Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Doum fiber and Shrimp Chitin Based Reinforced Low Density Polyethylene Biocomposites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to study the effects of reinforcing low density polyethylene (LDPE) by using bio-fillers (Doum cellulose or Shrimp chitin) on the mechanical properties. Both, Doum cellulose extracted frsom Doum leaves and Shrimp chitin extracted from shrimp co-products were compounded with LPDE without and with compatibilizer. The biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in a twin-screw extruder. Torsion and flexural tests were performed to investigate the impact of each reinforcement on the biocomposite mechanical properties. The SEM was carried out to study the filler/polymer interface adhesion. The present study has demonstrated that Doum fibers and shrimp chitin succeed in improving the mechanical properties of LPDE bio-composites. The results also showed that the use of maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene as a compatibilizer improves filler adhesion/matrix and mechanical properties. This study exhibits that polyethylene composites based on Doum fibers or shrimp chitin can be used to replace the polyethylene materials in several fields like packaging and automotive industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rao MbS, Kanatt SR, Chawla SP, Sharma A (2010) Carbohydr Polym 82:1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, Wu Q (2012) Nanocryst Synth Charact Appl 103–120

  3. Abul Kalam Azad M, Saiful Islam M (2014) Biomass bioenergy process. Springer, New York, 267–286

    Google Scholar 

  4. Essabir H, Bouhfid R, Qaiss A (2015) Agric Biomass Based Potential Mater 1–34

  5. Essabir H, Achaby M, Hilali EM, Bouhfid R, Qaiss A (2015) J Bionic Eng 12:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engineering P, Chakraborty S, Glass C, Dasgupta S, Shankar H, Elastomer S, Kharagpur T (2007) Polym Eng Sci 47:1956–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawasumi M, Hasegawa N, Kato M, Usuki A (1997) Macromolecules 30(20):6333–6338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Polym. Environ 15:25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera-Franco PJ, Valadez-González A (2005) Compos Part B 36:597–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Essabir H, Elkhaoulani A, Benmoussa K, Bouhfid R, Arrakhiz FZ, Qaiss A (2013) Mater Des 51:780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eyholzer C, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Oksman K (2012) J Polym Environ 20:1052–1062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallakpour S, Dinari M (2012) J Polym Environ 20:732–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Felix JM, Gatenholm P (1991) J Appl Polym Sci 42:609–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamaming J, Hashim R, Sulaiman O, Leh CP, Sugimoto T, Nordin NA (2015) Carbohydr Polym 127:202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosli NA, Ahmad I, Abdullah I (2013) J Bioresour 8:1893

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zbidi F, Sghaier S, Nejma MB, Zidi M (2009) J Appl Sci 9:366–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jayapriya G, Ramya R, Rathinam XR, Sudha P N (2011) Sch Res Libr 3:415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Percot A, Viton C, Domard A (2003) Biomacromolecules 4:12–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ravi Kumar MN (2000) React Funct Polym 46:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nair K, Dufresne A (2003) Biomacromolecules 4(3):657–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dufresne A, Paillet M (2001) Macromolecules 34:6527–6530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ku H, Wang H, Pattarachaiyakoop N, Trada M (2011) Compos Part B 42 (4), 856–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faruk O, Andrzej KB, Hans-Peter Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arrakhiz FZ, El Achaby M, Malha M, Bensalah MO, Fassi-Fehri O, Bouhfid R, Benmoussa K, Qaiss A (2013) Mater Des 51:780–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Silvério HA, Flauzino Neto WP, Pasquini D (2013) J Nanomater

  26. Kiruba A, Uthayakumar V, Munirasu S, Ramasubramanian V (2013) Indian J Appl Res 3: 44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK (2014) J Mat Phys Chem 2:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shankar S, Reddy JP, Rhim JW Kim HY (2015) Carbohydr Polym 117:468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aït Hocine N, Médéric P, Aubry T (2008) Polym. Test 27:330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by MAScIR; Moroccan Foundation for Advanced Science, Innovation and Research, MESRSFC and CNRST, Morocco Grant no. 1970/15.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachid Bouhfid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fardioui, M., Guedira, T., Qaiss, A.E.K. et al. A Comparative Study of Doum fiber and Shrimp Chitin Based Reinforced Low Density Polyethylene Biocomposites. J Polym Environ 26, 443–451 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-0955-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-0955-z

Keywords

Navigation