Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the double-deficit hypothesis (DDH) in an orthography of intermediate depth. Eighty-five European Portuguese-speaking children with developmental dyslexia, aged 7 to 12, were tested on measures of phonological awareness (PA), naming speed (NS), reading, and spelling. The results indicated that PA and NS were not significantly correlated, and that NS predicts reading fluency (but not reading accuracy and spelling) beyond what is accounted for by PA. Although the majority of the children with developmental dyslexia have double deficit (62.4%), some children have a single phonological deficit (24.7%) or a single NS deficit (8.2%). Children with a double deficit were not more impaired in reading fluency, reading accuracy, and spelling than both single-deficit subtypes. In conclusion, the findings of the present study are partially consistent with the DDH and provide evidence for the multifactorial model of developmental dyslexia. Implications of the DDH for an orthography of intermediate depth are emphasized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, P. T., Holloway, C. A., Youngdahl, P. L., & Dykman, R. A. (2001). The double-deficit theory of reading disability does not fit all. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(3), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00016.
Albuquerque, C. P. (2012). Rapid naming contributions to reading and writing acquisition of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9299-6.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Araújo, S., Pacheco, A., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2010). Visual rapid naming and phonological abilities: Different subtypes in dyslexic children. International Journal of Psychology, 45(6), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.499949.
Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000006.
Bowers, P. G., & Newby-Clark, E. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing, 15(1–2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013820421199.
Brunswick, N., McDougall, S., & Davies, P. M. (Eds.). (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies. New York: Psychology Press.
Caplan, D. (1992). Language: Structure, processing, and disorders. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Málková, G. S., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1398–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612473122.
Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(2), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.003.
Carvalho, A., & Pereira, M. (2009). O Rei: Um teste para avaliação da fluência e precisão da leitura no 1o e 2o ciclos do ensino básico [The King: Assessment test of the reading fluency and precision in the first and second cycles of elementary school]. Psychologica, 51, 283–305.
Catts, H. W., Gillispie, M., Leonard, L. B., Kail, R. V., & Miller, C. A. (2002). The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(6), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350060301.
Catts, H. W., McIlraith, A., Bridges, M. S., & Nielsen, D. C. (2017). Viewing a phonological deficit within a multifactorial model of dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 30(3), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9692-2.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
Cronin, V. S. (2013). RAN and double-deficit theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411413544.
Cummine, J., Chouinard, B., Szepesvari, E., & Georgiou, G. K. (2015). An examination of the rapid automatized naming–reading relationship using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience, 305, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.071.
Davies, R., Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Suárez, P., & Cuetos, F. (2013). Lexical and sub-lexical effects on accuracy, reaction time and response duration: Impaired and typical word and pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 26(5), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9388-1.
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.22.
Escribano, C. L. (2007). Evaluation of the double-deficit hypothesis subtype classification of readers in Spanish. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400040301.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.
Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2010). Predicting reading and spelling difficulties in transparent and opaque orthographies: A comparison between Scandinavian and US/Australian children. Dyslexia, 16(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.401.
Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005.
Georgiou, G. K., Ghazyani, R., & Parrila, R. (2018). Are RAN deficits in university students with dyslexia due to defective lexical access, impaired anchoring, or slow articulation? Annals of Dyslexia, 68(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-0156-z.
Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Liao, C. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9096-4.
Hawkins, R. O., Hale, A., Sheeley, W., & Ling, S. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary-previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high-school readers. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20545.
He, Q., Xue, G., Chen, C., Chen, C., Lu, Z., & Dong, Q. (2013). Decoding the neuroanatomical basis of reading ability: A multivoxel morphometric study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(31), 12835–12843. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0449-13.2013.
Heikkilä, R., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Närhi, V., & Ahonen, T. (2016). Double-deficit hypothesis in a clinical sample: Extension beyond reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415572895.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485.
Jiménez, J. E., Hernández-Valle, I., Rodríguez, C., Guzmán, R., Díaz, A., & Ortiz, R. (2008). The double-deficit hypothesis in Spanish developmental dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.adt.0000311415.69966.76.
Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.3.4.
Landerl, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., Heene, M., De Jong, P. F., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., … Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming as longitudinal predictors of reading in five alphabetic orthographies with varying degrees of consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936.
Landerl, K., Ramus, F., Moll, K., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., et al. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(6), 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12029.
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 21(02), 243–262.
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150.
Lee, J., & Yoon, S. Y. (2017). The effects of repeated reading on reading fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415605194.
Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2015). Ethnologue: Languages of Africa and Europe (18th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300406.
Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300405.
Moll, K., Loff, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Cognitive endophenotypes of dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.736439.
Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., et al. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003.
Moura, O., Moreno, J., Pereira, M., & Simões, M. R. (2015). Developmental dyslexia and phonological processing in European Portuguese orthography. Dyslexia, 21(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1489.
Moura, O., Pereira, M., Alfaiate, C., Fernandes, E., Fernandes, B., Nogueira, S., Moreno, J., & Simões, M. R. (2017). Neurocognitive functioning in children with developmental dyslexia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Multiple deficits and diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1225007.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Nelson, J. M. (2015). Examination of the double-deficit hypothesis with adolescents and young adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 65(3), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0105-z.
Norton, E. S., Black, J. M., Stanley, L. M., Tanaka, H., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Sawyer, C., & Hoeft, F. (2014). Functional neuroanatomical evidence for the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 61, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.015.
Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431.
Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G. K., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis in Greek: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6), 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338745.
Pennington, B. F. (2009). Diagnosing learning disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Pennington, B. F., Santerre-Lemmon, L., Rosenberg, J., MacDonald, B., Boada, R., Friend, A., … Olson, R. K. (2012). Individual prediction of dyslexia by single versus multiple deficit models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025823.
Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2004). Predictive influence of phonological processing, morphological/syntactic skill, and naming speed on spelling performance. Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.076.
Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.003.
Ring, J., & Black, J. L. (2018). The multiple deficit model of dyslexia: What does it mean for identification and intervention? Annals of Dyslexia, 68(2), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-0157-y.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500306.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859.
Simões, M. R., Albuquerque, C. P., Pinho, M. S., Vilar, M., Pereira, M., Lopes, A. F., … Moura, O. (2016). Bateria de Avaliação Neuropsicológica de Coimbra (BANC) [Coimbra Neuropsychological Assessment Battery]. Lisboa: HOGREFE.
Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: Individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74(2), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402003.
Song, S., Georgiou, G. K., Su, M., & Hua, S. (2016). How well do phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming correlate with Chinese reading accuracy and fluency? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1088543.
Sucena, A., Castro, S. L., & Seymour, P. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4.
Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 407–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073004407.
Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2014). Cognitive profiles of Italian children with developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.77.
Torppa, M., Georgiou, G., Salmi, P., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2012). Examining the double-deficit hypothesis in an orthographically consistent language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(4), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.554470.
Torppa, M., Parrila, R., Niemi, P., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). The double deficit hypothesis in the transparent Finnish orthography: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1353–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9423-2.
Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019465.
Vaessen, A., Gerretsen, P., & Blomert, L. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.004.
Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390010401.
Vukovic, R. K., Wilson, A. M., & Nash, K. K. (2004). Naming speed deficits in adults with reading disabilities: A test of the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370050601.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192.
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 14(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400010122.
Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0004.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.668.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300409.
Wolf, M., O’Rourke, A. G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15(1–2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013816320290.
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., Saine, N., Lyytinen, H., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moura, O., Pereira, M., Moreno, J. et al. Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth. Ann. of Dyslexia 70, 43–61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00190-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00190-1