Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Success in Science Learning and Preservice Science Teaching Self-Efficacy

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

This study examined relationships between conceptual understanding, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy beliefs as preservice teachers learned science in a constructivist-oriented methods class. Participants included 49 preservice elementary teachers. Analysis revealed that participants increased in self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and conceptual understanding. Engaging preservice teachers in hands-on, minds-on activities and discussion were important contributors. Participants reported that they would be inclined to teach from a constructivist perspective in the future. One implication from this study is that increasing the quantity of science content courses that preservice elementary teachers are required to take may not be sufficient to overcome their reluctance to teach science if some of their learning does not take place in a constructivist environment. In our teaching, we have tried to integrate pedagogy with learning science content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K., Anderson, M., Ruth, D., & Sattler, N. (1996). What’s the matter: Studying the concept of matter in middle school. Science Scope, 20(1), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balunuz, M., Jarrett, O. S., & Balunuz, N. (2001, March). Growth of science interest and confidence among Turkish preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research of Science Teaching, St Louis, MO.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: Foundation of agency. In W. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 17–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, R. (2001, March). Building science teaching confidence in preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.

  • Bleicher, R. (2002, April). Increasing confidence in preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Bleicher, R., & Lindgren, J. (2002). Building confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. In P. Rubba, J. Rye, W. DiBiase, & B. Crawford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual international conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp 1593–1606) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 465 602).

  • Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakiroglu, J., & Boone, W. J. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their conceptions of photosynthesis and inheritance. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (1995). Influence of cooperative early field experience on preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy. Science Education, 80, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enochs, L., & Riggs, I. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frechtling, J., & Sharp, L. (Eds.). (1997). User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication (RED 94-52965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, I. S., Watters, J. J., Tulip, D. F., & Lucas, K. G. (1995). Changes in preservice elementary teachers’ sense of efficacy in teaching science. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers’ beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 86, 783–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. (1990). Defining bridging the gap. In E. Duckworth, J. Easley, D. Hawkins, & A. Henriques (Eds.), Science education: A minds-on approach for the elementary years (pp. 97–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinheider, J. K. (1996). Assessment matters. Science & Children, 34(5), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological (pp. 63–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D.Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, J., & Bleicher, R. (2003, March). Understanding and Use of the learning cycle and elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.

  • Lloyd, J. K., Smith, R. G., Fay, C. L., Khang, G. N., Wah, L. L. K., & Sai, C. L. (1998). Subject knowledge for science teaching at primary level: A comparison of preservice teachers in England and Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 521–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, C. J., & Tobin, K. (1995). Restraints to reform: The congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. H. (2002). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 86, 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2002). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic contexts: An outline. Retrieved December, 22, 2003, from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/efftalk.html.

  • Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, M. G. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4(1), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. G., & Staver, J. R. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80, 283–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. C., & Roychoudhury, A. (2003). Preparing more confident preservice elementary science teacher: One elementary science methods teacher’s self-study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C., & Hampton, C. M. O. (1995). Cooperative learning and preservice elementary teacher science self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shymansky, J. A. (1992). Using constructivist ideas to teach science teachers about constructivist ideas, or teachers are students too! Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertsen, M. L. (1993). Transforming ideas for teaching and learning science. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 417).

  • Stevens, C., & Wenner, G. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded theory: Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K.(1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook on research in science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, T. (2000). The impact of prior science course experience and achievement on the science teaching self efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12(2), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teacher efficacy and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valli, L. (1992). Reflective teacher education. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science.: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practice in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document No. ED 382 461).

  • Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, M. E., Freeman, L., & Ramsey, J. (2000). Science teaching self-efficacy of first-year elementary teachers trained in a site-based program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, 93012, U.S.A.

    Robert E. Bleicher & Joan Lindgren

Authors
  1. Robert E. Bleicher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joan Lindgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Bleicher, R.E., Lindgren, J. Success in Science Learning and Preservice Science Teaching Self-Efficacy. J Sci Teacher Educ 16, 205–225 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-4861-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-4861-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation