Abstract
In developing countries, most of the daily produced household wastes are buried in landfill sites without any prior treatment. One of the many problems associated with these landfills is the formation of leachate. Because of its complexity and unpredictable composition, leachate has always constituted a challenging task for effluent managers. Despite the countless techniques that have been developed since then, leachate treatment still raises big concerns about the efficiency and sustainability of a suitable strategy. Accordingly, this study is carried out aiming at the optimization of leachate treatment through biostimulation using carob powder as a co-substrate. The added amount of biostimulant corresponds approximately to the addition of 3, 1, and 0.4 g/L of sucrose, fructose, and glucose, respectively. The adopted experimental system is based on the anaerobic process using an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, which was operated at HRT and OLR of 24 h and 26.1 kg COD/m3 d, respectively. For carob particle size larger than 2 mm, only a small amount of biogas was produced and the COD removal efficiency was lower than 77%, indicating that the poor quality of the effluent persists. However, 97% of COD was efficiently removed and a volume of 2.06 L/Lleachate of biogas was produced using a carob particle size of 0.250 mm. The obtained results showed also that the amount of produced biogas increases as the carob sugar content increases. Literally, a 1% fraction of total sugar content resulted in an increase of 17.9 mL/Lleahate of the produced biogas. Finally, the use of 10 g/L of carob amendment improved COD removal and exhibited less influence on syntrophs and methanogens since a large amount of biogas was generated.
Article Highlights
-
Carob powder biostimulant could be effectively used to optimize leachate treatment.
-
Carob particle size and total sugar content affected the treatment efficiency.
-
Thinner the carob particles, larger the produced biogas and larger the COD removal.
-
1%-fraction of sugar content resulted in an increase of 17.9 mL/Lleahate of biogas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baâti S, Benyoucef F, Makan A, El Bouadili A, El Ghmari A (2018) Influence of hydraulic retention time on biogas production during leachate treatment. Environ Eng Res 23(3):288–293
Bajpai P (2017) Anaerobic treatment of pulp and paper industry effluents. Anaerobic technology in pulp and paper industry. SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4130-3_8
Benyoucef F, Makan A, El Ghmari A, Ouatmane A (2015) Solid household waste characterization and fresh leachate treatment: case of Kasba Tadla city, Morocco. Environ Eng Res 20(4):363–369
Biner B, Gubbuk H, Karhan M, Aksu M, Pekmezci M (2007) Sugar profiles of the pods of cultivated and wild types of carob bean (Ceratonia siliqua L.) in Turkey. Food Chem 100(4):1453–1455
Bohdziewicz J, Kwarciak A (2008) The application of hybrid system UASB reactor-RO in landfill leachate treatment. Desalination 222(1–3):128–134
Cerminara G, Raga R, Hirata O, Pivato A (2020) Denitrification of low C/N landfill leachate in lab-scale landfill simulation bioreactors. Waste Manag 113:236–243
Charalambous P, Shin J, Shin SG, Vyrides I (2020) Anaerobic digestion of industrial dairy wastewater and cheese whey: performance of internal circulation bioreactor and laboratory batch test at pH 5–6. Renew Energy 147:1–10
Chelliapan S, Arumugam N, Din MFM, Kamyab H, Ebrahimi SS (2020) Anaerobic treatment of municipal solid waste landfill leachate. Bioreactors. Elsevier, pp 175–193
Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99(10):4044–4064
Costa AM, Alfaia RGDSM, Campos JC (2019) Landfill leachate treatment in Brazil—an overview. J Environ Manag 232:110–116
Daud MK, Rizvi H, Akram MF, Ali S, Rizwan M, Nafees M, Jin ZS (2018) Review of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor technology: effect of different parameters and developments for domestic wastewater treatment. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1596319
Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356
El Batal H, Hasib A, Ouatmane A, Dehbi F, Jaouad A, Boulli A (2016) Sugar composition and yield of syrup production from the pulp of Moroccan carob pods (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Arab J Chem 9:S955–S959
Elliott O, Gray S, McClay M, Nassief B, Nunnelley A, Vogt E et al (2017) Design and manufacturing of high surface area 3D-printed media for moving bed bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J Contemp Water Res Educ 160(1):144–156
Essahibi A, Benhiba L, Ghoulam C, Qaddoury A (2021) Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizas in improving carob culture in the Mediterranean regions. In: Shrivastava N, Mahajan S, Varma A (eds) Symbiotic soil microorganisms. Soil biology, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51916-2_8
Fidan H, Petkova N, Sapoundzhieva T, Abanoz EI (2016) Carbohydrate content in Bulgarian and Turkish carob pods and their products. In: CBU international conference proceedings, vol 4, pp 796–802
Gerardi MH (2006) Wastewater bacteria. Wiley
Gezer B, Kose U, Zubov D, Deperlioglu O, Vasant P (2019) Determining optimum carob powder adsorbtion for cleaning wastewater: intelligent optimization with electro-search algorithm. Wirel Netw 26:1–15
Ghahrchi M, Rezaee A (2020) Electro-catalytic ozonation for improving the biodegradability of mature landfill leachate. J Environ Manag 254:109811
Ghahrchi M, Rezaee A (2021) Electrocatalytic ozonation process supplemented by EDTA-Fe complex for improving the mature landfill leachate treatment. Chemosphere 263:127858
Huang BC, Li WW, Wang X, Lu Y, Yu HQ (2019) Customizing anaerobic digestion-coupled processes for energy-positive and sustainable treatment of municipal wastewater. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 110:132–142
Kang KH, Shin HS, Park H (2002) Characterization of humic substances present in landfill leachates with different landfill ages and its implications. Water Res 36(16):4023–4032
Kim S, Bae J, Choi O, Ju D, Lee J, Sung H et al (2014) A pilot scale two-stage anaerobic digester treating food waste leachate (FWL): performance and microbial structure analysis using pyrosequencing. Process Biochem 49(2):301–308
Kong Z, Li L, Xue Y, Yang M, Li YY (2019) Challenges and prospects for the anaerobic treatment of chemical-industrial organic wastewater: a review. J Clean Prod 231:913–927
Latif MA, Ghufran R, Wahid ZA, Ahmad A (2011) Integrated application of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for the treatment of wastewaters. Water Res 45(16):4683–4699
Liao X, Zhu S, Zhong D, Zhu J, Liao L (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and landfill leachate in single-phase batch reactors. Waste Manag 34(11):2278–2284
Liu M, Wang S, Nobu MK, Bocher BT, Kaley SA, Liu WT (2017) Impacts of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on the performance and microbial ecology in methanogenic reactors treating purified terephthalic acid wastewater. Water Res 122:308–316
Luo H, Zeng Y, Cheng Y, He D, Pan X (2020) Recent advances in municipal landfill leachate: a review focusing on its characteristics, treatment, and toxicity assessment. Sci Total Environ 703:135468
Ma J, Van Wambeke M, Carballa M, Verstraete W (2008) Improvement of the anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater in a UASB reactor by co-digestion with glycerol. Biotechnol Lett 30(5):861–867
Pezzolla D, Di Maria F, Zadra C, Massaccesi L, Sordi A, Gigliotti G (2017) Optimization of solid-state anaerobic digestion through the percolate recirculation. Biomass Bioenergy 96:112–118
Qi C, Huang J, Wang B, Deng S, Wang Y, Yu G (2018) Contaminants of emerging concern in landfill leachate in China: a review. Emerg Contam 4(1):1–10
Reinhart DR, Basel Al-Yousfi A (1996) The impact of leachate recirculation on municipal solid waste landfill operating characteristics. Waste Manag Res 14(4):337–346
Reshadi MAM, Bazargan A, McKay G (2020) A review of the application of adsorbents for landfill leachate treatment: focus on magnetic adsorption. Sci Total Environ 731:138863
Rodier J (2009) L’analyse de l’eau – eaux naturelles, eaux résiduaires, eau de mer, 9ème édition. Dunod, Paris, pp 1365–1475
Sbay H (2008) Le Caroubier au Maroc : un arbre d’avenir. Centre de recherche forestière, Rabat, Morocco
Sediqi S, Bazargan A, Mirbagheri SA (2021) Consuming the least amount of energy and resources in landfill leachate electrocoagulation. Environ Technol Innov 22:101454
Shende AD, Pophali GR (2020) Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:1–21
Shi X, Leong KY, Ng HY (2017) Anaerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 245:1238–1244
Show PL, Pal P, Leong HY, Juan JC, Ling TC (2019) A review on the advanced leachate treatment technologies and their performance comparison: an opportunity to keep the environment safe. Environ Monit Assess 191(4):1–28
Slorach PC, Jeswani HK, Cuéllar-Franca R, Azapagic A (2019) Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste. J Environ Manag 236:798–814
Stazi V, Tomei MC (2018) Enhancing anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater: state of the art, innovative technologies and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 635:78–91
Tay JH, He YX, Yan YG (2001) Improved anaerobic degradation of phenol with supplemental glucose. J Environ Eng 127(1):38–45
Tsui TH, Wu H, Song B, Liu SS, Bhardwaj A, Wong JW (2020) Food waste leachate treatment using an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bed (UASB): effect of conductive material dosage under low and high organic loads. Bioresour Technol 304:122738
Viegas RM, Mestre AS, Mesquita E, Campinas M, Andrade MA, Carvalho AP, Rosa MJ (2020) Assessing the applicability of a new carob waste-derived powdered activated carbon to control pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 743:140791
Wang ZP, Zhang Z, Lin YJ, Deng NS, Tao T, Zhuo K (2002) Landfill leachate treatment by a coagulation–photooxidation process. J Hazard Mater 95(1–2):153–159
Wiszniowski J, Robert D, Surmacz-Gorska J, Miksch K, Weber JV (2006) Landfill leachate treatment methods: a review. Environ Chem Lett 4(1):51–61
Xiang T, Li J, Chen D (2017) Start-up of a bench-scale UASB reactor treating real substitute natural gas wastewater with glucose addition. Environmental conservation, clean water, air & soil (CleanWAS). IWA Publishing, London, p 182
Xu R, Zhang K, Liu P, Khan A, Xiong J, Tian F, Li X (2018) A critical review on the interaction of substrate nutrient balance and microbial community structure and function in anaerobic co-digestion. Bioresour Technol 247:1119–1127
Ye J, Mu Y, Cheng X, Sun D (2011) Treatment of fresh leachate with high-strength organics and calcium from municipal solid waste incineration plant using UASB reactor. Bioresour Technol 102(9):5498–5503
Youcai Z (2018) Chapter 5—Leachate treatment engineering processes. In: Youcai Z (ed) Pollution control technology for leachate from municipal solid waste. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 361–522
Zanellati A, Spina F, Rollé L, Varese GC, Dinuccio E (2020) Fungal pretreatments on non-sterile solid digestate to enhance methane yield and the sustainability of anaerobic digestion. Sustainability 12(20):8549
Acknowledgements
This research was undertaken at the University of Sultan Moulay Slimane of Beni Mellal in collaboration with the municipality of Kasba Tadla. The authors thank all collaborators that contributed to achieve and succeed this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baâti, S., Benyoucef, F., Makan, A. et al. A Cost-Effective Strategy for Leachate Treatment Optimization: Biostimulation Using Carob Powder as Co-substrate. Int J Environ Res 15, 535–541 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-021-00332-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-021-00332-2