Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life cycle assessment of medicinal plant extract drying methods

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the environmental loads resulting from the two conventional operations for drying of medicinal plant extracts and to select effective variables to reduce impacts on a commercial scale. The boundaries of the system are limited on the production processes, including the production of maltodextrin carrier, extraction and drying of the extract. The functional unit of this study was 65.1 kg of product powder. SimaPro 9.0 was used to model the system with EcoInvent database. IMPACT 2002 + method was applied to estimate the environmental impacts. The data required to complete the inventory list, for the freeze-drying, were obtained from the manufacturer, and for spray drying, from published researches and the mass and energy balances. The results showed that the highest environmental loads in both drying processes are related to the extract production, and specifically, electricity consumption. By eliminating the common items of mass and energy, with the aim of comparing the two processes, it was shown that the freeze-drying method creates more environmental loads than spray drying. Sensitivity analysis was performed, and efforts were made to improve the impacts in both processes. With the proposed opportunities for process improvement, the impacts were reduced by about 20% in the spray drying and by up to 31% in the freeze-drying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article, and the remained datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AA:

Aquatic acidification

AE:

Aquatic eutrophication

AET:

Aquatic ecotoxicity

C:

Carcinogens

GWP:

Global warming

IR:

Ionizing radiation

LO:

Land occupation

ME:

Mineral extraction

NC:

Non-carcinogens

NRE:

Non-renewable energy consumption

OLD:

Ozone layer depletion

RI:

Respiratory inorganics

RO:

Respiratory organics

TAN:

Terrestrial acidification/nitrification

TET:

Terrestrial ecotoxicity

WPI:

Whey protein isolate

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Rashidi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khosravi, H., Rashidi, A. & Shourkaei, M.A. Life cycle assessment of medicinal plant extract drying methods. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 5843–5867 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02940-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02940-8

Keywords

Navigation