Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training metacognition in the classroom: the influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions

  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In two semester-long studies, we examined whether college students could improve their ability to accurately predict their own exam performance across multiple exams. We tested whether providing concrete feedback and incentives (i.e., extra credit) for accuracy would improve predictions by improving students’ metacognition, or awareness of their own knowledge. Students’ predictions were almost always higher than the grade they earned and this was particularly true for low-performing students. Experiment 1 demonstrated that providing incentives but minimal feedback failed to show improvement in students’ metacognition or performance. However, Experiment 2 showed that when feedback was made more concrete, metacognition improved for low performing students although exam scores did not improve across exams, suggesting that feedback and incentives influenced metacognitive monitoring but not control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alicke, M. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation: reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & McDonald, S. L. (2002). Influence of practice tests on the accuracy of predicting memory performance for paired associates, sentences, and text material. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 68–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 98–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: a metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramzow, R. H., Willard, G., & Mendes, W. B. (2008). Big tales and cool heads: academic exaggeration is related to cardiac vagal reactivity. Emotion, 8, 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: the effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval on learning. Science, 319, 966–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, W. L., Winningham, R. G., & Weaver, C. A., III. (2007). Repeated testing sessions and scholastic aptitude in college students’ metacognitive accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 689–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, J., & Mueller, R. A. (2002). Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Tyler M. Miller & Lisa Geraci

Authors
  1. Tyler M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa Geraci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler M. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, T.M., Geraci, L. Training metacognition in the classroom: the influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition Learning 6, 303–314 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation