Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidetector CT urography: experimental analysis of radiation dose reduction in an animal model

  • Experimental
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of reducing X-ray exposure during multidetector CT urography (MDCTU) considering image quality using a porcine model. MDCTU was performed in eight healthy pigs. Scanning was conducted using a gradual reduction of the tube current-time product at 120 kV [200–20 mAs (eff.) in ten steps]. Three blinded observers independently evaluated the image data for anatomic detail, subjective image quality, and subjective image noise. Overall image quality was compared to milliampere-second settings and radiation dose. Objective noise measurements were assessed. Noise measurements in patients were also performed to verify the comparabilty of the animal model. Adequate image quality allowing for detailed visualization of the upper urinary tract was obtained when the tube current-time product was decreased to 70 eff. mAs at 120 kV. Image noise did not impair image quality to a relevant degree using these parameters. There was high agreement among the observers (ICC = 0.95). In the animal experiments, reduced-dose MDCTU produced good image quality. A maximum current-time product reduction to 70 eff. mAs at 120 kV (CTDIvol = 5.3 mGy) proved to be feasible, thereby offering an advantageous dosage reduction. The study provides a basis for the development of reduced-dose MDCTU protocols in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nolte-Ernsting C, Cowan N (2006) Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol 16(12):2670–2686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caoili EM, Inampudi P, Cohan RH, Ellis JH (2005) Optimization of multi-detector row CT urography: effect of compression, saline administration, and prolongation of acquisition delay. Radiology 235:116–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kemper J, Regier M, Begemann PG, Stork A, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C (2005) Multislice computed tomography-urography: intraindividual comparison of different preparation techniques for optimized depiction of the upper urinary tract in an animal model. Invest Radiol 40:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kemper J, Regier M, Stork A, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C (2006) Multislice CT urography (MSCTU): Evaluation of a modified scan protocol for optimized opacification of the collecting system. FortschrRöntgenstr 178:531–537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McTavish JD, Jinzaki M, Zou KH, Nawfel RD, Silverman SG (2002) Multi-detector row CT urography: comparison of strategies for depicting the normal urinary collecting system. Radiology 225:783–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kemper J, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C (2005) Multislice CT urography: Aspects for technical management and clinical application. Radiologe 45:905–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nolte-Ernsting CC, Wildberger JE, Borchers H, Schmitz-Rode T, Gunther RW (2001) Multi-slice CT urography after diuretic injection: initial results. Fortschr Rontgenstr 173:176–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kemper J, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C (2006) Modern diagnostic assessment of the upper urinary tract using multislice CT urography. FortschrRöntgenstr 178:1086–1094

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wedegartner U, Lorenzen M, Lorenzen J, Nolte-Ernsting C, Weber C, Dieckmann C, Cramer M, Schoder V, Adam G (2004) Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality. FortschrRöntgenstr 176:106–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurung J, Khan MF, Maataoui A, Herzog C, Bux R, Bratzke H, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ (2005) Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT. Eur Radiol 15:1898–1905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wildberger JE, Max M, Wein BB, Mahnken AH, Weiss C, Dembinski R, Katoh M, Schaller S, Rossaint R, Gunther RW (2003) Low-dose multislice spiral computed tomography in acute lung injury: animal experience. Invest Radiol 38:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Honnef D, Wildberger JE, Stargardt A, Hohl C, Barker M, Gunther RW, Staatz G (2004) Multislice spiral CT (MSCT) in pediatric radiology: dose reduction for chest and abdomen examinations. FortschrRöntgenstr 176:1021–1030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-expo-a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. FortschrRöntgenstr 174:157–1576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coppenrath E, Meindl T, Herzog P, Khalil R, Mueller-Lisse U, Krenn L, Reiser M, Mueller-Lisse UG (2006) Dose reduction in multidetector CT of the urinary tract. Studies in a phantom model. Eur Radiol 16:1982–1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, Schaller S, Nikolaou K, Suess C, Weber C, Reiser M, Becker C (2005) Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 15:334–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Theocharopoulos N, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Karampekios S, Gourtsoyiannis N (2006) Dosimetric characteristics of a 16-slice computed tomography scanner. Eur Radiol 16:2575–2585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Leidecker C, Suss C, Schmidt T, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH (2006) Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 16:1841–1846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraioli F, Catalano C, Napoli A, Francone M, Venditti F, Danti M, Pediconi F, Passariello R (2006) Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA. Eur Radiol 16:137–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG (2004) Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology 232:126–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Platt JF, Francis IR, Faerber GJ, Montie JE, Ellis JH (2002) Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 222:353–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Isoardi P, Ropolo R, Savio L, Cesarani F, Marchisio F, Gandini G (2004) Patient dose evaluation and optimization of uropoietic multiphasic multislice CT examination. Radiol Med (Torino) 107:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S, Blake MA, Varghese J, Halpern EF, Thrall JH, Rhea JT (2002) Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1101–1106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J (2002) Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:461–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2001) CT radiation exposure risk in Germany. FortschrRöntgenstr 173:R1–R66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Joern Kemper, Marc Regier, Paul M. Bansmann, Philipp G. C. Begemann, Alexander Stork, Gerhard Adam & Claus Nolte-Ernsting

  2. Philips Medical Systems GmbH, Hamburg, Germany

    Hans Dieter Nagel

Authors
  1. Joern Kemper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Regier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul M. Bansmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philipp G. C. Begemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander Stork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hans Dieter Nagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gerhard Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Claus Nolte-Ernsting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joern Kemper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemper, J., Regier, M., Bansmann, P.M. et al. Multidetector CT urography: experimental analysis of radiation dose reduction in an animal model. Eur Radiol 17, 2318–2324 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0565-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0565-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation