Skip to main content
Log in

Time operators for quantum walks

  • Published:
Letters in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study time operators for discrete-time quantum systems. Quantum walks are typical examples. We construct time operators for one-dimensional homogeneous quantum walks and determine their deficiency indices and spectra. Our time operators always have self-adjoint extensions. This is in contrast to the fact that time operators for continuous-time quantum systems generally have no self-adjoint extensions. The uniqueness of the extensions relates to the winding numbers corresponding to the system. If it is unique, its spectrum becomes a discrete set of real numbers, i.e., the time operator is quantized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aharonov, Y., Bohm, D.: Time in the quantum theory and the uncertainty relation for time and energy. Phys. Rev. 122, 1649–1658 (1961)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Asbóth, J.K., Obuse, H.: Bulk-boundary correspondence for chiral symmetric quantum walks. Phys. Rev. B 88, 121406(R) (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arai, A.: Generalized weak Weyl relation and decay of quantum dynamics. Rev. Math. Phys. 17, 1071–1109 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Arai, A.: Spectrum of time operators. Lett. Math. Phys. 80, 211–221 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Arai, A.: Mathematical theory of time operators in quantum physics. RIMS Kôkyûroku 1609, 24–35 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egusquiza, I.L., Muga, J.G.: Free-motion time-of-arrival operator and probability distribution. Phys. Rev. A 61, 012104 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiroshima, F., Kuribayashi, S., Matsuzawa, Y.: Strong time operators of generalized Hamiltonians. Lett. Math. Phys. 87, 115–123 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jørgensen, P.T., Muhly, P.S.: Selfadjoint extensions satisfying the Weyl operator commutation relations. J. Anal. Math. 37, 46–99 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyamoto, M.: A generalized Weyl relation approach to the time operator and its connection to the survival probability. J. Math. Phys. 42, 1038–1052 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy, G.: \(C^*\)-Algebras and Operator Theory. Academic Press, Cambridge (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pauli, W.: General Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1980)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Sambou, D., de Aldecoa, R. Tiedra: Quantum time delay for unitary operators: general theory, Rev. Math. Phys. 31, 1950018 (2019)

  13. Schmüdgen, K.: On the Heisenberg commutation relation. I. J. Funct. Anal. 50, 8–49 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmüdgen, K.: Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 265. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Teranishi, N.: A note on time operators. Lett. Math. Phys. 106, 1259–1263 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao, L., Qiu, X., Wang, K., Bian, Z., Zhan, X., Obuse, H., Sanders, B.C., Yi, W., Xue, P.: Higher winding number in a nonunitary photonic quantum walk. Phys. Rev. A 98, 063847 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for constructive comments, which have been helpful to improve this paper. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP18K03327, JP16K17612 and 26800055), and by the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, a Joint Usage/ Research Center located in Kyoto University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasumichi Matsuzawa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A Fundamental properties of time operators of a unitary operator

A Fundamental properties of time operators of a unitary operator

The following are fundamental properties of time operators of a unitary operator.

Proposition A.1

Let T be a strong time operator of a unitary operator U. Then the following hold.

  1. (1)

    Its closure \({\bar{T}}\) is a strong time operator of U as well.

  2. (2)

    \([T,U]=U\) holds on a dense subspace D(T). In particular, T is a time operator of U. The converse is not true, i.e., not every time operator of U is a strong time operator of U.

  3. (3)

    \(\sigma (T)=\sigma (T+1)\) holds. In particular, T is unbounded.

  4. (4)

    If T is essentially self-adjoint, then \(\sigma (U)={\mathbb {T}}\)

Proof

(1) follows from a simple limiting argument. The first half of (2) is straightforward. For the second half of (2), see Example 4.6. (3) is obvious. We show (4). It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} U^*e^{it{\bar{T}}}U = e^{it({\bar{T}}+1)}= e^{it}e^{it{\bar{T}}} \end{aligned}$$

for any \(t\in {\mathbb {R}}\). Thus, we obtain \(e^{it{\bar{T}}}Ue^{-it{\bar{T}}}=e^{it}U\). This means that \(\sigma (U)=\sigma (e^{it}U)\) for all \(t\in {\mathbb {R}}\). Hence, \(\sigma (U)={\mathbb {T}}\) holds. \(\square \)

Theorem A.2

Let U be a unitary operator admitting a strong time operator T. Then U has no eigenvalues.

Proof

The proof is same as the proof of [9, Corollary 4.3], and thus we omit it. \(\square \)

A strong time operator governs the decay rate of the transition probability as follows:

Theorem A.3

Let T be a strong time operator of a unitary operator U. Then for any \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\), \(\psi \in D(T^n)\) and \(\phi \in D\bigl ((T^*)^n\bigr )\), there exists a constant \(C_n(\phi ,\psi )>0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} |\langle \phi ,U^t\psi \rangle | \le \frac{C_n(\phi ,\psi )}{|t|^n},\ \ \ \ \ t\in {\mathbb {Z}}\setminus \{0\} \end{aligned}$$

holds.

Proof

The proof is same as the proof of [3, Theorem 8.5], and thus we omit it. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Funakawa, D., Matsuzawa, Y., Sasaki, I. et al. Time operators for quantum walks. Lett Math Phys 110, 2471–2490 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-020-01299-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-020-01299-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation