Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to implement an abdominal CT angiography protocol using 100 kVp and to compare SNR and CNR, as well as subjective image quality, to a standard CT angiography protocol using 120 kVp on a 16 detector-row CT scanner. Forty-eight patients were referred for routine abdominal CT angiography on a 16 detector-row CT scanner. Patients were scanned using either 120 or 100 kVp at constant mAs settings. Vessel opacification was provided by automated contrast injection using similar injection protocols. Density measurements were performed along the aorto-iliac axis with SNR and CNR calculation. In addition, the estimated effective patient radiation dose was calculated. Results of both protocols were compared. The 100-kVp protocol (432±80 HU) showed a significantly higher vessel density than the 120-kVp (333±90 HU; P<0.001) protocol, corresponding to an average increase in signal intensity of 30.7%. SNR (36.0 vs 37.0) and CNR (31.1 vs 31.7) for the 100-kV protocol were not significantly lower that those for the standard protocol (P=0.79 and P=0.87), whilst the average estimated dose was significantly lower using the 100-kVp protocol (6.7±0.4 vs 10.1±1.2 mSv; P<0.0001). Tube kVp reduction from 120 to 100 kVp allows for significant reduction of patient dose in abdominal CT angiography, without significant change in SNR,CNR and image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC (2001) Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 221:146–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC (2000) Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology 215:670–676

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanikake M, Shimizu T, Narabayashi I, Matsuki M, Masuda K, Yamamoto K, Uesugi Y, Yoshikawa S (2003) Three-dimensional CT angiography of the hepatic artery: use of multi-detector row helical CT and a contrast agent. Radiology 227:883–889

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, Crispin A, Hong C, Becker CR, Reiser MF (2002) Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 222:483–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, Ghaye B, Cotte L, Mastora I, Delannoy V, Remy J (2002) CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Eur Radiol 12:1971–1978

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S, Epelman M, Fischer D, Karram T, Litmanovich D, Schwartz H, Hoffman A, Engel A (2003) Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:719–724

    Google Scholar 

  7. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M, Desbiolles LM, Verdun FR, Seifert B, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2003) Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 229:465–474

    Google Scholar 

  8. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, Roos JE, Seifert B, Hilfiker PR, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2003) Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 226:798–811

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohnen M, Poll LJ, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Modder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol 13:1148–1153

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G (2000) Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 217:430–435

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran JP, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Meuli R (2000) Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1881–1884

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huda W, Ravenel JG, Scalzetti EM (2002) How do radiographic techniques affect image quality and patient doses in CT? Semin Ultrasound CT MR 23:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EVP, Geleijns J, JK A, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC, Tosi G (1999) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262 EN: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/default.htm, ISBN 92-828-7478-7478

  15. Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC (1981) A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 8:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Imhof H, Schibany N, Ba-Ssalamah A, Czerny C, Hojreh A, Kainberger F, Krestan C, Kudler H, Nobauer I, Nowotny R (2003) Spiral CT and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 47:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Becker CR, Bruening R, Schaetzl M, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF (1999) Xenon versus ceramics: a comparison of two CT X-ray detector systems. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:795–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaatee R, Van Leeuwen MS, De Lange EE, Wilting JE, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, Mali WP (1998) Spiral CT angiography of the renal arteries: should a scan delay based on a test bolus injection or a fixed scan delay be used to obtain maximum enhancement of the vessels? J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S (2004) Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 230:142–150

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ertl-Wagner BB, Hoffmann RT, Bruning R, Herrmann K, Snyder B, Blume JD, Reiser MF (2004) Multi-detector row CT angiography of the brain at various kilovoltage settings. Radiology 231:528–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Wintersperger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wintersperger, B., Jakobs, T., Herzog, P. et al. Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 15, 334–341 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2575-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2575-y

Keywords

Navigation