Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimal research has been conducted on the simultaneous influence of multiple metalinguistic, linguistic, and processing skills that may impact literacy development in children who are in the process of learning to read and write. In this study, we assessed the phonemic awareness, morphological awareness, orthographic awareness, receptive vocabulary, and rapid naming abilities of second and third grade students (N = 56) and determined how these abilities predicted the children’s reading and spelling skills. Regression analyses revealed that morphological awareness was the sole unique contributor to spelling and, together with orthographic awareness, uniquely contributed to word recognition. Morphological awareness also was significantly related to reading comprehension. The results add to a growing literature base providing evidence that early literacy development is influenced by morphological awareness, an ability that has received considerably less educational attention. Additionally, the findings point to the importance of tapping into multiple sources of metalinguistic knowledge when providing instruction in reading and spelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, K. (in press). What is orthographic knowledge? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools.

  • Apel, K., & Masterson, J. J. (2001). Theory-guided spelling assessment and intervention: A case study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, D., & Templeton, S. (1998). Explorations in developmental spelling: Foundations for learning and teaching phonics, spelling, and vocabulary. Reading Teacher, 52(3), 222–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle. J. (2009). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Advance online publication: doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.

  • Berninger, V., & Fayol, M. (2008). Why spelling is important and how to teach it effectively. Encyclopedia of language and literacy development (pp. 1–13). London, ON: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, A. (2010). Children and adolescents from poverty and reading development: a research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 26, 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Freeman, N. H. (1995). Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 446–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., & Newby-Clark, E. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. R., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a pre-school sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J. S. (2006). What is orthographic processing skill and how does it relate to word identification in reading? Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 18–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., Cortina, K. S., & Zeng, J. (2010). Reading achievement in Reading First schools in Michigan. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M. T., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M. T., & Treiman, R. (2004). Developmental variations in spelling: Comparing typical and poor spellers. In A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 644–660). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A., Holmes, V. M., Neath, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2003). How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes? Reading Psychology, 30, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Naming of objects by dyslexic and other learning-disabled children. Brain and Language, 3, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental variations in word recognition. In A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 644–660). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, K. A., & Katz, L. A. (2010). Providing written language services in the schools: The time is now. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. Published online July 2, 2010 as doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0068).

  • Goswami, U. (2008). The development of reading across languages. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. New York, NY: Psychology Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic decipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (2004). Morphology and literacy: Implications for students with reading disabilities. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Katz, L. A. (2004). An investigation of the relationship of morphological awareness to reading comprehension in fourth and sixth graders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(06), 2138. (UMI No. 3138192).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, N. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing, 19, 737–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S., Hammill, D., & Moats, L. (1999). Test of Written Spelling-4. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. J., & Apel, K. (2007). Spelling and word-level reading: A multilinguistic approach. In A. G. Kamhi, J. J. Masterson, & K. Apel (Eds.), Clinical decision making in developmental language disorders (pp. 249–266). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. J., Apel, K., & Wasowicz, J. (2006). SPELL-2: Spelling performance evaluation for language & literacy. Evanston, IL: Learning By Design, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2009a). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2009b). Still wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 387–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muse, A. E. (2006). The nature of morphological knowledge. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI No. 3198241).

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vaughan, K., & Vermeulen, K. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second graders and at-risk fourth grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 730–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children’s word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing.

  • Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1985). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1991). Morphological knowledge and writing ability. In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Written language disorders. Neuropsychology and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 43–69). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R., Pillay, V., & Melidona, S. (2008). Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlagal, B. (2001). Traditional, developmental, and structural language approaches to spelling: Review and recommendations. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 147–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and development onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahoney, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strattman, K., & Hodson, B. W. (2005). Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21, 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoecha, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness and naming. A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies and phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troia, G. A. (2004). Phonological processing and its influence on literacy learning. In A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 271–301). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., & Hauerwas, L. B. (2006). Development of phonological, morphological, and orthographic knowledge in young spellers: The case of inflected verbs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 819–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. T. (2001). Group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). Naming speed processes and developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the special issue on the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, J. A., & Apel, K. (2010). Initial acquisition of mental graphemic representations in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 53, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, J. A., Wood, K. A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenn Apel.

Appendix

Appendix

Phonemic awareness target words taken from Masterson et al. (2006).

  • Cane

  • Lung

  • Match

  • Honey

  • Dress

  • Bottle

  • Cries

  • Stopped

  • Babies

  • Biting

  • Repair

  • Continue

  • Skeleton

  • Prisoner

  • Argument

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E.B., Brimo, D. et al. Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Read Writ 25, 1283–1305 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8

Keywords

Navigation