Abstract
The South Asian circulation and precipitation in spring shows a clear seasonal transition and interannual variation. We investigate how the North Atlantic sea surface temperature (SST) and Tibetan Plateau (TP) forcing affect this seasonal transition over South Asia on interannual timescale. Our results suggest that North Atlantic SST can affect the seasonal transition of South Asian monsoon via TP forcing in spring. The positive tripole pattern of North Atlantic SST anomaly during winter–spring can trigger a steady downstream Rossby wave train with cyclonic circulation over the southwestern TP. This forms a spring dipole mode of surface sensible heating and 10 m winds over the plateau, with a westerly (easterly) flow and positive (negative) surface sensible heating over its southern (northern) regions. A distinct land–air coupling configuration in May is then generated on the southwestern TP via such a positive TP dipole mode, which consists of anomalous positive precipitation, negative surface sensible heating and a baroclinic circulation structure with cyclonic circulation in the mid- to upper troposphere and a shallow anticyclonic circulation in the lower layer. The anticyclonic circulation is opposite to the summertime monsoon circulation. It weakens the cross-equatorial flow and water vapor transport to the South Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal, resulting in in-situ precipitation reduction. Consequently, the seasonal transition in circulation over South Asia from winter to summer is delayed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In South Asia, the seasonal transition features as the onset of the monsoon associated with strong rainfall, which is usually considered to be a consequence of the atmospheric circulation response to the seasonal transition of the land–sea thermal contrast induced by the annual cycle of solar radiation (Webster et al. 1998). The concept of a “monsoon year” was proposed to highlight the fact that May is a seasonal transition month (Yasunari 1991). It is during early May that the Bay of Bengal (BOB) summer monsoon builds up and monsoon precipitation starts to develop in South Asia (Wang and LinHo 2002; Liang et al. 2005; Li and Zhang 2009; Wu et al. 2012). BOB monsoon is followed by the South China Sea monsoon, the Indian monsoon and the Asian-Pacific monsoon (Wu and Zhang 1998; Wu and Wang 2001; LinHo and Wang 2002; Ding and Chan 2005; Wang et al. 2004, 2009; Shin and Huang; 2016). From April to May, precipitation is significantly enhanced over the BOB and South Arabian Sea (SAS) (Deng et al. 2016). This increases the probability of flooding in the surrounding countries (e.g., Bangladesh, India, Burma and China), which may result in massive losses to agriculture and the economy (Gadgil et al. 2004; Webster and Hoyos 2004; Chen et al. 2006). The intense release of condensational latent heat associated with deep convection modulates the atmospheric circulation by triggering atmospheric waves (Wang 1988; Wang and Li 1994; Xie et al. 2009; Shin et al. 2019).
The seasonal transition and precipitation in May over the BOB and SAS show a significant interannual variability (Deng et al. 2016). Extensive researches have been conducted in exploring the factors affecting the interannual variability of the seasonal transition and precipitation over the SAS and BOB regions. These include the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) (Mao and Wu 2007; Deng et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2017), the interannual variability of the local sea surface temperature (SST) (Jiang and Li 2011; Yu et al. 2012) and the timing of the South Asian High (SAH) establishment over the Indochina Peninsula (Wang and Guo 2012). In addition to these signals of tropical origin, the influence of the Europe–West Asia teleconnection from high latitudes has also been considered (Deng et al. 2016).
The TP which is located in the subtropics plays an important role in the regional and global climate as a result of its high mean elevation of 4 km, huge size of greater than 2.5 × 106 km2 and variety of complex landscapes (Yanai and Wu 2006; Wu and Liu 2016). The dynamical and thermo-dynamical status over the elevated TP is a prominent source of atmospheric forcing in the subtropics, the so-called TP forcing. The TP forcing can modulate the atmospheric circulation over the whole globe (Duan and Wu 2005; Liu et al. 2007, 2020; Wu et al. 1997, 2007; Tamura and Koike 2010; Wang et al. 2018a, b). Besides the studies of the TP influence on the mean circulation and climate, the influence of TP thermal forcing on interannual variation of the Asian summer monsoon has also been well addressed (Zhao and Chen 2001; Wang et al. 2008; Lau and Kim 2018). There is a significant positive correlation between the intensity of spring (March, April, and May)—summer TP heat source and summer monsoon precipitation in the Yangtze River valley and a negative correlation in southern and northern China (Zhao and Chen 2001; Hsu and Liu 2003; Cui et al. 2015). The strong spring surface sensible heating (SH) over the central-western TP can lead to an early onset of the Indian summer monsoon (Zhang et al. 2015).
Surface SH over the TP is the dominant source of diabatic heating and reaches its maximum during the boreal spring (Yeh and Gao 1979; Liu et al. 2015; Duan et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2019). The positive surface SH anomaly over the TP generates negative vorticity anomaly at higher levels, which influences the atmospheric circulation across the northern hemisphere by triggering Rossby wave trains (Wu et al. 1996, 2015, 2016; Liu et al. 2017). Most previous studies generally used a prescribed or area-averaged SH over the TP to investigate its impact on climate (Wu and Zhang 1998; Duan et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2007, 2012). A recent study based on station data indicated that the first leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) mode of spring and summer SH over the TP on an interannual timescale has an out-of-phase distribution between the south and north (Yu et al. 2018b). It is unclear whether there are different impacts on the seasonal transition over South Asia among the different leading modes of the TP SH. More importantly, SH over the TP is not only the forcing source of atmospheric circulation, but is also a result of the atmospheric circulation. Therefore determining the mechanisms involved in the generation of the springtime SH over the TP is challenging and requires further investigation.
The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is the prominent atmospheric mode at mid- and high latitudes in boreal winter (Cayan 1992a, b). The local latent and sensible heat fluxes associated with the NAO can trigger a tripole pattern of SST anomaly (SSTA) in the North Atlantic in winter, which usually persists into the spring or even summer (Cayan 1992a, b; Deser and Timlin 1997; Czaja and Frankignoul 2002; Herceg-Bulić and Kucharski 2014; Zheng et al. 2016). A significant positive feedback exists between this tripole SSTA pattern and the NAO (Watanabe and Kimoto 2000; Pan 2005). It has been reported that North Atlantic SST (NASST) produces a memory in the ocean, allowing winter–spring NAO to affect the Indian summer monsoon and precipitation in the surrounding regions (Srivastava et al. 2002; Goswami et al. 2006). However, because there is a deep layer of easterly winds in the tropics that Rossby waves cannot penetrate, it is unclear how the winter–spring NASST in high latitudes related to the NAO can directly or indirectly affect the seasonal transition of circulation and precipitation over South Asia in the tropics.
There is a clear impact of the winter–spring NASST/NAO on the spring atmospheric circulation and surface heating over the TP (Yu and Zhou 2004; Li et al. 2005, 2008; Cui et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2019). Li et al. (2005) showed that during positive NAO phases in winter the westerly flow is enhanced and can induce an abnormal ascending motion and the formation of mid-tropospheric stratiform clouds over the TP. This results in the decrease of surface air temperature over the TP in March through a positive cloud–temperature feedback. Cui et al. (2015) demonstrated that a steady downstream Rossby wave train stretching from North Atlantic to the TP was stimulated by the tripole NASST/NAO in early spring, which intensifies the spring westerly jet and SH over the TP.
In view of the importance of SH over the TP on the spring circulation over South Asia and its close connection with the preceding NASST, it is reasonable to infer that the interannual variability in the seasonal transition and precipitation over South Asia may be influenced by the winter–spring NASST through the modulation of TP forcing in spring. This study verifies this hypothesis by addressing the following questions. (1) Can the winter–spring NASST anomaly directly affect the seasonal transition and associated precipitation over South Asia? (2) What is the role of spring TP forcing in relaying the influence of the NASST on the circulation over South Asia? (3) How does the spring TP forcing affect the seasonal transition and associated precipitation over South Asia? Our focus is on how the NASST and the TP forcing influence the seasonal transition of circulation and precipitation over South Asia, instead of the detailed evolution of the onset of the South Asian summer monsoon (SASM).
The remainder of this paper is arranged as follows. Section 2 describes the data, methods and numerical model used for the study. Section 3 presents the spring climate features over South Asia and the TP. Section 4 investigates the possible impact of the winter–spring NASST on TP forcing in spring and their combined effect on the spring climate over South Asia. Section 5 discusses the physics of influence of the NASST on TP forcing in spring based on data diagnosis and numerical simulations. The physical mechanisms of influence of spring TP forcing on the seasonal transition of the SASM and the associated circulation and precipitation over South Asia are investigated in Sect. 6. A summary and discussion are presented in Sect. 7.
2 Data, methods and model
2.1 Data
Quality-controlled surface meteorological observations are obtained from 73 stations on the TP, which were derived from the China Meteorology Administration (https://data.cma.cn/). The variables used for this study include the surface air temperature (Ta), the 10 m wind speed (V10) and the land surface temperature (Ts); these measurements are made four times each day. Because reanalysis datasets are subject to uncertainties, we selected three different types of monthly atmospheric reanalysis data for comparison: (1) the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 (MERRA-2) dataset with a horizontal resolution of 0.625° × 0.5° and 42 vertical pressure levels (https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/GMAO_products/reanalysis_products.php; Gelaro et al. 2017); (2) the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) dataset with a horizontal resolution of 1.25° × 1.25° (https://jra.kishou.go.jp/JRA-55/index_en.html; Kobayashi et al. 2015); and (3) the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim (ERA-Interim) reanalysis dataset with a horizontal resolution of 0.75° × 0.75° (https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets; Dee et al. 2011). Monthly precipitation data were provided by version 2.3 of the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) with a horizontal resolution of 2.5° × 2.5° (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.gpcp.html; Adler et al. 2003). Monthly SST data were provided by the Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature Data Set Version 1 (HadISST1) with a horizontal resolution of 1° × 1° (https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadisst; Rayner et al. 2003).
All these datasets cover the time period 1980–2014. A 2–9 years bandpass Lanczos filter was applied to these datasets after the linear trends had been removed to extract the signals of interannual variability (Sun et al. 2019).
2.2 Methods
The bulk aerodynamic formula is employed to calculate the SH, which is defined as:
\(\rho\), \({C}_{p}\) and \({C}_{H}\) are separately the air density, the specific heat of dry air at a constant pressure and the drag coefficient for heat (for details, see Duan and Wu 2008). \(V\), \({T}_{s}\) and \({T}_{a}\) are derived from the local four times each day observations at all 73 stations over the TP. This equation has been widely used in studies related to the TP (Yeh and Gao 1979; Li and Yanai 1996; Duan and Wu 2008; Yang et al. 2011; Wang and Guo 2012).
Several statistical methods are utilized in this study, which includes EOF analysis, linear regression, correlation, partial correlation and composite analysis. To diagnose the generation and propagation of Rossby waves, the wave activity flux derived from Takaya and Nakamura (2001) is employed. We used the Niño3.4 index (area-averaged SSTA over 5° S–5° N, 170°–120° W) to measure the strength of ENSO events. Spring is defined as the period from March to May.
The partial correlation is calculated based on the following formula:
\({r}_{12}\) is the correlation coefficient between variable 1 and variable 2, \({r}_{13}\) and \({r}_{23}\) are similar with \({r}_{12}\). \({r}_{\mathrm{12,3}}\) is the partial correlation coefficient between variable 1 and variable 2 with variable 3 removed (Zar 2010).
To evaluate the statistical significance of our results, the two-tailed Student’s t-test is employed, among which the degree of effective freedom \({N}_{e}\) is defined as:
\({N}_{o}\) illustrates the original sample size. \({r}_{1}\) and \({r}_{2}\) are separately the lag 1 auto-correlation coefficients of two series (Bretherton et al. 1999).
2.3 Model
We used version 2 of the finite-volume atmospheric model (FAMIL2) atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM), the latest generation AGCM of the State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (Bao et al. 2019; Li et al. 2019). This is the atmospheric component of the climate system model CAS FGOALS-f2. We used the version with a horizontal resolution of C96 (about 100 km) and 32 vertical levels extending from the surface to 1 hPa.
FAMIL2 uses a finite-volume dynamic core (Lin 2004) and a cubed-sphere grid system (Putman and Lin 2007). A resolving convective precipitation parameterization (©2017 FAMIL Development Team) is also used, in which the microphysical processes are calculated in the cumulus scheme for both shallow and deep convection (Lin et al. 1983; Harris and Lin 2014; Li et al. 2019). CAS FGOALS-f2 participated in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). It showed a good performance in the simulation of precipitation over the TP and East Asia, the characteristics of the ENSO and the propagation of the Madden–Julian oscillation (Yu et al. 2018a; Bao et al. 2019; He et al. 2019; Li et al. 2019).
3 Spring climate features over South Asia and the Tibetan Plateau
3.1 Features of circulation and precipitation over South Asia in late spring
The most distinct feature of seasonal transition of boreal spring circulation over South Asia is the onset of the BOB summer monsoon. The easterly flow at lower levels dominates the SAS and central BOB in April (Fig. 1a). It abruptly changes to southwesterly in May (Fig. 1b), accompanied by a significant increase in precipitation over the BOB, SAS and Indochina Peninsula with the value above 3 mm day−1 (Fig. 1c).
The regions (BOB and SAS) with a significant increase in precipitation from April to May (red boxes in Fig. 1c) are coincident with the areas of strong interannual variability of precipitation in May (red boxes in Fig. 1b). The interannual standard deviation of precipitation over these regions in May is greater than 2 mm day−1. This indicates that the seasonal transition of circulation and precipitation over South Asia in late spring is closely linked with the corresponding variability in May because the onset of the BOB summer monsoon usually occurs in early May. Therefore, we use the precipitation anomalies in May over South Asia to represent the anomalous seasonal transition of SASM (Xiang and Wang 2013). The precipitation anomalies in May over the SAS (area-averaged over 4°–14° N, 57°–75° E) and the BOB (area-averaged over 8°–26° N, 87°–100° E) regions (red boxes in Fig. 1b) are highly correlated (0.63, exceeding the 99% confidence level).
A seasonal transition index (STI) is defined as May precipitation anomalies averaged over the SAS and the BOB regions, as shown in two red boxes in Fig. 1b–d. A positive STI implies an earlier seasonal transition of SASM, whereas a negative STI implies a delayed seasonal transition of SASM.
Figure 1d shows the regression pattern of precipitation in May against the STI. The SAS and BOB are occupied with notable positive precipitation anomalies, whereas remarkable negative precipitation anomalies occur over the southwestern TP and northwestern India. The correlation coefficient between May precipitation over southwestern TP (area-averaged over 27°–37° N, 65°–78° E) and SAS is − 0.39 (at 95% confidence level) and the correlation coefficient between May precipitation over southwestern TP and BOB in May is − 0.76 (at 99% confidence level). These results suggest that the earlier seasonal transition in the SASM corresponds to more precipitation over the SAS and BOB and below-normal precipitation over the southwestern TP, and vice versa.
3.2 Features of surface sensible heating and wind over the Tibetan Plateau in spring
Conventional observation stations are sparse over the TP, mainly due to the complex terrain, and therefore the estimation of the surface SH distribution over the TP is still controversial. Previous studies have shown that the JRA-55 and ERA-Interim reanalysis datasets perform better in estimating the SH over the TP (Zhu et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2015). Recently released MERRA-2 reanalysis dataset has also been used in climate research and performs better than the MERRA reanalysis dataset with respect to the water source, the land surface energy budget and the 2 m air temperature (Selkirk et al. 2015; Draper et al. 2018). We explore the discrepancies between the observations and the three reanalysis datasets through comparing the interannual variability of SH over the TP above 2000 m. The spatial distribution of the first two EOFs based on both the observations and reanalysis dataset represent either a dipole between the southeastern and northwestern TP or a nearly uniform mode (Fig. S1). The dipole modes of SH over the TP extracted from these four datasets show a high consistency on the interannual time scale, whereas the uniform modes of SH are generally not consistent with each other (Fig. S2). Caution should therefore be taken when we use these SH datasets.
According to Eq. (1), the factors (Ts–Ta) and V10 are the dominant elements determining the magnitude of SH. On decadal timescale, (Ts–Ta) presents a smaller change than V10 (Yeh and Gao 1979; Liu et al. 2012). Regarding the interannual variability, Duan and Wu (2009) and Yu et al. (2018b) found that the contribution of V10 to the variation in spring SH over the TP is larger than that of (Ts–Ta) based on partial correlation and multiple linear regression. It means that the interannual variation of spring SH over the TP largely depends on the variation in V10.
Figure 2 shows the first two leading EOF modes for the spring V10 over the TP region above 2000 m based on the four datasets. The EOF1 of V10 in spring represents a uniform mode (Fig. 2a, c, e, g), and the correlation coefficients between PC1 of observation and PC1 of MERRA-2, JRA-55 and ERA-Interim reanalysis datasets are 0.91, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively (Fig. S3). The EOF2 represents a south–north dipole mode (Fig. 2b, d, f, h), and the correlation coefficients between PC2 of observation and PC2 of MERRA-2, JRA-55 and ERA-Interim reanalysis datasets are 0.82, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively (Fig. S3). The correlation coefficients are all above the 99% confidence level, indicating that the interannual variations in V10 over the TP derived from the four datasets are highly consistent and MERRA-2 dataset is most consistent with observation. Due to the deficiency of station data over the TP (especially in the western TP), the MERRA-2 dataset was selected for the subsequent analysis.
Considering the consistent variation in the uniform mode, we calculated the area-averaged V10 over the TP region (25°–40° N, 70°–105° E) above 2000 m and defined a surface wind index (V10I1) to represent the temporal evolution of the uniform mode. The area-averaged difference in V10 between the southern TP (27°–31° N, 84°–102° E) and the northern TP (34°–39° N, 88°–103° E) above 2000 m is defined as another surface wind index (V10I2) (boxes in Fig. 2b, d, f, h) to represent the temporal evolution of the dipole mode. The correlation coefficient between V10I1 (V10I2) and the PC1 (PC2) of V10 extracted from the MERRA-2 dataset is 0.99 (0.94), significant at the 99% confidence level. Therefore V10I1 and V10I2 extracted from the MERRA-2 dataset were used to represent the uniform mode and dipole mode, respectively, of V10 in spring over the TP.
The relationship between the spring V10 and surface SH over the TP is also explored. It is obvious that during the positive V10I1 years, a positive SH anomaly with the center located in the central TP, and a westerly anomaly of V10 occurred over the TP (Fig. 3b) which enhanced the climatological mean V10 (Fig. 3a). The correlation coefficient between V10I1 and the PC2 (PC1) of SH uniform mode based on station data (the MERRA-2 dataset) is 0.65 (0.67), exceeding the 99% confidence level. This implies that the uniform mode of V10 can well represent the uniform mode of SH over the TP. As for the dipole mode, there is a positive SH anomaly over the southeastern TP and a negative SH anomaly over the western and northern TP during the positive V10I2 years (Fig. 3c). Correspondingly, the southwesterly anomaly of V10 occupies the southern TP, while the easterly anomaly occurs in the northern TP (Fig. 3c), which enhanced (weakened) the climatological mean V10 on the southern (northern) TP (Fig. 3a). The correlation coefficient between V10I2 and the PC1 (PC2) of SH dipole mode based on station data (the MERRA-2 dataset) is 0.55 (0.39), which is significant at the 99% (95%) confidence level. Therefore the dipole mode of V10 can also be used to represent the dipole mode of SH over the TP.
4 Impacts of the Tibetan Plateau forcing in spring and North Atlantic SST on precipitation in South Asia
4.1 Impacts of spring Tibetan Plateau forcing on precipitation in South Asia
Considering that the spring SH anomaly over the TP and the associated circulations might influence precipitation over the SAS and BOB regions, we investigate the correlation pattern between V10I1 and precipitation in May (Fig. 4b). The correlation coefficient between V10I1 and STI is only − 0.11, indicating that the spring uniform SH and surface westerly winds over the TP might not be correlated with precipitation anomaly over the SAS and BOB in May. By contrast, the correlation pattern between V10I2 and precipitation in May presents significant negative correlations over the SAS, the northeastern BOB and the southeastern TP and positive correlations in the southwestern and northern TP (Fig. 4c). This pattern resembles the regression map of the precipitation anomaly against the STI (Fig. 1d), which indicates that the variation in precipitation over the SAS and BOB is of opposite sign to that over the southwestern TP. Such a close connection is also apparent from the time series of the normalized V10I2 (red solid curve in Fig. 4a) and negative STI (green solid curve in Fig. 4a). The correlation coefficient between V10I2 and STI is significant (− 0.55). It is evident that the seasonal transition of the SASM and the associated precipitation anomaly over the SAS, BOB and southwestern TP in May are closely connected to the spring dipole modes of SH and V10 over the TP. The relationship of more precipitation and less SH over the southwestern TP will be presented in Sect. 6.
Previous studies have shown that the ENSO is a dominant signal of the climate system in terms of interannual variability and is an important factor in regulating the interannual variation of precipitation over the SAS and BOB in spring (Mao and Wu 2007; Deng et al. 2016). Figure 4d shows that warm ENSO events are highly correlated with a distinct reduction in precipitation over the Arabian Sea, BOB, Indochina Peninsula and southeastern TP and a significant increase in precipitation over the southwestern TP in May. Similar features are also revealed by the correlation coefficient between the Niño3.4 index in May (blue solid curve in Fig. 4a) and the STI (− 0.52, significant at the 99% confidence level). To explore whether the impacts of SH over the TP and the V10 dipole modes on the seasonal transition of the SASM and associated precipitation over the SAS and BOB are independent of the ENSO, we calculated the partial correlation [Eq. (2)] between May precipitation and V10I2 with the May Niño3.4 signal removed (Fig. 4e). The spatial pattern is similar to the original correlation pattern between the V10I2 and May precipitation (Fig. 4c). The partial correlation coefficient between V10I2 and STI with removing the May Niño3.4 signal is − 0.54, nearly the same as the original correlation coefficient between V10I2 and STI (− 0.55). These results imply that the spring dipole modes of SH and V10 over the TP affect the seasonal transition of the SASM and the associated precipitation over the SAS, BOB and southwestern TP, which are independent of the ENSO.
4.2 Impacts of the North Atlantic SST on precipitation in South Asia relayed by Tibetan Plateau forcing
The NASST influences the variation of spring SH and the westerly jet over the TP through triggering a steady downstream Rossby wave train, which extends from the North Atlantic to the TP (Cui et al. 2015). The correlation maps between V10I2 and the monthly mean NASST from the preceding January to May show that a significant tripole SSTA pattern exists over the North Atlantic (Fig. 5a–e). This pattern is sustained throughout the whole winter and spring as a result of the large heat content of the ocean and reaches a peak in March. The SSTA averaged over the warm core region in the central North Atlantic (the green box in Fig. 5c; 30°–40° N, 70°–50° W) is defined as the SSTW_C, the SSTA averaged over the cold core region in the subtropics (the southern red box in Fig. 5c; 15°–25° N, 40°–20° W) is defined as the SSTC_S and in the subpolar area (the northern red box in Fig. 5c; 50°–60° N, 48°–28° W) is defined as the SSTC_N. Thus an SSTI is constructed to depict this tripole SSTA pattern:
During the period from January to May, the SSTI of each month is highly correlated with the SSTIs of the other months (exceeding the 99% confidence level), except for the correlation coefficient between January and May (0.29, significant at the 90% confidence level), which further confirms the strong persistence of the tripole SSTA pattern over the North Atlantic (Cayan 1992a, b; Herceg-Bulić and Kucharski 2014). For convenience, we used the March SSTI to represent the North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern during winter and spring. The correlation coefficient between SSTI in March and V10I2 is 0.57, which is significant at 99% confidence level, implying that the winter–spring North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern may induce the dipole modes of SH and V10 over the TP. As revealed by Cui et al. (2015), the leading mode (EOF1) of the interannual component of the NASST in March is a tripole pattern (Fig. 5f). This mode is similar to the correlation pattern between the NASST in March and V10I2 (Fig. 5c). The time series of the normalized March SSTI (red solid curve in Fig. 5g) and PC1 of the NASST in March (SST_PC1, blue solid curve in Fig. 5g) or the mean of February to April are all significantly correlated, with the correlation coefficient more than 0.80.
We also examined the relationship between the winter–spring NASST and May precipitation over South Asia. The positive North Atlantic SSTA tripole pattern during winter–spring is significantly correlated with the negative precipitation anomaly over the SAS and northeastern BOB and the positive precipitation anomaly over the southwestern TP in May (Fig. 6a), similar to the distribution pattern illustrated in Fig. 1d. The correlation coefficient between the March SSTI and STI is − 0.38, which is significant at 95% confidence level. However, the partial correlation coefficient between the March SSTI and the STI after removing V10I2 is only − 0.03, which suggests that there is no evident precipitation anomaly over the SAS, BOB and the southwestern TP (Fig. 6b). The above analysis indicates that the winter–spring North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern might influence the seasonal transition over South Asia and the associated precipitation with the involvement of TP forcing in spring.
5 Influence of North Atlantic SST on Tibetan Plateau forcing in spring
5.1 Data diagnosis
The North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern is closely coupled with the atmospheric NAO in winter. These SST anomalies can influence the atmospheric thermal structure via translating anomalous diabatic heating into the atmosphere. The March SSTI regressed SST, surface air temperature Ta, air temperature in the mid- to upper troposphere and atmospheric circulation in March are presented in Fig. 7. The spatial pattern of Ta (Fig. 7b) is similar to the SST pattern (Fig. 7a), indicating the significant thermal impact of the SST tripole on the surface air temperature which also features the tripole configuration over the North Atlantic. Subject to the thermal wind relation, a near surface strong easterly flow is located between the tropical cold pole and the subtropical warm pole, while a strong westerly flow is located between the subtropical warm pole and the subpolar cold pole (Fig. 7a, b). A unique anticyclone circulation is thus forced over the central North Atlantic. Due to the geostrophic advection limit in the extratropics (Smagorinsky 1953), this anticyclone circulation exists also in the mid- to upper troposphere accompanied with cyclonic circulations to its south and north (Fig. 7c, d), presenting an equivalent barotropic structure and forming a NAO like circulation over the North Atlantic.
To investigate the mechanism linking the winter–spring NAO/North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern and the TP V10 dipole mode, the spring atmospheric circulation and wave activity flux were regressed onto the March SSTI (Fig. 8). There is a typical Rossby wave train with four centers extending from the middle of the North Atlantic to the western TP at 500 hPa (Fig. 8a). The four centers are located in the middle of the North Atlantic (marked A), the northern North Atlantic (marked B), western Europe (marked C) and the western TP (marked D), respectively. Geopotential height anomaly is positive in A and C and negative in B and D. This spatial distribution of geopotential height anomaly refers to as the North Atlantic–Europe–TP (NaET) wave train in later study. Figure 8b shows a zonal-vertical cross-section of geopotential height along the wave train linking A, B, C and D shown in Fig. 8a. An approximate equivalent barotropic structure appears from the middle of the North Atlantic to the western TP throughout almost the entire troposphere. A similar wave train is also found in the vorticity anomalies at 300 hPa (Fig. 8c). Through diagnosing wave activity flux, we find that the wave energy originates from the region just above the warm center of the North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern and propagates eastward to the western TP (Fig. 8c). An anomalous cyclonic circulation appears over the western TP, accompanied by a westerly anomaly over the southern TP and an easterly anomaly over the northern TP (Fig. 8b, d). The regressed surface wind pattern over the TP (Fig. 8e) is similar to the corresponding pattern at 500 hPa and is indeed mimicking the dipole mode of V10 as shown in Fig. 3c. This is because the average altitude of the TP exceeds 4000 m, so that the dipole mode of surface wind V10 over the TP (Figs. 3c, 8e) is consistent with the wind pattern at 500 hPa (Fig. 8d). In short, the winter–spring North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern significantly affects the generation of the TP V10 dipole pattern in spring via the NaET wave train.
Focusing on the month-to-month variations, Fig. 9 presents the composite difference fields of the 500 hPa geopotential height between seven strong positive tripole SSTA years (1986, 1989, 1999, 2008, 2009, 2012 and 2014) and six strong negative tripole SSTA years (1981, 1987, 1988, 1998, 2010 and 2013). The criterion is ± 0.75 standard deviations for the normalized time series of the March SSTI (red solid curve in Fig. 5g). The results confirm the existence of the NaET wave train in March (Fig. 9a), similar to the results for spring (Fig. 8a). However, the wave train is more zonal in April (Fig. 9b). The wavelength of the wave train in May (Fig. 9c) becomes smaller than that in March and April, which could be attributed to the significant change in the general circulation during May (Yasunari 1991; Lau and Yang 1997; Matsumoto 1997). The eastward shift in the NaET wave train is small from March to May, presenting a quasi-stationary pattern. Despite these month-to-month differences, it is evident that, associated with the persistent North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern, a negative geopotential height anomaly center occurs in the western TP during the whole spring that corresponds to the V10 dipole mode over the TP.
5.2 Numerical experiments
We further clarified these processes by conducting three AGCM experiments (CTRL, NA-POS and NA-NEG) based on FAMIL2. The experimental design is detailed in Table 1.
The control run (CTRL) experiment was an AMIP run using the monthly mean climatological SSTs averaged during 1980–2014 as the lower boundary conditions. The other external forcing fields (e.g., the greenhouse gases, aerosols, and volcanic and solar activity) were set as their climatological values. The CTRL experiment was integrated for 24 years. Only the last 20 years were utilized for the analysis. Two sets of SSTA sensitivity experiments were performed. Each set included 20 members integrated from January 1 to May 31, with the initial fields taken from every January 1 of the last 20 years of the CTRL experiment. One of the SSTA sensitivity experiments was forced by the double-composite SSTA in the seven strong positive tripole SSTA years from January to May over the North Atlantic (10°–70° N, 100° W–10° E), which is referred to as the NA-POS experiment. Another SSTA sensitivity experiment, NA-NEG, is the same as NA-POS, but forced by the prescribed strong negative tripole SSTA pattern with a double magnitude. The magnitude of the double positive (negative) composite SSTA is smaller (larger) than the maximum (minimum) SSTA that occurred in 2014 (2010) in the North Atlantic (Fig. 5g). Therefore it is acceptable to use the double observational SSTA in the North Atlantic as the SSTA in the sensitivity experiments. The differences between the NA-POS and NA-NEG ensemble means were evaluated to assess the impact of the North Atlantic tripole SSTA on circulation and climate.
Figure 10 illustrates the difference fields of geopotential height between the NA-POS and NA-NEG ensemble means. The NaET wave train with four centers extending from the middle of the North Atlantic to the western TP in spring (Fig. 10a) is well simulated. The zonal-vertical cross-section of geopotential height also reveals an equivalent barotropic structure along the wave train in the troposphere (Fig. 10b). These results are consistent with the observed change in circulation owing to the tripole SSTA in the North Atlantic during spring (Fig. 8a, b). The observed and simulated quasi-stationary wave trains are similar in March (Figs. 9a, 10c). However, compared with the results based on observations in April and May (Fig. 9b, c), the evolution of the wave trains is slower in the sensitivity experiments (Fig. 10d, e). This might be because the sensitivity experiments only consider North Atlantic tripole SSTA forcing. Other extra forcings, such as air–sea interactions over the Atlantic Ocean in the AGCM are ignored. Despite this difference, the simulated and observed results both present a quasi-stationary wave train extending from the North Atlantic to the western TP in the mid- to upper troposphere that leads to a negative geopotential height anomaly center over the western TP during the whole spring, corresponding to the V10 dipole pattern over the TP.
6 Mechanisms linking the Tibetan Plateau forcing in spring to the seasonal transition over South Asia
The above analyses signify that the winter–spring tripole SSTA pattern over North Atlantic is crucial to the occurrence of the spring V10 dipole mode over the TP. We next explore the impacts of the V10 dipole mode over the TP on surface heating and atmospheric circulation. Figure 11 presents the composite differences in SH and circulation over the TP and surrounding regions between nine strong positive V10 dipole years (V10I2 greater than 0.7 standard deviations in 1982, 1986, 1989, 1992, 1997, 2005, 2009, 2012 and 2014) and eight strong negative V10 dipole years (V10I2 less than − 0.7 standard deviations in 1980, 1984, 1988, 1990, 2002, 2006, 2007 and 2010). The results are insensitive to the value of the standard deviation threshold, with ± 0.7 chosen because it allows more composite members to be included.
Figure 11a–f shows the month-to-month evolution of the difference in geopotential height and vorticity along the zonal-vertical cross-section averaged between 30° and 35° N. There is a baroclinic structure with a deep and strong negative geopotential height anomaly in the mid- to upper troposphere centered at 200 hPa, but a shallow and weak positive anomaly at lower levels over the western TP during March to May (Fig. 11a, c, e). The negative geopotential height anomaly in the mid- to upper troposphere is coordinated with the positive vorticity anomaly, whereas the positive geopotential height anomaly in the lower layer is coordinated with the negative vorticity anomaly (Fig. 11b, d, f). The slowly eastward shift in this baroclinic structure from March to May is similar to the NaET quasi-stationary wave train induced by NASST anomalies (Fig. 9a–c). This baroclinic structure in April and May based on V10I2 is also consistent with the regressed spring baroclinic structure at D (Fig. 8b) with a negative geopotential height anomaly above 850 hPa and a positive anomaly below, although the positive anomaly in Fig. 8b is shallower and closer to the surface. This implies that the baroclinic structure in geopotential height over the western TP based on V10I2 is significantly influenced by TP thermal forcing.
In spring, a negative geopotential height anomaly center at 500 hPa appears over the western TP, accompanied with a westerly anomaly over the southern TP and an easterly anomaly over the northern TP (Fig. 11g). Similar to the composite 500 hPa wind over the TP, the spring regression pattern of V10 against V10I2 also shows a dipole mode over the TP with the regressed surface SH increased in its southeast and decreased in its west and north during spring (Fig. 3c). In Sect. 4, we have demonstrated that the seasonal transition in the SASM and the associated precipitation over the SAS, BOB and the southwestern TP in May are closely related to the spring TP V10 as well as SH dipole modes. The composite differences in surface SH and V10 also show a dipole mode distribution over the TP in May (Fig. 11h), in agreement with the results for the spring period (Fig. 3c).
Previous studies revealed that a positive heating, either a source of condensation heating or surface SH, can stimulate an anticyclonic circulation with negative vorticity in the mid- to upper troposphere and a cyclonic circulation near the surface (Hoskins et al. 1985; Wu and Liu 2000; Liu et al. 2001; Wu et al. 2007). By contrast, a negative SH anomaly near the surface can generate a vertical baroclinic structure with shallow anticyclonic circulation and positive geopotential height anomalies near the surface, but deep cyclonic circulation and negative geopotential height anomalies in the mid- to upper troposphere. Accordingly, the difference in circulation shown in Fig. 11e–f can be attributed at least partly to a negative anomaly in surface SH over the western TP and northwestern India (Fig. 11h).
In return, the surface SH can also be influenced by the atmospheric circulation (Duan and Wu 2009; Liu et al. 2012). A reduction in V10 or (Ts−Ta) can decrease the surface SH according to Eq. (1) and an increase in precipitation can decrease the local SH by decreasing Ts and (Ts–Ta). As the southwesterly flow of the anomalous cyclone above 700 hPa over the southwestern TP (Fig. 11e, g) is forced to glide upwards along the mountain slope, an abnormal ascent of air develops over the southwestern TP (Fig. 12a). This anomalous southwesterly flow brings abundant water vapor from Arabian Sea to the southwestern TP, resulting in the local convergence of the water vapor flux (Fig. 12b) and an increase in precipitation over the southwestern TP (Fig. 12c). The increased precipitation there then decreases Ts as well as (Ts–Ta) (Fig. 12d) over the southwestern TP and northwestern India, which leads to a reduction in surface SH over these regions (Fig. 11h). It is clear that, over the western TP and northwestern India, there is a positive feedback among the negative SH anomaly, the positive precipitation anomaly and the baroclinic structure with an anomalous cyclonic low in the mid- to upper troposphere (Fig. 12e) and an anticyclonic high at lower levels (Fig. 12f).
An abnormal westerly flow over the tropical SAS and BOB at upper levels (Fig. 12e) is the opposite of the climate mean easterly flow (Figure not shown), which delays the westward development of the SAH in May. At the same time, an abnormal northeasterly flow develops from the southeastern TP to the SAS at lower levels (Fig. 12f), which is opposite to the in-situ climate mean southwesterly flow and the cross-equatorial Somali jet (Fig. 1b). Subsequently, less water vapor is transported to the SAS and BOB regions and a negative precipitation anomaly occurs in these areas (Fig. 12c).
In a word, the above diagnosis demonstrates that the anomalous positive dipole mode of the surface wind and SH over the TP in spring can delay the seasonal advance of the SAH in the upper troposphere and the cross-equatorial Somali jet in the lower layer, leading to a delay in the seasonal transition over South Asia.
From the transient-state geostrophic vorticity equation and the continuity equation, the vertical velocity can be simplified as:
\(\omega\), \(v\) and \(\beta\) are the transient vertical velocity, transient meridional wind and the meridional gradient of the Coriolis parameter, respectively (Wu and Liu 2000; Wu et al. 2015). Thus the anomalous southerly wind at 200 hPa (Fig. 12e) and the northerly wind at 850 hPa and near the surface (Figs. 11h, 12f) in the areas from the southeastern TP to the northern BOB and over the eastern Arabian Sea can lead to descending motion and a negative precipitation anomaly in-situ (Fig. 12a, c). The reduction in precipitation over the southeastern TP then enhances the local SH and helps to maintain the SH dipole mode over the TP (Fig. 11h). Moreover, the reduced precipitation over the BOB and Arabian Sea can lead to the negative diabatic heating anomalies in-situ. Following the theory of Gill (1980), these negative diabatic heating anomalies contribute to the formation of the near-surface anomalous anticyclone to their west just over the India and Arabian Peninsula (Fig. 12f). Therefore, the reduced precipitation over the BOB and Arabian Sea and the negative SH anomaly over the southwestern TP together contributes to the near-surface anomalous anticyclone over the southwest of the TP.
7 Conclusion and discussion
The seasonal transition in spring over South Asia shows a clear interannual variation, although it is unclear how the TP forcing and the North Atlantic SST contribute to this variation. Based on the observational analysis and numerical simulations, we find that the dipole modes of SH and V10 over the TP in spring are influenced by the winter–spring North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern. These dipole modes are crucial to the seasonal transition of the SASM and the associated circulation and precipitation over the SAS, BOB and southwestern TP.
The relevant physical mechanisms can be summarized as follows. The tripole SSTA pattern in the North Atlantic features as a warm core in the middle and two cold cores in the subtropics and subpolar regions. This tripole SSTA pattern is closely coupled with the NAO in winter and can persist into the late spring. Observational analysis shows that the NAO coupled mode in winter and spring can remotely influence circulation and precipitation over South Asia when the TP forcing is included. The remote influence becomes trivial without TP forcing and therefore TP forcing plays a relaying role in this remote influence. This is because a positive winter–spring tripole SSTA pattern in the North Atlantic can trigger a quasi-stationary wave train, which extends from the North Atlantic to the western TP in the mid- to upper troposphere with cyclonic circulation above the western TP. Thus a spring V10 dipole mode with a southwesterly (easterly) anomaly appears over the southern (northern) TP. This is evident in both the observations and numerical sensitivity experiments and is accompanied by a dipole mode of surface SH with a positive sign in the southeastern TP and a negative sign in the western and northern TP.
The cyclone above the western TP generates an abnormal southwesterly airflow, which is forced to glide upwards in the mid-troposphere along the mountain slope and forms an ascending motion over the southwestern TP. The southwesterly airflow brings sufficient water vapor from the Arabian Sea to the southwestern TP, leading to a local increase in precipitation. Hence a positive precipitation anomaly and a negative land–air temperature difference anomaly appear in the southwestern TP, resulting in a negative surface SH anomaly. Such a negative surface SH source leads to a baroclinic circulation structure with an anomalous cyclone in the mid- to upper troposphere and a shallow anticyclone at lower levels over the southwestern TP. Therefore, a positive feedback is established between the negative SH anomaly, the positive precipitation anomaly and the baroclinic structure in the general circulation, with cyclonic circulation in the mid- to upper troposphere and anticyclonic circulation in the lower troposphere over the southwestern TP in May. Such circulation responses over the TP generate an anticyclonic circulation to the southwest of the TP in the lower troposphere. Thus, the anomalous northeasterly flow is appeared over the western Arabian Sea, which is in the opposite direction to the climate mean flow there, leading to the weakening of the cross-equatorial Somali jet and a delay in the seasonal transition over South Asia. Consequently, less water vapor is transported to the SAS and BOB regions and negative precipitation anomalies occur over there. In summary, the North Atlantic tripole SSTA pattern during winter–spring can delay the seasonal transition of the SASM and affect the associated circulation and precipitation over South Asia due to the modulation by TP forcing in spring.
The interannual variation of the seasonal transition and the associated precipitation in spring over South Asia is complex. It is influenced not only by tropical signals (e.g., the ENSO, the local SST and the SAH), but also by mid-latitude factors (e.g., TP forcing and the NAO). Understanding the extent to which these factors synthetically contribute to the seasonal transition of the monsoon circulation and the associated precipitation anomaly over South Asia is crucial in climate prediction and requires further study.
References
Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Chang A et al (2003) The version-2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-present). J Hydrometeorol 4(6):1147–1167. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004%3c1147:tvgpcp%3e2.0.co;2
Bao Q, Wu XF, Li JX et al (2019) Outlook for El Niño and the Indian Ocean Dipole in autumn-winter 2018–2019. Chin Sci Bull 64(1):73–78. https://doi.org/10.1360/N972018-00913
Bretherton CS, Widmann M, Dymnikov VP et al (1999) The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a time-varying field. J Clim 12(7):1990–2009. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012%3c1990:Tenosd%3e2.0.Co;2
Cayan DR (1992a) Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the Northern Oceans: the connection to monthly atmospheric circulation. J Clim 5(4):354–369. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005%3c0354:lashfa%3e2.0.co;2
Cayan DR (1992b) Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the Northern Oceans: driving the sea surface temperature. J Phys Oceanogr 22(8):859–881. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1992)022%3c0859:lashfa%3e2.0.co;2
Chen Y, Ding YH, Xiao ZN et al (2006) The impact of water vapor transport on the summer monsoon onset and abnormal rainfall over Yunnan Province in May. Chin J Atmos Scis 30(1):25–37
Chen L, Pryor SC, Wang H et al (2019) Distribution and variation of the surface sensible heat flux over the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau: comparison of station observations and multireanalysis products. J Geophys Res Atmos 124(12):6191–6206. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd030069
Cui YF, Duan AM, Liu YM et al (2015) Interannual variability of the spring atmospheric heat source over the Tibetan Plateau forced by the North Atlantic SSTA. Clim Dyn 45(5–6):1617–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2417-9
Czaja A, Frankignoul C (2002) Observed impact of Atlantic SST anomalies on the North Atlantic oscillation. J Clim 15(6):606–623. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3c0606:oioasa%3e2.0.co;2
Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
Deng MY, Lu RY, Chen W et al (2016) Interannual variability of precipitation in May over the South Asian monsoonal region. Int J Climatol 36(4):1724–1732. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4454
Deser C, Timlin MS (1997) Atmosphere-ocean interaction on weekly timescales in the North Atlantic and Pacific. J Clim 10(3):393–408. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010%3c0393:aoiowt%3e2.0.co;2
Ding YH, Chan JCL (2005) The East Asian summer monsoon: an overview. Meteorol Atmos Phys 89(1–4):117–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0125-z
Draper CS, Reichle RH, Koster RD (2018) Assessment of MERRA-2 land surface energy flux estimates. J Clim 31(2):671–691. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-17-0121.1
Duan AM, Wu GX (2005) Role of the Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing in the summer climate patterns over subtropical Asia. Clim Dyn 24(7–8):793–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0488-8
Duan AM, Wu GX (2008) Weakening trend in the atmospheric heat source over the Tibetan plateau during recent decades. Part I: observations. J Clim 21(13):3149–3164. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jcli1912.1
Duan AM, Wu GX (2009) Weakening trend in the atmospheric heat source over the Tibetan Plateau during recent decades. Part II: connection with climate warming. J Clim 22(15):4197–4212. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2699.1
Duan AM, Li F, Wang MR et al (2011) Persistent weakening trend in the spring sensible heat source over the Tibetan Plateau and its impact on the Asian summer monsoon. J Clim 24(21):5671–5682. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00052.1
Duan AM, Sun RZ, He JH (2017) Impact of surface sensible heating over the Tibetan Plateau on the western Pacific subtropical high: a land-air-sea interaction perspective. Adv Atmos Sci 34(2):157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6008-z
Gadgil S, Vinayachandran PN, Francis PA et al (2004) Extremes of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall, ENSO and equatorial Indian Ocean oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 31:L12213. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019733
Gelaro R, McCarty W, Suarez MJ et al (2017) The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J Clim 30(14):5419–5454. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0758.1
Gill AE (1980) Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106(449):447–462. https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.44904
Goswami BN, Madhusoodanan MS, Neema CP et al (2006) A physical mechanism for North Atlantic SST influence on the Indian summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02706. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024803
Harris LM, Lin SJ (2014) Global-to-regional nested grid climate simulations in the GFDL high resolution atmospheric model. J Clim 27(13):4890–4910. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-13-00596.1
He SC, Yang J, Bao Q et al (2019) Fidelity of the observational/reanalysis datasets and global climate models in representation of extreme precipitation in East China. J Clim 32(1):195–212. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-18-0104.1
Herceg-Bulić I, Kucharski F (2014) North Atlantic SSTs as a link between the wintertime NAO and the following spring climate. J Clim 27(1):186–201. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00273.1
Hoskins BJ, McIntyre ME, Robertson AW (1985) On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Q J R Meteorol Soc 111(470):877–946. https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.47001
Hsu HH, Liu X (2003) Relationship between the Tibetan plateau heating and east Asian summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys Res Lett 30(20):2066. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017909
Jiang XW, Li JP (2011) Influence of the annual cycle of sea surface temperature on the monsoon onset. J Geophys Res Atmos 116:D10105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015236
Kobayashi S, Ota Y, Harada Y et al (2015) The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 93(1):5–48. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001
Lau WKM, Kim KM (2018) Impact of snow darkening by deposition of light-absorbing aerosols on snow cover in the himalayas-tibetan plateau and influence on the Asian summer monsoon: a possible mechanism for the blanford hypothesis. Atmosphere 9:438. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110438
Lau KM, Yang S (1997) Climatology and interannual variability of the Southeast Asian summer monsoon. Adv Atmos Sci 14(2):141–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-997-0016-y
Li CF, Yanai M (1996) The onset and interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon in relation to land sea thermal contrast. J Clim 9(2):358–375. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009%3c0358:toaivo%3e2.0.co;2
Li JP, Zhang L (2009) Wind onset and withdrawal of Asian summer monsoon and their simulated performance in AMIP models. Clim Dyn 32(7–8):935–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0465-8
Li J, Yu RC, Zhou TJ et al (2005) Why is there an early spring cooling shift downstream of the Tibetan Plateau? J Clim 18(22):4660–4668. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3568.1
Li J, Yu RC, Zhou TJ (2008) Teleconnection between NAO and climate downstream of the Tibetan Plateau. J Clim 21(18):4680–4690. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2053.1
Li JX, Bao Q, Liu YM et al (2019) Evaluation of FAMIL2 in simulating the climatology and seasonal-to-interannual variability of tropical cyclone characteristics. J Adv Model Earth Syst 11:1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001506
Liang XY, Liu YM, Wu GX (2005) The role of land-sea distribution in the formation of the Asian summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 32:L03708. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021587
Lin SJ (2004) A “vertically Lagrangian” finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Mon Weather Rev 132(10):2293–2307. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132%3c2293:avlfdc%3e2.0.co;2
Lin YL, Farley RD, Orville HD (1983) Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22(6):1065–1092. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022%3c1065:bpotsf%3e2.0.co;2
LinHo, Wang B (2002) The time-space structure of the Asian-Pacific summer monsoon: a fast annual cycle view. J Clim 15:2001–2019. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015
Liu YM, Wu GX, Liu H et al (2001) Condensation heating of the Asian summer monsoon and the subtropical anticyclone in the Eastern Hemisphere. Clim Dyn 17(4):327–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820000117
Liu YM, Bao Q, Duan AM et al (2007) Recent progress in the impact of the Tibetan plateau on climate in China. Adv Atmos Sci 24(6):1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-1060-3
Liu YM, Wu GX, Hong JL et al (2012) Revisiting Asian monsoon formation and change associated with Tibetan Plateau forcing: II. Change. Clim Dyn 39(5):1183–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1335-y
Liu C, Liu YM, Liu BQ (2015) Comparison of six sensible heat flux datasets over the Iranian-Tibetan Plateaus. J Meteorol Sci 35(4):398–404. https://doi.org/10.3969/2014jms.0038
Liu YM, Wang ZQ, Zhuo HF et al (2017) Two types of summertime heating over Asian large-scale orography and excitation of potential-vorticity forcing II. Sensible heating over Tibetan-Iranian Plateau. Sci China Earth Sci 60(4):733–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-9016-3
Liu YM, Lu MM, Yang HJ et al (2020) Land-atmosphere-ocean coupling associated with the Tibetan Plateau and its climate impacts. Natl Sci Rev 7:534–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa011
Mao JY, Wu GX (2007) Interannual variability in the onset of the summer monsoon over the Eastern Bay of Bengal. Theor Appl Climatol 89(3–4):155–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-006-0265-1
Matsumoto J (1997) Seasonal transition of summer rainy season over Indochina and adjacent monsoon region. Adv Atmos Sci 14(2):231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-997-0022-0
Pan LL (2005) Observed positive feedback between the NAO and the North Atlantic SSTA tripole. Geophys Res Lett 32:L06707. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl022427
Putman WM, Lin SH (2007) Finite-volume transport on various cubed-sphere grids. J Comput Phys 227(1):55–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.022
Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB et al (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res Atmos 108(D14):4407. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002670
Selkirk HB, Molod A, Pawson S et al. (2015) An assessment of upper tropospheric water vapor in the MERRA-2 reanalysis: comparisons with MLS and in situ water vapor measurements. Agu Fall Meeting
Shin CS, Huang BH (2016) Slow and fast annual cycles of the Asian summer monsoon in the NCEP CFSv2. Clim Dyn 47:529–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2854-0
Shin CS, Huang BH, Zhu JS et al (2019) Improved seasonal predictive skill and enhanced predictability of the Asian summer monsoon rainfall following ENSO events in NCEP CFSv2 hindcasts. Clim Dyn 52:3079–3098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4316-y
Smagorinsky J (1953) The dynamical influence of large scale heat sources and sinks on the quasi-stationary mean motions of the atmosphere. Q J R Meteorol Soc 79:342–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707934103
Srivastava AK, Rajeevan M, Kulkarni R (2002) Teleconnection of OLR and SST anomalies over Atlantic Ocean with Indian summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 29(8):1284. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013837
Sun RZ, Duan AM, Chen LL et al (2019) Interannual variability of the north pacific mixed layer associated with the spring Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing. J Clim 32(11):3109–3130. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-18-0577.1
Takaya K, Nakamura H (2001) A formulation of a phase-independent wave-activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow. J Atmos Sci 58(6):608–627. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058%3c0608:afoapi%3e2.0.co;2
Tamura T, Koike T (2010) Role of convective heating in the seasonal evolution of the Asian summer monsoon. J Geophys Res Atmos 115:D14103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013418
Wang B (1988) Dynamics of tropical low-frequency waves: an analysis of the moist Kelvin wave. J Atmos Sci 45(14):2051–2065. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045%3c2051:dotlfw%3e2.0.co;2
Wang LJ, Guo SH (2012) Interannual variability of the South-Asian high establishment over the Indo-China Peninsula from April to May and its relation to Southern Asian summer monsoon. Trans Atmos Sci 35(1):10–23. https://doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.2012.01.010
Wang B, Li TM (1994) Convective interaction with boundary-layer dynamics in the development of a tropical intraseasonal system. J Atmos Sci 51(11):1386–1400. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051%3c1386:ciwbld%3e2.0.co;2
Wang B, LinHo (2002) Rainy season of the Asian-Pacifc summer monsoon. J Clim 15(4):386–398. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3c0386:RSOTAP%3e2.0.CO;2
Wang B, LinHo ZYS et al (2004) Definition of South China sea monsoon onset and commencement of the East Asia summer monsoon. J Clim 17(4):699–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1059-4
Wang B, Bao Q, Hoskins B et al (2008) Tibetan plateau warming and precipitation changes in East Asia. Geophys Res Lett 35:L14702. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl034330
Wang B, Huang F, Wu ZW et al (2009) Multi-scale climate variability of the South China Sea monsoon: a review. Dyn Atmos Oceans 47(1–3):15–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2008.09.004
Wang B, Li J, He Q (2017) Variable and robust East Asian monsoon rainfall response to El Niño over the past 60 years (1957–2016). Adv Atmos Sci 34:1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7016-3
Wang ZB, Wu RG, Chen SF et al (2018) Influence of western Tibetan Plateau summer snow cover on east Asian summer rainfall. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(5):2371–2386. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd028016
Wang ZQ, Yang S, Lau NC et al (2018) Teleconnection between summer NAO and East China rainfall variations: a bridge effect of the Tibetan Plateau. J Clim 31(16):6433–6444. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-17-0413.1
Wang ZB, Wu RG, Zhao P et al (2019) Formation of snow cover anomalies over the Tibetan Plateau in cold seasons. J Geophys Res Atmos 124(9):4873–4890. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029525
Watanabe M, Kimoto M (2000) Atmosphere-ocean thermal coupling in the North Atlantic: a positive feedback. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126(570):3343–3369. https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.57016
Webster PJ, Hoyos CD (2004) Prediction of monsoon rainfall and river discharge on 15–30-day time scales. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85(11):1745–1765. https://doi.org/10.1175/Bams-85-11-1745
Webster PJ, Magana VO, Palmer TN et al (1998) Monsoons: processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction. J Geophys Res Oceans 103(C7):14451–14510. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jc02719
Wu GX, Liu YM (2000) Thermal adaptation, overshooting, dispersion, and subtropical high. Part I: thermal adaptation and overshooting. Chin J Atmos Sci 24(4):433–436
Wu GX, Liu YM (2016) Impacts of the Tibetan Plateau on Asian climate. Meteorol Monogr 56:7.1-7.29. https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-15-0018.1
Wu R, Wang B (2001) Multi-stage onset of the summer monsoon over the western North Pacific. Clim Dyn 17:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820000118
Wu GX, Zhang YS (1998) Tibetan Plateau forcing and the timing of the monsoon onset over South Asia and the South China Sea. Mon Weather Rev 126(4):913–927. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126%3c0913:tpfatt%3e2.0.co;2
Wu GX, Liu H, Zhao YC et al (1996) A nine-layer atmospheric general circulation model and its performance. Adv Atmos Sci 13(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657024
Wu GX, Li WP, Guo H et al (1997) Sensible heat driven air-pump over the Tibetan Plateau and its impacts on the Asian summer monsoon. Collections on the memory of Zhao Jiuzhang. Chinese Science Press, Beijing, pp 116–126
Wu GX, Liu YM, Wang TM et al (2007) The influence of mechanical and thermal forcing by the Tibetan Plateau on Asian climate. J Hydrometeorol 8(4):770–789. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm609.1
Wu GX, Guan Y, Liu YM et al (2012) Air-sea interaction and formation of the Asian summer monsoon onset vortex over the Bay of Bengal. Clim Dyn 38(1–2):261–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0978-9
Wu GX, Duan AM, Liu YM et al (2015) Tibetan Plateau climate dynamics: recent research progress and outlook. Natl Sci Rev 2(1):100–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwu045
Wu GX, Zhuo HF, Wang ZQ et al (2016) Two types of summertime heating over the Asian large-scale orography and excitation of potential-vorticity forcing I. Over Tibetan Plateau. Sci China Earth Sci 59(10):1996–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5328-2
Xiang BQ, Wang B (2013) Mechanisms for the advanced Asian summer monsoon onset since the mid-to-late 1990s. J Clim 26(6):1993–2009. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00445.1
Xie SP, Hu KM, Hafner J et al (2009) Indian Ocean capacitor effect on Indo-Western Pacific climate during the summer following El Niño. J Clim 22:730–747. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2544.1
Yanai M, Wu GX (2006) Effects of the Tibetan Plateau. In: The Asian Monsoon. Springer Praxis Books, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 513–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37722-0_13
Yang K, Guo XF, Wu BY (2011) Recent trends in surface sensible heat flux on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci China Earth Sci 54(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-4036-6
Yasunari T (1991) The monsoon year—a new concept of the climatic year in the tropics. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 72(9):1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072%3c1331:tmynco%3e2.0.co;2
Yeh TC, Gao YX (1979) Meteorology of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau. Chinese Science Press, Beijing, p 278
Yu RC, Zhou TJ (2004) Impacts of winter-NAO on March cooling trends over subtropical Eurasia continent in the recent half century. Geophys Res Lett 31:L12204. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl019814
Yu WD, Shi JW, Liu L et al (2012) The onset of the monsoon over the Bay of Bengal: the observed common features for 2008–2011. Atmos Oceanic Sci Lett 5(4):314–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2012.11447009
Yu JH, Liu YM, Ma TT et al (2018a) The influence of surface potential vorticity density forcing over the Tibetan Plateau in the 2008 winter storm. Part II: numerical simulation. Acta Meteorologica Sinica 76(6):887–903. https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2018.043
Yu W, Liu YM, Yang XQ et al (2018b) The interannual and decadal variation characteristics of the surface sensible heating at different elevations over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and attribution analysis. Plateau Meteorol 37(5):1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2018.00027
Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Q Rev Biol 18:797–799
Zhang YY, Li ZX, Liu BQ (2015) Interannual variability of surface sensible heating over the Tibetan Plateau in boreal spring and its influence on the onset time of the Indian Summer monsoon. Chin J Atmos Sci 39(6):1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1410.14226
Zhao P, Chen LX (2001) Climatic features of atmospheric heat source/sink over the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau in 35 years and its relation to rainfall in China. Sci China Earth Sci 44(9):858–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02907098
Zhao Y, Duan AM, Wu GX (2018) Interannual variability of late-spring circulation and diabatic heating over the Tibetan Plateau associated with indian ocean forcing. Adv Atmos Sci 35(8):927–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-018-7217-4
Zheng F, Li JP, Li YJ et al (2016) Influence of the summer NAO on the spring-NAO-based predictability of the East Asian summer monsoon. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 55:1459–1476. https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-15-0199.1
Zhu XY, Liu YM, Wu GX (2012) An assessment of summer sensible heat flux on the Tibetan Plateau from eight data sets. Sci China-Earth Sci 55(5):779–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4379-2
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDB40030204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 91637312, 91937302 and 41730963) and the SOA Program on Global Change and Air–Sea Interactions (Grant GASI-IPOVAI-03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YL, GW and WY contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by WY. Analysis was performed by WY, YL, X-QY, and GW. BH, JL, and QB contributed to the numerical experiment design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WY and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, W., Liu, Y., Yang, XQ. et al. Impact of North Atlantic SST and Tibetan Plateau forcing on seasonal transition of springtime South Asian monsoon circulation. Clim Dyn 56, 559–579 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05491-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05491-0