Skip to main content
Log in

Spelling well despite developmental language disorder: what makes it possible?

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the study was to investigate the overlap between developmental language disorder (DLD) and developmental dyslexia, identified through spelling difficulties (SD), in Russian-speaking children. In particular, we studied the role of phoneme awareness (PA), rapid automatized naming (RAN), pseudoword repetition (PWR), morphological (MA), and orthographic awareness (OA) in differentiating between children with DLD who have SD from children with DLD who are average spellers by comparing the two groups to each other, to typically developing children as well as children with SD but without spoken language deficits. One hundred forty-nine children, aged 10.40 to 14.00 years, participated in the study. The results indicated that the SD, DLD, and DLD/SD groups did not differ from each other on PA and RAN Letters and underperformed in comparison to the control groups. However, whereas the children with written language deficits (SD and DLD/SD groups) underperformed on RAN Objects and Digits, PWR, OA, and MA, the children with DLD and no SD performed similarly to the children from the control groups on these measures. In contrast, the two groups with spoken language deficits (DLD and DLD/SD) underperformed on RAN Colors in comparison to the control groups and the group of children with SD only. The results support the notion that those children with DLD who have unimpaired PWR and RAN skills are able to overcome their weaknesses in spoken language and PA and acquire basic literacy on a par with their age peers with typical language. We also argue that our findings support a multifactorial model of DLD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are various labels used to refer to the condition in question, of which, the most commonly used is Specific Language Impairment (SLI). We will use the term DLD to refer to the clinical condition(s) in question, including when discussing or citing studies that use alternative terms. Our view is that, although there may be distinct subtypes of the condition(s) in question, the DLD label can be applied as a general term if it is (1) a disorder of language (not speech), (2) of a developmental, not acquired, nature, (3) primary (not a direct consequence of another syndromic developmental or genomic disorder), and (4) appropriate exclusionary criteria are applicable/applied (e.g., normal hearing and non-verbal IQ above the cutoff for intellectual disability).

  2. Although it is a common phenomenon, there are languages whose orthographies are more closely reflective of the pronunciation rather than the underlying phonemic or morphemic form. One example is Byelorussian, in which unstressed reduced vowels are spelled as they are pronounced (e.g., górad (town), garadók (“little town”), cf. with the Russian spellings of these words (gorod, gorodok). This principle in Byelorussian, however, only applies to vowels.

  3. Whether RAN deficits can be present without deficits in PA has been a subject of some controversy because such cases have been rather difficult to find (Pennington et al., 2001; Vaessen, Gerretsen, & Blomert, 2009). However, even if this is the case, this does not invalidate the multifactorial view: even if RAN is indeed distinct from PA, the two are clearly related. Therefore, we may expect the two to co-occur in most cases.

  4. Although some theories of DLD claim that a single phonological processing deficit is a core causal factor in DLD (e.g., Joanisse, 2004), there is strong empirical support that the complete range of oral language impairments (particularly in the population involved in the current study) cannot be fully explained by phonological deficits (Bishop, Adams, & Norbury, 2006; Rakhlin et al., 2013; van der Lely, 2005). Children with DLD with and without phonological processing deficits may constitute different subtypes of DLD but are likely to exhibit similar performance on many clinical language assessments measuring general language development typically used to diagnose DLD.

References

  • Adams, A.-M., & Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(2), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V., Adams, C. V., & Norbury, C. F. (2006). Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: Evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 5, 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M., McDonald, D., Bird, S., & Hayiou-Thomas, M. E. (2009). Children who read words accurately despite language impairment: Who are they and how do they do it? Child Development, 80(2), 593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boada, R., & Pennington, B. F. (2006). Deficient implicit phonological representations in children with dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 153–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botting, N. (2002). Narrative as a clinical tool for the assessment of linguistic and pragmatic impairments. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botting, N., Simkin, Z., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Associated reading skills in children with a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Reading and Writing, 19, 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., & Newby-Clark, E. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms, and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Itasca: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Norbury, C. F. (2001). Phonological processing, language, and literacy: A comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brizzolara, D., Pecini, C., Chilosi, A., Cipriani, P., Gasperini, F., Mazzotti, et al. (2006). Do phonological and rapid automatized naming deficits differentially affect dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay? A study of Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioural Neurology, 19(3), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., & Landerl, K. (2010). The influences of syllable structure and reading ability on the development of phoneme awareness: A longitudinal, cross–linguistic study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 464–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., & Volın, J. (2001). Phonological spelling errors among dyslexic children learning a transparent orthography: The case of Czech. Dyslexia, 7, 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso-Martins, C., & Pennington, B. F. (2004). The relationship between phoneme awareness and rapid serial naming skills and literacy acquisition: The role of developmental period and reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R., & Cattell, A. (1973). Measuring intelligence with the culture fair tests: Manual for scales 2 and 3. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Bridges, M. S., Little, T. D., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Reading achievement growth in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1569–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Individual differences in RAN and reading: A response timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, D. L., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2001). Are RAN and phonological awareness deficits additive in reading disabled individuals? Dyslexia, 7, 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., Simkin, Z., & Knox, E. (2001). Follow-up of children attending infant language units: Outcomes at 11 years of age. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2011). Specific language impairment. In D. Skuse, H. Bruce, L. Dowdney, & D. Mrazek (Eds.), Child psychology and psychiatry: Frameworks for practice (2nd ed., pp. 180–187). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., Simkin, Z., & Knox, E. (2009). Specific language impairment and school outcomes. I: Identifying and explaining variability at the end of compulsory education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca, M., Borrelli, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Reading words and pseudowords: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 80, 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. (1976a). Naming of pictured objects by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain and Language, 39, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. (1976b). Rapid "automatized" naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J., Goswami, U., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2010). Dyslexia and specific language impairment: The role of phonology and auditory processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(1), 8–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1996). The children's test of nonword repetition. London: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. L., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. L., Boulware-Gooden, B., & Rakhlin, N. (2012). Pravopisanie i morfologicheskoe osoznanie [Spelling and morphological awareness]. Psihologia. Zhurnal vy’shei shkoly’ ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Moscow School of Economics], 9(1), 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanisse, M. F. (2004). Specific language impairments in children: Phonology, semantics, and the English past tense. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. (1998). Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2003). A new way of assessing spelling and its classroom applications. In R. M. Joshi, B. Kaczmarek, & C. K. Leong (Eds.), Literacy acquisition, assessment, and instruction: The role phonology, orthography, and morphology (pp. 1530–161). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanina, N., Dukova-Zheleva, G., Geber, D., Kharlamov, V., & Tonciulescu, K. (2008). Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 800–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Review of research: Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornev, A. N., Rakhlin, N., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Dyslexia from a cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective: The case of Russian and Russia. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 8, 41–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornilov, S. A., Rakhlin, N., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Morphology and developmental language disorders: New tools for Russian. In Y. P. Zinchenko & V. F. Petrenko (Eds.), Psychology in Russia: State of the art (pp. 371–387). Moscow: Russian Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, R. F., & Snowling, M. (2007). Comparing phonological skills and spelling abilities children with reading and language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disabilities, 43, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L. B., & Eyer, J. A. (1996). Deficits of grammatical morphology in children with specific language impairment and their implications for notions of bootstrapping. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 233–248). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and Reading Disability: Solving the Reading Puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Lum, J. A. G., Gelgec, C., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2009). Research report: Procedural and declarative memory in children with and without specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, G. M., Hogben, J. H., Edwards, V. T., Heath, S. M., & Mengler, E. D. (2000). On the “specifics” of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 869–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messaoud-Galusi, S. & Marshall, C. (eds.) (2010). Exploring the overlap between dyslexia and SLI: The role of phonology [Special Issue]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(1), 1–7.

  • Meyer, M. (1969). Frog, Where are You? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.

  • Misra, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Neural systems for rapid automatized naming in skilled readers: Unraveling the RAN-reading relationship. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J., & Evans, J. (2009). Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naples, A. J., Chang, J. T., Katz, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Same or different? Insights into the etiology of phonological awareness and rapid naming. Biological Psychology, 80(2), 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1031–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbury, C. F., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Narrative skills of children with communication impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 287–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P. A., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B., Santerre-Lemmon, L., Rosenberg, J., MacDonald, B., Boada, R., Friend, S. A., et al. (2012). Individual prediction of dyslexia by single versus multiple deficit models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 212–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., Shriberg, L. D., & Boada, R. (2009). What influences literacy outcome in children with speech sound disorder? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(5), 1175–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S. A., Palejev, D., Koposov, R. A., Chang, J., & Grogorenko, E. L. (2013). The language phenotype of a small geographically isolated Russian-speaking population: Implications for genetic and clinical studies of developmental language disorder. Applied PsychoLinguistics. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S. A., Reich, J., Babyonyshev, M., Koposov, R. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). The relationship between syntactic development and theory of mind: Evidence from a small-population study of a developmental language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(4), 476–496. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F., Marshall, C. R., Rosen, S., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2013). Phonological deficits in specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia: Towards a multidimensional model. Brain, 136, 630–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye-movements immediately. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 772–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. (1975). Adapting primary grade reading instruction to individual differences in perceptual skills. Reading World, 14, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (2009). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In F. Fletcher-Campbell, J. Soler, & G. Reid (Eds.), Approaching difficulties in literacy development (pp. 23–38). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1995). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-3 examiner’s manual. New York: Psychological Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2000). Language and literacy skills: Who is at risk and why? In D. V. M. Bishop & L. B. Leonard (Eds.), Speech & language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 245–261). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Review Neuroscience, 5, 721–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, A. (2004). A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(4), 308–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaessen, A., Gerretsen, P., & Blomert, L. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lely, H. K. J. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from grammatical-SLI. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle, E., Boets, B., Ghesquiere, P., & Zink, I. (2010). Who is at risk for dyslexia? Phonological processing in five-to seven-year-old Dutch-speaking children with SLI. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(1), 58–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 32, 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S., Milne, E., Rosen, S., Hansen, P., Swettenham, J., Frith, U., et al. (2006). The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: A multiple case study of dyslexic children. Developmental Science, 9(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, D. (1988). Free Fall. New York: HarperCollins Children’s Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, D. (1991). Tuesday. New York: Clarion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Schurz, M. (2010). Dyslexia in regular orthographies: Manifestation and causation. Dyslexia, 16, 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986a). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: Longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986b). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, M., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R01 DC007665 to Elena L. Grigorenko. Grantees undertaking such projects are encouraged to express freely their professional judgment. This article, therefore, does not necessarily reflect the position or policies of the National Institutes of Health, and no official endorsement should be inferred. We thank Roman Koposov, Anastasia Strelina, and numerous others from Northern State Medical Academy (Arkhangelsk, Russia) for their help with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena L. Grigorenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rakhlin, N., Cardoso-Martins, C., Kornilov, S.A. et al. Spelling well despite developmental language disorder: what makes it possible?. Ann. of Dyslexia 63, 253–273 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-013-0084-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-013-0084-x

Keywords

Navigation