Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teachers’ Use of Educative Features in Guides for Nature of Science Read-Alouds

  • SI: nature of science
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the use of specific educative features for supporting the teaching of nature of science (NOS) during read-alouds of elementary science trade books. Educative features are components of educative curriculum materials that aim to increase teachers’ content knowledge and support effective instructional practices. Understanding how teachers use specific educative features is important for the future design of curriculum materials that can be used to improve teachers’ views of NOS in tandem with changing their teaching practices. Qualitative data from teacher interviews and observations of read-alouds were used to determine which educative features teachers used and how effective they were perceived as being. Results indicate that teachers varied in their use of educative features and tended to focus on the ones that addressed specific teaching moves as opposed to those that supported understanding why the curriculum was developed as it was. Based on these findings, recommendations for future research that highlights the importance of all educative features are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students’ conceptions of the nature of Science. (PhD Doctoral Dissertation), Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Images of nature of science in middle grade science trade books. New Advocate, 15(2), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22, 2087–2107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). The evolving landscape related to assessment of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 621–650). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: a case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Science Teacher Education, 76, 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L. (2007). Interdisciplinary language arts and science instruction in elementary classrooms: applying research to practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: a yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2005). “How should I know what scientists do?—I am just a kid”: fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: what understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32, 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 194–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Buck, G. A., Donnelly, L. A., Nargund-Josh, V., & Weiland, I. S. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Nargund-Josh, V., Weiland, I., Pongsanon, K., & Avsar, B. (2014). What third-grade students of differing ability levels learn about nature of science after a year of instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, A. M., Palincsar, A. S., & Davis, E. A. (2015). The design and use of educative curricular supports for text-based discussions in science. Journal of Education, 195, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Interacting with a suite of educative features: elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 422–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, A. M., Smith, P. S., Davis, E. A., Marino, J. C., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Justifying predictions: connecting use of educative curriculum materials to students’ engagement in science argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 281, 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J. L. (2016). Enriching science trade books with explicit-reflective nature of science instruction: impacting elementary taechers’ practice and improving students’ learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.

  • Brunner, J. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2017). Representations of nature of science in U.S. elementary trade books. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks: a global perspective (pp. 135–151). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G. N., Kulikowich, J. M., & Bravo, M. A. (2015). The effects of educative curriculum materials on teachers’ use of instructional strategies for English language learners in science and on student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, B. (2012). I, Galileo. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z. R., & Ford, D. J. (2005). How are scientists portrayed in children’s science biographies? Science & Education, 14, 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daisey, P. (1994). The value of trade books in secondary science and mathematics instruction: a rationale. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Marulis, L., & Iwashyna, S. (2014). Designing educative curriculum materials: a theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 24–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A. M., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: uptake, impact and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 17, 829–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 214–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, K. E., Masters, H., & Akerson, V. L. (2015). Using history of science to teach nature of science to elementary students. Science & Education, 24, 1103–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, G. (2007). Galaxies, Galaxies! New York: Holiday House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., & McComas, W. F. (2010). Charles Darwin and evolution: illustrating human aspects of science. Science & Education, 19, 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. B. (2018). An analysis of award-winning science trade books for children: who are the scientists, and what is science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi-org.silk.library.umass.edu/10.1002/tea.21447

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth-graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2004). Early elementary students’ and teacher’s understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry: lessons learned from Project ICAN. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC.

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 600–620). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.-F., Lieu, S.-C., Chen, S., Huang, M.-T., & Chang, W.-H. (2012). Affording explicit-reflective science teaching by using an educative teachers’ guide. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 999–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, L. (2010). Come see the Earth turn: the story of Leon Foucault. Berkley: Tricycle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). The next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. H. (2006a). Durability of changes in self-efficacy of preservice primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. H. (2006b). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36, 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C., Pongsanon, K., & Akerson, V. L. (2010). If we teach them, they can learn: young students views of nature of science during an informal science education program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. C. (2002). Using trade books in teaching elementary science: facts and fallacies. The Reading Teacher, 55, 552–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18, 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: the role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuchardt, A. M., Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Schunn, C. D., Stein, M. K., & Reynolds, B. (2017). How much professional development is needed with educative curriculum materials? It depends upon the intended student learning outcomes. Science Education, 101, 1015–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 425–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowski, M., & Turkel, S. (2013). How nonfiction reveals the nature of science. Children’s Literature in Education, 44, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, University of Massachusetts, 813 N. Pleasant Ave., Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    Jeanne L. Brunner

Authors
  1. Jeanne L. Brunner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanne L. Brunner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brunner, J.L. Teachers’ Use of Educative Features in Guides for Nature of Science Read-Alouds. Sci & Educ 28, 413–437 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00039-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00039-z

Search

Navigation