Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An examination of the effect of feedback on meta-ignorance of mental illness public stigma

  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Dunning-Kruger (DK) effect is a form of meta-ignorance of knowledge (Kruger & Dunning, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 121–1134, 1999) that has not been explored regarding mental illness public stigma. The current study examined the DK effect in this field by comparing participants’ actual stigma (measured by a social distance scale) and their perceived stigma (measured by a self-rating scale compared to their peers). In addition, the effectiveness of two types of feedback on stigma reduction was explored. Undergraduate participants (N = 393) with low actual public stigma perceived their public stigma level to be higher than it was, while those with high actual public stigma perceived it to be lower, supporting the DK effect. Generalized feedback did not reduce public stigma, whereas personalized feedback reduced public stigma for participants with high public stigma. This study revealed the existence of meta-ignorance in the field of mental illness public stigma and the effectiveness of personalized feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiaomiao Li, Andrew C. H. Szeto, and Keith S. Dobson contributed to the study conception and design. Xiaomiao Li, Brittany L. Lindsay, and Andrew C. H. Szeto created study materials. Brittany L. Lindsay conducted data collection. Xiaomiao Li and Brittany L. Lindsay conducted data analyses. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Xiaomiao Li. Brittany L. Lindsay, Andrew C. H. Szeto, and Keith S. Dobson provided critical revisions. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaomiao Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study received ethical approval from the University of Calgary Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board (file # REB18-0207).

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Lindsay, B.L., Szeto, A.C.H. et al. An examination of the effect of feedback on meta-ignorance of mental illness public stigma. Metacognition Learning 18, 165–181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09325-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09325-8

Keywords

Navigation