Skip to main content
Log in

Traditional, developmental, and structured language approaches to spelling: Review and recommendations

  • Part III Research Into Practice: Instruction And Intervention
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current research does not support the notion that spelling is a simple rote-memory task. Learning to spell is better understood as a complex developmental process that is interconnected with phonological awareness and reading ability. In this review, three perspectives on spelling theory, research, and instruction are examined. Traditional classroom-based, developmental, and structured language approaches are outlined and their implications for assisting poor spellers explored. Instructional recommendations are made by drawing from and combining some of the strengths of each method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailet, L. L. (1991). Development and disorders of spelling in the beginning school years. In A. M. Bains, L. L. Bailet, & L. C. Moats (eds.), Written language disorders: Theory into practice (pp. 2–21). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2000). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, J. (1980). Developmental strategies of spelling competence in primary school children. In E. Henderson & J. Beers (eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge (pp. 36–45). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1987). The adult outcomes of children with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 252–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1988). The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1979). Approaching reading through invented spelling. In L. B. Resnick, & P. A. Weaver (eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 2, pp. 43–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, D. W. (1988). American English spelling. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1989). The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1994). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 323–358). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. A. (1951). The teaching of spelling. Milwaukee: Bruce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. W. (1997). The Gillingham manual: Remedial training for students with specific disability in reading, spelling, and penmanship (8th ed.), Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulandris, N. K. (1994). Teaching spelling: Bridging theory and practice. In G. D. A. Brown, & N. C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of spelling (pp. 407–423). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as clues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, P. R., Hodges, R. E., & Hanna, J. S. (1971). Spelling: Structure and strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, P. R., & Moore, J. T. (1953). Spelling: From spoken word to written symbol. Elementary School Journal, 53, 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. H. (1981). Learning to read and spell: The child’s knowledge of words. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. H. (1990). Teaching spelling (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. H., & Beers, J. W. (Eds.). (1980). Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. K. (1993). Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, E. (1967). Teaching spelling. What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. D. (1947). The effect of the corrected test on learning to spell. Elementary School Journal, 47, 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. D. (1969). Spelling. In R. L. Ebel (ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed.) (pp. 1282–1299). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi, M. (1992). The vowel and what follows: A phonological frame of orthographic reference. In S. Templeton & D. Bear (eds.) Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 105–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luelsdorff, P. A. (1991). Developmental orthography. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I. (1985). Phonemic awareness can be developed without reading instruction. In S. A. Brady & D. Shankweiler (eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 47–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, T. R. (1993). Dyslexia: The pattern of difficulties (2nd ed.). London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, E., & Miles, T. R. (1994). The interface between research and remediation. In G. D. A. Brown & N. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process, and intervention (pp. 441–458). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1995). Spelling: Development, disability, and instruction. Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C., & Ferrell, M. (1999). Multisensory instruction. In J. R. Birsh (ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (pp. 1–17). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1999). Case studies in teaching beginning readers: The Howard Street tutoring manual. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., Blanton, L., Blanton, W. E., Nowacek, J., & Perney, J. (1995). Teaching low-achieving spellers at their “instructional level.” Elementary School Journal, 96, 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., Blanton, L., Blanton, W. E., & Perney, J. (1995). Spelling instruction and achievement in six classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 92, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., Nelson, L., & Perney, J. (1986). Exploring the concept of “spelling instructional level” through the analysis of error-types. Elementary School Journal, 87, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., & Perney, J. (1984). Developmental spelling as a predictor of first grade reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 84, 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Diakidoy, I., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. (1989). Something borrowed, something new: Teaching implications of developmental spelling research. Reading Psychology, 10, 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, S. T. (1999). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children, and selected papers. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. In K. Stanovich (ed.), Children’s reading and the development of phonological awareness (pp. 39–75). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, Y. V., Swank, P. R., Hiscock, M., & Fowler, A. F. (1999). Identification of vowel speech sounds by skilled and less skilled readers and the relation with vowel spelling. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 137–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1975). Children’s categorizations of speech sounds in English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1986). Children’s creative spelling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, D. J., Wade, S., & Kim, J. W. (1999). Spelling errors as a window on variations in phonological deficits among students with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlagal, R. (1992). Patterns of orthographic development into the intermediate grades. In S. Templeton & D. Bear (eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 32–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlagal, R. (1996). Teaching disabled spellers. In L. R. Putnam (ed.), How to become a better reading teacher: Strategies for assessment and intervention (pp. 307–329). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlagal, R., & Trathen, W. (1998). American spelling instruction: What history tells us. Yearbook of the American Reading Forum, 18, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in children. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, S., & Bear, D. (Eds.). (1992). Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, S., & Morris, D. (2000). Spelling. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 525–543). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, R. (1992). An orthography as a theory of language. In C. M. Sterling & C. Robson (eds.), Psychology, spelling, and education (pp. 30–42), Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L. (1967). English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L. (2000). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, S. (1990). A proposal for a new spelling curriculum. Elementary School Journal, 90, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, M. J., & Invernizzi, M. (1990). Spelling errors of normal and disabled students on achievement levels one through four: Instructional implications. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, A. H. (1966). The generalization controversy on spelling instruction. Elementary English, 43, 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutell J. (1980). Children’s spelling strategies and their cognitive development. In E. H. Henderson & J. W. Beers (eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge (pp. 52–73). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutell, J., & Rasinski, T. (1989). Reading and spelling connections in third and fifth grade students. Reading Psychology, 10, 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Schlagal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlagal, B. Traditional, developmental, and structured language approaches to spelling: Review and recommendations. Ann. of Dyslexia 51, 147–176 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0009-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0009-y

Keywords

Navigation