs and provoke microbial responses, thereby increasing bacterial mutation rates and promoting HGT of ARGs from ARB to non-resistant strains (Zhu et al. 2013). The persistence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in soil is influenced by the physicochemical properties of antibiotics (Berendsen et al. 2021). Antibiotics are frequently utilized in animal disease management and as growth-promoting additives in animal feed. The persistence of antibiotics in the environment is a significant contributor to the escalation of ARGs in soil. Antibiotics have the potential to selectively support the proliferation of bacteria carrying mutagenic genes, thereby facilitating the expansion of ARG populations. Additionally, antibiotics can increase the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria by facilitating the horizontal transfer of ARGs through conjugation (Johnston et al. 2014).
Elevated levels of antibiotics have a profound impact on the activity and diversity of soil microorganisms. Tetracycline, for instance, imposes a significant antimicrobial selection pressure on soil bacteria, leading to the proliferation of resistant strains when present in concentrated quantities (Wang et al. 2019). Nevertheless, the chelation, absorption, and degradation of antibiotics in soil result in a transient nature of the selective pressure on microorganisms. Research indicates that antibiotics account for a mere 4.76% of the variation in ARGs, suggesting that the presence of ARGs is not solely dependent on the presence of corresponding antibiotics (Gao et al. 2020; Guo et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2021a). The significance of low antibiotic concentrations on the dissemination and amplification of ARGs is a critical area of study. Numerous studies have consistently detected the presence of low levels of antibiotics in diverse environmental matrices. For example, Wu et al. (2019) reported that hygromycin, even at subinhibitory concentrations, can facilitate the persistence and horizontal transfer of ARGs. Furthermore, Yin et al. (2020) illustrated the phenomenon of cross-induction between antibiotic stress responses and sublethal antibiotic concentrations, which leads to the promotion of bacterial antibiotic resistance. Moreover, a limited number of studies have revealed that subminimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics contribute to the transfer of ARGs (Jutkina et al. 2018).
Biochar will influence the content of antibiotics in the following ways, and the ARB specific influencing mechanisms are shown in Table 3.
-
1.
Inherent properties of biochar: the primary mechanism of antibiotic adsorption by biochar involves the π–π bond interaction between the antibiotic and the aromatic ring present on the biochar, as supported by previous studies (Peng et al. 2016; Rajapaksha et al. 2014). Additionally, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, pore filling (Tang et al. 2021), cation bridging, and surface complexation have been identified to play a crucial role in the adsorption process for certain antibiotics (Pan 2020). The aromaticity of biochar is shown to significantly impact the π–π electron donor–acceptor interaction between the adsorbent and biochar, thereby influencing the overall adsorption process (Pignatello et al. 2017). Moreover, electrostatic interactions are a significant factor in the adsorption process of ionic organic pollutants onto biochar. The presence of negatively charged molecules on the biochar surface facilitates the electrostatic binding of cationic dyes, such as brilliant blue and rhodamine B, as demonstrated in studies by Xu et al. (2011) and Qiu et al. (2009). Furthermore, biochar has been shown to decrease the bioavailability of antibiotics and reduce the transfer of antibiotics from contaminated soil to plant tissues, as evidenced by research conducted by Hurtado et al. (2017). The mechanism of action of biochar can vary depending on the type of antibiotics used. In instances where the pH is elevated, sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) forms hydrogen bonds with the COOH or OH groups of biochar. Conversely, at a pH below 8, the interaction between SMZ and biochar is primarily characterized by electrostatic π–π electron donor interaction and cation exchange interaction (Vithanage et al. 2014); biochar has the potential to enhance the adsorption of tetracycline through mechanisms such as π–π bonds and metal bridging, leading to the conversion of free tetracyclines to bound forms. This process ultimately results in reduced mobility, bioavailability, and selective pressure of tetracycline in soil, consequently lowering tetracycline content and the prevalence of its resistance gene (Qin et al. 2022).
-
2.
Effect on soil physicochemical properties: the incorporation of biochar resulted in an elevation of soil pH and a decrease in bio-rich tetracycline levels, as demonstrated by Yue et al. (2019). The modification of fungal community composition by biochar is attributed to its alkaline impact on soil and electrostatic repulsion, which in turn hinders the interaction between tetracycline and microbial organisms, as discussed by Liu et al. (2020a); TC is associated with SOM via H-bonding, cation bridging and cation exchange, with the latter probably being the dominant mechanism (Pollard and Morra 2018); nitrogen is one of the important nutrients of soil microorganisms, and biochar contains primarily heterocyclic nitrogen; increasing N in the soil may enhance the excretion of tetracycline antibiotics (Yue et al. 2019).
-
3.
Effect on surface microorganisms: the concentration of antibiotics at the onset can have an impact on biodegradation and soil microorganisms through modifications in enzyme activity and metabolic capacity, albeit with variability among bacterial species and their growth stages (Cycon et al. 2019; Katiyar et al. 2022). Additionally, bacteria attached to biochar surfaces demonstrate increased effectiveness in antibiotic degradation, as biochar provides carbon and other nutrients that facilitate microbial colonization and activity, thereby accelerating the biodegradation of organic pollutants in soil (Adelaide and José Luís da Silva 2021).
3.2.4 Biochar affects antibiotic resistance through the adsorption of HMs
The distribution and propagation of AR can be significantly influenced by environmental metal pollution due to the antimicrobial properties of metals and the long-term selection pressure they impose (Cao et al. 2020). Figure 5 demonstrates that HMs can promote HGT of ARGs among environmental bacteria. Metal ions have the ability to induce oxidative stress and bacterial reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to a bacterial SOS response that is considered a key mechanism in the evolution of AR. This response can activate integrases and transferases, facilitating the transfer of ARGs through HGT (Guerin et al. 2009; Lin et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2018). Numerous research studies have illustrated the antimicrobial and growth-promoting attributes of specific HMs commonly incorporated into animal feed. As a result, pollution from heavy metals aids in the dissemination of ARGs through mechanisms of co-selection and co-regulation. Co-selection arises from the interplay between resistance mechanisms for antibiotics and heavy metals, leading to the development of co-resistance, wherein multiple resistance genes are clustered in close proximity on a mobile genetic element. Moreover, metal ions have the ability to simultaneously modulate genes associated with antibiotic resistance and diminish susceptibility to antibiotics (Berendsen et al. 2021; Seiler and Berendonk 2012). The occurrence of ARGs demonstrated a significant and favorable relationship with HMs such as As, Cd, Cu, and Zn. Specifically, tetracycline readily formed complexes with HMs and frequently co-localized within the same MGEs. Conversely, HMs also impacted the transferability of tetracycline, leading to a positive association between the two variables. This observation highlighted a synergistic selection pressure on ARGs due to long-term co-selection exerted by metals (Guo et al. 2018). The sul gene displayed greater sensitivity to metal contamination in comparison to the tet gene, particularly in response to heavy metals Cu and Hg which exhibited a stronger capacity for induction compared to other metals. These two metals are likely the main triggers of microbial SOS responses, leading to an upregulation of the sul gene (Deng et al. 2020). Concentrations of Zn (II), Cr (VI), Ag (I), and Cu (II) were found to be comparable to sub-inhibitory levels observed in contaminated environments and in treated animals and humans, potentially facilitating horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (Zhang et al. 2018).
The utilization of biochar for the stabilization of HMs in soils encompasses a multitude of potential mechanisms, whereby biochar can directly or indirectly influence the chemical speciation of HMs, as shown in Table 4, encompassing: (1) Direct interaction. Furthermore, aside from physical adsorption and surface precipitation as discussed by Zeng et al. (2015), the interaction of metal ions and cations with biochar is influenced by humic complexation and co-precipitated inner sphere complexation of mineral oxides with biochar. The biochar is characterized by numerous surface functional groups such as carbonyl groups, carboxyl, and phenolic hydroxyls, in addition to a well-defined porous structure. These attributes possess the capacity to improve ion exchange processes on the biochar surface and reduce the bioavailability of heavy metals (Li et al. 2021; Mohamed et al. 2017). The charge properties of these characteristics facilitate interactions between various functional groups and the surfaces of heavy metals, resulting in internal spherical complexation with the available hydroxyl groups of mineral oxides and other surface precipitates, consequently impacting the adsorption efficacy (Puga et al. 2015). (2) Indirect interaction. The elevation of soil pH through the utilization of biochar and the subsequent liberation of dissolved organic carbon have been found to enhance the adsorption and precipitation of heavy metals in forms such as phosphates, carbonates, oxides, and hydroxides, ultimately diminishing their bioavailability via adsorption and/or precipitation reactions (Beesley et al. 2011; Li et al. 2021; Zeng et al. 2015). Furthermore, the composite nature of biochar, encompassing both mineral and organic constituents, imparts a substantial binding capacity for heavy metals and furnishes supplementary sites for adsorption (Uchimiya et al. 2010).
3.2.5 Biochar affects antibiotic resistance through influencing enzyme activity
The assessment of soil enzyme activity is essential for evaluating microbial functionality, as all biochemical processes in the soil are interconnected with it (Gianfreda and Rao 2008). The potential influence of enzyme activity on mitigating ARGs contamination through biochar application has not been extensively investigated. The enzymatic activity plays a crucial role in the resistance mechanisms against aminoglycosides and chloramphenicol antibiotics (Ogawara 2019; Costello et al. 2019). A novel dihydrofolate reductase found in the soil microbiome has been identified as resistant to trimethoprim. Enzyme activity in soil is subject to alterations stemming from variations in its physical, chemical, and biological constituents (Gianfreda and Rao 2008). Nonetheless, the introduction of biochar can wield an indirect impact on soil enzyme activity by regulating these factors (Zheng et al. 2022). Additionally, biochar harbors vital nutrients conducive to microbial proliferation, including phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium. These nutrients can bolster soil enzyme activity by fostering heightened microbial activity within the soil (Lehmann et al. 2011). Current research in the field has explored the effects of biochar on soil enzyme activity and microorganisms, with a particular focus on the regulatory role of ARGs (Zheng et al. 2022). The mechanisms by which biochar impacts enzyme activity are complex and varied, with different types of biochar yielding differing effects on enzyme activity. Additionally, the supplementation of biochar with nutrients has been found to enhance microbial activity, supporting the growth and utilization of microorganisms and serving as a substrate for specific enzymes. Ultimately, these findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of biochar in soil health and microbial processes. For example, Imparato et al. (2016) found that elevated levels of wheatgrass gasification biochar can augment soil phenoloxidase activity while diminishing cellulase levels; the incorporation of poultry litter biochar led to heightened soil enzyme activity for cellulase, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase (Paz-Ferreiro et al. 2015). The impact of biochar on soil ARGs was examined, with a specific focus on the influence of enzyme activity. The results of this investigation revealed strong negative associations between enzyme activity and extractable concentrations of Cd and Pb, as well as positive correlations with SOC, DOC contents, microbial activity, and biomass (Azadi and Raiesi 2021). The impact of straw biochar on dehydrogenase, catalase, and urease activities was observed to be influenced by the availability of As, Cu, Cd, and Zn (Tang et al. 2020). It is postulated that the addition of biochar may have a beneficial effect on the elimination of soil ARGs through its effects on soil enzyme activity, reduction of co-selection pressure, and modulation of microbial activity.
3.3 Biochar affects antibiotic resistance through other factors
In addition to HMs found in soil, various pollutants, including microplastics, inorganic salts, and non-antibiotics, also affect the occurrence and transmission of ARGs within soil. The presence of microplastics in the soil environment not only alters the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil and its functions but also results in a notable increase in the relative abundance of ARGs due to a higher prevalence of bacteria hosting more than 5 ARGs (Lu and Chen 2022; Su et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2022a, b). The impact of microplastics and biochar on soil ARGs is predominantly shaped by indirect variables such as soil characteristics, microbial populations, and the prevalence of MGEs, with soil properties emerging as the most influential factor (Su et al. 2024). The presence of inorganic salts in the soil undoubtedly contributes to the effects of biochar on ARGs, as certain anions and antibiotics occupy adsorption sites where ARGs, being negatively charged, may experience electrostatic repulsion from the anions. Therefore, the cations present enhance the adsorption of ARGs by biochar (Du et al. 2023). Wang (2013) suggested that Ca2+ can form inner sphere complexes with phosphate groups of DNA, forming a compact molecular structure, which is more suitable for the microporous size of the biochar. It is hypothesized that pesticides, disinfectants, detergents, nanomaterials, and other non-antibiotics play a substantial role in the reduction of soil ARGs. However, there is a lack of research investigating the relationship between these complex agricultural chemicals and pharmaceutical pollutants with soil ARGs. The potential benefits and mechanisms of action of biochar as an eco-friendly amendment require thorough examination, posing new challenges for future research efforts.
4 Conclusions and future prospects
To address the challenges posed by AR, it is crucial to conduct thorough investigations into the origins, selection pressures, enrichment mechanisms, and transmission pathways of ARGs in environmental media. The soil environment is consistently exposed to antibiotics, ARGs, and ARB from sources including livestock manure, wastewater, and sewage sludge. The potential transmission of ARGs and ARB to humans via contaminated vegetables and crops poses a significant threat to human health. Despite this risk, research on the removal of ARGs from agricultural soils has been limited, with even fewer studies investigating environmentally sustainable soil treatment methods. The application of biochar as a soil conditioner has shown promise in influencing the abundance and diversity of soil ARGs due to its rich functional groups, extensive specific surface area, and porous structure. It is imperative to comprehend the mechanism through which biochar regulates antibiotics and ARGs, as it presents an innovative strategy for soil remediation. The concurrent implementation of measures to prohibit antibiotic abuse and the advancement of efficient technical treatment methods can effectively mitigate antibiotic resistance in environmental media.
Despite the known health risks posed by ARGs pollution, there is a lack of reliable methods for accurately measuring the extent and frequency of this risk. Due to the microscopic nature of ARGs pollution, visual detection is not possible. The absence of statistical data on soil ARGs, coupled with the difficulty in detection methods, hinders the assessment of associated risks and the allocation of appropriate attention to them. Current available methods primarily focus on mitigating soil ARGs through biochar application. The comprehensive elimination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from soil has not been thoroughly investigated, presenting an ongoing challenge that requires additional examination and resolution. The effectiveness of biochar in remediating soil ARGs is affected by factors such as the amount, composition, and timing of application. The scarcity of research has impeded the development of a systematic approach for categorizing and summarizing findings for future application. Some studies have indicated that prolonged use of specific biochar types in soil may have a contradictory effect on ARGs; however, this issue has yet to be resolved. The results of these foundational studies underscore the need for the development of management and regulatory measures designed to minimize potential long-term health hazards for humans.
Data availability
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abushaheen MA, Muzaheed AJ, Fatani M, Alosaimi W, Mansy M, George S, Acharya S, Rathod DD, Divakar C, Jhugroo S, Vellappally AA, Khan JS, Jhugroo P (2020) Antimicrobial resistance, mechanisms and its clinical significance. Dis Mon 66:100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2020.100971
Aciego Pietri JC, Brookes PC (2009) Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.017
Adelaide P, Luís J, da Silva P (2021) Effects of biochar in soil and water remediation: a review. Biodegr Technol Org Inorg Pollut. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101374
Ahmad Bhat S, Kuriqi A, Dar MUD, Bhat O, Sammen SS, Towfiqul Islam ARM, Elbeltagi A, Shah O, Ai-Ansari N, Ali R, Heddam S (2022) Application of biochar for improving physical, chemical, and hydrological soil properties: a systematic review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711104
Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Wenshan Guo Md, Johir AH, Sornalingam K, Sahedur Rahman M (2017) Chloramphenicol interaction with functionalized biochar in water: sorptive mechanism, molecular imprinting effect and repeatable application. Sci Total Environ 609:885–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.239
Akhtar L, Ahmad M, Iqbal S, Abdelhafez AA, Mehran MT (2021) Biochars’ adsorption performance towards moxifloxacin and ofloxacin in aqueous solution: role of pyrolysis temperature and biomass type. Environ Technol Innov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101912
Aller MF (2016) Biochar properties: transport, fate, and impact. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:1183–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2016.1212368
Al-Wabel MI, Hussain Q, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Abduljabbar A, Sallam AS, Ok YS (2018) Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: a review. Land Degrad Dev 29:2124–2161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2829
Amonette JE, Joseph S (2009a) Physical properties of biochar. Biochar for environmental management. Science and technology. Earthscan, pp 33–53
Amonette JE, Joseph S et al (2009b) Characteristics of biochar: microchemical properties. J Party School Shengli Oilfield 7(6):1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0706143
An XL, Chen QL, Zhu D, Su JQ (2018) Distinct effects of struvite and biochar amendment on the class 1 integron antibiotic resistance gene cassettes in phyllosphere and rhizosphere. Sci Total Environ 631–632:668–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.034
Arif M, Liu G, Zia Rehman M, Mian MM, Ashraf A, Yousaf B, Rashid MS, Ahmed R, Imran M, Munir MAM (2023) Impregnation of biochar with montmorillonite and its activation for the removal of azithromycin from aqueous media. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:78279–78293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27908-z
Azadi N, Raiesi F (2021) Sugarcane bagasse biochar modulates metal and salinity stresses on microbial functions and enzyme activities in saline co-contaminated soils. Appl Soil Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104043
Banik C, Lawrinenko M, Bakshi S, Laird DA (2018) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock on surface charge and functional group chemistry of biochars. J Environ Qual 47:452–461. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.11.0432
Bashir S, Hussain Q, Akmal M, Riaz M, Hongqing Hu, Ijaz SS, Iqbal M, Abro S, Mehmood S, Ahmad M (2017) Sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments 18:874–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1796-z
Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2011) A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:3269–3282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023
Berendsen BJA, Roelofs G, van Zanten B, Driessen-van Lankveld WDM, Pikkemaat MG, Bongers IEA, de Lange E (2021) A strategy to determine the fate of active chemical compounds in soil; applied to antimicrobially active substances. Chemosphere 279:130495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130495
Blair J, Webber M, Baylay A et al (2015) Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380
Bolan N, Son A et al (2021) Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage. Int Mater Rev 67:150–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2021.1922047
Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao XD, Dugan B, Driver LE, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenerg 66:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.059
Burachevskaya M, Minkina T, Bauer T, Lobzenko I, Fedorenko A, Mazarji M, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S, Nazarenko A, Butova V, Wong MH, Rajput VD (2023) Fabrication of biochar derived from different types of feedstocks as an efficient adsorbent for soil heavy metal removal. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27638-9
Buta M, Hubeny J, Zielinski W, Harnisz M, Korzeniewska E (2021) Sewage sludge in agriculture the effects of selected chemical pollutants and emerging genetic resistance determinants on the quality of soil and crops—a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 214:112070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112070
Byrne CE, Nagle DC (1997) Carbonization of wood for advanced materials applications. Carbon 35:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(96)00136-4
Cai P, Liu X, Ji D, Yang S, Walker SL, Wu Y, Gao C, Huang Q (2018) Impact of soil clay minerals on growth, biofilm formation, and virulence gene expression of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Environ Pollut 243:953–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.032
Cao J, Yang G, Mai Q, Zhuang Z, Zhuang L (2020) Co-selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in a paddy soil exposed to As(III) contamination with an emphasis on potential pathogens. Sci Total Environ 725:138367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138367
Cerqueira F, Matamoros V, Bayona JM, Berendonk TU, Elsinga G, Hornstra LM, Pina B (2019) Antibiotic resistance gene distribution in agricultural fields and crops. A Soil-to-Food Analysis Environ Res 177:108608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108608
Chand H, Lu YX, Wu Y, Thebo A, Nan J, Yang YL, Song HL (2023) Deciphering of microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes to the selection pressures of antibiotic concentration in aerobic activated sludge reactors. J Water Process Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103499
Chen QL, An XL, Zhu YG, Su JQ, Gillings MR, Ye ZL, Cui L (2017) Application of struvite alters the antibiotic resistome in soil, rhizosphere, and phyllosphere. Environ Sci Technol 51:8149–8157. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01420
Chen T, Luo L, Deng S, Shi G, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Deng O, Wang L, Zhang J, Wei L (2018) Sorption of tetracycline on H3PO4 modified biochar derived from rice straw and swine manure. Biores Technol 267:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.074
Chen Z, Bao H, Wen Q, Wu Y, Fu Q (2022) Effects of H3PO4 modified biochar on heavy metal mobility and resistance genes removal during swine manure composting. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126632
Chen Z, Shen J, Xu X, Feng H, Wang M (2023) Adsorption of antibiotic, heavy metal and antibiotic plasmid by a wet-state silicon-rich biochar/ferrihydrite composite to inhibit antibiotic resistance gene proliferation/transformation. Chemosphere 324:138356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138356
Cheng JH, Tang XY, Su JQ, Liu C (2021) Field aging alters biochar’s effect on antibiotic resistome in manured soil. Environ Pollut 288:117719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117719
Christou A, Papadavid G, Dalias P, Fotopoulos V, Michael C, Bayona JM, Pina B, Fatta-Kassinos D (2019) Ranking of crop plants according to their potential to uptake and accumulate contaminants of emerging concern. Environ Res 170:422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.048
Cole EJ, Zandvakili OR, Blanchard J, Xing B, Hashemi M, Etemadi F (2019) Investigating responses of soil bacterial community composition to hardwood biochar amendment using high-throughput PCR sequencing. Appl Soil Ecol 136:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.12.010
Costello SE, Deshpande LM, Davis AP, Mendes RE, Castanheira M (2019) Aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme and 16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferase genes among a global collection of Gram-negative isolates. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 16:278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2018.10.020
Crombie K, Mašek O, Sohi SP, Brownsort P, Cross A (2013) The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods. GCB Bioenergy 5:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12030
Cycon M, Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z (2019) Antibiotics in the soil environment-degradation and their impact on microbial activity and diversity. Front Microbiol 10:338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00338
Dai Z, Xiong X, Zhu H, Haojie Xu, Leng P, Jihui Li C, Tang and Jianming Xu, (2021) Association of biochar properties with changes in soil bacterial, fungal and fauna communities and nutrient cycling processes. Biochar 3:239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00099-x
Deng W, Zhang A, Chen S, He X, Jin L, Yu X, Yang S, Li B, Fan L, Ji L, Pan X, Zou L (2020) Heavy metals, antibiotics and nutrients affect the bacterial community and resistance genes in chicken manure composting and fertilized soil. J Environ Manage 257:109980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109980
Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Li Z, Tan X, Huang X, Zeng G, Zhou L, Zheng B (2016) Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agronomy Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0372-z
Ding J, Yin Y, Sun AQ, Lassen SB, Li G, Zhu D, Ke X (2019) Effects of biochar amendments on antibiotic resistome of the soil and collembolan gut. J Hazard Mater 377:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.089
Du L, Ahmad S, Liu L, Wang L, Tang J (2023) A review of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) adsorption by biochar and modified biochar in water. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159815
Ejileugha C (2022) Biochar can mitigate co-selection and control antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in compost and soil. Heliyon 8:e09543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09543
Fan S, Zuo J, Dong H (2020) Changes in soil properties and bacterial community composition with biochar amendment after six years. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050746
Fang H, Wang H, Cai L, Yu Y (2015) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial pathogens in long-term manured greenhouse soils as revealed by metagenomic survey. Environ Sci Technol 49:1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504157v
Fang J, Jin L, Meng Q, Shan S, Wang D, Lin D (2022) Biochar effectively inhibits the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes via transformation. J Hazard Mater 423:127150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127150
Fisher JF, Mobashery S (2016) beta-lactam resistance mechanisms: gram-positive bacteria and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a025221
Gao FZ, He LY, He LX, Zou HY, Zhang M, Wu DL, Liu YS, Shi YJ, Bai H, Ying GG (2020) Untreated swine wastes changed antibiotic resistance and microbial community in the soils and impacted abundances of antibiotic resistance genes in the vegetables. Sci Total Environ 741:140482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140482
Garneau-Tsodikova S, Labby KJ (2016) Mechanisms of resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics: overview and perspectives. Medchemcomm 7:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MD00344J
Gholami L, Rahimi G (2020) Chemical fractionation of copper and zinc after addition of carrot pulp biochar and thiourea–modified biochar to a contaminated soil. Environ Technol 42:3523–3532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1733101
Gianfreda L, Rao MA (2008) Interactions between xenobiotics and microbial and enzymatic soil activity. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 38:269–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701413526
Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenerg 61:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.010
Guerin É, Cambray G, Sanchez-Alberola N, Campoy S, Erill I, Da Re S, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Barbé J, Ploy M-C, Mazel D (2009) The SOS response controls integron recombination. Science 324:1034–1034. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172914
Guo T, Lou C, Zhai W, Tang X, Hashmi MZ, Murtaza R, Li Y, Liu X, Xu J (2018) Increased occurrence of heavy metals, antibiotics and resistance genes in surface soil after long-term application of manure. Sci Total Environ 635:995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.194
Guo M, Song W, Tian J (2020) Biochar-facilitated soil remediation: mechanisms and efficacy variations. Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.521512
Hashmi MZ, Mahmood A, Kattel DB, Khan S, Hasnain A, Ahmed Z (2017) Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in soil: occurrence, fate, and effects. In: Hashmi MZ, Kumar V, Varma A (eds) Xenobiotics in the soil environment: monitoring, toxicity and management. Springer, pp 41–54
He X, Li J, Meng Q, Guo Z, Zhang H, Liu Y (2021) Enhanced adsorption capacity of sulfadiazine on tea waste biochar from aqueous solutions by the two-step sintering method without corrosive activator. J Environ Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104898
Herrmann L, Lesueur D, Robin A, Robain H, Wiriyakitnateekul W, Brau L (2019) Impact of biochar application dose on soil microbial communities associated with rubber trees in North East Thailand. Sci Total Environ 689:970–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.441
Hu H, Dai J, Jin Y, Liu X (2021) Bibliometric analysis on desertification restoration based on CiteSpace. Arab J Geosci 14:72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06309-3
Hu X, Fu Y, Shi H, Xu W, Shen C, Hu B, Ma L, Lou L (2022) Neglected resistance risks: cooperative resistance of antibiotic resistant bacteria influenced by primary soil components. J Hazard Mater 429:128229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128229
Hu F, Gao C, Wang B, Ding Z, Zhang L, Wei S, An J (2023) Effects of chicken manure-modified biochar on the adsorption capacity of tetracycline and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in soil. Land Degrad Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4983
Huang P, Ge C, Feng D, Yu H, Luo J, Li J, Strong PJ, Sarmah AK, Bolan NS, Wang H (2018) Effects of metal ions and pH on ofloxacin sorption to cassava residue-derived biochar. Sci Total Environ 616–617:1384–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.177
Huang J, Zhu C, Kong Y, Cao X, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Ning Y, Tian W, Zhang H, Yu Y, Zhang J (2022) Biochar Application Alleviated Rice Salt Stress via Modifying Soil Properties and Regulating Soil Bacterial Abundance and Community Structure. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020409
Hughes VM, Datta N (1983) Conjugative plasmids in bacteria of the ‘pre-antibiotic’ era. Nature 302:725–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/302725a0
Hurtado C, Canameras N, Dominguez C, Price GW, Comas J, Bayona JM (2017) Effect of soil biochar concentration on the mitigation of emerging organic contaminant uptake in lettuce. J Hazard Mater 323:386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.046
Hussain HI, Aqib AI, Seleem MN, Shabbir MA, Hao H, Iqbal Z, Kulyar MF, Zaheer T, Li K (2021) Genetic basis of molecular mechanisms in beta-lactam resistant gram-negative bacteria. Microb Pathog 158:105040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105040
Imparato V, Hansen V, Santos SS, Nielsen TK, Giagnoni L, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Johansen A, Renella G, Winding A (2016) Gasification biochar has limited effects on functional and structural diversity of soil microbial communities in a temperate agroecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 99:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.05.004
Islam MU, Jiang F, Guo Z, Peng X (2021) Does biochar application improve soil aggregation? A meta-analysis. Soil Tillage Res 209:104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104926
Jang HM, Kan E (2022) Enhanced removal of antibiotic resistance genes and human bacterial pathogens during anaerobic digestion of dairy manure via addition of manure biochar. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135178
Jauregi L, Epelde L, Alkorta I, Garbisu C (2021) Antibiotic resistance in agricultural soil and crops associated to the application of cow manure-derived amendments from conventional and organic livestock farms. Front Vet Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.633858
Jiang S, Tan M, Huang Z, Hu J, Li C, Lei T, Zhang X, Wu Z, Huang J, Qin X, Li H (2021) Combining oxidative torrefaction and pyrolysis of phragmites australis: improvement of the adsorption capacity of biochar for tetracycline. Front Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.673758
Jiao W, Du R, Ye M, Sun M, Feng Y, Wan J, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Huang D, Du D, Jiang X (2018) ‘Agricultural Waste to Treasure’—biochar and eggshell to impede soil antibiotics/antibiotic resistant bacteria (genes) from accumulating in Solanum tuberosum L. Environ Pollut 242:2088–2095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.059
Johnston C, Martin B, Fichant G, Polard P, Claverys JP (2014) Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:181–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3199
Jutkina J, Marathe NP, Flach CF, Larsson DGJ (2018) Antibiotics and common antibacterial biocides stimulate horizontal transfer of resistance at low concentrations. Sci Total Environ 616–617:172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.312
Katiyar R, Chen CW, Singhania RR, Tsai ML, Saratale GD, Pandey A, Dong CD, Patel AK (2022) Efficient remediation of antibiotic pollutants from the environment by innovative biochar: current updates and prospects. Bioengineered 13:14730–14748. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2108564
Kaviani Rad A, Astaykina A, Streletskii R, Afsharyzad Y, Etesami H, Zarei M, Balasundram SK (2022) An overview of antibiotic resistance and abiotic stresses affecting antimicrobial resistance in agricultural soils. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084666
Kazemi Shariat Panahi H, Dehhaghi M, Ok YS, Nizami AS, Khoshnevisan B, Mussatto SI, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Lam SS (2020) A comprehensive review of engineered biochar: production, characteristics, and environmental applications. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122462
Kim WK, Shim T, Kim YS, Hyun S, Ryu C, Park YK, Jung J (2013) Characterization of cadmium removal from aqueous solution by biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus at different pyrolytic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 138:266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.186
Klupfel L, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Sander M (2014) Redox properties of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 48:5601–5611. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500906d
Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ (2010) How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:423–435. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2333
Laghari M, Naidu R, Xiao B, Hu Z, Mirjat MS, Hu M, Kandhro MN, Chen Z, Guo D, Jogi Q, Abudi ZN, Fazal S (2016) Recent developments in biochar as an effective tool for agricultural soil management: a review. J Sci Food Agric 96:4840–4849. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7753
Larranaga O, Brown-Jaque M, Quiros P, Gomez-Gomez C, Blanch AR, Rodriguez-Rubio L, Muniesa M (2018) Phage particles harboring antibiotic resistance genes in fresh-cut vegetables and agricultural soil. Environ Int 115:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.019
Lawal AA, Hassan MA, Zakaria MR, Yusoff MZM, Norrrahim MNF, Mokhtar MN, Shirai Y (2021) Effect of oil palm biomass cellulosic content on nanopore structure and adsorption capacity of biochar. Bioresour Technol 332:125070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125070
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
Li S, Harris S, Anandhi A, Chen G (2019a) Predicting biochar properties and functions based on feedstock and pyrolysis temperature: a review and data syntheses. J Clean Prod 215:890–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.106
Li Y, Wang X, Li J, Wang Y, Song J, Xia S, Jing H, Zhao J (2019b) Effects of struvite-humic acid loaded biochar/bentonite composite amendment on Zn(II) and antibiotic resistance genes in manure-soil. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122013
Li J, Guangwei Yu, Pan L, Li C, You F, Wang Y (2020a) Ciprofloxacin adsorption by biochar derived from co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and bamboo waste. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:22806–22817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08333-y
Li Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang F, Xia S, Zhao J (2020b) Struvite-supported biochar composite effectively lowers Cu bio-availability and the abundance of antibiotic-resistance genes in soil. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138294
Li H, Wei Wu, Min X, Zhan W, Fang T, Dong X, Shi Y (2021) Immobilization and assessment of heavy metals in chicken manure compost amended with rice straw-derived biochar. Environ Pollut Bioavailability 33:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395940.2021.1885311
Li H, Wang X, Tan L, Li Q, Zhang C, Wei X, Wang Q, Zheng X, Xu Y (2022) Coconut shell and its biochar as fertilizer amendment applied with organic fertilizer: efficacy and course of actions on eliminating antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soil. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129322
Li M, Yang L, Yen H, Zhao F, Wang X, Zhou T, Feng Q, Chen L (2023) Occurrence, spatial distribution and ecological risks of antibiotics in soil in urban agglomeration. J Environ Sci 125:678–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.03.029
Lian F, Xing B (2017) Black carbon (biochar) in water/soil environments: molecular structure, sorption, stability, and potential risk. Environ Sci Technol 51:13517–13532. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02528
Liao W, Zhang X, Ke S, Shao J, Yang H, Zhang S, Chen H (2022) Effect of different biomass species and pyrolysis temperatures on heavy metal adsorption, stability and economy of biochar. Ind Crops Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115238
Lin H, Jiang L, Li B, Dong Y, He Y, Qiu Y (2019) Screening and evaluation of heavy metals facilitating antibiotic resistance gene transfer in a sludge bacterial community. Sci Total Environ 695:133862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133862
Lin Z, Yuan T, Zhou L, Cheng S, Qu X, Lu P, Feng Q (2021) Impact factors of the accumulation, migration and spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Environ Geochem Health 43:1741–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00759-0
Liu WJ, Jiang H, Yu HQ (2015) Development of biochar-based functional materials: toward a sustainable platform carbon material. Chem Rev 115:12251–12285. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00195
Liu HY, Song C, Zhao S, Wang SG (2020a) Biochar-induced migration of tetracycline and the alteration of microbial community in agricultural soils. Sci Total Environ 706:136086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136086
Liu J, Ding Y, Ji Y, Gao G, Wang Y (2020b) Effect of maize straw biochar on bacterial communities in agricultural soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 104:333–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02793-1
Liu H, Shi B, Liu W, Wang L, Zhu L, Wang J, Kim YM, Wang J (2023) Effects of magnesium-modified biochar on antibiotic resistance genes and microbial communities in chicken manure composting. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:108553–108564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29804-y
Lu XM, Chen YL (2022) Varying characteristics and driving mechanisms of antibiotic resistance genes in farmland soil amended with high-density polyethylene microplastics. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128196
Luby EM, Moorman TB, Soupir ML (2016) Fate and transport of tylosin-resistant bacteria and macrolide resistance genes in artificially drained agricultural fields receiving swine manure. Sci Total Environ 550:1126–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.132
Luo J, Li X, Ge C, Müller K, Huamei Yu, Huang P, Li J, Tsang DCW, Bolan NS, Rinklebe J, Wang H (2018) Sorption of norfloxacin, sulfamerazine and oxytetracycline by KOH-modified biochar under single and ternary systems. Biores Technol 263:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.022
Maestrini B, Herrmann AM, Nannipieri P, Schmidt MWI, Abiven S (2014) Ryegrass-derived pyrogenic organic matter changes organic carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a temperate forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 69:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.11.013
Mao D, Yu S, Rysz M, Luo Y, Yang F, Li F, Hou J, Mu Q, Alvarez PJ (2015) Prevalence and proliferation of antibiotic resistance genes in two municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 85:458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.010
Marshall CG, Lessard IAD, Park I-S, Wright GD (1998) Glycopeptide antibiotic resistance genes in glycopeptide-producing organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2215–2220. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.42.9.2215
Mašek O, Brownsort P, Cross A, Sohi S (2013) Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar. Fuel 103:151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.044
Maurya AP, Rajkumari J, Pandey P (2021) Enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in polyaromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: a major challenge for environmental health. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28:12178–12189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12171-3
Mohamed BA, Ellis N, Kim CS, Bi X (2017) The role of tailored biochar in increasing plant growth, and reducing bioavailability, phytotoxicity, and uptake of heavy metals in contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 230:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.075
Mohsin M, Hassan B, Wmbs Martins R, Li S, Abdullah KS, Walsh TR (2021) Emergence of plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance tet(X4) gene in Escherichia coli isolated from poultry, food and the environment in South Asia. Sci Total Environ 787:147613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147613
Montes-Morán MA, Suárez D, Menéndez JA, Fuente E (2004) On the nature of basic sites on carbon surfaces: an overview. Carbon 42:1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.023
Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris W (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163:247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.021
Mukome FN, Zhang X, Silva LC, Six J, Parikh SJ (2013) Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks. J Agric Food Chem 61:2196–2204. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf3049142
Mulyani O, Joy B, Kurnia D (2022) The various forms of cow manure waste as adsorbents of heavy metals. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115763
Munita JM, Arias CA (2016) Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. 4: 4.2.15. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0016-2015
Nguyen F, Starosta AL, Arenz S, Sohmen D, Donhofer A, Wilson DN (2014) Tetracycline antibiotics and resistance mechanisms. Biol Chem 395:559–575. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2013-0292
Nunes OC, Manaia CM, Kolvenbach BA, Corvini PF (2020) Living with sulfonamides: a diverse range of mechanisms observed in bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:10389–10408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10982-5
Odinga ES, Waigi MG, Gudda FO, Wang J, Yang B, Hu X, Li S, Gao Y (2020) Occurrence, formation, environmental fate and risks of environmentally persistent free radicals in biochars. Environ Int 134:105172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105172
Ogawara H (2019) Comparison of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in antibiotic-producing and pathogenic bacteria. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24193430
Oladeinde A, Cook K, Lakin SM, Woyda R, Abdo Z, Looft T, Herrington K, Zock G, Lawrence JP, Thomas JC, Beaudry MS, Glenn T (2019) Horizontal gene transfer and acquired antibiotic resistance in S. Heidelberg following in vitro incubation in broiler ceca. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01903-01919. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01903-19
Oliveira FR, Patel AK, Jaisi DP, Adhikari S, Lu H, Khanal SK (2017) Environmental application of biochar: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 246:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.122
Ondon BS, Li SN, Zhou QX, Li FX, De Voogt P (2021) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology volume 256 sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the soil: a review of the spreading mechanism and human health risks. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 121–153
Orlek A, Stoesser N, Anjum MF, Doumith M, Ellington MJ, Peto T, Crook D, Woodford N, Walker AS, Phan H, Sheppard AE (2017) Plasmid classification in an era of whole-genome sequencing: application in studies of antibiotic resistance epidemiology. Front Microbiol 8:182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00182
Pan M (2020) Biochar adsorption of antibiotics and its implications to remediation of contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04551-9
Pandey D, Daverey A, Arunachalam K (2020) Biochar: Production, properties and emerging role as a support for enzyme immobilization. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120267
Pavelquesi SL, de Oliveira Ferreira AC, Rodrigues AR, de Souza Silva CM, Orsi DC, da Silva IC (2021) Presence of tetracycline and sulfonamide resistance genes in Salmonella spp.: literature review. Antibiotics (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111314
Paz-Ferreiro J, Shenglei Fu, Méndez A, Gascó G (2015) Biochar modifies the thermodynamic parameters of soil enzyme activity in a tropical soil. J Soils Sediments 15:578–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1029-7
Peiris C, Gunatilake SR, Mlsna TE, Mohan D, Vithanage M (2017) Biochar based removal of antibiotic sulfonamides and tetracyclines in aquatic environments: a critical review. Biores Technol 246:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.150
Peng B, Chen L, Que C, Yang K, Deng F, Deng X, Shi G, Xu G, Wu M (2016) Adsorption of antibiotics on graphene and biochar in aqueous solutions induced by pi-pi interactions. Sci Rep 6:31920. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31920
Peterson E, Kaur P (2018) Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: relationships between resistance determinants of antibiotic producers, environmental bacteria, and clinical pathogens. Front Microbiol 9:2928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02928
Pignatello JJ, Mitch WA, Xu W (2017) Activity and reactivity of pyrogenic carbonaceous matter toward organic compounds. Environ Sci Technol 51:8893–8908. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01088
Pollard AT, Morra MJ (2018) Fate of tetracycline antibiotics in dairy manure-amended soils. Environ Rev 26:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2017-0041
Puga AP, Abreu CA, Melo LCA, Beesley L (2015) Biochar application to a contaminated soil reduces the availability and plant uptake of zinc, lead and cadmium. J Environ Manage 159:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.036
Qin J, Song J, Liu F, Zhang J, Xiong H, Bi W, Ni Y (2022) Reducing residues of tetracycline and its resistance genes in soil-maize system and improving plant growth: Selecting the best remediation substance. Pedosphere 32:268–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(21)60072-3
Qing L, Qigen D, Jian H, Hongjun W, Jingdu C (2022) Profiles of tetracycline resistance genes in paddy soils with three different organic fertilizer applications. Environ Pollut 306:119368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119368
Qiu Y, Zheng Z, Zhou Z, Sheng GD (2009) Effectiveness and mechanisms of dye adsorption on a straw-based biochar. Bioresour Technol 100:5348–5351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.054
Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Lim JE, Ahmed MB, Zhang M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Invasive plant-derived biochar inhibits sulfamethazine uptake by lettuce in soil. Chemosphere 111:500–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.040
Razzaghi F, Obour PB, Arthur E (2020) Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055
Ro KS, Cantrell KB, Hunt PG (2010) High-temperature pyrolysis of blended animal manures for producing renewable energy and value-added biochar. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:10125–10131. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101155m
Sazykin IS, Minkina TM, Khmelevtsova LE, Antonenko EM, Azhogina TN, Dudnikova TS, Sushkova SN, Klimova MV, Karchava SK, Seliverstova EY, Kudeevskaya EM, Konstantinova EY, Khammami MI, Gnennaya NV, Al-Rammahi AAK, Rakin AV, Sazykina MA (2021) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, antibiotic resistance genes, toxicity in the exposed to anthropogenic pressure soils of the Southern Russia. Environ Res 194:110715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110715
Seiler C, Berendonk TU (2012) Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Front Microbiol 3:399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00399
Seyoum MM, Obayomi O, Bernstein N, Williams CF, Gillor O (2022) The dissemination of antibiotics and their corresponding resistance genes in treated effluent-soil-crops continuum, and the effect of barriers. Sci Total Environ 807:151525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151525
Shao B, Liu Z, Tang L, Liu Y, Liang Q, Wu T, Pan Y, Zhang X, Tan X, Yu J (2022) The effects of biochar on antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) removal during different environmental governance processes: a review. J Hazard Mater 435:129067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129067
Sharma D, Debasish SS, Barman S, Halder G (2023) Elucidating facile biosorptive eradication of enrofloxacin: equilibrium, kinetics, reusability, cost estimation, and safe disposal. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14231
Shen Y, Ryser ET, Li H, Zhang W (2021) Bacterial community assembly and antibiotic resistance genes in the lettuce-soil system upon antibiotic exposure. Sci Total Environ 778:146255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146255
Sheng Y, Zhu L (2018) Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Sci Total Environ 622–623:1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.337
Shi H, Hu X, Xu J, Hu B, Ma L, Lou L (2023) Conjugation-mediated transfer of antibiotic resistance genes influenced by primary soil components and underlying mechanisms. Sci Total Environ 865:161232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161232
Singh H, Northup BK, Rice CW, Vara Prasad PV (2022) Biochar applications influence soil physical and chemical properties, microbial diversity, and crop productivity: a meta-analysis. Biochar. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00138-1
Song W, Guo M (2012) Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrol 94:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018
Song L, Hou L, Zhang Y, Li Z, Wang W, Sun Q (2020) Regular biochar and bacteria-inoculated biochar alter the composition of the microbial community in the soil of a Chinese fir plantation. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090951
Sorrenti G, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Toselli M (2016) Biochar physico-chemical properties as affected by environmental exposure. Sci Total Environ 563–564:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.245
Soucy SM, Huang J, Gogarten JP (2015) Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat Rev Genet 16:472–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3962
Su X, Qian F, Bao Y (2024) The effect of bulk-biochar and nano-biochar amendment on the removal of antibiotic resistance genes in microplastic contaminated soil. Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.117488
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A-M, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenerg 84:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.010
Sun Z, Hu Y, Shi L, Li G, Pang Z, Liu S, Chen Y (2022) Effects of biochar on soil chemical properties: a global meta-analysis of agricultural soil. Plant Soil Environ 68(6):272–289. https://doi.org/10.17221/522/2021-PSE
Sun L, Tang D, Tai X, Wang J, Long M, Xian T, Jia H, Wu R, Ma Y, Jiang Y (2023) Effect of composted pig manure, biochar, and their combination on antibiotic resistome dissipation in swine wastewater-treated soil. Environ Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121323
Svara F, Rankin DJ (2011) The evolution of plasmid-carried antibiotic resistance. BMC Evol Biol 11:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-130
Tang X, Lou C, Wang S, Yanhong Lu, Liu M, Hashmi MZ, Liang X, Li Z, Liao Y, Qin W, Fan F, Jianming Xu, Brookes PC (2015) Effects of long-term manure applications on the occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in paddy soils: evidence from four field experiments in south of China. Soil Biol Biochem 90:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.027
Tang J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Ren L, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Luo L, Yang Y, Huang H, Chen A (2020) Physicochemical features, metal availability and enzyme activity in heavy metal-polluted soil remediated by biochar and compost. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134751
Tang S, Liang J, Gong J, Song B, Yang Z, Fang S, Zhang P, Cao W, Li J, Luo Y (2021) The effects of biochar/compost for adsorption behaviors of sulfamethoxazole in amended wetland soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28:49289–49301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13959-7
Thaker M, Spanogiannopoulos P, Wright GD (2010) The tetracycline resistome. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0172-6
Trigo C, Cox L, Spokas K (2016) Influence of pyrolysis temperature and hardwood species on resulting biochar properties and their effect on azimsulfuron sorption as compared to other sorbents. Sci Total Environ 566–567:1454–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.027
Tu P, Zhang G, Wei G, Li J, Li Y, Deng L, Yuan H (2022) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on the physicochemical properties of biochars obtained from herbaceous and woody plants. Bioresour Bioprocess. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00618-z
Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Klasson KT, Wartelle LH (2010) Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendment: roles of natural organic matter. Chemosphere 80:935–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.020
Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Heninstoa A, Ahmad Z, Nishihara E (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J Food Agric Environ 9:1137–1143
van Hoek AH, Mevius D, Guerra B, Mullany P, Roberts AP, Aarts HJ (2011) Acquired antibiotic resistance genes: an overview. Front Microbiol 2:203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00203
Virolle C, Goldlust K, Djermoun S, Bigot S, Lesterlin C (2020) Plasmid transfer by conjugation in gram-negative bacteria: from the cellular to the community level. Genes (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111239
Vithanage M, Rajapaksha AU, Tang X, Thiele-Bruhn S, Kim KH, Lee SE, Ok YS (2014) Sorption and transport of sulfamethazine in agricultural soils amended with invasive-plant-derived biochar. J Environ Manage 141:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.030
Wang C, Wang T, Li W, Yan J, Li Z, Ahmad R, Herath SK, Zhu Na (2013) Adsorption of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) by willow wood biochars produced at different pyrolysis temperatures. Biol Fertil Soils 50:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0836-0
Wang L, Zhao X, Wang J, Wang J, Zhu L, Ge W (2019) Macrolide- and quinolone-resistant bacteria and resistance genes as indicators of antibiotic resistance gene contamination in farmland soil with manure application. Ecol Indicat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105456
Wang L, Wang J, Wang J, Zhu L, Conkle JL, Yang R (2020) Soil types influence the characteristic of antibiotic resistance genes in greenhouse soil with long-term manure application. J Hazard Mater 392:122334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122334
Wang C, Hu R, Strong PJ, Zhuang W, Huang W, Luo Z, Yan Q, He Z, Shu L (2021a) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial pathogens along the soil-mangrove root continuum. J Hazard Mater 408:124985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124985
Wang X, Lan B, Fei H, Wang S, Zhu G (2021b) Heavy metal could drive co-selection of antibiotic resistance in terrestrial subsurface soils. J Hazard Mater 411:124848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124848
Wang F, Sun R, Hu H, Duan G, Meng L, Qiao M (2022a) The overlap of soil and vegetable microbes drives the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from manure-amended soil to vegetables. Sci Total Environ 828:154463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154463
Wang Y, Wang X, Li Y, Liu Y, Sun Y, Hansen HCB, Xia S, Zhao J (2022b) Effects of struvite-loaded zeolite amendment on the fate of copper, tetracycline and antibiotic resistance genes in microplastic-contaminated soil. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130478
Wang K, Yao R, Zhang D, Peng N, Zhao P, Zhong Y, Zhou H, Huang J, Liu C (2023) Tetracycline adsorption performance and mechanism using calcium hydroxide-modified biochars. Toxics. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11100841
Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC (2007) Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil—concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil 300:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5
Wei Z, Shen W, Feng K, Feng Y, He Z, Li Y, Jiang C, Liu S, Zhu YG, Deng Y (2022) Organic fertilizer potentiates the transfer of typical antibiotic resistance gene among special bacterial species. J Hazard Mater 435:128985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128985
Wen X, Xu J, Xiang G, Cao Z, Yan Q, Mi J, Ma B, Zou Y, Zhang N, Liao X, Wang Y, Wu Y (2021) Multiple driving factors contribute to the variations of typical antibiotic resistance genes in different parts of soil-lettuce system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 225:112815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112815
Wu M, Han H, Zheng X, Bai M, Xu T, Ding GC, Li J (2019) Dynamics of oxytetracycline and resistance genes in soil under long-term intensive compost fertilization in Northern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:21381–21393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05173-3
Wu J, Wu C, Zhou C, Dong L, Liu B, Xing D, Yang S, Fan J, Feng L, Cao G, You S (2020) Fate and removal of antibiotic resistance genes in heavy metals and dye co-contaminated wastewater treatment system amended with β-cyclodextrin functionalized biochar. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137991
Wu C, Fu L, Li H, Liu X, Wan C (2022a) Using biochar to strengthen the removal of antibiotic resistance genes: performance and mechanism. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151554
Wu J, Wang J, Li Z, Guo S, Li K, Xu P, Ok YS, Jones DL, Zou J (2022b) Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soils: A systematic analysis. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2094693
Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018a) Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental applications: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 52:5027–5047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06487
Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018b) Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental applications: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol ES&T 52:5027–5047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06487
Xiao R, Huang D, Du L, Song B, Yin L, Chen Y, Gao L, Li R, Huang H, Zeng G (2023) Antibiotic resistance in soil-plant systems: a review of the source, dissemination, influence factors, and potential exposure risks. Sci Total Environ 869:161855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161855
Xu RK, Xiao SC, Yuan JH, Zhao AZ (2011) Adsorption of methyl violet from aqueous solutions by the biochars derived from crop residues. Bioresour Technol 102:10293–10298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.089
Xu W, Whitman WB, Gundale MJ, Chien C-C, Chiu C-Y (2020) Functional response of the soil microbial community to biochar applications. GCB Bioenergy 13:269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12773
Yang F, Gao Y, Sun L, Zhang S, Li J, Zhang Y (2018) Effective sorption of atrazine by biochar colloids and residues derived from different pyrolysis temperatures. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:18528–18539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2077-0
Yang W, Shang J, Li B, Flury M (2019) Surface and colloid properties of biochar and implications for transport in porous media. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 50:2484–2522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1699381
Yang F, Wang B, Shi Z, Li L, Li Y, Mao Z, Liao L, Zhang H, Yang Wu (2021a) Immobilization of heavy metals (Cd, Zn, and Pb) in different contaminated soils with swine manure biochar. Environ Pollut Bioavailability 33(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395940.2021.1916407
Yang F, Zhang F, Li H, Wu H, Zhao H, Cheng X, Ba Y, Huang H, Chen S, Zhu J (2021b) Contribution of environmental factors on the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soil. Eur J Soil Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103269
Yang Y, Ling Y, Wang L, Sun P, Zhao L, Wang H (2023) Mechanism of sulfamethoxazole adsorption on wastewater-sludge-based biochar: Sludge type and modification improvement. Korean J Chem Eng 40:1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-022-1274-1
Yao Y, Zhang Y, Gao B, Chen R, Feng Wu (2017) Removal of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and sulfapyridine (SPY) from aqueous solutions by biochars derived from anaerobically digested bagasse. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:25659–25667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8849-0
Yin H, Li G, Chen X, Wang W, Wong PK, Zhao H, An T (2020) Accelerated evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance through early emerged stress responses driven by photocatalytic oxidation. Appl Catal B Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118829
Yu H, Gu L, Chen L, Wen H, Zhang D, Tao H (2020a) Activation of grapefruit derived biochar by its peel extracts and its performance for tetracycline removal. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123971
Yu K, Chen F, Yue L, Luo Y, Wang Z, Xing B (2020b) CeO2 nanoparticles regulate the propagation of antibiotic resistance genes by altering cellular contact and plasmid transfer. Environ Sci Technol 54:10012–10021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01870
Yue Y, Shen C, Ge Y (2019) Biochar accelerates the removal of tetracyclines and their intermediates by altering soil properties. J Hazard Mater 380:120821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120821
Zeng G, Haipeng Wu, Liang J, Shenglian Guo Lu, Huang PX, Liu Y, Yuan Y, He X, He Y (2015) Efficiency of biochar and compost (or composting) combined amendments for reducing Cd, Cu, Zn and Pb bioavailability, mobility and ecological risk in wetland soil. RSC Adv 5:34541–34548. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra04834f
Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H, Shao J, Chen Y, Liao X, Wang X, Chen H (2017) Generalized two-dimensional correlation infrared spectroscopy to reveal mechanisms of CO2 capture in nitrogen enriched biochar. Proc Combust Inst 36:3933–3940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.062
Zhang Y, Gu AZ, Cen T, Li X, He M, Li D, Chen J (2018) Sub-inhibitory concentrations of heavy metals facilitate the horizontal transfer of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Environ Pollut 237:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.032
Zhang YJ, Hu HW, Chen QL, Singh BK, Yan H, Chen D, He JZ (2019) Transfer of antibiotic resistance from manure-amended soils to vegetable microbiomes. Environ Int 130:104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104912
Zhang Y, Wang J, Feng Y (2021) The effects of biochar addition on soil physicochemical properties: a review. CATENA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105284
Zhang Y, Chen M, Bao C, Wu J, Zhou J, He W, Shi X, Li G (2022) Application of pig manure compost with different biochar modifies the antibiotic resistome and bacterial community in agriculture soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05582-0
Zhang Z, Sun L, Pei Z, Li H, Wang L, Ma J, Li Y, Yang R, Zhang Q (2023) New insight into the adsorption of sulfadiazine on graphite-like biochars prepared at different pyrolytic temperatures. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137468
Zhao Z, Zhou W (2019) Insight into interaction between biochar and soil minerals in changing biochar properties and adsorption capacities for sulfamethoxazole. Environ Pollut 245:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.013
Zhao M, Dai Y, Zhang M, Feng C, Qin B, Zhang W, Zhao N, Li Y, Ni Z, Xu Z, Tsang DCW, Qiu R (2020) Mechanisms of Pb and/or Zn adsorption by different biochars: biochar characteristics, stability, and binding energies. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136894
Zheng H, Feng N, Yang T, Shi M, Wang X, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Li F, Sun K, Xing B (2021) Individual and combined applications of biochar and pyroligneous acid mitigate dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148962
Zheng L, Tong C, Gao J, Xiao R (2022) Effects of wetland plant biochars on heavy metal immobilization and enzyme activity in soils from the Yellow River estuary. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:40796–40811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18116-8
Zhi D, Yang D, Zheng Y, Yang Y, He Y, Luo L, Zhou Y (2019) Current progress in the adsorption, transport and biodegradation of antibiotics in soil. J Environ Manage 251:109598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109598
Zhou SY, Zhu D, Giles M, Daniell T, Neilson R, Yang XR (2020) Does reduced usage of antibiotics in livestock production mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance in soil, earthworm guts, and the phyllosphere? Environ Int 136:105359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105359
Zhu YG, Johnson TA, Su JQ, Qiao M, Guo GX, Stedtfeld RD, Hashsham SA, Tiedje JM (2013) Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:3435–3440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222743110
Zhu D, Ding J, Wang YF, Zhu YG (2022) Effects of trophic level and land use on the variation of animal antibiotic resistome in the soil food web. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c00710
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program [grant numbers 2019YFC1803804] and Shenyang Science and Technology Program [grant numbers 22-322-3-01].
Funding
This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program [grant numbers 2019YFC1803804] and Shenyang Science and Technology Program [grant numbers 22-322-3-01].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HL: Conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—review & editing; YL: Methodology, visualization, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft; XQ: Visualization, methodology, formal analysis; LS: Investigation, methodology; FF: Formal analysis, methodology; YL: Investigation; SL: Resources.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Please refer to “Competing Interests and Funding” below for more information on how to complete this section.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Handling editor: Baoshan Xing.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Lin, Y., Qin, X. et al. An updated review on how biochar may possess potential in soil ARGs control on aspects of source, fate and elimination. Biochar 6, 24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00319-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00319-0