Abstract
In this work, the synthesis of biochar from several biomass wastes to act as matrix for urea was investigated. The objective was to select the most promising biochar synthesis condition that result in a matrix with the highest urea retention and subsequent slow release as well as to understand the urea–biochar interaction. A quite simple urea impregnation method was proposed and investigated for biuret formation; its experimental conditions were optimized to increase final urea retention performance. The results pointed out that the urea–biochar interaction has chemical nature, in which the lower presence of mineral elements associated with an acid surface seemed to favor the urea retention. The material impregnated at 133 °C for 1 h with the straw biochar synthesized at 400 °C for 0.5 h showed the lowest initial release of urea (≈ 17 wt. %). However, it presented a high content of biuret (≈ 8 wt. %). Thus, an alternative material was produced applying a shorter period of urea impregnation (10 min); it also maintained the initial release of urea ≈ 17 wt. %.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang M, Gao B, Chen J, Li Y, Creamer AE, Chen H (2014) Slow-release fertilizer encapsulated by graphene oxide films. Chem Eng J 255:107–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.023
IFA INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER INSDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (2013) Fertilizer indicators, 3rd edn. IFA, Paris
Verdier J, Benedito VA, Udvardi MK (2012) The Medicago truncatula Gene Expression Atlas (MtGEA): A Tool for Legume Seed Biology and Biotechnology. In: Agrawal GK, Rakwal R (eds) Seed Development: Omics Technologies toward Improvement of Seed Quality and Crop Yield. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 111–127
Saha BK, Rose MT, Wong VNL, Cavagnaro TR, Patti AF (2019) A slow-release brown coal-urea fertilizer reduced gaseous N loss from soil and increased silver beet yield and N uptake. Sci Total Environ 649:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.145
Ricci M (2013) Carbon dioxide as a building block for organic intermediates: an industrial perspective. In: Aresta M (ed) Carbon dioxide recovery and utilization. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 395–402
Jones C, Brown BD, Engel R, Horneck D, Olson-rutz K (2013) Factors affecting nitrogen fertilizer volatilization. Montana State University Extension, Bozeman. http://landresources.montana.edu/soilfertility/documents/PDF/pub/UvolfactEB0208.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
Osman KT (2012) Soils: principles, properties, and management. Springer Science & Business Med, Dordrecht
Yuan W, Solihin ZQ, Kano J, Saito F (2014) Mechanochemical formation of K-Si–Ca–O compound as a slow-release fertilizer. Powder Technol 260:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.072
Jyothi AN, Pillai SS, Aravind M, Salim SA, Kuzhivilayil SJ (2018) Cassava starch-graft-poly(acrylonitrile)-coated urea fertilizer with sustained release and water retention properties. Adv Polym Technol 37:2687–2694. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21943
Said A, Zhang Q, Qu J, Liu Y, Lei Z, Hu H, Xu Z (2018) Mechanochemical activation of phlogopite to directly produce slow-release fertilizer. Appl Clay Sci 165:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.08.006
Trenkel ME (2010) Slow-and controlled-release, and stabilized fertilizers: an option for enhancing nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. 2nd edn. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), Paris
Azeem B, Kushaari K, Man ZB, Basit A, Thanh TH (2014) Review on materials & methods to produce controlled-release coated urea fertilizer. J Controlled Release 181:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020
Trinh TH, Kushaari K, Shuib AS, Ismail L, Azeem B (2015) Modelling the release of nitrogen from controlled-release fertilizer: constant and decay release. Biosyst Eng 130:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.12.004
Melaj MA, Daraio ME (2013) Preparation and characterization of potassium nitrate controlled-release fertilizers based on chitosan and xanthan layered tablets. J Appl Polym Sci 130:2422–2428. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39452
Perez JJ, Francois NJ (2016) Chitosan-starch beads prepared by ionotropic gelation as potential matrices for controlled release of fertilizers. Carbohydr Polym 148:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.054
González ME, Cea M, Medina J, González A, Diez MC, Cartes P, Monreal CN, R. (2015) Evaluation of biodegradable polymers as encapsulating agents for the development of a urea controlled-release fertilizer using biochar as support material. Sci Total Environ 505:446–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.014
Bhardwaj D, Sharma M, Sharma P, Tomar R (2012) Synthesis and surfactant modification of clinoptilolite and montmorillonite for the removal of nitrate and preparation of slow release nitrogen fertilizer. J Haz Mat 227–228:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.058
Yuan G (2014) An organoclay formula for the slow release of soluble compounds. Appl Clay Sci 100:84–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.04.005
UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA. Diez RJN, Astete REB, Jerez MCD, Ramírez NZS, Fuentes GAC, Lemus MXC, Aedo CAT, Ruiz AG, Quijón MEG (2014) Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer using biochar as a renewable support matrix. WO n. 2014/091279A1, 12 Dec. 2012, 14 June 2014
Magrini-Bair KA, Czernik S, Pilath HM, Evans RJ, Maness PC, Leventhal J (2009) Biomass derived, carbon sequestering, designed fertilizers. Annals Environ Sci 3:217–225
Luyima D, Lee J, Sung J, Oh T (2020) Co-pyrolysed animal manure and bone meal-based urea hydrogen peroxide (UHP) fertilisers are an effective technique of combating ammonia emissions. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:1887–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01074-7
Hutten IM (2007) Raw materials for nonwoven filter media. In: Handbook of nonwoven filter media, Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 103–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-185617441-1/50019-6
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (EMBRAPA) (2021) Beneficiamento da casca de coco verde para a produção de fibra e pó. https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-solucoes-tecnologicas/-/produto-servico/33/beneficiamento-da-casca-de-coco-verde-para-a-producao-de-fibra-e-po. Accessed 13 Nov 2021
Melati RB, Schmatz AA, Pagnocca FC, Contiero J, Brienzo M (2017) Sugarcane bagasse: production, composition, properties, and feedstock potential. Sugarcane: production systems, uses and economic importance, pp 1–38. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174692
Leal MRV, Walter AS, Seabra JEA (2013) Sugarcane as an energy source. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 3:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-012-0055-1
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB) (2020) Acompanhamento da safra basileira: cana-de-açúcar. V7 Safra 2020/21 N.3, 3rd survey, Dec
Barbosa BH, Santos CS, Oliveira S (2018) Análise da eficiência energética do bagaço da cana na geração de vapor em uma usina sucroalcooleira. RMetrop Sustent 8(3):106–112
UNESP (UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA) (2012) Composição do Bagaço de cana-de-açúcar. UNESP, Rio Claro http://www.rc.unesp.br/ib/ceis/mundoleveduras/2012/Composi%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20do%20Baga%C3%A7o%20de%20cana-de-a%C3%A7%C3%BAcar.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2016
Menandro LMS, Cantarella H, Franco HCJ, Kölln OT, Pimenta MTB, Sanches GM, Rabelo SC, Carvalho JLN (2017) Comprehensive assessment of sugarcane straw: implications for biomass and bioenergy production. Biofuels, Bioprod Bioref 11(3):488–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1760
Pupulin C (2015) Retrospectiva canal 2015: biomassa da cana-de-açúcar é pura energia. Goiânia: Mac Editora e Jornalismo. http://www.canalbioenergia.com.br/biomassa-da-cana-de-acucar-aproveitamento-ou-desperdicio/. Accessed 05 Dec 2020
Giraldo JD, Rivas BL (2017) Determination of urea using p-N, N-dimethylaminobenzaldeyde: solvent effect and interference of chotosan. J Chilean Chem Soc 62:3538–3542. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072017000200023
Shi L, Liu Q, Guo X, Wu W, Liu Z (2013) Pyrolysis behavior and bonding information of coal — A TGA study. Fuel Proc Technol 108:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.06.023
ASTM D5373 (2016). Standard Test Methods for Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in Analysis Samples of Coal and Carbon in Analysis Samples of Coal and Coke
Boehm HP, Diehl E, Heck W, Sappok R (1964) Surface oxides of carbon. Angewandte Chem Internat Ed 3:669–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.196406691
Noh JS, Schwarz JA (1989) Estimation of the point of zero charge of simple oxides by mass titration. J Coll Interface Sci 130:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(89)90086-6
Ferreira RB, Franzini VP, Gomes Neto JÁ (2007) Determinação de biureto em ureia agroindustrial por espectrofotometria. Eclét Quím 32:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-46702007000100006
Tan Z, Zou J, Zhang L, Huang Q (2018) Morphology, pore size distribution, and nutrient characteristics in biochars under different pyrolysis temperatures and atmospheres. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0666-5
Bera T, Purakayastha TJ, Patra AK, Datta SC (2018) Comparative analysis of physicochemical, nutrient, and spectral properties of agricultural residue biochars as influenced by pyrolysis temperatures. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0675-4
Yang Y, Ni X, Zhou Z, Yu L, Liu B, Yang Y, Wu Y (2017) Performance of matrix-based slow-release urea in reducing nitrogen loss and improving maize yields and profits. F Crops Res 212:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.005
Zhou T, Wang Y, Huang S, Zhao Y (2018) Synthesis composite hydrogels from inorganic-organic hybrids based on leftover rice for environment-friendly controlled-release urea fertilizers. Sci Total Environ 615:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.084
Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management science and technology. Eartscan, London
Do PTM, Ueda T, Kose R, Nguyen LX, Okayama T, Miyanishi T (2019) Properties and potential use of biochars from residues of two rice varieties, Japanese Koshihikari and Vietnamese IR50404. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0768-8
Brown RA, Kercher AK, Nguyen TH, Nagle DC, Ball WP (2006) Production and characterization of synthetic wood chars for use as surrogates for natural sorbents. Organ Geochem 37:321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.10.008
Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosci 11:6613–6621. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6613-2014
Masresha S (2018) Evaluation of Sugarcane Straw Derived Biochar for the Remediation of Chromium and Nickel Contaminated Soil. School of Chemical and Bio-Engineering. Addis Ababa University. http://213.55.95.56/bitstream/handle/123456789/15762/Selam%20Masresha.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 08 Oct 2019
Jassal RS, Johnson MS, Molodovskaya M, Black TA, Jollymore A, Sveinson K (2015) Nitrogen enrichment potential of biochar in relation to pyrolysis temperature and feedstock quality. J Environ Manag 152:140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.021
Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin J, Steiner C, Das K, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts D, Busscher W, Schomberg H (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals Environ Sci 3:195–206. https://openjournals.neu.edu/aes/journal/article/view/v3art5/v3p195-206. Accessed 08 Jun 2019
Sahoo K, Kumar A, Chakraborty JP (2021) A comparative study on valuable products: bio-oil, biochar, non-condensable gases from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:186–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01114-2
Santos LER, Meili L, Soletti JI, Carvalho SHV, Ribeiro LMO, Duarte JLS, Santos R (2020) Impact of temperature on vacuum pyrolysis of Syagrus coronate for biochar production. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:878–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-00978-8
Fang Q, Chen B, Lin Y, Guan Y (2014) Aromatic and hydrophobic surfaces of wood-derived biochar enhance perchlorate adsorption via hydrogen bonding to oxygen-containing organic groups. Environ Sci Technol 48:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403711y
Das D, Samal DP, Meikap BC (2015) Preparation of activated carbon from green coconut shell and its characterization. J Chem Eng Proc Technol 6:1000248. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000248
Ghosh U, Luthy RG, Conerlissen G, Werner D, Menzie CA (2011) In-situ sorbent amendments: a new direction in contaminated sediment management. Environ Sci Technol 45:1163–1168. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102694h
Cheng CH, Lehmann J (2009) Ageing of black carbon along a temperature gradient. Chemosp 75:1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.045
Li J, Zhang H, Tang X, Lu H (2016) Adsorptive desulfurization of dibenzothiophene over lignin-derived biochar by one-step modification with potassium hydrogen phthalate. RSC Adv 6:100352–100360. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra20220a
Kim WK, Shim T, Kim YS, Hyun S, Ryu C, Park YK, Jung J (2013) Characterization of cadmium removal from aqueous solution by biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus at different pyrolytic temperatures. Biores Technol 138:266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.186
DISHA EXPERTS, (2017) 10 in one study package for CBSE chemistry class 12 with 5 model papers. Disha Publications, New Delhi
Montes-Morán MA, Suárez D, Menéndez JA, Fuente E (2004) On the nature of basic sites on carbon surfaces: an overview. Carbon 42:1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.023
Marsh H, Rodríguez-Reinoso F (2006) Activated Carbon. Elsevier, Amesterdam
Bandosz TJ, Ania CO (2006) Surface chemistry of activated carbons and its characterization. In: Carbon A (ed) BANDOSZ TJ. Surfaces in Environmental Remediation. Elsevier, New York, pp 159–229
Melo LCA, Coscione AR, Abreu CA, Puga AP, Camargo OA (2013) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on cadmium and zinc sorption capacity of sugar cane straw-derived biochar. BioRes 8:4992–5004. https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BioRes_08_4_4992_Melo_CAPC_Pyrol_Temp_Cd_Zn_Sorp_Capacity_Cane_Biochar_4370.pdf. Accessed 09 Aug 2019
Hariz ARM, Azlina WAKGW, Fazly MM, Norziana ZZ, Ridzuan MDM, Tosiah S, Ain ABN (2015) Local practices for production of rice husk biochar and coconut shell biochar: production methods, product characteristics, nutrient, and field water holding capacity. J Trop Agricult Food Sci 43:91–101. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48906/. Accessed 07 Aug 2019
Redemann CE, Riesenfeld FC, La Viola FS (1958) Formation of Biuret from Urea. Ind Eng Chem 50:633–636. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50580a035
Young D, Green J (1982) Method of selectively removing biuret from urea and compositions for use therein. US n. 4345099, 10 Aug. 1981, 17 Aug. 1982
Baia LV, Araujo LRR, Pereira CG, Souza WC, Figueiredo MAG (2021) Adsorption as alternative process in the preliminary production of automotive additive. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 26(3):215–226. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ190419038B
Xie L, Liu M, Ni B, Zhang X, Wang Y (2011) Slow-release nitrogen and boron fertilizer from a functional superabsorbent formulation based on wheat straw and attapulgite. Chem Eng J 167:342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.082
Saha BK, Rose MT, Cavagnaro TR, Patti AF (2017) Hybrid brown coal-urea fertiliser reduces nitrogen loss compared to urea alone. Sci Total Environ 601–602:1496–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.270
Rose MT, Perkins EL, Saha BK, Tang ECW, Cavagnaro TR, Jackson WR, Hapgood KP, Hoadley AFA, Patti AF (2016) A slow release nitrogen fertiliser produced by simultaneous granulation and superheated steam drying of urea with brown coal. Chem Biol Technol Agric 3:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0062-8
Dimin MF, Sian-Meng S, Shaaban A, Hashim MM (2014) Urea impregnated biochar to minimize nutrients loss in paddy soils. Internatl J Automot Mech Eng (IJAME) 10:2016–2024. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.10.2014.18.0169
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 [process number 88881.189377/2018-01]; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia is also acknowledged for financial support [Projects to CQE (UIDB/MULTI/00100/2020 and UIDP/00100/2020) and IMS (LA/P/0056/2020)]; and Qualitec Program (Call2018) from Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Luna, A. S. thanks to FAPERJ—Programa Cientista de Nosso Estado, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro -Programa Pró-Ciência and CNPq – Bolsa de Produtividade, nível 1D—for financial support.
Funding
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Programa Qualitec—Call2018,Luana Baia, IC-PIBIC, Juliana Leitão, Programa Pró-Ciência, Aderval Luna,Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Finance Code 001 [process number 88881.189377/2018–01], Luana Baia, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, [Projects to CQE (UIDB/MULTI/00100/2020 and UIDP/00100/2020) and IMS (LA/P/0056/2020)], Ana Paula de Carvalho, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Programa Cientista de Nosso Estado, Aderval Luna, Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas CNPQ, Bolsa de Produtividade, Aderval Luna,nível 1D, Aderval Luna
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Below, it can find the formulas used in the quantification techniques of this work.
Pyrolysis yield
In which: m0—initial biomass mass (g);
mf—biochar final mass (g).
Percentual of the initial release
In which: mu0—urea mass quantified in the volume of liquid recovered at the first monitoring point (t = 20 min);
mut—total mass of urea in the release agent (t = 0).
Volatile matter (vm)
In which: md—the mass of dried sample (g);
mh—mass post-heating (g).
Ash content (ac)
In which: ma—ash mass after the final heating (g);
md—the mass of dried sample (g).
Boehm titration
In which:
ncsf—the amount of acid functional groups on the surface of the solid that reacted with the base (mol.g−1);
Nb—concentration of the titrant (mol dm−3 −1);
Vam—Volume of titrant spent with the sample (dm−3);
Vb—Volume of titrant spent on blank titrations (dm−3);
Val—Filtrate aliquot volume (dm−3);
VT—Volume of solution added to the coal (dm−3);
mbu—the mass of previously dried biochar (g) (Table 3).
In the calculation of alkaline groups, the order of subtraction was inverted from (Vam—Vb) to (Vb—Vam).
Appendix B
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baia, L.V., Luna, A.S., Leitão, J.P.S. et al. Investigation of biomass waste biochar production to act as matrix for urea. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24, 606–617 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01345-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01345-x