Abstract
Bacteriocins are highly diverse, abundant, and heterogeneous antimicrobial peptides that are ribosomally synthesized by bacteria and archaea. Since their discovery about a century ago, there has been a growing interest in bacteriocin research and applications. This is mainly due to their high antimicrobial properties, narrow or broad spectrum of activity, specificity, low cytotoxicity, and stability. Though initially used to improve food quality and safety, bacteriocins are now globally exploited for innovative applications in human, animal, and food systems as sustainable alternatives to antibiotics. Bacteriocins have the potential to beneficially modulate microbiota, providing viable microbiome-based solutions for the treatment, management, and non-invasive bio-diagnosis of infectious and non-infectious diseases. The use of bacteriocins holds great promise in the modulation of food microbiomes, antimicrobial food packaging, bio-sanitizers and antibiofilm, pre/post-harvest biocontrol, functional food, growth promotion, and sustainable aquaculture. This can undoubtedly improve food security, safety, and quality globally. This review highlights the current trends in bacteriocin research, especially the increasing research outputs and funding, which we believe may proportionate the soaring global interest in bacteriocins. The use of cutting-edge technologies, such as bioengineering, can further enhance the exploitation of bacteriocins for innovative applications in human, animal, and food systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has risen as one of the major public health challenges in recent times. While the discovery of antibiotics revolutionized modern medicine making them the most successful therapeutic agents to be widely used against bacterial infections, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics have resulted in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Alonso et al. 2017; Torres et al. 2018; Baquero et al. 2021). Regardless of the appropriateness of antibiotics use, routine use of antibiotics at the individual and/or community level exerts immense selective pressure which drives bacterial evolution and the development and acquisition of resistant determinants (Bloom et al. 2018; Baquero et al. 2021). Importantly, antibiotic use in human and veterinary medicine and food production is increasing, and this may likely continue into the coming years as unrestrained antibiotic access rises in resource-limited countries (CDC 2018; Hussain et al. 2020; Gupta 2022). The surge and continuous spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the diminished potency of commercially available antimicrobials and therapeutics necessitate a concerted approach to the search for novel and potent antimicrobials that may become alternatives to available antibiotics. Unless the enigma of widespread AMR and associated public health concerns are urgently prioritized and mitigated, global health and economic burdens will continue to worsen.
Over the past decades, there has been growing interest and research exploring several emerging antimicrobial compounds, including antimicrobial peptides, nanomedicines, probiotics, postbiotics, phytochemicals, bacteriophages, etc. as alternatives to antibiotics (Reuben et al. 2019, 2020; Wang et al. 2020a; Mba and Nweze 2022; Anyaegbunam et al. 2022; Field et al. 2023; Ye et al. 2023; Baquero et al. 2024). Interestingly, ribosomally synthesized peptides of bacterial origin have received increased attention and hold great potential as valuable antimicrobial compounds against a broad spectrum of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens as well as therapeutic agents for the treatment of several diseases (Lynch et al. 2019; Magana et al. 2020; Mba and Nweze 2022; Telhig et al. 2022; García-Vela et al. 2023). Bacteriocins, which are antimicrobial peptides synthesized by bacteria have attracted increasing interest due to their high antimicrobial activities, stability, and low toxicity (Cotter et al. 2013; Lynch et al. 2019; Deslouches et al. 2020; Wiman et al. 2023). The majority of bacteria synthesize at least one known or unknown bacteriocin (Riley and Wertz 2002; Meade et al. 2020; Darbandi et al. 2022). While the ecological function of bacteriocins is yet to be fully elucidated, they are believed to help bacteria outcompete other members of the community, modulate the competitive landscape through direct or exclusive antagonisms, and also serve as signaling molecules (Dobson et al. 2012; Meade et al. 2020; Darbandi et al. 2022).
Bacteriocins are structurally diverse and encoded by highly variable and complex biosynthetic gene clusters that evolve rapidly (Cotter et al. 2013; Heilbronner et al. 2021; Ye et al. 2023). The high antimicrobial activity, diversity, low toxicity, stability, and therapeutic benefits of bacteriocins have prompted a soaring multi-sectorial and transdisciplinary interest in their search, characterization, and broad applications either as (i) antimicrobial/therapeutic compounds for the treatment and prevention of human and animal diseases, (ii) food additives for the inhibition of foodborne pathogens or spoilage organisms, (iii) feed supplements for growth promotion in animal production, or (iv) microbiome-based interventions for the modulation of the gut, reproductive tract, respiratory tract, skin, and food microbiomes (Cotter et al. 2013; Jayaraman et al. 2013; Campion et al. 2013; Vieco-Saiz et al. 2019; Sarika et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020; Soltani et al. 2021a; Bosák et al. 2021; Saur et al. 2021; Polak et al. 2021). Bacteriocins have a high potential for medico- and techno-economic use in biomedicine and agri-food systems, thus depicting their relevance and prospects across the One Health continuum.
From a cross-disciplinary and multisectoral perspective, several bacteriocins from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are being explored. Some of these bacteriocins have shown great potential and prospects for field applications. Bacteriocin research has evolved from basic characterization to high-throughput identification and applications in multiple systems. The increasingly comprehensive scientific reports of multi-sourced (and novel) bacteriocins as well as their impacts on human and animal health, food quality and safety, [micro]ecological landscapes, and industry necessitate their unified compilation and synthesis. Furthermore, bacteriocin research and bibliographies are often disjointed in a ‘stand-alone’ manner seldom without a nexus linking them across disciplines. Understanding the current bacteriocin research across disciplines will inform concerted future research direction which may further foster interdisciplinary perspectives and collaborations. To this end, this review carefully assessed and compiled significant advances and emerging roles of bacteriocins and related innovations within the One Health continuum. Furthermore, we provided a comprehensive cross-disciplinary, multisectoral, and up-to-date potential and prospects of bacteriocins applications and bibliometrics in the human, animal, and food systems.
Advances in the biology, classification, and sources of bacteriocins
Bacteriocins have been generally defined as ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptide molecules that can either be enzymatically modified or remain unaltered (Cotter et al. 2013; Johnson et al. 2018; Simons et al. 2020; Heilbronner et al. 2021). They are abundant and highly diverse with widespread synthesis among different groups of bacteria (Riley and Wertz 2002; Cotter et al. 2013; Fernández-Fernández et al. 2023c). It has been suggested that 30% to 99% of Archaea and bacterial species synthesize one or more bacteriocins (Klaenhammer 1988; Riley 1998). Typically, bacteriocins have a narrow spectrum of bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity against taxonomically related bacteria (O’Connor et al. 2018; Simons et al. 2020; Darbandi et al. 2022), but occasionally they can have a broad spectrum of activity against unrelated bacteria (Cotter et al. 2005; Mills et al. 2011; Silva et al. 2018). The biosynthetic mechanisms for these antimicrobial peptides are relatively simple and often encoded in transferable elements such as plasmids and transposons (Klaenhammer 1993; And and Hoover 2003; Fernández-Fernández et al. 2023b). Bacteriocins are synthesized as biologically inactive precursor peptides harboring an N-terminal leader sequence (Kanmani et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2023). These precursor peptides are often detached from the leader peptide and exported outside the cell after post-translational modifications (PTMs) (Riley and Wertz 2002; Mokoena 2017; Soltani et al. 2021a). Bacteriocinogenic bacteria have developed mechanisms to protect themselves from being killed by the bacteriocins they produce. These mechanisms include using efflux pumps to export bacteriocins from inside the cells to the outside, synthesizing self-immunity proteins, or using both mechanisms in some instances (Bastos et al. 2015; Ben Lagha et al. 2017; Bountra et al. 2017).
The function of bacteriocins depends on the recognition of specific receptors and ionic interactions with the hydrophobic surface molecules of target cells (Soliman et al. 2010; Todorov et al. 2022; Śmiałek-Bartyzel et al. 2023). This is typically considered the initial step of the antimicrobial mechanism of action exerted by bacteriocins. To infiltrate the cell membrane and compromise cellular integrity, bacteriocins must effectively recognize these receptors and also express physicochemical interactions with the target cells. For example, receptors like mannose phosphotransferase and lipid II are primarily recognized by class II, unmodified bacteriocins (such as pediocin PA-1 and enterocin CRL35) and class I, post-translationally modified bacteriocins (RiPPs) (such as nisin and mutacin 1140), respectively (Grein et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020c; Zhu et al. 2022). These intricate interactions between bacteriocins and target cells are often influenced by various physicochemical factors such as temperature, pH, and other chemical constituents. These factors also affect cell membrane integrity and physiological conditions, which consequently impact bacteriocin interactions with specific receptors or directly with the cell membrane (Todorov et al. 2022). Depending on their primary structure and complexity, bacteriocins exert antimicrobial activity through distinct mechanisms of action on susceptible microbial strains. Some bacteriocins cause cell lysis by inhibiting cell wall synthesis or forming pores in the cell membrane. Others act inside the target cells, inhibiting protein production and gene expression (Dobson et al. 2012; Darbandi et al. 2022).
Since the discovery of bacteriocins about a century ago, there has been an increasing number of characterized and identified bacteriocins. These bacteriocins are heterogeneous and highly diverse, possessing a wide range of complexities, structures, sizes, mechanisms of action, spectra of activity, and target cells. To better collate and understand the structural and functional diversities of bacteriocins, some integrated open-access databases and tools have been developed. These include antiSMASH 2.0 [http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/ (Blin et al. 2013)], BAGEL3 [http://bagel.molgenrug.nl/ (van Heel et al. 2013)], ADAM, [http://bioinformatics.cs.ntou.edu.tw/ADAM (Lee et al. 2015)], BACTIBASE, [http://bactibase.hammamilab.org (Soltani et al. 2021a)], NucleBact [https://pubmlst.org/projects/nuclebact (Sharp et al. 2017)], LABiocin [https://bio.tools/LABiocin_database (Kassaa et al. 2019)], BUR—bacteriocins database URMITE [https://drissifatima.wixsite.com/bacteriocins (Drissi et al. 2015)], Bacteriocin (https://aapep.bocsci.com/), and Syngulon (https://syngulon.com/). Following the first bacteriocin classification by Klaenhammer (1993), several classifications have been proposed and used in recent years. Due to the advent of cutting-edge high throughput technologies and new developments in bacteriocins’ structures, functions, and mechanisms of action, the classification of bacteriocins progressively evolved, undergoing continuous modification. These classification systems primarily hinge on multiple factors such as physical properties, chemical structure, molecular composition, size, stability, mechanism of action, post-translational modification, microbial target, organism producing them, and cell wall type (Klaenhammer 1993; Dobson et al. 2012; Arnison et al. 2013; Cotter et al. 2013; Bastos et al. 2015; Alvarez-Sieiro et al. 2016; Johnson et al. 2018; Soltani et al. 2021a).
Building on the previous classification (Cotter et al. 2013) and recent advances in ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), the latest and updated classification system proposed by Soltani et al. (2021a) suggests two large classes of bacteriocins. Class I, also referred to as RiPPs have molecular masses < 5 kDa and contain post-translational modifications (PTMs). Class I is subdivided into 12 subclasses, including lanthipeptides, sactipeptides, linear azole(ine)-containing peptides (LAP), circular peptides, glycocins, nucleotide peptides, lasso peptides, siderophore peptides, and Bottromycins from both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Cotter et al. 2013; Norris and Patchett 2016; Mills et al. 2017). Additionally, thiopeptides and linaridins from Actinobacteria (Bagley et al. 2005; Claesen and Bibb 2010), and cyanobactins produced by different cyanobacteria (Martins and Vasconcelos 2015; Martins et al. 2018) are subclasses of class I bacteriocin. Class II bacteriocins, also known as unmodified bacteriocins, have molecular masses < 10 kDa and are subdivided into three subclasses: pediocin-like bacteriocins (single peptides containing the YGNGV consensus sequence), two peptides bacteriocins (containing two or more unmodified peptides), and non-pediocin-like bacteriocins (unmodified linear single peptides devoid of the YGNGV) (Mills et al. 2017; Soltani et al. 2021a) (Fig. 1). Generally, the PTMs make class I bacteriocins more stable to extreme pHs, high temperatures, or proteolysis than class II bacteriocins. However, the presence of disulfide bridges in class II bacteriocins relatively increases their stability (Soltani et al. 2021a).
Bacteriocins are abundant and heterogeneous in nature. Bacteriocin-producing bacteria can be found in both conventional and unconventional sources. While the human gut is considered a conventional source of bacteriocinogenic bacteria, unconventional sources include soil, water, foods/food products, animal guts, and the vagina and nose of animals and humans (Ryan et al. 2008; Vera Pingitore et al. 2009; Lo Verso et al. 2018; Zielińska and Kolożyn-Krajewska 2018; Fuochi et al. 2019; Reuben et al. 2020; Darbandi et al. 2022; Fernández-Fernández et al. 2023a, b, c, d; Navarro et al. 2023). Common bacteriocin-producing bacteria in humans include Enterococcus, Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus (Ryan et al. 2008; Lakshminarayanan et al. 2013; Zalewska et al. 2018; Laux et al. 2019; Kassem et al. 2021; Darbandi et al. 2022). These bacteria not only act as the first line of defense against invading pathogens, but their bacteriocins also play a role in enhancing the immune system (Zipperer et al. 2016; O’Sullivan et al. 2019).
Interestingly, most of the bacteriocins that have been successfully characterized and identified are produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), which are frequently found in milk and dairy products. LAB is a diverse group of bacteria that has garnered significant interest due to their widely recognized safety status, known as ‘Generally Recognized as Safe’ (GRAS) and ‘Qualified Presumption of Safety’ (QPS) status (Reuben et al. 2020; Zimina et al. 2020). Some well-known bacteriocinogenic bacteria commonly found in dairy products include Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum (found in camel, cow, and goat milk), Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens and L. plantarum (found in cheese and kefir), and Lactobacillus brevis, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus thermophilus (found in other dairy products) (Reuben et al. 2020; Zimina et al. 2020; Benkirane et al. 2022). Lactobacillus acidophilus is commonly isolated from yogurt and fermented soy products as a bacteriocin-producing bacterium, while Bifidobacterium lactis and Brevibacillus brevis are most commonly found in raw milk (Darbandi et al. 2022). In milk products, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus are the predominant bacteriocin-producing bacteria.
From fermented raw or cooked meat products, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus curvatus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum, Enterococcus faecium UAM1, Pediococcus pentosaceus, and P. accidilactici are widely isolated bacteriocinogenic bacteria (Aymerich et al. 2011; Zielińska and Kolożyn-Krajewska 2018; Khorshidian et al. 2021; García-López et al. 2023; Kaveh et al. 2023). These bacteria exhibit inhibitory activity against major foodborne pathogens including Aeromonas hydrophila, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, thereby preventing their growth in meat products (Winkowski and Montville 1992; Khan et al. 2016). E. faecium HL7, L. plantarum, and L. brevis LAP2 are commonly associated with fish and seafood (Vijayabaskar and Somasundaram 2008; Gómez-Sala et al. 2015; Ringø et al. 2018), while L. brevis, L. paracasei, L. pentosus, L. fermentum, L. plantarum, Weissella, Pediococcus, and Enterococcus durans are known bacteriocin-producing bacteria found in fruits and vegetables (Knorr 1998; Linares-Morales et al. 2020). Soil is another extensively studied unconventional source of bacteriocinogenic bacteria. Many bacteriocins obtained from soilborne bacteria and rhizosphere exhibit inhibitory and biocidal activity against phytopathogens, pests, and insects, making them useful for plant protection as well as biopesticides, bioinsecticides, and growth stimulants (Lv et al. 2017; Zimina et al. 2020). Soil bacteria, including Pseudomonas putida BW11M1, Bacillus subtilis 14B, and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) produce bacteriocin putidacin, Bac 14B, and michiganin A which have inhibitory activity against P. putida GR12-2R3, Agrobacter tumefaciens, and C. michiganensis subsp. Sepedonicus, the etiological agents of plant diseases. Similarly, Bacillus clausii GM17 produces bacteriocin Bac GM17 which has broad-spectrum antifungal and antibacterial activity against multiple phytopathogens (Zimina et al. 2020). Recently, our group characterized and identified different bacteriocins of staphylococcal origin from multiple sources including humans, food, migratory birds, pets, wild animals, and the environment (Fernández-Fernández et al. 2022a, b, 2023a; b).
Trends in bacteriocins research: a bibliometrics perspective
To fully comprehend the current direction of bacteriocin research, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to identify the prevalent research trends and gaps in the field as well as future research perspectives. In August 2023, we conducted a comprehensive literature search on the Web of Science core collection database (http://www.webofscience.com/) using the keyword ‘bacteriocin’ to identify relevant bacteriocin-based publications. We included articles published in 16 different languages until August 2023 for our synthesis (Table S1). In total, there were 8303 publications with 270,493 citations recorded in the Web of Science (WoS) core collection between 1958 to August 2023. Throughout this period, we observed a relatively steady increase in the number of articles and citations, with a notable spike in 2021 (articles = 474; citations = 23,638) (Fig. 2). It is worth mentioning that the last decade has seen an unprecedented exponential increase in bacteriocin-related research, nearly doubling the total research output of previous decades. Given the utilization of advanced technologies in bacteriocin research and the growing global interest and acceptance of bacteriocins in recent years, this trend is not surprising.
There is a wide geographical spread of bacteriocin-related research outputs, spanning 127 countries or regions around the world. The United States, China, and Spain are leading with 1238 (14.907%), 716 (8.621%), and 605 (7.285%) publications respectively, while 26 other countries have over 100 publications each (Table 1). Interestingly, the top regions leading in bacteriocin-related research outputs are North America, Europe, and Asia which are known to have highly industrialized economies. The dominance of these countries can be rationalized by the public perception and national/regional approval of certain bacteriocins for commercial use. For example, the European Union (EU) approved the use of Nisin (E 234) as a food additive in various food categories in the EU under Directive 83/463/EEC, Directive 95/2/EC in 1988, and EU Annex II of Regulation (EC) 1333/2008 in 2006, following its safety evaluation by the European Food Safety Authority expert panel (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2006). Similarly, the Food and Drug Administration of the USA approved the use of nisin as an antimicrobial agent in 1988 (and later amended at 59 FR 14364, Mar. 28, 1994; 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003; and 88 FR 17724, Mar. 24, 2023) (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=184.1538), and it was given the GRAS status for use in processed food (Cotter et al. 2005; Shin et al. 2016). The periods of these approvals coincided with the rise in antimicrobial resistance to commercially available antimicrobials and concerns about the use of in-fed antimicrobials in livestock production (European Commission 2005).
The categorization of publications related to bacteriocins, according to disciplines and specialties demonstrates the broad and multidisciplinary nature of bacteriocin research and applications in various fields, including the One Health systems. Out of the 8303 publications, 45.1% (3749), 30.3% (2513), and 23.6% (1958) were categorized under microbiology, biotechnology and applied microbiology, and food science and technology, respectively. Other disciplines that have significant bacteriocin-related research outputs, with over 100 publications, include pharmacology and pharmacy, biochemistry and molecular biology, agriculture, infectious diseases, immunology, nutrition and dietetics, plant sciences, chemistry, veterinary sciences, dentistry and oral medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences (Fig. 3). Microbiology is the discipline with the highest number of research outputs, which is expected since bacteriocins are microbial products. Therefore, most microbiological research focuses on characterizing, synthesizing, and identifying (novel) bacteriocins from various microorganisms isolated from both conventional and unconventional sources. Biotechnology and applied microbiology, as well as food science and technology, are also prominent research areas in bacteriocins-related publications, highlighting the dynamic and diverse biotechnological applications of bacteriocins and their increasing use in food production (Gharsallaoui et al. 2016; Chandrakasan et al. 2019). Furthermore, emerging areas with bacteriocin-related publications include obstetrics and gynecology, dermatology, oncology, soil science, nanoscience and nanotechnology, neurosciences, entomology, and agronomy. To further support the categorization of bacteriocin-associated research outputs, we examined the intra-discipline citations at both the meso- and micro-scale. Our findings revealed that inflammatory bowel diseases and infections (3325), bacteriology (787), antibiotics and antimicrobials (345), dentistry and oral medicine (236), and plant pathology (187) were the specialized areas with the highest number of citations (Figure S1).
While Elsevier (1723), Springer Nature (1202), Wiley (914), the American Society for Microbiology (905), and MDPI (323) are the publishers with the most bacteriocin-related publications, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ), and the Spanish Government are among the leading funding agencies for bacteriocin research (Tables S2 and S3). There is a global spread of funding for bacteriocin research. This demonstrates the willingness of funding agencies across different regions of the world to support bacteriocin research. Finally, among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 7277, 172, 123, 63, and 46 bacteriocin-related research outputs primarily align with Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being, Goal 2: Zero Hunger, Goal 15: Life on Land, Goal 13: Climate Action, and Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production (Table S4). While there are a few bacteriocin research outputs that align with several other SDGs, this highlights the potential of bacteriocins in promoting global peace and prosperity for both people and the planet, both now and in the future (https://sdgs.un.org/goals).
Bacteriocins vs. viable [probiotics/protective cultures] cells: mitigating emerging concerns
Most bacteriocin-producing bacteria, especially (foodborne) LAB and gut commensals are widely used as probiotics or protective cultures in food production and as supplements for animals and humans. Bacteriocin production has long been recognized as an important trait in probiotics or protective cultures (Corr et al. 2007; Dobson et al. 2012; Cotter et al. 2013). Although the exact ecological function of bacteriocins is not fully understood, it is believed that they play a significant role in the functionality of probiotics within their host. Functioning as colonizing peptides, bacteriocins facilitate the colonization and dominance of a producing [probiotic] strain into an already established niche (Riley and Wertz 2002; Anjana 2022). These promising advantages exerted by bacteriocins are attributed to their biofunctional properties and structural diversity (Zhu et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2023). Current research focuses on exploring the underlying bioactivity of bacteriocins in the development of novel probiotics for broad and newer applications in biomedicine and the agri-food industry. Under different conditions, probiotic-derived bacteriocins are often evaluated and used alone or in combination with the producing strains (Umair et al. 2022; Hussien et al. 2022; Ahn et al. 2023; Mihailovskaya et al. 2023; Yu et al. 2023). Bacteriocins can directly inhibit pathogens and other competing microorganisms (Majeed et al. 2011; Simons et al. 2020) or modulate the composition and diversity of microbial communities and the host immune system through signaling mechanisms (Czárán et al. 2002; Di Cagno et al. 2007; Chikindas et al. 2018). For example, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were successfully controlled using pediocin PA-1-producing P. acidilactici MM33. Conversely, no effect was recorded using the non-pediocin PA-1 producing P. acidilactici MM33 strain (Millette et al. 2008). In separate studies, novel bacteriocins such as cerein B4080, cerein 7B, bacteriocin AS-48, garvicin KS, and micrococcin P1 were studied and proposed as promising alternatives for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections caused by multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (Ovchinnikov et al. 2020; Velázquez-Suárez et al. 2021; Jaumaux et al. 2023). Like probiotics, the antimicrobial properties of bacteriocins are pathogen-specific and activity-dependent (Tran et al. 2023; Zhu et al. 2023). Similarly, oral administration of bacteriocin (ABP118) producing L. salivarius UCC118 reportedly controlled L. monocytogenes infection than the non-ABP118 producing strain of L. salivarius UCC118 (Corr et al. 2007). Therefore, assessing the antimicrobial profiles of bacteriocins against multiple pathogens under different conditions is a prerequisite for their selection in the treatment of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in clinical settings.
The common and primary denominator in probiotics and protective cultures is the viability of the cells. Both probiotics and protective cultures essentially consist of live or viable cells specifically selected to confer desired benefits when used in adequate amounts (Hill et al. 2014; Hammami et al. 2019; Fischer and Titgemeyer 2023). However, emerging evidence demonstrates their viability as a non-essential precursor for exerting the desired beneficial properties. Some non-viable components from probiotics and protective cultures, such as bacteriocins and postbiotics, can exude comparable beneficial properties (Raman et al. 2016; Hammami et al. 2019; Homayouni Rad et al. 2021; Mack et al. 2022; Liang and Xing 2023; Teng et al. 2023). Bacteriocins are highly diverse and often outperform viable cells in terms of safety, bioavailability, absorption, distribution, and metabolism while maintaining cognate bioactivities (Ng et al. 2020; Todorov et al. 2022; Liang and Xing 2023).
In recent decades, there have been overwhelming concerns associated with the use of probiotics and protective cultures, particularly regarding the acquisition and distribution of undesired genes, such as antibiotic resistance and virulence. In most cases, microbial strains used as probiotics or protective cultures are generally benign and pose no risk. However, untoward conditions, especially horizontal transfer directly or indirectly predispose them to acquire or spread antibiotic resistance and virulence genes among the commensal microbiota (and opportunistic pathogens) inhabiting the same niche (Imperial and Ibana 2016; Costa et al. 2018; Kothari et al. 2019). Human or animal microbiota is believed to be a trove of numerous [functional] genes, including antibiotic resistance genes which can be easily shared or transferred between resident and transient bacteria (e.g., probiotics and pathogens) (Kothari et al. 2019). Several studies have extensively documented the transfer of undesirable genes between the resident microbiota (in the gut or food) and the strains used as probiotics or protective cultures (Hu et al. 2013; Aarts and Margolles 2014; Abriouel et al. 2015; Wolfe 2023; Sada et al. 2024). Other concerns associated with the use of probiotics and protective cultures include deleterious metabolic activities and imbalances, the eruption of excessive immune responses, persistent microbial colonization that disrupts the normal microbiota, septicemia, and localized or systemic infections (Spano et al. 2010; Doron and Snydman 2015; Pararajasingam and Uwagwu 2017; Costa et al. 2018; Kim et al. 2018; Sada et al. 2024).
The concerns associated with the use of live cells necessitate the use of bacteriocins, which may be safer for application in multiple systems. Since most microbial strains used as probiotics or protective cultures produce known (or unknown) bacteriocins or bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) that exert similar beneficial effects as the viable strains, it is believed that researchers may sooner than expected preferably explore the use of bacteriocins to mitigate the concerns associated with the use of viable cells. Bacteriocins seem to pose little or no risks for use within animal, human, and food systems while exerting their heterogeneous beneficial effects. Therefore, they may be the most preferred choice for broad applications earlier than anticipated. To fully understand the risks associated with the use of viable cells and to establish the preference for bacteriocin applications in real-life situations, more comprehensive studies using experimental evolution across multiple systems are required.
Applications of bacteriocins
As the science of bacteriocins steadily progresses, their areas of application are increasing proportionately, encompassing previously unknown areas. Since their discovery, bacteriocins have been used to improve food production, preservation, and safety in the food industry. However, their potential has now extended to various fields, including biotechnology, ecology, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, clinical settings, and veterinary medicine. Bacteriocins offer sustainable solutions to a wide range of scientific problems. Here, we critically evaluated and compiled the significant advances and emerging roles of bacteriocins as well as the latest bacteriocin-related innovations aimed at harnessing their heterogeneous potential and prospects for multisectoral applications in health and agrifood systems. Table 2 summarizes some bacteriocins with potential applications in different systems.
Modulation of microbiomes
The microbiota is crucial and necessary for maintaining homeostasis, the host defense system, disease prevention, and overall health and well-being. The composition and diversity of the microbiota vary depending on localized regions (e.g., oral, nasal, respiratory, gut, and skin) and consist of highly diverse and complex communities with specialized autochthonous bacteria (Berg et al. 2020; Anjana 2022; Baquero et al. 2019; Zheng et al. 2023; Ormaasen et al. 2023; Reuben et al. 2023; Pérez-Cobas et al. 2023; Ferraz 2023). Dysbiosis of the microbiota often leads to physiological dysfunction, dysregulation, and diseases (Hou et al. 2022). Numerous studies have highlighted the indiscriminate impact of antibiotics on the microbiota, resulting in dysbiosis and perturbations of microbial composition and diversity that predispose the host to metabolic and immune system disorders (Francino 2015; Sanchez-Rodriguez et al. 2020; Hou et al. 2022). Unlike antibiotics, bacteriocins have a narrow spectrum of activity, are highly specific, and can inhibit pathogens without disrupting host-microbiota homeostasis or causing detrimental effects. Bacteriocins that can promote beneficial shifts in the abundance, composition, and diversity of the microbiota may provide sustainable and valuable microbiome-based solutions for the treatment of infectious and non-infectious microbiome-related diseases resulting from microbiota dysbiosis.
Furthermore, bacteriocin production by most bacteria can be seen as a strategy to modulate the microbiome (Pu et al. 2022; O’Reilly et al. 2023; Ríos Colombo et al. 2023; Rani and Tiwari 2023; Puls et al. 2024). Bacteriocins can either prevent invasion by allochthonous bacteria (competitors or pathogens) or stimulate the immune system to prevent oxidative stress and inflammation (Dahiya et al. 2017; Bäuerl et al. 2017; Heilbronner et al. 2021; Rani and Tiwari 2023; Puls et al. 2024). In another instance, bacteriocin-producing bacteria can invade and colonize communities predominantly populated by susceptible strains (Riley and Gordon 1999; Heilbronner et al. 2021). Bacterial interactions within the microbiota are characterized by both competition (antagonism) and cooperation (mutualism), which require a delicate balance for overall microbiota functioning and cohesion (Heilbronner et al. 2021; Pérez-Cobas et al. 2023). However, the mechanisms regulating the integration and modulation of bacteriocins in this complex multifactorial meshwork remain a black box.
Although the roles of bacteriocins in microbiome modulation and the maintenance of homeostasis and host health are limited, extensive metagenomic analysis substantially revealed the omnipresence of bacteriocin biosynthetic gene clusters across human microbiomes (Donia et al. 2014; Aleti et al. 2019; Naimi et al. 2022). In a study, several bacteriocins, including garvicin ML (GarML), plantaricins EF and JK (plantaricins), enterocins P, Q, and L50 (enterocins), pediocin PA-1 (PedPA-1), and sakacin A (SakA) were reported to beneficially modulate the gut microbiota in mice (Umu et al. 2016). While these bacteriocins differ greatly in terms of physicochemical properties and inhibition spectrum, their administration had a favorable impact on the microbiota, resulting in changes at the taxonomic level, increased abundance of LAB, and a decrease in Enterococcaceae, clostridia, and staphylococci. Recent studies showed that nisin, lacticin 3147, pediocin PA1, and bactofencin A separately modulated gut microbiota, resulting in subtle and beneficial alterations in pigs, Simplified Human Intestinal Microbiota (SIHUMI), and simulated colon models (Ríos Colombo et al. 2023; O’Reilly et al. 2023; Pu et al. 2022; Guinane et al. 2016). Bactofencin A increased the relative abundances of Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus while lowering the abundances of Blautia and Clostridium spp. (Arboleya et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2020). Bifidobacterium spp. are considered important microbes in healthy microbiota and are associated with probiotic properties. Mice fed with bacteriocin-producing L. salivarius UCC118 for eight weeks showed changes in gut microbiota compared to those fed with non-bacteriocin-producing variants (Murphy et al. 2013). Treatment with bacteriocin-producing L. salivarius UCC118 significantly increased Proteobacteria and Bacteroides while decreasing Actinobacteria. Similarly, the assessment of L. salivarius bacteriocin, bactofencin A, in a simulated gut microbiota system showed significant microbiota modulation in both the bactofencin A-producing strain and bactofencin A treatments compared with the non-bactofencin A producing mutant (Guinane et al. 2016). Bacteriocin production subtly changes the community structure of the gut microbiota at the taxonomic level, maintaining a beneficial and desirable microbiota (Guinane et al. 2016; Garcia-Gutierrez et al. 2019; O’Connor et al. 2020). In the same manner, Naimi et al. (2022) recently reported the subtle beneficial modulatory effect of Microcin J25 (MccJ25) or reuterin on the overall colon microbiota diversity and metabolome of swine.
Within the oral cavity, some strains of S. mutans produce bacteriocins called mutacins which modulate the oral microbiome by inhibiting phylogenetically related plaque-forming strains (Gillor et al. 2008). There is a positive correlation between the production of bacteriocins by S. mutans and their ability to colonize the oral cavity (Hillman et al. 1987, 2000). S. salivarius K12, a commensal of the oral cavity often produces bacteriocins called salivaricins A and B. The presence of S. salivarius K12 which produces salivaricins A and B has been shown to modulate the oral and throat microbiomes, preventing the invasion of oral pathogens such as S. pyogenes and reducing throat infections (Brook 2005; Horz et al. 2007). Similarly, the consumption of milk containing a strain of S. salivarius 20P5, which produces salivaricin A, positively modulates the oral microbiota of children by significantly increasing the production and antagonistic activity of salivaricin A and providing immunity against S. pyogenes infection (Walls et al. 2003). Bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus spp. including L. gasseri, L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. iners, are dominant in the vagina microbiota of healthy women (Vásquez et al. 2002; Pendharkar et al. 2023). In contrast, women with bacterial vaginosis have a distinct vaginal microbiota characterized predominantly by Mycoplasma hominis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Bacteroides, Mobiluncus, Peptostreptococcus, and Prevotella spp., along with lower densities of lactobacilli (O’Brien 2005; Falagas et al. 2007; Turovskiy et al. 2009). The vaginal microbiota is often modulated by bacteriocin-producing lactobacilli, which typically antagonize pathogens, especially G. vaginalis and Candida spp. (Kaewsrichan et al. 2006; Günther et al. 2022).
The skin microbiome consists of a highly diverse array of microorganisms involved in complex but balanced multifactorial interactions with the host and external environment (Carmona-Cruz et al. 2022; Nicholas-Haizelden et al. 2023; Glatthardt et al. 2024). Any imbalance (dysbiosis) in the structure and composition of the skin microbiota often results in skin infections/diseases such as acne, impetigo, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis (Grice 2014; O’Sullivan et al. 2019; Carmona-Cruz et al. 2022; Richter and Wohlrab 2023; Sato et al. 2023; Puls et al. 2024). Bacteriocins have been used to selectively modulate and restore the skin microbial balance (eubiosis) in situations of dysbiosis caused by pathogen colonization and environmental perturbation (O’Sullivan et al. 2019; Ovchinnikov et al. 2020; Soltani et al. 2022b; Alessandrini et al. 2023; Jaumaux et al. 2023). Lugdunin, a cyclic peptide bacteriocin facilitates the restoration of skin microbial balance while inhibiting different etiological agents of skin infections, especially MRSA and other Gram-positive bacteria (Bitschar et al. 2019; Krauss et al. 2020; Barber and Zhang 2021; Bier and Schittek 2021). Lugdunin is believed to exert microbiome modulatory activity by stimulating the expression of different cutaneous antimicrobial peptides and recruiting phagocytic neutrophils and monocytes (Bitschar et al. 2019; Krauss et al. 2020; Saur et al. 2021; Hirsch et al. 2024). Lugdunin also inhibits colonizing skin pathogens by disrupting the transmembrane pH gradient, which likely leads to protein denaturation and a reduction in proton motive force, obstructing cellular respiration (Krulwich et al. 2011; Farha et al. 2013; Barber and Zhang 2021). Similarly, two recently discovered bacteriocins, cerein B4080 and cerein 7B, reportedly enhance skin microbiome eubiosis by selectively promoting the growth of skin commensals while inhibiting pathogens (Jaumaux et al. 2023). By preserving skin commensals through competitive exclusion/inhibition of pathogens, bacteriocins could beneficially modulate the skin microbiome while limiting the emergence and spread of superbugs within the skin ecosystem, thereby reducing skin infections (Meade et al. 2020; Soltani et al. 2022b; Jaumaux et al. 2023). Other bacteriocins that show high potential for application in skin microbiome modulation include garvicin KS, nisin Z, bactofencin A, pediocin PA-1, subtilosin, microcin J25, micrococcin P1, subtilin, bacteriocin A37, and reuterin (Joseph et al. 2013; O’Sullivan et al. 2019; Ovchinnikov et al. 2020; Heilbronner et al. 2021; Soltani et al. 2022b; Alessandrini et al. 2023; Puls et al. 2024). There is a need to further explore the mechanisms of activity and pharmacological benefits of promising skin-relevant bacteriocins for their suitability in clinical application and commercialization.
Bacteriocins have also been used to modulate food microbiota to improve organoleptic properties, quality, and microbiological safety. The growing knowledge of the structure and function of food microbiota now influences their modulation towards desirable functions and beneficial outcomes. Food microbiota are often modulated through the regulation of abiotic factors or by using specific microorganisms and/or their products, such as bacteriocins (And and Hoover 2003; Walsh et al. 2023). The latter involves the use of various forms of bacteriocins, whether purified or semi-purified, and/or bacteriocin-producing strains to modulate food microbiota (O’Sullivan et al. 2003; Ramu et al. 2015; Silva et al. 2018). It has been demonstrated that the microbiota of fermented foods (e.g., cheese and kefir) can be modulated, making them useful models for shaping food microbiota (Wolfe et al. 2014; Bonham et al. 2017; Wolfe 2018; Blasche et al. 2021; Walsh et al. 2023). The application of bacteriocins or bacteriocin-producing strains as starter or protective cultures in dairy products can confer numerous advantages during food processing. They can modulate the food microbiota by accelerating ripening, as is the case with cheese (Ávila et al. 2005; Martinez et al. 2015), or reduce the growth of adventitious non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) and other non-starter microbiota in fermented foods (Oumer et al. 2001; O’Sullivan et al. 2003), or inhibit invasion by environmental or spoilage organisms (Muñoz et al. 2004, 2007), or significantly reduce the growth of foodborne pathogens (Carnio et al. 2000; Aspri et al. 2017; Kondrotiene et al. 2018), or accelerate enzyme release and activities (O’Sullivan et al. 2003), or enhance fermentation (Oumer et al. 2001). Additionally, bacteriocin production has been detected in LAB bacteria recovered from wine during malolactic fermentation, especially among L. plantarum strains (Navarro et al. 2000; Rojo-Bezares et al. 2008; Díez et al. 2012). During vinification, bacteriocin production could be an important characteristic to consider when selecting LAB as starters for malolactic fermentation. Furthermore, bacteriocins produced by LAB have significant potential for use as biocontrol agents against foodborne and spoilage organisms as well as biopreservatives throughout the enological processes (Díez et al. 2012; Dündar 2016; Fernández-Pérez et al. 2018).
Medical and pharmaceutical applications
The emergence and spread of infectious diseases, especially those caused by antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, and the increasing morbidity and mortality due to non-communicable diseases like diabetes and cancer pose major threats to global health (PAHO/WHO 2019; WHO 2021). Due to their high antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens, safety, biocompatibility, unique mechanisms of action, biodegradability, high specificity, and nanomolar range, bacteriocins exert desirable heterogeneous traits relevant for medical application (Naveen and Kalaivani 2018; Meade et al. 2020; Le et al. 2021, 2023; Reinseth et al. 2024; Rossi et al. 2024). The potential of bacteriocins in medicine has been demonstrated through various in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experiments, with some undergoing clinical evaluation. However, concerns have risen regarding solubility, stability, bioavailability, sensitivity to proteolytic enzymes, high cost, and the challenges of large-scale purification and production for general use, which often limit the direct use of bacteriocins in clinical studies and hinder their industrial production and commercialization (Böttger et al. 2017; Mathur et al. 2018; Hols et al. 2019; Soltani et al. 2021a). Nevertheless, due to the unique and diverse medical potentials exhibited by bacteriocins, further investigations involving cutting-edge bioengineering techniques can be conducted to address these concerns and improve their properties and large-scale production for general medical use.
Inhibition of pathogens: viable alternatives to antibiotics
Since the discovery of antibiotics, they have played a significant role in the prevention and treatment of animal and human diseases. However, the emergence and increasing spread of multi- and extensive-drug-resistant superbugs necessitate the urgent use of novel, suitable, and sustainable strategies for infection control, treatment, and addressing AMR concerns. Bacteriocins show great promise as sustainable alternatives to currently available antibiotics. Numerous studies have described the unique mechanisms of action and potency of different bacteriocins against a broad range of superbugs (Bastos et al. 2009, 2015; Svetoch et al. 2009; Ahmad et al. 2017; Goodarzi et al. 2020; Ovchinnikov et al. 2021; Benítez-Chao et al. 2021; Sharma et al. 2022; Soltani et al. 2022a; Barman et al. 2023; Ghapanvari et al. 2022; Bahy et al. 2023; Ibraheim et al. 2023; Wolden et al. 2023; Reinseth et al. 2024). Over the years, many studies have reported the antimicrobial properties of various bacteriocins against clinically important pathogens responsible for respiratory tract, nosocomial, dental, skin, and gastrointestinal tract infections. Bacteriocins have also been shown to have inhibitory effects on multidrug-resistant pathogens including C. difficile, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenza, Listeria spp., Salmonella spp., Enterobacter spp., Acinetobacter spp. and others (Oman and van der Donk 2009; Lay et al. 2016; Hanchi et al. 2017; Yu et al. 2019; Velázquez-Suárez et al. 2021; Ghapanvari et al. 2022; Bahy et al. 2023; Le et al. 2023; Alattar et al. 2024; Mu et al. 2024; Reinseth et al. 2024). Recently, Ying et al. (2024) and Wolden et al. (2023) separately identified novel bacteriocins, bacteriocin XJS01 and romsacin (produced by Lactobacillus salivarius and Staphylococcus haemolyticus) which showed broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive World Health Organization (WHO) priority pathogens such as VRE (E. faecium) and MRSA. Additionally, romsacin also eradicated the biofilms of VRE, MRSA, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus.
Nosocomial infections are mostly caused by MDR E. coli, enterococci, P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, K. pneumoniae, pneumococci, S. aureus, and Proteus spp. (Ghodhbane et al. 2015; Khan et al. 2017; Le et al. 2021; Rossi et al. 2024). Lacticin 3147, klebicin, and nisin A have shown high inhibitory activity against multiple nosocomial pathogens including MRSA and VRE (Piper et al. 2009; Ahmad et al. 2017; Alattar et al. 2024; Zhao et al. 2024). These bacteriocins also exhibit significant antagonism against pathogens in the kidney, liver, and spleen. In an in vivo study involving S. aureus Xen 29 infected mice, subcutaneous treatment with lacticin 3147 prevented the systemic spread of the pathogen, indicating the potential of lacticin 3147 as a biotherapeutic in real-life applications (Piper et al. 2009). Pumilicin 4, a bacteriocin produced by Bacillus pumilus, has shown remarkable inhibitory activity against MRSA, VRE, and several Gram-positive bacteria (Aunpad and Na-Bangchang 2007). This demonstrates the potential of the use of Pumilicin 4 in the management of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other susceptible Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Similarly, planosporicin, a bacteriocin produced by Planomonospora spp. DSM14920, has shown activity against S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, and S. aureus (Aunpad and Na-Bangchang 2007). Jabés et al. (2011) and Mota-Meira et al. (2005) separately demonstrated high in vitro and in vivo inhibitory activities of bacteriocins NAI-107, mutacin B-Ny266, and microbisporicin against MDR pathogens. Additionally, the activity of microcin J25, a bacteriocin produced by E. coli against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has also been reported (Telhig et al. 2022).
The growth of major pathogenic bacteria including H. influenzae, Pasteurella multocida, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, P. aeruginosa, or Moraxella catarrhalis, responsible for various respiratory tract infections (RTIs) such as rhinitis, pneumonia, otitis, and tuberculosis were reportedly inhibited by different bacteriocins (mutacin B-Ny266, bacteriocin L23, lantibiotic MU1140, nisin F, and Mersacidin) under in vivo conditions in mice and Wistar Rats models and in vitro models (Kruszewska et al. 2004; Mota-Meira et al. 2005; Pascual et al. 2008; De Kwaadsteniet et al. 2009; Ghobrial et al. 2009; Le et al. 2023; Martin et al. 2023; Zhao et al. 2024). The activities of these bacteriocins under varied in vivo conditions, including immunosuppression, were observed to have no toxicity to the bronchi, trachea, lungs, or haematology of the evaluated animals. Similarly, purified salivaricin D and mutacin 1140 have shown antagonism against known RTI pathogens, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and S. pneumoniae (Ghobrial et al. 2009; Birri et al. 2012). Multiple in vitro and in vivo (mice and macrophages) anti-tubercular activities of various bacteriocins (e.g. lacticin 3147, nisin, laterosporulin10, and enterocin AS-48) have been tested against different strains of M. tuberculosis with favorable outcomes (Sosunov et al. 2007; de Kwaadsteniet et al. 2010; Carroll et al. 2010; Aguilar-Pérez et al. 2018). Furthermore, variants of bioengineered nisin S, T, and V tested against M. tuberculosis (H37Ra), M. avium subsp. Paratuberculosis (ATCC 19698), M. avium subsp. Hominissuis (CIT05/03), and M. kansasii (CIT11/06) showed more significant inhibitory activities compared to parent nisin (Carroll et al. 2010). Among the bioengineered nisin variants, nisin S showed the most potent antagonism. Latham et al. (2017) also reported narrow-spectrum activity against nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) by a novel bacteriocin produced by Haemophilus haemolyticus. Their findings suggest that the novel bacteriocin or bacteriocinogenic strains of H. haemolyticus have the potential to reduce NTHi colonization and respiratory tract infection caused by NTHi.
Topical evaluation of bacteriocins has successfully been reported against oral and skin diseases, and breastfeeding women with mastitis (Fernández et al. 2008; Kang et al. 2009; Tong et al. 2014). Etiological agents of these diseases especially Propionibacterium acnes, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, L. monocytogenes, B. subtilis, and B. cereus were controlled using bacteriocins such as nisin, lactocyclicin Q, subpeptin JM4B and hiracin JM79 (Sánchez et al. 2007; Kang et al. 2009; Sawa et al. 2009; Izquierdo et al. 2009; Ovchinnikov et al. 2020; Barman et al. 2023). Similarly, bacteriocins or bacteriocin-based formulas have been topically used for the treatment and prevention of mastitis and intramammary infections in animals Bennett et al. 2021; 2022; Heinzinger et al. 2023; Raheel et al. 2023). Several studies have reported the potency of different bacteriocins against pathogenic bacteria responsible for dental infections, vaginosis, gastric ulcers, gastroenteritis, etc. (Howell et al. 1993; Dover et al. 2007; Miyauchi et al. 2012; Kaewnopparat et al. 2013; van Staden et al. 2016; Cebrián et al. 2019; Ovchinnikov et al. 2020, 2021; Goodarzi et al. 2020; Benítez-Chao et al. 2021; Sharma et al. 2022; Barman et al. 2023; Alessandrini et al. 2023).
Potential antiviral agents
Apart from antibacterial properties exhibited by bacteriocins, several bacteriocins also possess antiviral activities against different viruses. While working with bacteriocins produced by E. faecium CRL35, (Wachsman et al. 1999) first described the antiviral activity of enterocin CRL35 against Herpes simplex viruses (HSV-1 and HSV-2). Enterocin CRL35 interferes with intracellular viral multiplication and inhibits viral late stages of replication (Wachsman et al. 2003; Al Kassaa et al. 2014). Similarly, enterocin ST4V and enterocin ST5Ha produced by E. mundtii ST4V and E. faecium ST5Ha, respectively, have shown high potency against HSV-1 and HSV-2 (Wachsman et al. 2003; Todorov et al. 2005). Bacteriocins produced by L. curvatus and L. delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus have shown antiviral properties against murine norovirus (MNV) and influenza virus (H1N1) (Serkedjieva et al. 2000; Lange-Starke et al. 2014). Non-LAB bacteriocins including Subtilosin A, erwiniocin NA4, and staphylococcin 188 produced by B. subtilis, E. carotovora NA4, and S. aureus AB188 independently showed inhibitory activities against HSV-1 (Torres et al. 2013), influenza, Newcastle disease, and coliphage HSA viruses (Qureshi et al. 2006; Saeed et al. 2007), respectively. Likewise, Actinomadura namibiensis DSM 6313 secretes bacteriocin, Labyrinthopeptin A1 (LabyA1) with antiviral activity against HSV and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (Férir et al. 2013). LabyA1 inhibited intracellular transmission of HIV-1 between infected and noninfected CD4 + T cells. Lee et al. (2016) similarly demonstrated the antiviral inhibitory activity of Micrococcin P1. In their study, they reported that Micrococcin P1, a naturally occurring macrocyclic peptide efficiently inhibited the attachment, entry, and cell-to-cell transmission of all hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes.
In a recent study, bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances produced by E. faecium CM019 isolated from Egyptian dairy products showed broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and several Gram-positive bacteria activity (Bahy et al. 2023). Generally, the antiviral mechanisms and pharmacodynamics of bacteriocins against viruses are yet to be fully elucidated. However, it is believed that bacteriocins interfere with viral key determinants responsible for viral replication (Wachsman et al. 2003). Further studies are required to decipher the mechanisms of action and pharmacodynamics of bacteriocins against different viruses, especially those emerging with high virulence.
Potential non-invasive bio-diagnostic tool
Emerging reports show the great potential of bacteriocins as valuable tools for bioanalytical purposes in medicine, largely due to their precision, specificity, and in vivo recognition in biological systems. Different studies have demonstrated the labeling of bacteriocins using specific organic probes, fluorescent, or radioactive markers (Imran et al. 2013; Deng et al. 2020; Escobar et al. 2023). Through visualization with fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy, a labeled bacteriocin, fluorescent nisin Z, was able to precisely detect three pathogenic listerial strains: L. monocytogenes CIP 82110, L. ivanovii CIP 12510, and L. innocua CIP 12511 (Imran et al. 2013). Additionally, the mechanism of antilisterial action using the labeled nisin was demonstrated. Technetium-99 m (99mTc)–duramycin a bacteriocin which is known to have high specificity and affinity towards phosphatidylethanolamine was used to identify apoptotic and necrotic cells (Ahmad et al. 2017). The combinatorial use of sodium iodide symporter (NIS) and 99mTc-duramycin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging has proven effective in monitoring the spread of oncolytic virotherapy (OV) and determining the absence or presence of therapeutic-associated cell death (Zhang et al. 2019).
Recent advances in bacteriocin and peptide-based diagnosis, detection, and monitoring of pathogens have been increasingly developed for application in clinical and food systems with remarkable success. Various bacteriocins such as warnericin RK, leucocin, leucocin A, pediocin PA1, and curvacin A, have been used for the detection and monitoring of pathogens including bacteria and viruses, in clinical settings and the food system (Etayash et al. 2014a, b; Azmi et al. 2015; Islam et al. 2021, 2022; Escobar et al. 2023). These advances show the potential application of bacteriocins not only as noninvasive diagnostic tools for the diagnosis and prognosis of both infectious and non-infectious diseases but also for the identification of individuals predisposed to chronic diseases or secondary infections. Additionally, the use of peptide-based biosensors could offer promising, rapid, and highly sensitive alternatives for pathogen detection and food monitoring in agrifood systems.
Potential as anticancer agents
Globally, cancer remains one of the most severe, life-threatening, and difficult-to-treat diseases, resulting from the spread of uncontrollable proliferation of cells. The use of conventional cancer treatments, especially chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, often results in more devastating side effects and is still unable to curb the rising cases of cancer-associated morbidity and mortality (Naveen and Kalaivani 2018; Meade et al. 2020). A paradigm shift in cancer treatment approaches, including the use of innovative, safe, and sustainable solutions with no severe side effects is imperative. Interestingly, several bacteriocins have demonstrated varying degrees of anticancer activity (Hoskin and Ramamoorthy 2008; Kaur and Kaur 2015; Baindara et al. 2018; Meade et al. 2020). Due to the differences between the membranes of cancerous and healthy cells, bacteriocins can identify and selectively destroy cancer cells (Meade et al. 2020). Unlike healthy cells, which have outer membranes with neutral charged ions, the outer membrane of cancer cells upregulates the expressions of O-glycosylated mucins and phosphatidylserine (Yoon et al. 1996; Dobrzyńska et al. 2005) and becomes negatively charged. The negatively charged cell membranes of cancer cells trigger electrostatic interactions in the presence of [positively charged] bacteriocins (Hammami et al. 2010; Baindara et al. 2018; Meade et al. 2020; Ananou et al. 2020). The inhibitory activity of bacteriocins against cancer cells is primarily based on membrane permeabilization, which is mainly due to the amphiphilic and cationic nature of bacteriocins (Kaur and Kaur 2015; Perez et al. 2018). Ahmadi et al. (2017) reported antiproliferative activity of nisin against colon cancer SW480 cells. Nisin ZP induced anticancer activity, resulting in a high level of apoptosis in squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC cells) with no histological damage, necrosis, fibrosis, or inflammation even after prolonged exposure to nisin ZP (Kamarajan et al. 2015). Similarly, nisin has shown activity in the control of oral cancer as well as in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in in vivo mice studies (Lopetuso et al. 2019). Purified colicin, microcin, pediocin, and pyocin have also demonstrated high inhibitory activities in xenograft mouse models and neoplastic cell lines (Shin et al. 2016). Microcin E492, produced by K. pneumoniae, exhibits anticancer properties against breast and colorectal cancer cells through the induction of apoptosis and necrosis in some human cell lines (Hetz et al. 2002).
In recent years, several bacteriocins, including Laterosporulin10, Enterocin 12a, nisin A, Fermenticin HV6b, colicins, and Enterocin LNS18, have shown anticancer properties against various types of cancers in different cancer cell models (Baindara et al. 2017; Norouzi et al. 2018; Al-Madboly et al. 2020; Hosseini et al. 2020; Soleimanpour et al. 2020; Sharma et al. 2021; Balcik-Ercin and Sever 2022; Molujin et al. 2022; Ye et al. 2023). These bacteriocins often exhibit anticancer activities against human cell lines or in vivo, with minimal activity towards non-cancerous cells. Several studies have confirmed the anticancer potential of bacteriocins. However, more in vivo studies are necessary to fully elucidate and validate the clinical potency of bacteriocins as anticancer therapeutic agents.
Food applications
The application of bacteriocins in the food system has been extensively studied since their discovery. Bacteriocins are naturally synthesized and ready-to-use, without color, taste, odor, or impact on the sensory properties of food. They also demonstrate stability at high temperatures and low pH, making them increasingly important in the food sector (Perez et al. 2014; Abbasiliasi et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2018; Sanguyo et al. 2021; Shafique et al. 2022; Field et al. 2023; Yu et al. 2023). The suitability of bacteriocins for extensive application in the food system leverages several beneficial aspects of food production. Bacteriocins are able to (a) decrease the risk of transmission of foodborne or zoonotic pathogens and food poisoning, (b) improve the shelf life of food, (c) decrease economic losses due to disease outbreaks, food spoilage, and recalls, (d) preserve the nutritional value of food through the reduction of the intensity of physical treatments, (e) decrease processing costs and time, (f) provide a safe and sustainable alternative preservation approach for ready-to-eat and "novel” food, and (g) provide extra protection during temperature abuse episodes (Gálvez et al. 2007; Hu et al. 2014; Darbandi et al. 2022). While various aspects of bacteriocin applications within the food system, including food preservation, fermentation, and protective culture, have been extensively reviewed (Deegan et al. 2006; Zacharof and Lovitt 2012; Perez et al. 2014; Bali et al. 2016; Ahmad et al. 2017; Lopetuso et al. 2019), we provide additional updates on the emerging and relevant potential of bacteriocin use in the food system.
Potential in antimicrobial food packaging
Despite the application of advanced technologies in the food industry, excessive economic loss as a result of microbial contamination and spoilage continue to constitute a major challenge globally. The application of antimicrobial agents, including bacteriocins, in antimicrobial packaging is specifically suitable for mitigating the risk of microbial contamination. The use of bacteriocin-coated packaging films to inhibit and control food spoilage has attracted considerable attention the recent years. These bacteriocins can either be directly coated onto the packaging film surface or incorporated into the matrix of the packaging film (Woraprayote et al. 2016; Ahmad et al. 2017; Benabbou et al. 2020). However, it is important to understand both the physicochemical properties and the mechanism(s) of action of the selected bacteriocin(s) for such use (O’Connor et al. 2015). Active bacteriocin coating serves to protect food products by continuously interacting with the packaged food and modifying the internal environmental conditions within the required shelf life (Gumienna and Górna 2021). In most instances, bacteriocins improve food quality by maintaining microbiological safety, improving nutritional and sensory properties, and extending shelf life (Santos et al. 2018; Mousavi Khaneghah et al. 2018; Sanguyo et al. 2021; Shafique et al. 2022; Yu et al. 2023). Food packaging films or polymers incorporated with bacteriocins directly inhibit the growth of microorganisms on the food surface, where most of the microbial food spoilage or contamination occurs (Ahmad et al. 2017; Gumienna and Górna 2021; Rivera-Hernández et al. 2021). Interestingly, most bacteriocins retain their antimicrobial activity during food processing. Their viability is not impacted by changes in temperature, sterilization, pasteurization, or other processing techniques (Santos et al. 2018; Gumienna and Górna 2021). The growing consumer demand for safe, natural, and chemical-free food has enabled food industries to explore the use of bacteriocins in food packaging, among other applications. Active bacteriocin-coated materials are highly promising sustainable solutions to enhance food safety and shelf life while retarding food contamination and spoilage.
For example, a polyethylene-based packaging film infused with plantaricin BM-1 produced by L. plantarum BM-1 showed antilisterial activity against L. monocytogenes for at least 120 days at room temperature (Zhang et al. 2017). Woraprayote et al. (2018) also demonstrated the inhibitory activity of Weissella hellenica-produced bacteriocin 7293 impregnated onto a biocomposite film (PLA/SP) with pangasius fish fillets against various foodborne pathogens, including A. hydrophila, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa, and S. typhimurium. The adsorption of nisin on a wide variety of packaging films with antimicrobial activities has been successfully reported on polypropylene, ethylene vinyl acetate, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, acrylics, polyamide, and polyester. Nisin-incorporated coatings for poultry products have also been documented (Appendini and Hotchkiss 2002; Scaffaro et al. 2011; Tumbarski et al. 2018). Polyamide and polyethylene pouches coated with nisin preparation (Nisaplin®) and lacticin 3147 significantly reduced L. lactis subsp. lactis, S. aureus, and L. innocua during the storage of vacuum-packed cheese (Scannell et al. 2000). Pediocin coated on plastic bags and cellulose casings completely inhibited L. monocytogenes in meats during 3 months of storage at refrigeration temperature (Ming et al. 1997). Benabbou et al. (2020) also reported the antimicrobial properties of biocompatible and biodegradable chitosan films incorporated with divergicin M35 for the biocontrol of Listeria spp. in foods, especially minimally processed products, and ready-to-eat food. The success observed in these studies highlights the potential of bacteriocins in antimicrobial packaging by effectively inhibiting or limiting the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in packaged food.
Potential as antibiofilm and sanitizers
Microorganisms mostly exist as sessile communities, known as biofilms, enclosed in an extracellular matrix typically composed of extracellular DNA, lipids, polysaccharides, etc. (Flemming et al. 2016). Biofilm formation by microorganisms in the food system makes them resistant to antimicrobials and difficult to remove from food production facilities, surfaces, and environments (Mathur et al. 2018). Many biofilm-forming species in the food industry are known human pathogens that can cause metal corrosion, changes in organoleptic properties of food, and disease (Colagiorgi et al. 2017; Kirtonia et al. 2021). Biofilms are commonly found on surfaces such as tanks, pipelines, glass, polyethylene, polypropylene, rubber, packaging tools, and wood (Kirtonia et al. 2021). Recently, the use of bacteriocins as antibiofilm agents in the food industry has been widely reported (Mathur et al. 2018; Kirtonia et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2022a, b). In a study by Bolocan et al. (2017), several bacteriocins including, subtilomycin, nisin Z, and lichenicidin demonstrated high antibiofilm activity against L. monocytogenes biofilms. These bacteriocins also significantly decreased the viability of already formed biofilms. Another study showed that nisin at the concentration of 4000 IU/ml reduced biofilm formation by 87, 57, and 30% for Salmonella Enteriditis, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus, respectively (Mahdavi et al. 2007). Bacteriocin sonorensin exhibited inhibitory activity against S. aureus biofilms (Chopra et al. 2015). From their study, the inhibitory property of sonorensin was attributed to increased membrane permeability in S. aureus. Biofilms formed by fourteen Staphylococcus strains were inhibited by hyicin 4244, a circular sactibiotic secreted by S. hyicus 4244 (Duarte et al. 2018). Hyicin 4244 decreased biofilm-forming ability, number of cells, cellular viability, and proliferation of sessile cells within already formed biofilm.
While the combination of nisin with enterocin B3A-B3B resulted in a 2-log decrease in L. monocytogenes biofilms on the surface of stainless steel within 24 h, nisin mixed with ethanol however resulted in a 5-log reduction of Salmonella and E. coli biofilms on stainless steel surfaces within 15 min (Phongphakdee and Nitisinprasert 2015; Al-Seraih et al. 2017). Industrial application of bacteriocins as antibiofilm agents or sanitizers may require a longer period to achieve significant bacterial reduction. However, bacteriocin combination with other antimicrobials can result in rapid bacterial reduction and biofilms clearance. Further studies are needed to explore the potential of bacteriocins as antibiofilm agents in the food industry, focusing on unraveling their mechanism of action and spectrum of activity.
Agriculture and veterinary medicine
Antibiotics have been routinely used in agriculture, either for treating or preventing animal diseases or as growth promoters. This practice has significantly contributed to the increased emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens from animals to humans (Ben Lagha et al. 2017). To address the issue of AMR in animal production, many countries have prohibited antibiotic use as growth promoters in animal production (European Commission 2005; AccessScience Editors 2017; Prescott 2019; Field et al. 2023; WOAH 2023). Therefore, the application of bacteriocins and/or bacteriocin-producing strains as growth promoters, prophylaxis, or therapeutics in agriculture has been considered viable and sustainable alternatives to antibiotics.
Potential as prophylactic and therapeutic agents
Dairy animals often suffer from mastitis, which is an inflammation of the mammary gland resulting in considerable economic losses due to reduced milk quantity and quality. Mastitis is predominantly caused by S. aureus, S. dysgalactiae, S. uberis, Mycoplasma spp., and E. coli (Cheng and Han 2020). Several bacteriocins, including lacticin 3147 and nisin, have been shown to inhibit the etiological agents of mastitis, especially S. agalactiae and S. aureus in dairy cattle (Cao et al. 2007; Pieterse et al. 2010b; Klostermann et al. 2010; Field et al. 2021; Bennett et al. 2021; 2022; Heinzinger et al. 2023; Raheel et al. 2023). The United States FDA has approved the general use of a nisin-based preparation, Wipe Out® Dairy Wipes (Immucell, Portland, ME, USA), for mastitis control in lactating dairy cows. Klostermann et al. (2010) demonstrated the efficacy of lacticin 3147 in eliminating mastitis-causing S. uberis, S. dysgalactiae, and S. aureus after a 10-min teat dip treatment. Other bacteriocins, such as aureocins A70, A53, epilancin K7, entomocin, Pep5, kurstacin 287, bacteriocin ST91KM, uberolysin, nisin U, kenyacin 404, and epidermin, have shown anti-mastitis effects against S. aureus and S. agalactiae (Barboza-Corona et al. 2009; Pieterse et al. 2010a; Salvucci et al. 2012).
Microcin J25 has been used for Salmonella control in poultry (Stavric and D’Aoust 1993; Ben Said et al. 2020; Baquero et al. 2024). Divercin AS7, a bacteriocin produced by Carnobacterium divergens AS7 has been effective in controlling S. enterica Typhimurium, Campylobacter spp., and C. perfringens in both poultry and swine (Gillor et al. 2004; Stern et al. 2005; Udompijitkul et al. 2012). Our recent studies have demonstrated the antagonistic and pathogen-reducing activity of plantaricin EF producing-L. plantarum, alone and in combination with other potential probiotic strains against enterobacteria in poultry (Reuben et al. 2022) as well as other zoonotic pathogens such as Salmonella Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, E. coli O157: H7, E. faecalis, and L. monocytogenes (Reuben et al. 2020). In another study involving boilers challenged with Pasteurella multocida, we found that dietary supplementation with novel multistrain probiotics containing plantaricin EF-producing L. plantarum attenuated mortality, clinical manifestations, and inflammatory reactions associated with P. multocida-induced fowl cholera (Reuben et al. 2021). Furthermore, the abundance of gut enterobacteria and P. multocida was also significantly reduced in birds supplemented with the multistrain probiotics containing plantaricin EF-producing L. plantarum. Similarly, the therapeutic potential of bacteriocin and a strain of bacteriocin producing L. plantarum was investigated on broilers experimentally infected with E. coli (Ogunbanwo et al. 2004). Treatment with bacteriocin or the producing L. plantarum strain reduced E. coli-associated infections and improved the overall health and well-being of the birds.
Potential as growth promoters
The prohibition of antibiotic use as growth promoters in animal production has created a void that must be filled with equally potent, safe, and sustainable alternatives. Bacteriocins and their producing strains have emerged as widely accepted and suitable growth promoters in animal production. Several studies have demonstrated the growth promotion effects of bacteriocins and bacteriocin-producing strains in various animal species including poultry, cattle, and swine (Gillor et al. 2004; Cutler et al. 2007; McAllister et al. 2011; Józefiak et al. 2013; Reuben et al. 2021, 2022; Soltani et al. 2022a; Zhang et al. 2022a, b; Field et al. 2023).
The dietary supplementation with colicin E1 improved growth performance and significantly reduced F18-positive enterotoxigenic E. coli-associated postweaning diarrhea in piglets (Cutler et al. 2007). Supplementation with L. salivarius Bacteriocin Abp118 induced intestinal microbiota modulation, leading to increased growth performance and feed conversion efficiency in pigs (Riboulet-Bisson et al. 2012). Grilli et al. (2009) observed improved growth performance in C. perfringens infected broiler chickens supplemented with pediocin A alone or in combination with the producing strain. Similarly, the inclusion of nisin in the diet of broiler chickens beneficially modulated gut microbiota and significantly enhanced feed conversion and growth performance (Józefiak et al. 2013). Supplementation with plantaricin EF-producing L. plantarum, alone or in combination with other probiotic strains including E. faecium C14 and P. pentosaceus I13, improved haemato‐biochemical parameters, intestinal health, and growth in broilers (Reuben et al. 2022). Dietary supplementation of broiler feed with bacteriocin microcin J25 significantly improved performance, intestinal microbiota composition, and diversity, while reducing systemic inflammatory markers and levels of faecal E. coli and Salmonella (Wang et al. 2020b). These studies demonstrate the potential of bacteriocins or bacteriocinogenic strains as viable alternatives to antibiotics for growth promotion in animals.
Potential in sustainable aquaculture
The aquaculture supply chain is continuously exposed to multiple physical, chemical, and biological hazards, especially a wide range of pathogenic organisms. This impacts the quality and safety of aquaculture and its products. Minimizing microbiological hazards often involves the use of antibiotics, which enhances the selective pressure for the emergence and spread of superbugs and drug residues in both aquaculture products and their environment (Gillor et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2019a; Stentiford et al. 2022). However, in recent years, substantial attention has been given to the use of bacteriocins in aquaculture mostly for aquaculture processing and disease mitigation, improvement of water quality, and enhancement of sensory quality and shelf life (Wang et al. 2019a). Bacteriocin cloning and heterogeneous expressions from producing strains have demonstrated great potential in designing robust microbial cell factories capable of producing potent bacteriocins (Xu et al. 2019; Feito et al. 2023). Through this advancement, Feito et al. (2022) and Contente et al. (2023) engineered a recombinant multi-bacteriocinogenic strain (L. cremoris WA2-67) to produce three bacteriocins: garvicin A, Q, and nisin Z. The three recombinant bacteriocins, especially nisin Z, beneficially enhanced immune functions and growth performance while inhibiting pathogen colonization in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) (Contente et al. 2023). Bacteriocin-like substances (BLS) obtained by co-cultures of E. faecium MU8 with Aeromonas veronii showed significant antimicrobial activity against major pathogens of Nile tilapia, including Aeromonas jandaei and A. veronii (Promrug et al. 2023). Bacteriocin production through co-cultures of Gram-negative-inducing strains with Gram-positive bacteriocin-producing strains is now used to increase bacteriocin biosynthesis and yields (Liu et al. 2021; Promrug et al. 2023).
Bacteriocins such as enteromycin F4-9 and MC13, produced from E. faecalis F4-9 and E. faecium MC13 respectively, have shown broad inhibitory activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial pathogens of aquatic animals, including E. coli JM109, A. hydrophila, Vibrio harveyi, and V. parahaemolyticus (Pinto et al. 2009). Bacteriocin produced by A. media strain A199 has controlled V. tubiashii-infected Pacific oyster larvae (Gibson et al. 1998) and significantly reduced mortality due to saprolegniosis in eels (Lategan and Gibson 2003). The dietary inclusion of bacteriocin NPUST1 produced by Paenibacillus ehimensis NPUST1 reduced the counts of S. iniae and A. hydrophila and improved the growth performance of Oreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia) (Chen et al. 2019). Plantaricin FGC-12 applied to Whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) inhibited V. parahaemolyticus by causing cell wall perforation (Hu et al. 2013).
Furthermore, bacteriocin-like substances obtained from LAB associated with the gut of Mugil cephalus L (grey mullet) improved water quality, inhibited the growth of L. garvieae and reduced microbial-associated morbidity and mortality in aquatic animals (Lin et al. 2013). In addition to their pathogen inhibitory properties, bacteriocins also improve the sensory properties and shelf life of aquatic products (Cortesi et al. 2009; Alzamora et al. 2012).
Potential as plant growth promoters
So far, only bacteriocins of Bacillus spp. have been extensively studied and mostly used in plant production (Nazari and Smith 2020; Negash and Tsehai 2020). Bacteriocins bacthuricin F4 and thuricin 17 are produced by different B. thuringiensis strains, especially B. thuringiensis BF4 and NEB17. These bacteriocins, along with bacteriocin C85 secreted by B. cereus UW85, have been reported to possess growth promotion properties in plants (Negash and Tsehai 2020). Applying a cocktail containing the combination of the 3 bacteriocins and their producing strains increased photosynthesis by 6%, plant dry weight by 15%, root nodulation by 21%, and leaf area in corn, soybean, and tomato plants when compared with controls. These bacteriocins exhibit bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic activities that promote disease resistance in plants.
Mirzaee et al. (2021) recently reported that plant-produced bacteriocins inhibit different plant pathogens while conferring resistance to diseases in tomatoes. Furthermore, other bacteriocins such as amylocyclicin, Bac 14B, Bac-GM17, putidacin, and cerein 8A have been used for both antimicrobial activity and growth promotion in plants (Cherif et al. 2001, 2008; Hammami et al. 2009; Prudent et al. 2015).
Commercialization of bacteriocins: patent and market perspectives
While the current report of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html) shows 1127 bacteriocins-related patent applications published, the Espacenet and Lens global patent search engines (https://www.epo.org/ and https://about.lens.org/) report 10,790 and 10,846 patents, respectively (Fig. 4). Over the past three decades, there has been a consistent increase in bacteriocin-related patent publications, filings, and approvals. The leading countries in patent applications are the USA, China, Canada, the Republic of Korea, Japan, and Australia. The top applicants include Colgate Palmolive Co, Unilever Plc, Unilever Nv, University of California, Coca-Cola Co, Chr Hansen As, and US Agriculture (Figures S2 and S3). The fascinating properties of bacteriocins contribute to their widespread acceptance and market potential.
In 1969, the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) of the United Nations approved the general use of nisin as a food preservative. Subsequently, the European Union (Directive 83/463/EEC; Directive 95/2/EC), United States (FDA 21CFR), and Canada [Health Canada (NOP/ADP-0028)] granted similar approvals in 1983, 1988, and 2017, respectively. Although most commercially available bacteriocins especially nisin (Nisaplin™, Biosafe™, Oralpeace™), leucocin A (Bactoferm™ B-SF-43), sakacin (Bactoferm™ B-2, BactofermTM B-FM), and pediocin PA-1 (Microgard™, Alta 2341), are primarily used as food preservatives (Daba and Elkhateeb 2020; Cesa-Luna et al. 2021; Naskar and Kim 2021), others such as colicins and salmocins, intended for use as antibacterial agents, have received FDA approval (Hahn-Löbmann et al. 2019). In 2019, the FDA approved five bacteriocin preparations including, SalE1a, SalE1b, SalE2, SalE3, and SalE7 (Nomad Bioscience GmbH) for use as antimicrobial agents on meat, poultry, fish, and egg products (https://www.fda.gov/media/135524/download) The five bacteriocins were derived from non-typhoidal bacteriocinogenic Salmonella strains, and can be used individually or in combination. Duramycin (Moli1901) (AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG), a commercially available bacteriocin, has been used in patients for the treatment of cystic fibrosis in humans (Grasemann et al. 2007; Steiner et al. 2008). Similarly, Delvo® Nis (DSM, Delft, Netherlands), Nisin Z® (Handary, Brussel, Belgium), and Nisaplin® (Danisco, Copenhagen, Denmark) have been approved for commercial use (Soltani et al. 2021a).
Bacteriocin-producing protective cultures, such as C. divergens M35, Leuconostoc carnosum 4010 (Danisco, HOLDBAC®) and C. maltaromaticum CB1 have been approved by several countries for use in the food industry (https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2017/SPS/CAN/17_0131_00_e.pdf; https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/public-involvement-partnerships/use-microbiological-preparation-carnobacterium-maltaromaticum-strain-certain-ready-meat-poultry-products/document.html). Nisin-based commercially available bacteriocins approved by the USDA, Teatseal® (Zoetis, USA), Wipe-Out® Dairy Wipes and Mast Out® (Immucell Corporation, USA) are commonly used as anti-mastitis agents in dairy cows (Soltani et al. 2021a). Additionally, nisin-incorporated soy-derived packaging films have been commercialized as an antimicrobial food package to inhibit Listeria (Ahmad et al. 2017). Several bacteriocin products, including sakacin (Bactoferm FLC®, Chr. Hansen, Hørsholm, Denmark), NVB302, Moli1901 (Actinoplanes liguriae NCIMB41362), mutacin 1140 (S. mutans JH1000), pediocin (Fargo 23, Quest International, B.V.), and NAI-107 (Microbispora corallina), are currently at various phases of clinical trials for subsequent use in health and agrifood systems (Soltani et al. 2021a; Cesa-Luna et al. 2021).
Challenges and limitations of bacteriocin application and future research
Despite increasing research on bacteriocin discovery, characterization, and application over the past decades, only a few have been commercially applied. While bacteriocins are generally believed to be safe, concerns about their cytotoxicity against eukaryotic cells, stability, immunogenicity, development of resistance, unpredictable biofunctions, and high production costs have raised doubts about their application. These concerns necessitate extensive safety evaluations of each bacteriocin before final approval and use in health and agrifood systems.
Several reports have demonstrated the safety and non-cytotoxicity of bacteriocins; however, others have shown varying (low) degrees of cytotoxicity in both in vitro and in vivo experiments (Pulse et al. 2019; Baños et al. 2019; Cebrián et al. 2019, 2023; Wang et al. 2022; Abdille et al. 2022; Heinzinger et al. 2023). The minimal cytotoxicity observed in most studies was due to significantly higher concentrations of bacteriocins and prolonged experimental exposure, beyond the required minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for pathogen inhibition or food protection. At significantly higher concentrations (above the MIC), bacteriocin PA166 showed minimal cytotoxicity on Vero and NR8383 cells, as well as in the mouse infection model (Wang et al. 2022). Similarly, enterocin AS-48, bacteriocin OG716, and dermaseptin only exhibited mild cytotoxicity with prolonged treatment or at significantly higher concentrations in Golden Syrian hamsters, B2 BALB/c mice, and Albino Wistar rats (Pulse et al. 2019; Baños et al. 2019; Abdille et al. 2022). Additionally, cytolysin, a bacteriocin produced by E. faecalis, showed broad cytotoxicity to various cell lines, including intestinal epithelial cells, leucocytes, erythrocytes, and human retinal cells (Coburn and Gilmore 2003; Cox et al. 2005). It is important to note that the cytotoxicity of bacteriocins can be influenced by factors such as purity, concentration, the specific mammalian cell line or experimental model used, and host-associated factors (e.g., in vivo experiments) (Cavicchioli et al. 2018; Soltani et al. 2021a; Cebrián et al. 2023). Certain eukaryotic cell lines may be more sensitive to particular bacteriocins than others, with differences attributed to cell type, composition of cell membranes, permeability, and hydrophobicity (Das and Goyal 2014; Soltani et al. 2021a; Abdille et al. 2022).
Physiological and physicochemical parameters can influence the stability and bioactivity of bacteriocins in the host or food matrix. Several reports have shown rapid inactivation or enzymatic degradation of bacteriocins produced in situ, orally ingested, or applied to food matrices (De Vuyst and Leroy 2007; Fernandez et al. 2013; Md Sidek et al. 2018; Holcapkova et al. 2018; Flynn et al. 2019, 2022; Soltani et al. 2021b). Despite their potential for applications in clinical and agrifood systems, class II bacteriocins are highly sensitive to proteolytic enzymes, which reduces their bioactivity when used (Soltani et al. 2021a). For instance, pediocin PA-1, nisin A, and microcin J25 were inactivated or degraded when exposed to intestinal contents and proteolytic enzymes (Kheadr et al. 2010; Gough et al. 2017; Naimi et al. 2018). However, through encapsulation and bioengineering, microcin J25 or nisin showed some stability in the presence of proteolytic enzymes and under intestinal conditions (Field et al. 2015, 2019). Engineering bacteriocins can help create resistant bacteriocin derivatives that can withstand harsh gut conditions and enzymatic degradation while maintaining their bioactivity. Additionally, systems like encapsulation and coating have been developed to protect and precisely deliver bacteriocins to the intended site of action or within specific food matrices, allowing them to exert their biological functions (Gomaa et al. 2017; Gough et al. 2018; Holcapkova et al. 2018; Flynn et al. 2019, 2022).
To avoid any sudden or unexpected immune responses, the immunogenicity of bacteriocins should be carefully examined, especially when intended for use in humans and animals. Generally, several bacteriocins, including pyocins S2, S5, AP41, and L1, bacteriocins LR14, TSU4, JCM1132, and P34, plantaricin E/F, mutacin 1140, microbisporicin, actagardine, and duramycin have been reported to be non-immunogenic in in vivo studies (McCaughey et al. 2016; Ongey et al. 2017; Sahoo et al. 2017; Hanny et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2019c). However, prolonged administration of some bacteriocins, such as pyocin S5 and Nisaplin®, has been shown to elicit mild immunogenicity (de Pablo et al. 1999; Scholl and Martin 2008; McCaughey et al. 2016). Furthermore, some bacteriocins have also displayed unique and unpredictable properties, expressing both bacteriocin and virulence factors. Listeriolysin S (LLS) and pneumocins exhibit both virulence and bacteriocin properties and are highly expressed in the gut of orally infected mice (Quereda et al. 2016; Wholey et al. 2019). Both LLS and pneumocins are antibiotic-induced and can alter the host intestinal microbiome, enhancing intestinal colonization with L. monocytogenes and S. pneumoniae (Kjos et al. 2016; Quereda et al. 2016; Wholey et al. 2019). Bacteriocins may exert different sudden and unpredictable effects when used in humans and animals. Therefore, their immunogenicity and other emerging co-bioactive properties such as virulence factors should be elucidated before use.
Another major challenge of bacteriocin application in health and agrifood systems is their low yields and high cost of large-scale industrial production, purification, and prolonged storage. For commercial and economic purposes, bacteriocins need to be produced in large and sufficient quantities. For research purposes, crude, unpurified, and concentrated bacteriocins are often produced using costly and complex media that are mostly not food or pharmaceutical-grade (Garsa et al. 2014; Abbasiliasi et al. 2017; Johnson et al. 2018). The bottleneck for efficient and commercial production of bacteriocins is the need for complex media that optimally support the metabolism and auxotrophies of the producing strains (Ongey and Neubauer 2016; Goldbeck et al. 2021). Additionally, industrial-level purification and biopreservation of bacteriocins is another limitation for commercial-scale bacteriocin production. In most cases, laboratory-based purification protocols are usually not suitable at the industrial scale mostly due to the high cost of the purification processes (Garsa et al. 2014; Mesa-Pereira et al. 2018; Juturu and Wu 2018). Nevertheless, chemical synthesis has been recently proposed as a viable alternative for the industrial-scale production of bacteriocins (Bédard and Biron 2018; Bédard et al. 2018; Desiderato et al. 2023; Sevim and Güneş Altuntaş 2024). Industrial and large-scale production of active bacteriocins using chemical synthesis would further enhance the use of bioengineering and consequently, improve stability, spectra of antimicrobial activity, and pharmacological properties of bacteriocins in humans and agrifood systems (Bédard et al. 2018; Kuniyoshi et al. 2022; García-Vela et al. 2024). Efficient and cost-effective production and purification processes are essential for wider applications in health and agrifood systems. Additional research is necessary to further develop economical and low-cost production and purification processes of highly promising bacteriocins.
Finally, like other conventional antimicrobials, persistent exposure to bacteriocins can lead to the development of resistance in target bacteria. Bacteriocin resistance has been demonstrated for divercin V41, mesenterocin, leucocin A, pediocin and pediocin-like bacteriocins, lacticin 3147, lysostaphin, nisin, pyocin S2, mesenterocin, mundticin KS, etc. (Sakayori et al. 2003; Opsata et al. 2010; Collins et al. 2012; Inglis et al. 2016; López-González et al. 2018; Bhattacharya et al. 2019; Gradisteanu Pircalabioru et al. 2021). So far, bacteriocin resistance has been mostly studied in in vitro and model systems and can either be acquired (emerged from previously susceptible strains) or innate (naturally inherent in taxonomically related strains) (Bastos et al. 2015; Soltani et al. 2021a). Bacteriocin resistance mechanisms can include impermeability due to changes in cellular surfaces, enzymatic inactivation, changes in the antimicrobial peptide targets, entrapment by secreted molecules that can bind and neutralize bacteriocins, chemical modifications in membrane lipid composition, D-alanylation of teichoic acid, cellular filamentation, efflux pumps, and capsule synthesis to avoid contact with bacteriocins (Sakayori et al. 2003; Chifiriuc et al. 2014; Bastos et al. 2015; Kumariya et al. 2015, 2019; Soltani et al. 2021a). Rasch and Knøchel (1998) and Collins et al. (2010) separately reported up to 5.2 and 8.0% resistance of multi-sourced L. monocytogenes to pediocin PA-1 and pediocin-like bacteriocins respectively. The instances and mechanisms of bacteriocin resistance have been extensively reviewed (Bastos et al. 2015; Gradisteanu Pircalabioru et al. 2021; Soltani et al. 2021a). Some target microbial strains have developed multiple mechanisms of resistance which can be synchronously displayed against specific bacteriocins (Vadyvaloo et al. 2002; Lohans and Vederas 2012; Bastos et al. 2015; Kumariya et al. 2015). This can therefore lead to the emergence of bacteriocin-resistant phenotypes, which may constitute an additional burden to the rising antimicrobial resistance menace. Understanding these resistance mechanisms and developing countermeasures can significantly enhance the clinical application of bacteriocins. Additional research is needed to address these challenges and further develop safe, economical, and low-cost production and purification processes for bacteriocins.
Conclusion and prospects
The exacerbating global crisis of the emergence and spread of pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, dearth of novel antimicrobials, and the implementation of strict antibiotic-limiting policies in many countries necessitate a comprehensive approach to identify and apply widely accepted, potent, and safe alternative antimicrobials. Bacteriocins have invaluable and heterogeneous properties that make them suitable for use in human, animal, and food systems for disease prevention and treatment, microbiome modulation, growth promotion, and enhancing food quality, safety, and organoleptic properties, among other benefits.
Through bibliometric analyses, we have identified several prevailing trends in bacteriocin research. Firstly, there has been a significant increase in annual research outputs, which we believe reflects the growing global interest in bacteriocins. Secondly, we have observed a multidisciplinary participation in bacteriocin research, with contributions from various fields. Additionally, we have found that funding for bacteriocin research is relatively evenly distributed worldwide. The countries leading in bacteriocin-related research outputs are spread across the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The majority of these research outputs are published by reputable publishes such as Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, and the American Society of Microbiology. Interestingly, while bacteriocins research is primarily focused on microbiology, biotechnology, and food science, we have also discovered a significant number of outputs in emerging areas such as plant science, virology, polymer science, and biophysics. This suggests that bacteriocins may have applications in previously unknown fields, and we anticipate further research and applications in these areas in the coming years.
Harnessing the ubiquitous nature of bacteriocins could help in their exploitation for broad applications in innovative areas of the human, animal, and food systems. The food system is benefiting immensely from commercially available bacteriocins. However, the scope of bacteriocin applications in the food system could be expanded in areas such as [fermented] food microbiota modulation, antimicrobial packaging/coating, biosanitizers, antibiofilm, pre/post-harvest biocontrol, and functional food.
Furthermore, the use of bacteriocins in the modulation of human and animal microbiota can beneficially improve the composition, diversity, and richness of the microbiota, fostering health and well-being. Bacteriocin modulatory activity can provide a viable microbiome-based solution for the treatment and management of microbiome-associated diseases. Bacteriocins also have the potential for non-invasive bio-diagnosis and could be used for diagnosing both infectious and non-infectious diseases, thus complementing conventional diagnostic tools. In terms of agriculture, the growth-promoting effect of bacteriocins in both plants and animals would undoubtedly improve food security, safety, and quality, as well as promote sustainable agriculture and mitigate concerns associated with antibiotic use.
Through vigorous research, it is necessary to increase the potency and applications of bacteriocins in humans, using innovative approaches such as bioengineering, computational methods, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, machine learning, microscopy techniques, chemistry, metabolic activity-based assays, and pharmacodynamics. These approaches will facilitate optimal and industrial-scale production of safe bacteriocins for general use.
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.
References
Aarts H, Margolles A (2014) Antibiotic resistance genes in food and gut (non-pathogenic) bacteria. Bad genes in good bugs. Front Microbiol 5:754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00754
Abbasiliasi S, Tan JS, Tengku Ibrahim TA et al (2017) Fermentation factors influencing the production of bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria: a review. RSC Adv 7:29395–29420. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA24579J
Abdi-Ali A, Worobec EA, Deezagi A, Malekzadeh F (2004) Cytotoxic effects of pyocin S2 produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the growth of three human cell lines. Can J Microbiol 50:375–381. https://doi.org/10.1139/w04-019
Abdille AA, Kitimu SR, Ndubi MM et al (2022) Sub-acute and sub-chronic toxicity assessment of the antimicrobial peptide dermaseptin B2 on biochemical, haematological and histopathological parameters in BALB/c mice and albino Wistar rats. Heliyon 8:e12124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12124
Abitayeva GK, Urazova MS, Abilkhadirov AS et al (2021) Characterization of a new bacteriocin-like inhibitory peptide produced by Lactobacillus sakei B-RKM 0559. Biotechnol Lett 43:2243–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-021-03193-z
Abriouel H, Franz CMAP, Ben Omar N, Gálvez A (2011) Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:201–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x
Abriouel H, Casado Muñoz MDC, Lavilla Lerma L et al (2015) New insights in antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus species from fermented foods. Food Res Int 78:465–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.016
AccessScience Editors (2017) U.S. bans antibiotics use for enhancing growth in livestock. McGraw-Hill Professional. https://doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.br0125171
Acuña L, Corbalan NS, Fernandez-No IC et al (2015) Inhibitory effect of the hybrid bacteriocin Ent35-MccV on the growth of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes in model and food systems. Food Bioprocess Technol 8:1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-015-1469-0
Aguilar-Pérez C, Gracia B, Rodrigues L et al (2018) Synergy between circular bacteriocin AS-48 and ethambutol against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00359-18
Ahmad V, Khan MS, Jamal QMS et al (2017) Antimicrobial potential of bacteriocins: in therapy, agriculture and food preservation. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.016
Ahmadi S, Ghollasi M, Hosseini HM (2017) The apoptotic impact of nisin as a potent bacteriocin on the colon cancer cells. Microb Pathog 111:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.08.037
Ahn H, Lee G, Lee W et al (2023) Evaluation of probiotic and anti-inflammatory properties of bacteriocinogenic Pediococcus acidilactici HW01 and Leuconostoc citreum HW02 from malted barley. Chem Biol Technol Agric 10:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00425-4
Al Atya AK, Abriouel H, Kempf I et al (2016a) Effects of colistin and bacteriocins combinations on the in vitro growth of Escherichia coli strains from swine origin. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 8:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-016-9227-9
Al Atya AK, Belguesmia Y, Chataigne G et al (2016b) Anti-MRSA activities of enterocins DD28 and DD93 and evidences on their role in the inhibition of biofilm formation. Front Microbiol 7:817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00817
Al Kassaa I, Hober D, Hamze M et al (2014) Antiviral potential of lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 6:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-014-9162-6
Alang H, Kusnadi J, Ardyati T, Suharjono (2020) Optimization and characterization of enterocin Enterococcus faecalis K2B1 isolated from Toraja’s Belang Buffalo Milk, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21:1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210351
Alattar N, Tawfeeq H, Omran A (2024) Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of klebicin crude extract on clinical isolates of Salmonella and Enterobacter. Wrld Acd Sci 6:7. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.222
Alessandrini G, Mercuri SR, Martella A et al (2023) Topical application of bacteriocins from Bacillus subtilis promotes Staphylococcus aureus decolonization in acneic skin and improves the clinical appearance of mild-to-moderate acne. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 40:115–118. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2022.124108
Aleti G, Baker JL, Tang X et al (2019) Identification of the bacterial biosynthetic gene clusters of the oral microbiome illuminates the unexplored social language of bacteria during health and disease. Mbio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00321-19
Al-Madboly LA, El-Deeb NM, Kabbash A et al (2020) Purification, characterization, identification, and anticancer activity of a circular bacteriocin from Enterococcus thailandicus. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00450
Alonso CA, Zarazaga M, Ben Sallem R et al (2017) Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli in husbandry animals: the African perspective. Lett Appl Microbiol 64:318–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12724
Al-Seraih A, Belguesmia Y, Baah J et al (2017) Enterocin B3A–B3B produced by LAB collected from infant faeces: potential utilization in the food industry for Listeria monocytogenes biofilm management. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-016-0791-5
Alvarez-Sieiro P, Montalbán-López M, Mu D, Kuipers OP (2016) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: extending the family. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:2939–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7343-9
Alves FCB, Barbosa LN, Andrade BFMT et al (2016) Short communication: inhibitory activities of the lantibiotic nisin combined with phenolic compounds against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes in cow milk. J Dairy Sci 99:1831–1836. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10025
Alzamora SM, Welti-Chanes J, Guerrero SN, Gómez PL (2012) Rational use of novel technologies: a comparative analysis of the performance of several new food preservation technologies for microbial inactivation. In: McElhatton A, do Amaral Sobral PJ (eds) Novel technologies in food science. Springer New York, New York, pp 235–260
An J, Zhu W, Liu Y et al (2015) Purification and characterization of a novel bacteriocin CAMT2 produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolated from marine fish Epinephelus areolatus. Food Control 51:278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.11.038
Ananou S, Zentar H, Martínez-Bueno M et al (2014) The impact of enterocin AS-48 on the shelf-life and safety of sardines (Sardina pilchardus) under different storage conditions. Food Microbiol 44:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.06.008
Ananou S, Lotfi S, Azdad O, Nzoyikorera N (2020) Production, recovery and characterization of an enterocin with anti-listerial activity produced by Enterococcus hirae OS1. Appl Food Biotechnol 7:103–114. https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v7i2.27582
And HC, Hoover DG (2003) Bacteriocins and their food applications. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safety 2:82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00016.x
Anjana TSK (2022) Bacteriocin-producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria in controlling dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:851140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.851140
Anyaegbunam NJ, Anekpo CC, Anyaegbunam ZKG et al (2022) The resurgence of phage-based therapy in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance: from research progress to challenges and prospects. Microbiol Res 264:127155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127155
Appendini P, Hotchkiss JH (2002) Review of antimicrobial food packaging. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 3:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-8564(02)00012-7
Arakawa K, Kawai Y, Iioka H et al (2009) Effects of gassericins A and T, bacteriocins produced by Lactobacillus gasseri, with glycine on custard cream preservation. J Dairy Sci 92:2365–2372. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1240
Arboleya S, Stanton C, Ryan CA et al (2016) Bosom buddies: the symbiotic relationship between infants and Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum and ssp. infantis. Genetic and probiotic features. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 7:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033151
Arnison PG, Bibb MJ, Bierbaum G et al (2013) Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat Prod Rep 30:108–160. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2np20085f
Arqués JL, Rodríguez E, Nuñez M, Medina M (2011) Combined effect of reuterin and lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins on the inactivation of food-borne pathogens in milk. Food Control 22:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.027
Aspri M, O’Connor PM, Field D et al (2017) Application of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium isolated from donkey milk, in the bio-control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh whey cheese. Int Dairy J 73:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.04.008
Aunpad R, Na-Bangchang K (2007) Pumilicin 4, a novel bacteriocin with anti-MRSA and anti-VRE activity produced by newly isolated bacteria Bacillus pumilus strain WAPB4. Curr Microbiol 55:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-006-0632-2
Ávila M, Garde S, Gaya P et al (2005) Influence of a bacteriocin-producing lactic culture on proteolysis and texture of Hispánico cheese. Int Dairy J 15:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.06.009
Aymerich T, Garriga M, Monfort J (2011) Applications of protective cultures, bacteriocins and bacteriophages in fermented meat products. Protective cultures, antimicrobial metabolites and bacteriophages for food and beverage biopreservation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 297–323
Azmi S, Jiang K, Stiles M et al (2015) Detection of Listeria monocytogenes with short peptide fragments from class IIa bacteriocins as recognition elements. ACS Comb Sci 17:156–163. https://doi.org/10.1021/co500079k
Bagley MC, Dale JW, Merritt EA, Xiong X (2005) Thiopeptide antibiotics. Chem Rev 105:685–714. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0300441
Bahy R, Emara M, Elalem N et al (2023) A new bacteriocin- like-inhibitory substance from Egyptian dairy products isolated from Enterococcus faecium with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Process Biochem 134:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2023.10.023
Baindara P, Singh N, Ranjan M et al (2016) Laterosporulin10: a novel defensin like Class IId bacteriocin from Brevibacillus sp. strain SKDU10 with inhibitory activity against microbial pathogens. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 162:1286–1299. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000316
Baindara P, Gautam A, Raghava GPS, Korpole S (2017) Anticancer properties of a defensin like class IId bacteriocin Laterosporulin10. Sci Rep 7:46541. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46541
Baindara P, Korpole S, Grover V (2018) Bacteriocins: perspective for the development of novel anticancer drugs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:10393–10408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9420-8
Balcik-Ercin P, Sever B (2022) An investigation of bacteriocin nisin anti-cancer effects and FZD7 protein interactions in liver cancer cells. Chem Biol Interact 366:110152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110152
Bali V, Panesar PS, Bera MB, Kennedy JF (2016) Bacteriocins: recent trends and potential applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56:817–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.729231
Balty C, Guillot A, Fradale L et al (2019) Ruminococcin C, an anti-clostridial sactipeptide produced by a prominent member of the human microbiota Ruminococcus gnavus. J Biol Chem 294:14512–14525. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.009416
Baños A, García JD, Núñez C et al (2019) Subchronic toxicity study in BALBc mice of enterocin AS-48, an anti-microbial peptide produced by Enterococcus faecalis UGRA10. Food Chem Toxicol 132:110667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.110667
Baquero F, Lanza VF, Baquero M-R et al (2019) Microcins in Enterobacteriaceae: peptide antimicrobials in the eco-active intestinal chemosphere. Front Microbiol 10:2261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02261
Baquero F, Martínez JL, Lanza F, V, et al (2021) Evolutionary pathways and trajectories in antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 34:e0005019. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00050-19
Baquero F, Beis K, Craik DJ et al (2024) The pearl jubilee of microcin J25: thirty years of research on an exceptional lasso peptide. Nat Prod Rep. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3np00046j
Barber CC, Zhang W (2021) Small molecule natural products in human nasal/oral microbiota. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 48:kuab010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuab010
Barbiroli A, Musatti A, Capretti G et al (2017) Sakacin-A antimicrobial packaging for decreasing Listeria contamination in thin-cut meat: preliminary assessment. J Sci Food Agric 97:1042–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8120
Barbosa AAT, Silva de Araújo HG, Matos PN et al (2013) Effects of nisin-incorporated films on the microbiological and physicochemical quality of minimally processed mangoes. Int J Food Microbiol 164:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.04.004
Barboza-Corona JE, de la Fuente-Salcido N, Alva-Murillo N et al (2009) Activity of bacteriocins synthesized by Bacillus thuringiensis against Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated to bovine mastitis. Vet Microbiol 138:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.018
Barman P, Sharma C, Joshi S et al (2023) In vivo acute toxicity and therapeutic potential of a synthetic peptide, DP1 in a Staphylococcus aureus infected murine wound excision model. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-023-10176-1
Bastos MCF, Ceotto H, Coelho MLV, Nascimento JS (2009) Staphylococcal antimicrobial peptides: relevant properties and potential biotechnological applications. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10:38–61. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920109787048580
Bastos MDCDF, Coelho MLV, Santos OCDS (2015) Resistance to bacteriocins produced by Gram-positive bacteria. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 161:683–700. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.082289-0
Bäuerl C, Umu ÖCO, Hernandez PE et al (2017) A method to assess bacteriocin effects on the gut microbiota of mice. J vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/56053
Bédard F, Biron E (2018) Recent progress in the chemical synthesis of Class II and S-glycosylated bacteriocins. Front Microbiol 9:1048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01048
Bédard F, Hammami R, Zirah S et al (2018) Synthesis, antimicrobial activity and conformational analysis of the class IIa bacteriocin pediocin PA-1 and analogs thereof. Sci Rep 8:9029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27225-3
Belfiore C, Castellano P, Vignolo G (2007) Reduction of Escherichia coli population following treatment with bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria and chelators. Food Microbiol 24:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2006.05.006
Ben Lagha A, Haas B, Gottschalk M, Grenier D (2017) Antimicrobial potential of bacteriocins in poultry and swine production. Vet Res 48:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-017-0425-6
Ben Said L, Emond-Rheault J-G, Soltani S et al (2020) Phenomic and genomic approaches to studying the inhibition of multiresistant Salmonella enterica by microcin J25. Environ Microbiol 22:2907–2920. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15045
Benabbou R, Subirade M, Desbiens M, Fliss I (2020) Divergicin M35-chitosan film: development and characterization. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 12:1562–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09660-9
Bengtsson T, Lönn J, Khalaf H, Palm E (2018) The lantibiotic gallidermin acts bactericidal against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus and antagonizes the bacteria-induced proinflammatory responses in dermal fibroblasts. Microbiologyopen 7:e00606. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.606
Bengtsson T, Selegård R, Musa A et al (2020) Plantaricin NC8 αβ exerts potent antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus spp. and enhances the effects of antibiotics. Sci Rep 10:3580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60570-w
Benítez-Chao DF, León-Buitimea A, Lerma-Escalera JA, Morones-Ramírez JR (2021) Bacteriocins: an overview of antimicrobial, toxicity, and biosafety assessment by in vivo models. Front Microbiol 12:630695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.630695
Benkirane G, Ananou S, Dumas E et al (2022) Moroccan traditional fermented dairy products: current processing practices and physicochemical and microbiological properties—a review. JMBFS. https://doi.org/10.55251/jmbfs.5636
Bennett S, Ben Said L, Lacasse P et al (2021) Susceptibility to nisin, bactofencin, pediocin and reuterin of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Streptococcus uberis causing bovine mastitis. Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111418
Bennett S, Fliss I, Ben Said L et al (2022) Efficacy of bacteriocin-based formula for reducing staphylococci, streptococci, and total bacterial counts on teat skin of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 105:4498–4507. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21381
Bhattacharya A, Stacy A, Bashey F (2019) Suppression of bacteriocin resistance using live, heterospecific competitors. Evol Appl 12:1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12797
Bier K, Schittek B (2021) Beneficial effects of coagulase-negative Staphylococci on Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization. Exp Dermatol 30:1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.14381
Birri DJ, Brede DA, Nes IF (2012) Salivaricin D, a novel intrinsically trypsin-resistant lantibiotic from Streptococcus salivarius 5M6c isolated from a healthy infant. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06588-11
Bitschar K, Sauer B, Focken J et al (2019) Lugdunin amplifies innate immune responses in the skin in synergy with host- and microbiota-derived factors. Nat Commun 10:2730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10646-7
Blasche S, Kim Y, Mars RAT et al (2021) Metabolic cooperation and spatiotemporal niche partitioning in a kefir microbial community. Nat Microbiol 6:196–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-00816-5
Blin K, Medema MH, Kazempour D et al (2013) antiSMASH 2.0—a versatile platform for genome mining of secondary metabolite producers. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W204–W212. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt449
Bloom DE, Black S, Salisbury D, Rappuoli R (2018) Antimicrobial resistance and the role of vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:12868–12871. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717157115
Boakes S, Weiss WJ, Vinson M et al (2016) Antibacterial activity of the novel semisynthetic lantibiotic NVB333 in vitro and in experimental infection models. J Antibiot 69:850–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2016.47
Bolocan AS, Pennone V, O’Connor PM et al (2017) Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms by bacteriocin-producing bacteria isolated from mushroom substrate. J Appl Microbiol 122:279–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13337
Bonham KS, Wolfe BE, Dutton RJ (2017) Extensive horizontal gene transfer in cheese-associated bacteria. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22144
Bosák J, Laiblová P, Smarda J et al (2012) Novel colicin Fy of Yersinia frederiksenii inhibits pathogenic Yersinia strains via YiuR-mediated reception, TonB import, and cell membrane pore formation. J Bacteriol 194:1950–1959. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.05885-11
Bosák J, Micenková L, Hrala M et al (2018) Colicin FY inhibits pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in mice. Sci Rep 8:12242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30729-7
Bosák J, Hrala M, Micenková L, Šmajs D (2021) Non-antibiotic antibacterial peptides and proteins of Escherichia coli: efficacy and potency of bacteriocins. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 19:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1816824
Böttger R, Hoffmann R, Knappe D (2017) Differential stability of therapeutic peptides with different proteolytic cleavage sites in blood, plasma and serum. PLoS ONE 12:e0178943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178943
Bountra K, Hagelueken G, Choudhury HG et al (2017) Structural basis for antibacterial peptide self-immunity by the bacterial ABC transporter McjD. EMBO J 36:3062–3079. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201797278
Brand AM, de Kwaadsteniet M, Dicks LMT (2010) The ability of nisin F to control Staphylococcus aureus infection in the peritoneal cavity, as studied in mice. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:645–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02948.x
Brook I (2005) The role of bacterial interference in otitis, sinusitis and tonsillitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.03.012
Brötz H, Bierbaum G, Leopold K et al (1998) The lantibiotic mersacidin inhibits peptidoglycan synthesis by targeting lipid II. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:154–160. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.42.1.154
Broughton LJ, Crow C, Maraveyas A, Madden LA (2016) Duramycin-induced calcium release in cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs 27:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000000313
Burton JP, Chilcott CN, Moore CJ et al (2006a) A preliminary study of the effect of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral malodour parameters. J Appl Microbiol 100:754–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02837.x
Burton JP, Wescombe PA, Moore CJ et al (2006b) Safety assessment of the oral cavity probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3050–3053. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.4.3050-3053.2006
Caballero Gómez N, Abriouel H, Grande MJ et al (2013) Combined treatments of enterocin AS-48 with biocides to improve the inactivation of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus planktonic and sessile cells. Int J Food Microbiol 163:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.02.018
Campion A, Casey PG, Field D et al (2013) In vivo activity of nisin A and nisin V against Listeria monocytogenes in mice. BMC Microbiol 13:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-23
Cao LT, Wu JQ, Xie F et al (2007) Efficacy of nisin in treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 90:3980–3985. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0153
Carlin Fagundes P, Miceli de Farias F, da Silva C, Santos O et al (2016) The four-component aureocin A70 as a promising agent for food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 237:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.017
Carmona-Cruz S, Orozco-Covarrubias L, Sáez-de-Ocariz M (2022) The human skin microbiome in selected cutaneous diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:834135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.834135
Carnio MC, Höltzel A, Rudolf M et al (2000) The macrocyclic peptide antibiotic micrococcin P(1) is secreted by the food-borne bacterium Staphylococcus equorum WS 2733 and inhibits Listeria monocytogenes on soft cheese. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2378–2384. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2378-2384.2000
Carroll J, Draper LA, O’Connor PM et al (2010) Comparison of the activities of the lantibiotics nisin and lacticin 3147 against clinically significant mycobacteria. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36:132–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.03.029
Castellano P, Vignolo G (2006) Inhibition of Listeria innocua and Brochothrix thermosphacta in vacuum-packaged meat by addition of bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus curvatus CRL705 and its bacteriocins. Lett Appl Microbiol 43:194–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01933.x
Cavicchioli VQ, de Carvalho OV, de Paiva JC et al (2018) Inhibition of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and poliovirus (PV-1) by bacteriocins from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Enterococcus durans strains isolated from goat milk. Int J Antimicrob Agents 51:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.04.020
Cebrián R, Rodríguez-Cabezas ME, Martín-Escolano R et al (2019) Preclinical studies of toxicity and safety of the AS-48 bacteriocin. J Adv Res 20:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.06.003
Cebrián R, Martínez-García M, Fernández M et al (2023) Advances in the preclinical characterization of the antimicrobial peptide AS-48. Front Microbiol 14:1110360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1110360
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC (2018) CDC core elements to help resource-limited settings improve antibiotic use | CDC. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/solutions-initiative/stories/core-elements-resource-limited-settings.html. Accessed 31 Aug 2023.
Cesa-Luna C, Alatorre-Cruz J-M, Carreño-López R et al (2021) Emerging applications of bacteriocins as antimicrobials, anticancer drugs, and modulators of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Pol J Microbiol 70:143–159. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-020
Chandrakasan G, Rodríguez-Hernández A-I, Del Rocío L-C et al (2019) Bacteriocin encapsulation for food and pharmaceutical applications: advances in the past 20 years. Biotechnol Lett 41:453–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-02635-5
Chen S-W, Liu C-H, Hu S-Y (2019) Dietary administration of probiotic Paenibacillus ehimensis NPUST1 with bacteriocin-like activity improves growth performance and immunity against Aeromonas hydrophila and Streptococcus iniae in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol 84:695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.10.059
Cheng WN, Han SG (2020) Bovine mastitis: risk factors, therapeutic strategies, and alternative treatments—a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 33:1699–1713. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0156
Cherif A, Ouzari H, Daffonchio D et al (2001) Thuricin 7: a novel bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis BMG1.7, a new strain isolated from soil. Lett Appl Microbiol 32:243–247. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00898.x
Cherif A, Rezgui W, Raddadi N et al (2008) Characterization and partial purification of entomocin 110, a newly identified bacteriocin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Entomocidus HD110. Microbiol Res 163:684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.10.005
Chifiriuc M, Grumezescu A, Lazar V et al (2014) Contribution of antimicrobial peptides to the development of new and efficient antimicrobial strategies. CP 11:98–107. https://doi.org/10.2174/157016461102140917121943
Chikindas ML, Weeks R, Drider D et al (2018) Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr Opin Biotechnol 49:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.011
Chiumento S, Roblin C, Kieffer-Jaquinod S et al (2019) Ruminococcin C, a promising antibiotic produced by a human gut symbiont. Sci Adv 5:eaaw9969. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw9969
Chopra L, Singh G, Kumar Jena K, Sahoo DK (2015) Sonorensin: a new bacteriocin with potential of an anti-biofilm agent and a food biopreservative. Sci Rep 5:13412. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13412
Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Gao X, Borriss R (2015) Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42—a review. Front Microbiol 6:780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780
Cirkovic I, Bozic DD, Draganic V et al (2016) Licheniocin 50.2 and Bacteriocins from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis BGBU1–4 inhibit biofilms of coagulase negative Staphylococci and Listeria monocytogenes clinical isolates. PLoS ONE 11:e0167995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167995
Claesen J, Bibb M (2010) Genome mining and genetic analysis of cypemycin biosynthesis reveal an unusual class of posttranslationally modified peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:16297–16302. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008608107
Coburn PS, Gilmore MS (2003) The Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin: a novel toxin active against eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Cell Microbiol 5:661–669. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00310.x
Colagiorgi A, Bruini I, Di Ciccio PA et al (2017) Listeria monocytogenes biofilms in the Wonderland of Food Industry. Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens6030041
Collins B, Curtis N, Cotter PD et al (2010) The ABC transporter AnrAB contributes to the innate resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to nisin, bacitracin, and various beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4416–4423. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00503-10
Collins B, Guinane CM, Cotter PD et al (2012) Assessing the contributions of the LiaS histidine kinase to the innate resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to nisin, cephalosporins, and disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2923–2929. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07402-11
Contente D, Díaz-Rosales P, Feito J et al (2023) Immunomodulatory effects of bacteriocinogenic and non-bacteriocinogenic Lactococcus cremoris of aquatic origin on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Front Immunol 14:1178462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1178462
Corbin A, Pitts B, Parker A, Stewart PS (2011) Antimicrobial penetration and efficacy in an in vitro oral biofilm model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3338–3344. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00206-11
Corr SC, Li Y, Riedel CU et al (2007) Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiinfective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7617–7621. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700440104
Cortesi ML, Panebianco A, Giuffrida A, Anastasio A (2009) Innovations in seafood preservation and storage. Vet Res Commun 33(Suppl 1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-009-9241-4
Costa RL, Moreira J, Lorenzo A, Lamas CC (2018) Infectious complications following probiotic ingestion: a potentially underestimated problem? A systematic review of reports and case series. BMC Complement Altern Med 18:329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2394-3
Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2005) Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:777–788. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1273
Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C (2013) Bacteriocins—a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat Rev Microbiol 11:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2937
Cox CR, Coburn PS, Gilmore MS (2005) Enterococcal cytolysin: a novel two component peptide system that serves as a bacterial defense against eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Curr Protein Pept Sci 6:77–84. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203053027557
Cruchet S, Obregon MC, Salazar G et al (2003) Effect of the ingestion of a dietary product containing Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 on Helicobacter pylori colonization in children. Nutrition 19:716–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(03)00109-6
Cursino L, Smajs D, Smarda J et al (2006) Exoproducts of the Escherichia coli strain H22 inhibiting some enteric pathogens both in vitro and in vivo. J Appl Microbiol 100:821–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02834.x
Cutler SA, Lonergan SM, Cornick N et al (2007) Dietary inclusion of colicin e1 is effective in preventing postweaning diarrhea caused by F18-positive Escherichia coli in pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3830–3835. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00360-07
Czárán TL, Hoekstra RF, Pagie L (2002) Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:786–790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012399899
Daba GM, Elkhateeb WA (2020) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria as biotechnological tools in food and pharmaceuticals: current applications and future prospects. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 28:101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101750
Dabour N, Zihler A, Kheadr E et al (2009) In vivo study on the effectiveness of pediocin PA-1 and Pediococcus acidilactici UL5 at inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol 133:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.005
Dahiya DK, Renuka PM et al (2017) Gut microbiota modulation and its relationship with obesity using prebiotic fibers and probiotics: a review. Front Microbiol 8:563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00563
Dal Bello B, Cocolin L, Zeppa G et al (2012) Technological characterization of bacteriocin producing Lactococcus lactis strains employed to control Listeria monocytogenes in cottage cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 153:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.10.016
Darbandi A, Asadi A, Mahdizade Ari M et al (2022) Bacteriocins: properties and potential use as antimicrobials. J Clin Lab Anal 36:e24093. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24093
Das D, Goyal A (2014) Characterization of a noncytotoxic bacteriocin from probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum DM5 with potential as a food preservative. Food Funct 5:2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4fo00481g
David OM, Onifade OE (2018) Effects of partially purified enterocins from Enterococcus faecalis strains on the growth of some phytopathogenic fungi. Ruhuna J Sci 9(2):160–168. Available at: https://www.rjs.ruh.ac.lk/index.php/rjs/article/view/236
de Carvalho AAT, Mantovani HC, Vanetti MCD (2007) Bactericidal effect of bovicin HC5 and nisin against Clostridium tyrobutyricum isolated from spoiled mango pulp. Lett Appl Microbiol 45:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02150.x
de Kwaadsteniet M, van Reenen CA, Dicks LMT (2010) Evaluation of nisin F in the treatment of subcutaneous skin infections, as monitored by using a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2:61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-009-9017-8de
De Vuyst L, Leroy F (2007) Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: production, purification, and food applications. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 13:194–199. https://doi.org/10.1159/000104752
De Giani A, Bovio F, Forcella M et al (2019) Identification of a bacteriocin-like compound from Lactobacillus plantarum with antimicrobial activity and effects on normal and cancerogenic human intestinal cells. AMB Express 9:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0813-6
De Kwaadsteniet M, Doeschate KT, Dicks LMT (2009) Nisin F in the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02488.x
Deegan LH, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross P (2006) Bacteriocins: biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf-life extension. Int Dairy J 16:1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.026
Deng J, Viel JH, Chen J, Kuipers OP (2020) Synthesis and characterization of heterodimers and fluorescent nisin species by incorporation of methionine analogues and subsequent click chemistry. ACS Synth Biol 9:2525–2536. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00308
Desiderato CK, Müller C, Schretzmeier A et al (2023) Optimized recombinant production of the bacteriocin garvicin Q by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Front Microbiol 14:1254882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1254882
Deslouches B, Montelaro RC, Urish KL, Di YP (2020) Engineered cationic antimicrobial peptides (eCAPs) to combat multidrug-resistant bacteria. Pharmaceutics. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060501
Dey D, Ema TI, Biswas P et al (2021) Antiviral effects of bacteriocin against animal-to-human transmittable mutated SARS-COV-2: a systematic review. Front Agric Sci Eng 8:603. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2021397
Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Limitone A et al (2007) Cell-cell communication in sourdough lactic acid bacteria: a proteomic study in Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Proteomics 7:2430–2446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700143
Dierksen KP, Moore CJ, Inglis M et al (2007) The effect of ingestion of milk supplemented with salivaricin A-producing Streptococcus salivarius on the bacteriocin-like inhibitory activity of streptococcal populations on the tongue. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00228.x
Díez L, Rojo-Bezares B, Zarazaga M et al (2012) Antimicrobial activity of pediocin PA-1 against Oenococcus oeni and other wine bacteria. Food Microbiol 31:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.006
Dobrzyńska I, Szachowicz-Petelska B, Sulkowski S, Figaszewski Z (2005) Changes in electric charge and phospholipids composition in human colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem 276:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-005-3557-3
Dobson A, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C (2012) Bacteriocin production: a probiotic trait? Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05576-11
Donia MS, Cimermancic P, Schulze CJ et al (2014) A systematic analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters in the human microbiome reveals a common family of antibiotics. Cell 158:1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.032
Doron S, Snydman DR (2015) Risk and safety of probiotics. Clin Infect Dis 60(Suppl 2):S129–S134. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ085
Doshi MN, Nair K, Hassan ZU, Jaoua S (2022) Pyocin QDD1: a highly thermostable bacteriocin produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa QDD1 for the biocontrol of foodborne pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus. Bioresour Technol Rep 18:101106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101106
Dover SE, Aroutcheva AA, Faro S, Chikindas ML (2007) Safety study of an antimicrobial peptide lactocin 160, produced by the vaginal Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2007:78248. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/78248
Drissi F, Buffet S, Raoult D, Merhej V (2015) Common occurrence of antibacterial agents in human intestinal microbiota. Front Microbiol 6:441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00441
du Toit M, Franz CM, Dicks LM, Holzapfel WH (2000) Preliminary characterization of bacteriocins produced by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolated from pig faeces. J Appl Microbiol 88:482–494. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00986.x
Duarte AFDS, Ceotto-Vigoder H, Barrias ES et al (2018) Hyicin 4244, the first sactibiotic described in staphylococci, exhibits an anti-staphylococcal biofilm activity. Int J Antimicrob Agents 51:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.06.025
Dündar H (2016) Bacteriocinogenic potential of Enterococcus faecium isolated from wine. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 8:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-016-9222-1
Elsayed SS, Trusch F, Deng H et al (2015) Chaxapeptin, a lasso peptide from extremotolerant Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii strain C58 from the hyperarid atacama desert. J Org Chem 80:10252–10260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b01878
Ermolenko EI, Desheva YA, Kolobov AA et al (2019) Anti-influenza activity of enterocin B in vitro and protective effect of bacteriocinogenic enterococcal probiotic strain on influenza infection in mouse model. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 11:705–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9457-0
Escobar V, Scaramozzino N, Vidic J et al (2023) Recent advances on peptide-based biosensors and electronic noses for foodborne pathogen detection. Biosensors (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020258
Etayash H, Jiang K, Thundat T, Kaur K (2014a) Impedimetric detection of pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria using an antimicrobial peptide from Class IIa bacteriocins. Anal Chem 86:1693–1700. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4034938
Etayash H, Norman L, Thundat T et al (2014b) Surface-conjugated antimicrobial peptide leucocin a displays high binding to pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1021/am404729c
European Commission (2005) Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_05_1687. Accessed 31 Aug 2023
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2006) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) related to the use of nisin (E 234) as a food additive. EFSA J 4:314. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.314
Falagas ME, Betsi GI, Athanasiou S (2007) Probiotics for the treatment of women with bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:657–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01688.x
Farha MA, Verschoor CP, Bowdish D, Brown ED (2013) Collapsing the proton motive force to identify synergistic combinations against Staphylococcus aureus. Chem Biol 20:1168–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.07.006
Feito J, Contente D, Ponce-Alonso M et al (2022) Draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris WA2-67: a promising nisin-producing probiotic strain isolated from the rearing environment of a Spanish Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) farm. Microorganisms 10:521. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030521
Feito J, Araújo C, Arbulu S et al (2023) Design of Lactococcus lactis strains producing garvicin A and/or garvicin Q, either alone or together with nisin A or nisin Z and high antimicrobial activity against Lactococcus garvieae. Foods 12:1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051063
Felicio BA, Pinto MS, Oliveira FS et al (2015) Effects of nisin on Staphylococcus aureus count and physicochemical properties of Minas Frescal cheese. J Dairy Sci 98:4364–4369. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9520
Férir G, Petrova MI, Andrei G et al (2013) The lantibiotic peptide labyrinthopeptin A1 demonstrates broad anti-HIV and anti-HSV activity with potential for microbicidal applications. PLoS ONE 8:e64010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064010
Férir G, Petrova MI, Andrei G et al (2014) Dual anti-HSV and anti-HIV activity of the lantibiotic Labyrinthopeptin A1. BMC Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-S2-P79
Fernández L, Delgado S, Herrero H et al (2008) The bacteriocin nisin, an effective agent for the treatment of staphylococcal mastitis during lactation. J Hum Lact 24:311–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334408317435
Fernandez B, Le Lay C, Jean J, Fliss I (2013) Growth, acid production and bacteriocin production by probiotic candidates under simulated colonic conditions. J Appl Microbiol 114:877–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12081
Fernández-Fernández R, Lozano C, Eguizábal P et al (2022a) Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances in Staphylococci of different origins and species with activity against relevant pathogens. Front Microbiol 13:870510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.870510
Fernández-Fernández R, Lozano C, Ruiz-Ripa L et al (2022b) Antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial activity of Staphylococcus lugdunensis obtained from two Spanish hospitals. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081480
Fernández-Fernández R, Abdullahi IN, González-Azcona C et al (2023a) Detection of antimicrobial producing Staphylococcus from migratory birds: potential role in nasotracheal microbiota modulation. Front Microbiol 14:1144975. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1144975
Fernández-Fernández R, Elsherbini AMA, Lozano C et al (2023b) Genomic analysis of bacteriocin-producing Staphylococci: high prevalence of lanthipeptides and the Micrococcin P1 biosynthetic gene clusters. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-023-10119-w
Fernández-Fernández R, Lozano C, Fernández-Pérez R, Zarazaga M, Peschel A, Krismer B, Torres C (2023c) Detection and evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of Micrococcin P1 isolated from commensal and environmental staphylococcal isolates against MRSA. Intl J Antimicrob Agents 65:106965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106965
Fernández-Fernández R, Lozano C, Reuben RC et al (2023d) Comprehensive approaches for the search and characterization of staphylococcins. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051329
Fernández-Pérez R, Sáenz Y, Rojo-Bezares B et al (2018) Production and antimicrobial activity of nisin under enological conditions. Front Microbiol 9:1918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01918
Ferraz MP (2023) An overview of the relevance of human gut and skin microbiome in disease: the influence on atopic dermatitis. Appl Sci 13:10540. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810540
Field D, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2015) Bioengineering lantibiotics for therapeutic success. Front Microbiol 6:1363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01363
Field D, Blake T, Mathur H et al (2019) Bioengineering nisin to overcome the nisin resistance protein. Mol Microbiol 111:717–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14183
Field D, Considine K, O’Connor PM et al (2021) Bio-engineered nisin with increased anti-Staphylococcus and selectively reduced anti-Lactococcus activity for treatment of bovine mastitis. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073480
Field D, Fernandez de Ullivarri M, Ross RP, Hill C (2023) After a century of nisin research—where are we now? FEMS Microbiol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuad023
Fischer SW, Titgemeyer F (2023) Protective cultures in food products: from science to market. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12071541
Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Szewzyk U et al (2016) Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
Flynn J, Mallen S, Durack E et al (2019) Mesoporous matrices for the delivery of the broad spectrum bacteriocin, nisin A. J Colloid Interface Sci 537:396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.037
Flynn J, Ryan A, Hudson SP (2022) Synergistic antimicrobial interactions of nisin A with biopolymers and solubilising agents for oral drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 171:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.12.010
Francino MP (2015) Antibiotics and the human gut microbiome: dysbioses and accumulation of resistances. Front Microbiol 6:1543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01543
Fu L, Wang C, Ruan X et al (2018) Preservation of large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) by Coagulin L1208, a novel bacteriocin produced by Bacillus coagulans L1208. Int J Food Microbiol 266:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.11.012
Fugaban JII, Holzapfel WH, Todorov SD (2021a) Probiotic potential and safety assessment of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium strains with antibacterial activity against Listeria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Curr Res Microbial Sci 2:100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100070
Fugaban JII, Vazquez Bucheli JE, Kim B et al (2021b) Safety and beneficial properties of bacteriocinogenic Pediococcus acidilactici and Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from silage. Lett Appl Microbiol 73:725–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13562
Fuochi V, Cardile V, Petronio Petronio G, Furneri PM (2019) Biological properties and production of bacteriocins-like-inhibitory substances by Lactobacillus sp. strains from human vagina. J Appl Microbiol 126:1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14164
Gálvez A, Abriouel H, López RL, Ben Omar N (2007) Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 120:51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.001
Garcia-Gutierrez E, Mayer MJ, Cotter PD, Narbad A (2019) Gut microbiota as a source of novel antimicrobials. Gut Microbes 10:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1455790
García-López JD, Teso-Pérez C, Martín-Platero AM et al (2023) Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2 and Pediococcus acidilactici ST6, two bacteriocinogenic isolated strains from andalusian spontaneous fermented sausages. Foods 12:2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132445
García-Vela S, Ben Said L, Soltani S et al (2023) Targeting enterococci with antimicrobial activity against Clostridium perfringens from poultry. Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020231
García-Vela S, Guay L-D, Rahman MRT et al (2024) Antimicrobial activity of synthetic enterocins A, B, P, SEK4, and L50, alone and in combinations, against Clostridium perfringens. Int J Mol Sci 25:1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031597
Garsa AK, Kumariya R, Sood SK et al (2014) Bacteriocin production and different strategies for their recovery and purification. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 6:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9153-z
Gavrish E, Sit CS, Cao S et al (2014) Lassomycin, a ribosomally synthesized cyclic peptide, kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the ATP-dependent protease ClpC1P1P2. Chem Biol 21:509–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.014
Gebhart D, Lok S, Clare S et al (2015) A modified R-type bacteriocin specifically targeting Clostridium difficile prevents colonization of mice without affecting gut microbiota diversity. Mbio 6:e02368-e2414. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02368-14
Ghapanvari P, Taheri M, Jalilian FA et al (2022) The effect of nisin on the biofilm production, antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Med Res 27:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00804-x
Gharsallaoui A, Oulahal N, Joly C, Degraeve P (2016) Nisin as a food preservative: part 1: physicochemical properties, antimicrobial activity, and main uses. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56:1262–1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2013.763765
Ghobrial OG, Derendorf H, Hillman JD (2009) Pharmacodynamic activity of the lantibiotic MU1140. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33:70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.07.028
Ghodhbane H, Elaidi S, Sabatier J-M et al (2015) Bacteriocins active against multi-resistant gram negative bacteria implicated in nosocomial infections. IDDT 15:2–12. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526514666140522113337
Gillor O, Kirkup BC, Riley MA (2004) Colicins and microcins: the next generation antimicrobials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 129–146
Gillor O, Etzion A, Riley MA (2008) The dual role of bacteriocins as anti- and probiotics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:591–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1726-5
Glatthardt T, Lima RD, de Mattos RM, Ferreira RBR (2024) Microbe interactions within the skin microbiome. Antibiotics (Basel) 13:10049. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010049
Goldbeck O, Desef DN, Ovchinnikov KV et al (2021) Establishing recombinant production of pediocin PA-1 in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2021.09.002
Goldstein B (1998) Activity of nisin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, in vitro, and in a mouse infection model. J Antimicrob Chemother 42:277–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/42.2.277
Gomaa AI, Martinent C, Hammami R et al (2017) Dual coating of liposomes as encapsulating matrix of antimicrobial peptides: development and characterization. Front Chem 5:103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00103
Gómez NC, Abriouel H, Grande MAJ et al (2012) Effect of enterocin AS-48 in combination with biocides on planktonic and sessile Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol 30:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.013
Gómez-Sala B, Muñoz-Atienza E, Sánchez J et al (2015) Bacteriocin production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from fish, seafood and fish products. Eur Food Res Technol 241:341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-015-2465-3
Goodarzi A, Mozafarpoor S, Bodaghabadi M, Mohamadi M (2020) The potential of probiotics for treating acne vulgaris: a review of literature on acne and microbiota. Dermatol Ther 33:e13279. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13279
Gotteland M (2003) Suppressive effect of frequent ingestion of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 on Helicobacter pylori colonization in asymptomatic volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:1317–1319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg227
Gough R, O’Connor PM, Rea MC et al (2017) Simulated gastrointestinal digestion of nisin and interaction between nisin and bile. LWT 86:530–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.031
Gough R, Cabrera Rubio R, O’Connor PM et al (2018) Oral delivery of nisin in resistant starch based matrices alters the gut microbiota in mice. Front Microbiol 9:1186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01186
Gradisteanu Pircalabioru G, Popa LI, Marutescu L et al (2021) Bacteriocins in the era of antibiotic resistance: rising to the challenge. Pharmaceutics. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020196
Grasemann H, Stehling F, Brunar H et al (2007) Inhalation of Moli 1901 in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 131:1461–1466. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2085
Grein F, Schneider T, Sahl H-G (2019) Docking on lipid II-A widespread mechanism for potent bactericidal activities of antibiotic peptides. J Mol Biol 431:3520–3530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.014
Grice EA (2014) The skin microbiome: potential for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to cutaneous disease. Semin Cutan Med Surg 33:98–103. https://doi.org/10.12788/j.sder.0087
Grilli E, Messina MR, Catelli E et al (2009) Pediocin A improves growth performance of broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens. Poult Sci 88:2152–2158. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00160
Grinter R, Milner J, Walker D (2012) Bacteriocins active against plant pathogenic bacteria. Biochem Soc Trans 40:1498–1502. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20120206
Guinane CM, Lawton EM, O’Connor PM et al (2016) The bacteriocin bactofencin A subtly modulates gut microbial populations. Anaerobe 40:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.05.001
Gumienna M, Górna B (2021) Antimicrobial food packaging with biodegradable polymers and bacteriocins. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123735
Günther V, Allahqoli L, Watrowski R et al (2022) Vaginal microbiome in reproductive medicine. Diagnostics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081948
Gupta N (2022) Antimicrobial therapy in resource-limited settings with high antimicrobial resistance: a case-based approach. Infez Med 30:73–79. https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3001-8
Hahn-Löbmann S, Stephan A, Schulz S et al (2019) Colicins and salmocins—new classes of plant-made non-antibiotic food antibacterials. Front Plant Sci 10:437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00437
Hammami I, Rhouma A, Jaouadi B et al (2009) Optimization and biochemical characterization of a bacteriocin from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain 14B for biocontrol of Agrobacterium spp. strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02524.x
Hammami R, Zouhir A, Le Lay C et al (2010) BACTIBASE second release: a database and tool platform for bacteriocin characterization. BMC Microbiol 10:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-22
Hammami R, Fliss I, Corsetti A (2019) Editorial: application of protective cultures and bacteriocins for food biopreservation. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01561
Hanchi H, Hammami R, Fernandez B et al (2016) Simultaneous production of formylated and nonformylated enterocins L50A and L50B as well as 61A, a new glycosylated durancin, by Enterococcus durans 61A, a strain isolated from artisanal fermented milk in Tunisia. J Agric Food Chem 64:3584–3590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00700
Hanchi H, Hammami R, Gingras H et al (2017) Inhibition of MRSA and of Clostridium difficile by durancin 61A: synergy with bacteriocins and antibiotics. Future Microbiol 12:205–212. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2016-0113
Hanny ELL, Mustopa AZ, Budiarti S et al (2019) Efficacy, toxicity study and antioxidant properties of plantaricin E and F recombinants against enteropathogenic Escherichia coli K1.1 (EPEC K1.1). Mol Biol Rep 46:6501–6512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-05096-9
Heeney DD, Zhai Z, Bendiks Z et al (2019) Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriocin is associated with intestinal and systemic improvements in diet-induced obese mice and maintains epithelial barrier integrity in vitro. Gut Microbes 10:382–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1534513
Heilbronner S, Krismer B, Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Peschel A (2021) The microbiome-shaping roles of bacteriocins. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:726–739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00569-w
Heinzinger LR, Pugh AR, Wagner JA, Otto M (2023) Evaluating the translational potential of bacteriocins as an alternative treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in animals and humans. Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081256
Henker J, Laass M, Blokhin BM et al (2007) The probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) stops acute diarrhoea in infants and toddlers. Eur J Pediatr 166:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0419-x
Hetz C, Bono MR, Barros LF, Lagos R (2002) Microcin E492, a channel-forming bacteriocin from Klebsiella pneumoniae, induces apoptosis in some human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2696–2701. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052709699
Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G et al (2014) Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:506–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66
Hillman JD, Dzuback AL, Andrews SW (1987) Colonization of the human oral cavity by a Streptococcus mutans mutant producing increased bacteriocin. J Dent Res 66:1092–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660060101
Hillman JD, Brooks TA, Michalek SM et al (2000) Construction and characterization of an effector strain of Streptococcus mutans for replacement therapy of dental caries. Infect Immun 68:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.2.543-549.2000
Hirsch P, Tagirdzhanov A, Kushnareva A et al (2024) ABC-HuMi: the Atlas of biosynthetic gene clusters in the human microbiome. Nucleic Acids Res 52:D579–D585. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1086
Holcapkova P, Hurajova A, Bazant P et al (2018) Thermal stability of bacteriocin nisin in polylactide-based films. Polym Degrad Stab 158:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.10.019
Hols P, Ledesma-García L, Gabant P, Mignolet J (2019) Mobilization of microbiota commensals and their bacteriocins for therapeutics. Trends Microbiol 27:690–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2019.03.007
Homayouni Rad A, Aghebati Maleki L, Samadi Kafil H, Abbasi A (2021) Postbiotics: a novel strategy in food allergy treatment. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 61:492–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1738333
Horz HP, Meinelt A, Houben B, Conrads G (2007) Distribution and persistence of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the human oral cavity as determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:126–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00334.x
Hoskin DW, Ramamoorthy A (2008) Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778:357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008
Hosseini SS, Hajikhani B, Faghihloo E, Goudarzi H (2020) Increased expression of caspase genes in colorectal cancer cell line by nisin. Arch Clin Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.97734
Hou K, Wu Z-X, Chen X-Y et al (2022) Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7:135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4
Howell TH, Fiorellini JP, Blackburn P et al (1993) The effect of a mouthrinse based on nisin, a bacteriocin, on developing plaque and gingivitis in beagle dogs. J Clin Periodontol 20:335–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00369.x
Hrabalikova M, Holcapkova P, Suly P, Sedlarik V (2016) Immobilization of bacteriocin nisin into a poly(vinyl alcohol) polymer matrix crosslinked with nontoxic dicarboxylic acid. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43674
Hu Y, Yang X, Qin J et al (2013) Metagenome-wide analysis of antibiotic resistance genes in a large cohort of human gut microbiota. Nat Commun 4:2151. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3151
Hu X, Mao R, Zhang Y et al (2014) Biotechnical paving of recombinant enterocin A as the candidate of anti-Listeria agent. BMC Microbiol 14:220. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0220-8
Hu J, Ma L, Nie Y et al (2018) A microbiota-derived bacteriocin targets the host to confer diarrhea resistance in early-weaned piglets. Cell Host Microbe 24:817-832.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.006
Hussain K, Khan MF, Ambreen G et al (2020) An antibiotic stewardship program in a surgical ICU of a resource-limited country: financial impact with improved clinical outcomes. J Pharm Policy Pract 13:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00272-w
Hussien H, Abd-Rabou HS, Saad MA (2022) The impact of incorporating Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteriocin with inulin and FOS on yogurt quality. Sci Rep 12:13401. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17633-x
Ibraheim HK, Madhi KS, Baqer GK, Gharban HAJ (2023) Effectiveness of raw bacteriocin produced from lactic acid bacteria on biofilm of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Vet World 16:491–499. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.491-499
Ilinskaya ON, Ulyanova VV, Yarullina DR, Gataullin IG (2017) Secretome of intestinal bacilli: a natural guard against pathologies. Front Microbiol 8:1666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01666
Imperial ICVJ, Ibana JA (2016) Addressing the antibiotic resistance problem with probiotics: reducing the risk of its double-edged sword effect. Front Microbiol 7:1983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01983
Imran M, Revol-Junelles A-M, de Bruin M et al (2013) Fluorescent labeling of nisin Z and assessment of anti-listerial action. J Microbiol Methods 95:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.07.009
Inglis RF, Scanlan P, Buckling A (2016) Iron availability shapes the evolution of bacteriocin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J 10:2060–2066. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.15
Islam MA, Hassen WM, Tayabali AF, Dubowski JJ (2021) Short ligand, cysteine-modified warnericin RK antimicrobial peptides favor highly sensitive detection of Legionella pneumophila. ACS Omega 6:1299–1308. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04753
Islam MA, Hassen WM, Ishika I et al (2022) Selective detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and 5 with a digital photocorrosion biosensor using antimicrobial peptide-antibody sandwich strategy. Biosensors (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020105
Izquierdo E, Wagner C, Marchioni E et al (2009) Enterocin 96, a novel class II bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecalis WHE 96, isolated from Munster cheese. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4273–4276. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02772-08
Jabés D, Brunati C, Candiani G et al (2011) Efficacy of the new lantibiotic NAI-107 in experimental infections induced by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1671–1676. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01288-10
Jaumaux F, Petit K, Martin A et al (2023) Selective bacteriocins: a promising treatment for Staphylococcus aureus skin infections reveals insights into resistant mutants, vancomycin resistance, and cell wall alterations. Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12060947
Jayaraman S, Thangavel G, Kurian H et al (2013) Bacillus subtilis PB6 improves intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. Poult Sci 92:370–374. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02528
Jia Z, Chen A, Bao F et al (2018) Effect of nisin on microbiome-brain-gut axis neurochemicals by Escherichia coli-induced diarrhea in mice. Microb Pathog 119:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.005
Jiang H, Zou J, Cheng H et al (2017) Purification, characterization, and mode of action of pentocin JL-1, a novel bacteriocin isolated from Lactobacillus pentosus, against drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biomed Res Int 2017:7657190. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7657190
Jiang Y-H, Xin W-G, Yang L-Y et al (2022) A novel bacteriocin against Staphylococcus aureus from Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from Yunnan traditional fermented yogurt: purification, antibacterial characterization, and antibiofilm activity. J Dairy Sci 105:2094–2107. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21126
Jin P, Chen X, Yu G et al (2019) The clinical and experimental research on the treatment of endometriosis with thiostrepton. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 19:323–329. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520618666180108100211
Johnson EM, Jung DY-G, Jin DY-Y et al (2018) Bacteriocins as food preservatives: challenges and emerging horizons. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58:2743–2767. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1340870
Joo NE, Ritchie K, Kamarajan P et al (2012) Nisin, an apoptogenic bacteriocin and food preservative, attenuates HNSCC tumorigenesis via CHAC1. Cancer Med 1:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.35
Joseph B, Dhas B, Hena V, Raj J (2013) Bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis as a novel drug against diabetic foot ulcer bacterial pathogens. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 3:942–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60183-5
Józefiak D, Kierończyk B, Juśkiewicz J et al (2013) Dietary nisin modulates the gastrointestinal microbial ecology and enhances growth performance of the broiler chickens. PLoS ONE 8:e85347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085347
Juarez Tomás MS, Bru E, Wiese B et al (2002) Influence of pH, temperature and culture media on the growth and bacteriocin production by vaginal Lactobacillus salivarius CRL 1328. J Appl Microbiol 93:714–724. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01753.x
Juturu V, Wu JC (2018) Microbial production of bacteriocins: latest research development and applications. Biotechnol Adv 36:2187–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.10.007
Kaewnopparat S, Dangmanee N, Kaewnopparat N et al (2013) In vitro probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum SK5 isolated from vagina of a healthy woman. Anaerobe 22:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.04.009
Kaewsrichan J, Peeyananjarassri K, Kongprasertkit J (2006) Selection and identification of anaerobic lactobacilli producing inhibitory compounds against vaginal pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 48:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00124.x
Kåhrström CT (2015) Antimicrobials: targeting of C. difficile made easy. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3481
Kamarajan P, Hayami T, Matte B et al (2015) Nisin ZP, a bacteriocin and food preservative, inhibits head and neck cancer tumorigenesis and prolongs survival. PLoS ONE 10:e0131008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131008
Kang BS, Seo J-G, Lee G-S et al (2009) Antimicrobial activity of enterocins from Enterococcus faecalis SL-5 against Propionibacterium acnes, the causative agent in acne vulgaris, and its therapeutic effect. J Microbiol 47:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-008-0179-y
Kanmani P, Satish Kumar R, Yuvaraj N et al (2013) Probiotics and its functionally valuable products—a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.553752
Kassaa IA, Rafei R, Moukhtar M et al (2019) LABiocin database: a new database designed specifically for lactic acid bacteria bacteriocins. Int J Antimicrob Agents 54:771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.07.012
Kassem MA, Saafan AE, Bayomy F, El-Gendy AO (2021) Exploring clinically isolated Staphylococcus sp. bacteriocins revealed the production of amonabactin, micrococcin, and α-circulocin. Iran J Microbiol 13:212–224. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i2.5983
Kaur S, Kaur S (2015) Bacteriocins as potential anticancer agents. Front Pharmacol 6:272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00272
Kaveh S, Hashemi SMB, Abedi E et al (2023) Bio-preservation of meat and fermented meat products by lactic acid bacteria strains and their antibacterial metabolites. Sustainability 15:10154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310154
Khan I, Miskeen S, Khalil AT et al (2016) Foodborne pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes an unsolved problem of the food industry. Pak J Nutr 15:505–514. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2016.505.514
Khan HA, Baig FK, Mehboob R (2017) Nosocomial infections: epidemiology, prevention, control and surveillance. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 7:478–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.01.019
Kheadr E, Zihler A, Dabour N et al (2010) Study of the physicochemical and biological stability of pediocin PA-1 in the upper gastrointestinal tract conditions using a dynamic in vitro model. J Appl Microbiol 109:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04644.x
Khorshidian N, Khanniri E, Mohammadi M et al (2021) Antibacterial activity of pediocin and pediocin-producing bacteria against Listeria monocytogenes in meat products. Front Microbiol 12:709959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.709959
Kim SY, Shin S, Koo HC et al (2010) In vitro antimicrobial effect and in vivo preventive and therapeutic effects of partially purified lantibiotic lacticin NK34 against infection by Staphylococcus species isolated from bovine mastitis. J Dairy Sci 93:3610–3615. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3129
Kim MJ, Ku S, Kim SY et al (2018) Safety evaluations of Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Bifidobacterium longum BORI. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051422
Kim TH, Hanh BTB, Kim G et al (2019) Thiostrepton: a novel therapeutic drug candidate for Mycobacterium abscessus infection. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244511
Kirtonia K, Salauddin M, Bharadwaj KK et al (2021) Bacteriocin: a new strategic antibiofilm agent in food industries. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 36:102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102141
Kjos M, Miller E, Slager J et al (2016) Expression of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteriocins is induced by antibiotics via regulatory interplay with the competence system. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005422
Klaenhammer TR (1988) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Biochimie 70:337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9084(88)90206-4
Klaenhammer TR (1993) Genetics of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:39–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00012.x
Klostermann K, Crispie F, Flynn J et al (2010) Efficacy of a teat dip containing the bacteriocin lacticin 3147 to eliminate Gram-positive pathogens associated with bovine mastitis. J Dairy Res 77:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029909990239
Knorr D (1998) Technology aspects related to microorganisms in functional foods. Trends Food Sci Technol 9:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(98)00051-X
Kohoutova D, Smajs D, Moravkova P et al (2014) Escherichia coli strains of phylogenetic group B2 and D and bacteriocin production are associated with advanced colorectal neoplasia. BMC Infect Dis 14:733. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0733-7
Kondrotiene K, Kasnauskyte N, Serniene L et al (2018) Characterization and application of newly isolated nisin producing Lactococcus lactis strains for control of Listeria monocytogenes growth in fresh cheese. LWT Food Sci Technol 87:507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.09.021
Kongsema M, Wongkhieo S, Khongkow M et al (2019) Molecular mechanism of Forkhead box M1 inhibition by thiostrepton in breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep 42:953–962. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7225
Kothari D, Patel S, Kim S-K (2019) Probiotic supplements might not be universally-effective and safe: a review. Biomed Pharmacother 111:537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.104
Krauss S, Zipperer A, Wirtz S et al (2020) Secretion of and self-resistance to the novel fibupeptide antimicrobial lugdunin by distinct ABC transporters in Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01734-20
Krulwich TA, Sachs G, Padan E (2011) Molecular aspects of bacterial pH sensing and homeostasis. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:330–343. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2549
Kruszewska D, Sahl H-G, Bierbaum G et al (2004) Mersacidin eradicates methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a mouse rhinitis model. J Antimicrob Chemother 54:648–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh387
Kumar B (2012) In vitro cytotoxicity of native and Rec-Pediocin CP2 against cancer cell lines: a comparative study. Pharm Anal Acta. https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-2435.1000183
Kumariya R, Sood SK, Rajput YS et al (2015) Increased membrane surface positive charge and altered membrane fluidity leads to cationic antimicrobial peptide resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1848:1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.03.007
Kumariya R, Garsa AK, Rajput YS et al (2019) Bacteriocins: classification, synthesis, mechanism of action and resistance development in food spoilage causing bacteria. Microb Pathog 128:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.01.002
Kuniyoshi TM, O’Connor PM, Lawton E et al (2022) An oxidation resistant pediocin PA-1 derivative and penocin A display effective anti-Listeria activity in a model human gut environment. Gut Microbes 14:2004071. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.2004071
Kwok JM-M, Myatt SS, Marson CM et al (2008) Thiostrepton selectively targets breast cancer cells through inhibition of forkhead box M1 expression. Mol Cancer Ther 7:2022–2032. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0188
Lakshminarayanan B, Guinane CM, O’Connor PM et al (2013) Isolation and characterization of bacteriocin-producing bacteria from the intestinal microbiota of elderly Irish subjects. J Appl Microbiol 114:886–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12085
Lange-Starke A, Petereit A, Truyen U et al (2014) Antiviral potential of selected starter cultures, bacteriocins and d, l-lactic acid. Food Environ Virol 6:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-013-9135-z
Lategan MJ, Gibson LF (2003) Antagonistic activity of Aeromonas media strain A199 against Saprolegnia sp., an opportunistic pathogen of the eel, Anguilla australis Richardson. J Fish Dis 26:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00443.x
Latham RD, Gell DA, Fairbairn RL et al (2017) An isolate of Haemophilus haemolyticus produces a bacteriocin-like substance that inhibits the growth of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:503–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.12.010
Laux C, Peschel A, Krismer B (2019) Staphylococcus aureus colonization of the human nose and interaction with other microbiome members. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0029-2018
Lavermicocca P, Lonigro SL, Valerio F et al (2002) Reduction of olive knot disease by a bacteriocin from Pseudomonas syringae pv. ciccaronei. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1403–1407. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.3.1403-1407.2002
Lay CL, Dridi L, Bergeron MG et al (2016) Nisin is an effective inhibitor of Clostridium difficile vegetative cells and spore germination. J Med Microbiol 65:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000202
Le T, Wang L, Zeng C et al (2021) Clinical and microbiological characteristics of nosocomial, healthcare-associated, and community-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in Guangzhou. China Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 10:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00910-1
Le MN-T, Nguyen TH-H, Trinh VM et al (2023) Comprehensive analysis of bacteriocins produced by the hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0086323. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00863-23
Lee DG, Hahm K-S, Park Y et al (2005) Functional and structural characteristics of anticancer peptide Pep27 analogues. Cancer Cell Int 5:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-5-21
Lee H-T, Lee C-C, Yang J-R et al (2015) A large-scale structural classification of antimicrobial peptides. Biomed Res Int 2015:475062. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/475062
Lee M, Yang J, Park S et al (2016) Micrococcin P1, a naturally occurring macrocyclic peptide inhibiting hepatitis C virus entry in a pan-genotypic manner. Antiviral Res 132:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.07.002
Li J-Z, Zhou L-Y, Peng Y-L, Fan J (2020) Pseudomonas bacteriocin syringacin M released upon desiccation suppresses the growth of sensitive bacteria in plant necrotic lesions. Microb Biotechnol 13:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13367
Liang B, Xing D (2023) The current and future perspectives of postbiotics. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-023-10045-x
Lin YH, Chen YS, Wu HC et al (2013) Screening and characterization of LAB-produced bacteriocin-like substances from the intestine of grey mullet (Mugil cephalus L.) as potential biocontrol agents in aquaculture. J Appl Microbiol 114:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12041
Linares-Morales JR, Cuellar-Nevárez GE, Rivera-Chavira BE et al (2020) Selection of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fresh fruits and vegetables based on their antimicrobial and enzymatic activities. Foods 9:1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101399
Liu G, Lv Y, Li P et al (2008) Pentocin 31–1, an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus pentosus 31–1 isolated from Xuan-Wei Ham, a traditional China fermented meat product. Food Control 19:353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.010
Liu Y, Liu Y, Du Z et al (2020) Skin microbiota analysis-inspired development of novel anti-infectives. Microbiome 8:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00866-1
Liu G, Nie R, Liu Y et al (2021) Bacillus subtilis BS-15 effectively improves plantaricin production and the regulatory biosynthesis in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RX-8. Front Microbiol 12:772546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.772546
Liu F, van Heel AJ, Kuipers OP (2023) Leader- and terminal residue requirements for circularin A biosynthesis probed by systematic mutational analyses. ACS Synth Biol 12:852–862. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00661
Lo Verso L, Lessard M, Talbot G et al (2018) Isolation and selection of potential probiotic bacteria from the pig gastrointestinal tract. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 10:299–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9309-3
Lohans CT, Vederas JC (2012) Development of class iia bacteriocins as therapeutic agents. Int J Microbiol 2012:386410. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/386410
Lopetuso LR, Giorgio ME, Saviano A et al (2019) Bacteriocins and bacteriophages: therapeutic weapons for gastrointestinal diseases? Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010183
López-González MJ, Campelo AB, Picon A et al (2018) Resistance to bacteriocin Lcn972 improves oxygen tolerance of Lactococcus lactis IPLA947 without compromising its performance as a dairy starter. BMC Microbiol 18:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1222-8
Lv X, Du J, Jie Y et al (2017) Purification and antibacterial mechanism of fish-borne bacteriocin and its application in shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) for inhibiting Vibrio parahaemolyticus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33:156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2320-8
Lynch D, O’Connor PM, Cotter PD et al (2019) Identification and characterisation of capidermicin, a novel bacteriocin produced by Staphylococcus capitis. PLoS ONE 14:e0223541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223541
Mack I, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Mazurak N et al (2022) A nonviable probiotic in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:1039-1047.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.028
Magana M, Pushpanathan M, Santos AL et al (2020) The value of antimicrobial peptides in the age of resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 20:e216–e230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30327-3
Mahdavi M, Jalali M, Kasra Kermanshahi R (2007) The effect of nisin on biofilm forming foodborne bacteria using microtiter plate method. Res Pharma Sci 2(2):113–118. Available at: http://rps.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrps/article/view/35/33
Mahdi LH, Jabbar HS, Auda IG (2019) Antibacterial immunomodulatory and antibiofilm triple effect of salivaricin LHM against Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infection model. Int J Biol Macromol 134:1132–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.181
Majeed H, Gillor O, Kerr B, Riley MA (2011) Competitive interactions in Escherichia coli populations: the role of bacteriocins. ISME J 5:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.90
Maldonado-Barragán A, Caballero-Guerrero B, Martín V et al (2016) Purification and genetic characterization of gassericin E, a novel co-culture inducible bacteriocin from Lactobacillus gasseri EV1461 isolated from the vagina of a healthy woman. BMC Microbiol 16:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0663-1
Mantovani HC, Hu H, Worobo RW, Russell JB (2002) Bovicin HC5, a bacteriocin from Streptococcus bovis HC5. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 148:3347–3352. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-11-3347
Marín-Cevada V, Muñoz-Rojas J, Caballero-Mellado J et al (2012) Antagonistic interactions among bacteria inhabiting pineapple. Appl Soil Ecol 61:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.014
Martin A, Bland MJ, Rodriguez-Villalobos H et al (2023) Promising antimicrobial activity and synergy of bacteriocins against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microb Drug Resist 29:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2021.0429
Martinez RCR, Staliano CD, Vieira ADS et al (2015) Bacteriocin production and inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei 2a in a potentially synbiotic cheese spread. Food Microbiol 48:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.12.010
Martins J, Vasconcelos V (2015) Cyanobactins from cyanobacteria: current genetic and chemical state of knowledge. Mar Drugs 13:6910–6946. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13116910
Martins J, Leikoski N, Wahlsten M et al (2018) Sphaerocyclamide, a prenylated cyanobactin from the cyanobacterium Sphaerospermopsis sp. LEGE 00249. Sci Rep 8:14537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32618-5
Mathur H, Field D, Rea MC et al (2018) Fighting biofilms with lantibiotics and other groups of bacteriocins. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 4:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-018-0053-6
Mba IE, Nweze EI (2022) Application of nanotechnology in the treatment of infectious diseases: an overview. In: Hameed S, Rehman S (eds) Nanotechnology for infectious diseases. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 25–51
McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA, Alazzeh AY et al (2011) Review: The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle. Can J Anim Sci 91:193–211. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas10047
McCaughey LC, Ritchie ND, Douce GR et al (2016) Efficacy of species-specific protein antibiotics in a murine model of acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. Sci Rep 6:30201. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30201
Md Sidek NL, Halim M, Tan JS et al (2018) Stability of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) produced by Pediococcus acidilactici kp10 at different extreme conditions. Biomed Res Int 2018:5973484. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5973484
Meade E, Slattery MA, Garvey M (2020) Bacteriocins, potent antimicrobial peptides and the fight against multi drug resistant species: resistance is futile? Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9010032
Mehta RR, Yamada T, Taylor BN et al (2011) A cell penetrating peptide derived from azurin inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth by inhibiting phosphorylation of VEGFR-2, FAK and Akt. Angiogenesis 14:355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-011-9220-6
Meira SMM, Zehetmeyer G, Scheibel JM et al (2016) Starch-halloysite nanocomposites containing nisin: characterization and inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in soft cheese. LWT Food Sci Technol 68:226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.006
Melian C, Segli F, Gonzalez R et al (2019) Lactocin AL705 as quorum sensing inhibitor to control Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. J Appl Microbiol 127:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14348
Mesa-Pereira B, Rea MC, Cotter PD et al (2018) Heterologous expression of biopreservative bacteriocins with a view to low cost production. Front Microbiol 9:1654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01654
Mihailovskaya VS, Sutormin DA, Karipova MO et al (2023) Bacteriocin-producing Escherichia coli Q5 and C41 with potential probiotic properties: in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612636
Millette M, Cornut G, Dupont C et al (2008) Capacity of human nisin- and pediocin-producing lactic acid bacteria to reduce intestinal colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1997–2003. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02150-07
Mills S, Serrano LM, Griffin C et al (2011) Inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 against Listeria innocua when used as an adjunct starter in the manufacture of cheese. Microb Cell Fact 10(Suppl 1):S7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S7
Mills S, Ross RP, Hill C (2017) Bacteriocins and bacteriophage; a narrow-minded approach to food and gut microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:S129–S153. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux022
Ming X, Weber GH, Ayres JW, Sandine WE (1997) Bacteriocins applied to food packaging materials to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes on meats. J Food Sci 62:413–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb04015.x
Mirzaee H, Neira Peralta NL, Carvalhais LC et al (2021) Plant-produced bacteriocins inhibit plant pathogens and confer disease resistance in tomato. N Biotechnol 63:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2021.03.003
Mitra S, Mukhopadhyay BC, Biswas SR (2011) Potential application of the nisin Z preparation of Lactococcus lactis W8 in preservation of milk. Lett Appl Microbiol 53:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03075.x
Miyauchi E, O’Callaghan J, Buttó LF et al (2012) Mechanism of protection of transepithelial barrier function by Lactobacillus salivarius: strain dependence and attenuation by bacteriocin production. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303:G1029–G1041. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00003.2012
Mokoena MP (2017) Lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins: classification, biosynthesis and applications against uropathogens: a mini-review. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081255
Molujin AM, Abbasiliasi S, Nurdin A et al (2022) Bacteriocins as potential therapeutic approaches in the treatment of various cancers: a review of in vitro studies. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194758
Morgan SM, Galvin M, Ross RP, Hill C (2001) Evaluation of a spray-dried lacticin 3147 powder for the control of Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus in a range of food systems. Lett Appl Microbiol 33:387–391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.01016.x
Mota-Meira M, LaPointe G, Lacroix C, Lavoie MC (2000) MICs of mutacin B-Ny266, nisin A, vancomycin, and oxacillin against bacterial pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.1.24-29.2000
Mota-Meira M, Morency H, Lavoie MC (2005) In vivo activity of mutacin B-Ny266. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:869–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki295
Mouritzen MV, Andrea A, Qvist K et al (2019) Immunomodulatory potential of nisin A with application in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 27:650–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12743
Mousavi Khaneghah A, Hashemi SMB, Limbo S (2018) Antimicrobial agents and packaging systems in antimicrobial active food packaging: an overview of approaches and interactions. Food Bioprod Process 111:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.05.001
Mu Y, Zhang C, Jin C-Z et al (2024) Antibacterial activity and action mode of crude bacteriocin C2–1 from Ligilactobacillus salivarius C2–1 against Listeria monocytogenes CICC 21633. LWT 193:115765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115765
Muñoz A, Maqueda M, Gálvez A et al (2004) Biocontrol of psychrotrophic enterotoxigenic Bacillus cereus in a nonfat hard cheese by an enterococcal strain-producing enterocin AS-48. J Food Prot 67:1517–1521. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1517
Muñoz A, Ananou S, Gálvez A et al (2007) Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy products by enterocin AS-48 produced in situ and ex situ: bactericidal synergism with heat. Int Dairy J 17:760–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.09.006
Murphy EF, Cotter PD, Hogan A et al (2013) Divergent metabolic outcomes arising from targeted manipulation of the gut microbiota in diet-induced obesity. Gut 62:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300705
Naimi S, Zirah S, Hammami R et al (2018) Fate and biological activity of the antimicrobial lasso peptide microcin J25 under gastrointestinal tract conditions. Front Microbiol 9:1764. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01764
Naimi S, Zirah S, Greppi A et al (2022) Impact of microcin J25 on the porcine microbiome in a continuous culture model. Front Microbiol 13:930392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.930392
Naskar A, Kim KS (2021) Potential novel food-related and biomedical applications of nanomaterials combined with bacteriocins. Pharmaceutics 13:86. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010086
Navarro L, Zarazaga M, Sáenz J et al (2000) Bacteriocin production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from Rioja red wines. J Appl Microbiol 88:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00865.x
Navarro S, Abla H, Colmer-Hamood JA et al (2023) Under conditions closely mimicking vaginal fluid, Lactobacillus jensenii strain 62B produces a bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance that targets and eliminates Gardnerella species. Microbiology (Reading, Engl). https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001409
Naveen SV, Kalaivani K (2018) Cancer stem cells and evolving novel therapies: a paradigm shift. Stem Cell Investig 5:4. https://doi.org/10.21037/sci.2018.01.03
Nazari M, Smith DL (2020) A PGPR-produced bacteriocin for sustainable agriculture: a review of thuricin 17 characteristics and applications. Front Plant Sci 11:916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00916
Negash AW, Tsehai BA (2020) Current applications of bacteriocin. Int J Microbiol 2020:4374891. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4374891
Ng ZJ, Zarin MA, Lee CK, Tan JS (2020) Application of bacteriocins in food preservation and infectious disease treatment for humans and livestock: a review. RSC Adv 10:38937–38964. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA06161A
Nicholas-Haizelden K, Murphy B, Hoptroff M, Horsburgh MJ (2023) Bioprospecting the skin microbiome: advances in therapeutics and personal care products. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081899
Norouzi Z, Salimi A, Halabian R, Fahimi H (2018) Nisin, a potent bacteriocin and anti-bacterial peptide, attenuates expression of metastatic genes in colorectal cancer cell lines. Microb Pathog 123:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.07.006
Norris GE, Patchett ML (2016) The glycocins: in a class of their own. Curr Opin Struct Biol 40:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.09.003
O’Brien RF (2005) Bacterial vaginosis: many questions—any answers? Curr Opin Pediatr 17:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mop.0000170516.35272.45
O’Connor PM, Ross RP, Hill C, Cotter PD (2015) Antimicrobial antagonists against food pathogens: a bacteriocin perspective. Curr Opin Food Sci 2:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.01.004
O’Connor PM, O’Shea EF, Cotter PD et al (2018) The potency of the broad spectrum bacteriocin, bactofencin A, against staphylococci is highly dependent on primary structure, N-terminal charge and disulphide formation. Sci Rep 8:11833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30271-6
O’Connor PM, Kuniyoshi TM, Oliveira RP et al (2020) Antimicrobials for food and feed; a bacteriocin perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol 61:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.023
O’Mahony T, Rekhif N, Cavadini C, Fitzgerald GF (2001) The application of a fermented food ingredient containing “variacin”, a novel antimicrobial produced by Kocuria varians, to control the growth of Bacillus cereus in chilled dairy products. J Appl Microbiol 90:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01222.x
O’Reilly C, Grimaud GM, Coakley M et al (2023) Modulation of the gut microbiome with nisin. Sci Rep 13:7899. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34586-x
O’Sullivan L, Ryan MP, Ross RP, Hill C (2003) Generation of food-grade lactococcal starters which produce the lantibiotics lacticin 3147 and lacticin 481. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3681–3685. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.6.3681-3685.2003
O’Sullivan JN, Rea MC, O’Connor PM et al (2019) Human skin microbiota is a rich source of bacteriocin-producing staphylococci that kill human pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy241
Ogunbanwo ST, Sanni AI, Onilude AA (2004) Influence of bacteriocin in the control of Escherichia coli infection of broiler chickens in Nigeria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WIBI.0000013311.43842.74
Oliveira MM, Ramos ETA, Drechsel MM et al (2018) Gluconacin from Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAL5 is an active bacteriocin against phytopathogenic and beneficial sugarcane bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14074
Oman TJ, van der Donk WA (2009) Insights into the mode of action of the two-peptide lantibiotic haloduracin. ACS Chem Biol 4:865–874. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb900194x
Ongey EL, Neubauer P (2016) Lanthipeptides: chemical synthesis versus in vivo biosynthesis as tools for pharmaceutical production. Microb Cell Fact 15:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0502-y
Ongey EL, Yassi H, Pflugmacher S, Neubauer P (2017) Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of lanthipeptides undergoing clinical studies. Biotechnol Lett 39:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2279-9
Opsata M, Nes IF, Holo H (2010) Class IIa bacteriocin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis V583: the mannose PTS operon mediates global transcriptional responses. BMC Microbiol 10:224. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-224
Ormaasen I, Rudi K, Diep DB, Snipen L (2023) Metagenome-mining indicates an association between bacteriocin presence and strain diversity in the infant gut. BMC Genomics 24:295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09388-0
Oumer A, Garde S, Gaya P et al (2001) The effects of cultivating lactic starter cultures with bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria. J Food Prot 64:81–86. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-64.1.81
Ovchinnikov KV, Kranjec C, Thorstensen T et al (2020) Successful development of bacteriocins into therapeutic formulation for treatment of MRSA skin infection in a murine model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00829-e920. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00829-20
Ovchinnikov KV, Kranjec C, Telke A et al (2021) A strong synergy between the thiopeptide bacteriocin micrococcin P1 and rifampicin against MRSA in a murine skin infection model. Front Immunol 12:676534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.676534
Pablo MA, Gaforio JJ, Gallego AM et al (1999) Evaluation of immunomodulatory effects of nisin-containing diets on mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 24:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.1999.tb01262.x
Paiva AD, de Oliveira MD, de Paula SO et al (2012) Toxicity of bovicin HC5 against mammalian cell lines and the role of cholesterol in bacteriocin activity. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 158:2851–2858. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.062190-0
Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) Ten threats to global health in 2019. Available at: https://www3.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14916:ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019&Itemid=0&lang=en#gsc.tab=0. Accessed 1 Sept 2023
Pararajasingam A, Uwagwu J (2017) Lactobacillus: the not so friendly bacteria. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-218423
Parret AHA, Temmerman K, De Mot R (2005) Novel lectin-like bacteriocins of biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5197–5207. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5197-5207.2005
Pascual LM, Daniele MB, Giordano W et al (2008) Purification and partial characterization of novel bacteriocin L23 produced by Lactobacillus fermentum L23. Curr Microbiol 56:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9094-4
Pattanayaiying R, H-Kittikun A, Cutter CN (2015) Incorporation of nisin Z and lauric arginate into pullulan films to inhibit foodborne pathogens associated with fresh and ready-to-eat muscle foods. Int J Food Microbiol 207:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.045
Pendharkar S, Skafte-Holm A, Simsek G, Haahr T (2023) Lactobacilli and their probiotic effects in the vagina of reproductive age women. Microorganisms 11:636. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030636
Perez RH, Zendo T, Sonomoto K (2014) Novel bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB): various structures and applications. Microb Cell Fact 13(Suppl 1):S3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-S1-S3
Perez RH, Zendo T, Sonomoto K (2018) Circular and leaderless bacteriocins: biosynthesis, mode of action, applications, and prospects. Front Microbiol 9:2085. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02085
Pérez-Cobas AE, Rodríguez-Beltrán J, Baquero F, Coque TM (2023) Ecology of the respiratory tract microbiome. Trends Microbiol 31:972–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2023.04.006
Pérez-Ibarreche M, Castellano P, Leclercq A, Vignolo G (2016) Control of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on industrial surfaces by the bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus sakei CRL1862. FEMS Microbiol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw118
Phongphakdee K, Nitisinprasert S (2015) Combination inhibition activity of nisin and ethanol on the growth inhibition of pathogenic gram negative bacteria and their application as disinfectant solution. J Food Sci 80:M2241–M2246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13015
Pieterse R, Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2010a) Mode of action and in vitro susceptibility of mastitis pathogens to macedocin ST91KM and preparation of a teat seal containing the bacteriocin. Braz J Microbiol 41:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000100020
Pieterse R, Todorov SD, Leon MTD (2010b) Mode of action and In vitro susceptibility of mastitis pathogens to macedocin ST91KM and preparation of a teat seal containing the bacteriocin. Braz J Microbiol 41:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838220100001000020
Pinto AL, Fernandes M, Pinto C et al (2009) Characterization of anti-Listeria bacteriocins isolated from shellfish: potential antimicrobials to control non-fermented seafood. Int J Food Microbiol 129:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.11.005
Piper C, Draper LA, Cotter PD et al (2009) A comparison of the activities of lacticin 3147 and nisin against drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:546–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp221
Pogány Simonová M, Chrastinová Ľ, Ščerbová J et al (2022) Preventive potential of dipeptide enterocin A/P on rabbit health and its effect on growth, microbiota, and immune response. Animals (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091108
Polak K, Jobbágy A, Muszyński T et al (2021) Microbiome modulation as a therapeutic approach in chronic skin diseases. Biomedicines. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101436
Prescott J (2019) Veterinary antimicrobial stewardship in australia. Can Vet J 60:246–248
Príncipe A, Fernandez M, Torasso M et al (2018) Effectiveness of tailocins produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens SF4c in controlling the bacterial-spot disease in tomatoes caused by Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Microbiol Res 212–213:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.05.010
Promrug D, Wittayacom K, Nathapanan N et al (2023) Cocultures of Enterococcus faecium and Aeromonas veronii induce the secretion of bacteriocin-like substances against aeromonas. J Agric Food Chem 71:16194–16203. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04019
Prudent M, Salon C, Souleimanov A et al (2015) Soybean is less impacted by water stress using Bradyrhizobium japonicum and thuricin-17 from Bacillus thuringiensis. Agron Sust Dev 35:749–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0256-z
Pu J, Hang S, Liu M et al (2022) A Class IIb bacteriocin plantaricin NC8 modulates gut microbiota of different enterotypes in vitro. Front Nutr 9:877948. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.877948
Puls J-S, Winnerling B, Power JJ et al (2024) Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteriocin A37 kills natural competitors with a unique mechanism of action. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae044
Pulse ME, Weiss WJ, Kers JA et al (2019) Pharmacological, toxicological, and dose range assessment of OG716, a novel lantibiotic for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01904-18
Quereda JJ, Dussurget O, Nahori M-A et al (2016) Bacteriocin from epidemic Listeria strains alters the host intestinal microbiota to favor infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:5706–5711. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523899113
Quintana VM, Torres NI, Wachsman MB et al (2014) Antiherpes simplex virus type 2 activity of the antimicrobial peptide subtilosin. J Appl Microbiol 117:1253–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12618
Qureshi H, Saeed S, Ahmed S, Rasool SA (2006) Coliphage HSA as a model for antiviral studies/spectrum by some indigenous bacteriocin like inhibitory substances (BLIS). Pak J Pharm Sci 19:182–185
Raheel I, Mohammed AN, Mohamed AA (2023) The efficacy of bacteriocins against biofilm-producing bacteria causing bovine clinical mastitis in dairy farms: a new strategy. Curr Microbiol 80:229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03324-x
Raman M, Ambalam P, Doble M (2016) Probiotics and bioactive carbohydrates in colon cancer management. Springer India, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2586-7
Ramu R, Shirahatti PS, Devi AT et al (2015) Bacteriocins and their applications in food preservation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1020918
Rani P, Tiwari SK (2023) Role of bacteriocins in modulation of microbiome in human diseases. In: Sobti RC, Kuhad RC, Lal R, Rishi P (eds) Role of microbes in sustainable development: human health and diseases. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 395–408
Rasch M, Knøchel S (1998) Variations in tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to nisin, pediocin PA-1 and bavaricin A. Lett Appl Microbiol 27:275–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.t01-6-00449.x
Rea MC, Clayton E, O’Connor PM et al (2007) Antimicrobial activity of lacticin 3,147 against clinical Clostridium difficile strains. J Med Microbiol 56:940–946. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.47085-0
Rea MC, Sit CS, Clayton E et al (2010) Thuricin CD, a posttranslationally modified bacteriocin with a narrow spectrum of activity against Clostridium difficile. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:9352–9357. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913554107
Rea MC, Alemayehu D, Casey PG et al (2014) Bioavailability of the anti-clostridial bacteriocin thuricin CD in gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 160:439–445. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.068767-0
Redero M, López-Causapé C, Aznar J et al (2018) Susceptibility to R-pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:2770–2776. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky261
Reinseth I, Diep DB, Kjos M et al (2024) Exploring the feasibility of bacteriocins EntK1 and EntEJ97s in treatment of systemic VRE infections in mice. J Appl Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae054
Reuben RC, Roy PC, Sarkar SL et al (2019) Isolation, characterization, and assessment of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as poultry probiotics. BMC Microbiol 19:253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1626-0
Reuben RC, Roy PC, Sarkar SL et al (2020) Characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous raw milk for potential probiotic properties. J Dairy Sci 103:1223–1237. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17092
Reuben RC, Sarkar SL, Ibnat H et al (2021) Novel multi-strain probiotics reduces Pasteurella multocida induced fowl cholera mortality in broilers. Sci Rep 11:8885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88299-0
Reuben RC, Sarkar SL, Ibnat H et al (2022) Novel mono- and multi-strain probiotics supplementation modulates growth, intestinal microflora composition and haemato-biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Vet Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.709
Reuben RC, Beugnon R, Jurburg SD (2023) COVID-19 alters human microbiomes: a meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1211348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1211348
Ribeiro SC, O’Connor PM, Ross RP et al (2016) An anti-listerial Lactococcus lactis strain isolated from Azorean Pico cheese produces lacticin 481. Int Dairy J 63:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.07.017
Riboulet-Bisson E, Sturme MHJ, Jeffery IB et al (2012) Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius bacteriocin Abp118 on the mouse and pig intestinal microbiota. PLoS ONE 7:e31113. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031113
Richter K, Wohlrab J (2023) Impact of preservatives in topicals on the cutaneous microbiota. Dermatologie (heidelb) 74:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-023-05112-x
Riley MA (1998) Molecular mechanisms of bacteriocin evolution. Annu Rev Genet 32:255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.255
Riley MA, Gordon DM (1999) The ecological role of bacteriocins in bacterial competition. Trends Microbiol 7:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-842x(99)01459-6
Riley MA, Wertz JE (2002) Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:117–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161024
Ringø E, Hoseinifar SH, Ghosh K et al (2018) Lactic acid bacteria in finfish—an update. Front Microbiol 9:1818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818
Ríos Colombo NS, Perez-Ibarreche M, Draper LA et al (2023) Impact of bacteriocin-producing strains on bacterial community composition in a simplified human intestinal microbiota. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1290697
Rivera-Hernández L, Chavarría-Hernández N, López Cuellar MDR et al (2021) Pectin-gellan films intended for active food packaging: release kinetics of nisin and physico-mechanical characterization. J Food Sci Technol 58:2973–2981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04800-z
Rodnina MV, Savelsbergh A, Matassova NB et al (1999) Thiostrepton inhibits the turnover but not the GTPase of elongation factor G on the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9586–9590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.17.9586
Rojo-Bezares B, Sáenz Y, Navarro L et al (2008) Characterization of a new organization of the plantaricin locus in the inducible bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus plantarum J23 of grape must origin. Arch Microbiol 189:491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-007-0342-6
Rolhion N, Chassaing B, Nahori M-A et al (2019) A Listeria monocytogenes bacteriocin can target the commensal Prevotella copri and modulate intestinal infection. Cell Host Microbe 26:691-701.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.016
Rooney WM, Grinter RW, Correia A et al (2020) Engineering bacteriocin-mediated resistance against the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Biotechnol J 18:1296–1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13294
Rossi CC, Ahmad F, Giambiagi-deMarval M (2024) Staphylococcus haemolyticus: an updated review on nosocomial infections, antimicrobial resistance, virulence, genetic traits, and strategies for combating this emerging opportunistic pathogen. Microbiol Res 282:127652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2024.127652
Ryan KA, Jayaraman T, Daly P et al (2008) Isolation of lactobacilli with probiotic properties from the human stomach. Lett Appl Microbiol 47:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02416.x
Rybalchenko OV, Bondarenko VM, Orlova OG et al (2015) Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus fermentum on microbial growth and biofilm formation. Arch Microbiol 197:1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-015-1140-1
Saá Ibusquiza P, Herrera JJR, Cabo ML (2011) Resistance to benzalkonium chloride, peracetic acid and nisin during formation of mature biofilms by Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol 28:418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.09.014
Sada RM, Matsuo H, Motooka D et al (2024) Clostridium butyricum bacteremia associated with probiotic use, Japan. Emerging Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3004.231633
Saeed S, Rasool SA, Ahmad S, Zaidi SE, Rehmanii S (2007) Antiviral activity of Staphylococcin 188: a purified bacteriocin like inhibitory substance isolated from Staphylococcus aureus AB188. Available at: https://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=jm.2007.796.806
Saelao S, Maneerat S, Kaewsuwan S et al (2017) Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus in vitro by bacteriocinogenic Lactococcus lactis KTH0-1S isolated from Thai fermented shrimp (Kung-som) and safety evaluation. Arch Microbiol 199:551–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1324-3
Sahoo TK, Jena PK, Prajapati B et al (2017) In vivo assessment of immunogenicity and toxicity of the bacteriocin TSU4 in balb/c mice. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 9:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-016-9249-3
Saising J, Dube L, Ziebandt A-K et al (2012) Activity of gallidermin on Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5804–5810. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01296-12
Sakayori Y, Muramatsu M, Hanada S et al (2003) Characterization of Enterococcus faecium mutants resistant to mundticin KS, a class IIa bacteriocin. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 149:2901–2908. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26435-0
Salazar-Marroquín EL, Galán-Wong LJ, Moreno-Medina VR et al (2016) Bacteriocins synthesized by Bacillus thuringiensis: generalities and potential applications. Rev Med Microbiol 27:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000076
Salvucci E, Saavedra L, Hebert EM et al (2012) Enterocin CRL35 inhibits Listeria monocytogenes in a murine model. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.0972
Sánchez J, Diep DB, Herranz C et al (2007) Amino acid and nucleotide sequence, adjacent genes, and heterologous expression of hiracin JM79, a sec-dependent bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus hirae DCH5, isolated from Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). FEMS Microbiol Lett 270:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00673.x
Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Egea-Zorrilla A, Plaza-Díaz J et al (2020) The gut microbiota and its implication in the development of atherosclerosis and related cardiovascular diseases. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030605
Sand SL, Nissen-Meyer J, Sand O, Haug TM (2013) Plantaricin A, a cationic peptide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum, permeabilizes eukaryotic cell membranes by a mechanism dependent on negative surface charge linked to glycosylated membrane proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.001
Sanguyo FHC, Angeles FLA, Deborde SMV et al (2021) Bacteriocin and its current application as a food packaging film component against spoilage: a narrative review. AJBLS 10:325–339. https://doi.org/10.5530/ajbls.2021.10.45
Santos JCP, Sousa RCS, Otoni CG et al (2018) Nisin and other antimicrobial peptides: production, mechanisms of action, and application in active food packaging. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 48:179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.06.008
Sarika AR, Lipton AP, Aishwarya MS, Dhivya RS (2012) Isolation of a bacteriocin-producing Lactococcus lactis and application of its bacteriocin to manage spoilage bacteria in high-value marine fish under different storage temperatures. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167:1280–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9701-0
Sarika AR, Lipton AP, Aishwarya MS (2019) Biopreservative efficacy of bacteriocin GP1 of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GP1 on stored fish filets. Front Nutr 6:29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00029
Sassone-Corsi M, Nuccio S-P, Liu H et al (2016) Microcins mediate competition among Enterobacteriaceae in the inflamed gut. Nature 540:280–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20557
Satish Kumar R, Kanmani P, Yuvaraj N et al (2011) Purification and characterization of enterocin MC13 produced by a potential aquaculture probiont Enterococcus faecium MC13 isolated from the gut of Mugil cephalus. Can J Microbiol 57:993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1139/w11-092
Sato T, Nikolovski J, Gould R et al (2023) Skin surface biomarkers are associated with future development of atopic dermatitis in children with family history of allergic disease. Skin Res Technol 29:e13470. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13470
Saur JS, Wirtz SN, Schilling NA et al (2021) Distinct lugdunins from a new efficient synthesis and broad exploitation of its MRSA-antimicrobial structure. J Med Chem 64:4034–4058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02170
Sawa N, Zendo T, Kiyofuji J et al (2009) Identification and characterization of lactocyclicin Q, a novel cyclic bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus sp. strain QU 12. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1552–1558. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02299-08
Scaffaro R, Botta L, Marineo S, Puglia AM (2011) Incorporation of nisin in poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) films by melt processing: a study on the antimicrobial properties. J Food Prot 74:1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-383
Scannell AG, Hill C, Ross RP et al (2000) Development of bioactive food packaging materials using immobilised bacteriocins lacticin 3147 and nisaplin. Int J Food Microbiol 60:241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00314-7
Schelegueda LI, Vallejo M, Gliemmo MF et al (2015) Synergistic antimicrobial action and potential application for fish preservation of a bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus mundtii isolated from Odontesthes platensis. LWT Food Sci Technol 64:794–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.017
Schneider T, Hahn-Löbmann S, Stephan A et al (2018) Plant-made Salmonella bacteriocins salmocins for control of Salmonella pathovars. Sci Rep 8:4078. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22465-9
Scholl D, Martin DW (2008) Antibacterial efficacy of R-type pyocins towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine peritonitis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:1647–1652. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01479-07
Scholz R, Vater J, Budiharjo A et al (2014) Amylocyclicin, a novel circular bacteriocin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Bacteriol 196:1842–1852. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01474-14
Sequeiros C, Garcés ME, Vallejo M et al (2015) Potential aquaculture probiont Lactococcus lactis TW34 produces nisin Z and inhibits the fish pathogen Lactococcus garvieae. Arch Microbiol 197:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-1076-x
Serkedjieva J, Danova S, Ivanova I (2000) Antiinfluenza virus activity of a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 88:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:88:1-3:285
Sevim B, Güneş Altuntaş E (2024) Molecular dynamic study on the structure and thermal stability of mutant pediocin PA-1 peptides engineered with cysteine substitutions. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10225-3
Shafique B, Ranjha MMAN, Murtaza MA et al (2022) Recent trends and applications of nanoencapsulated bacteriocins against microbes in food quality and safety. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010085
Shanks RMQ, Dashiff A, Alster JS, Kadouri DE (2012) Isolation and identification of a bacteriocin with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity from Citrobacter freundii. Arch Microbiol 194:575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-012-0793-2
Sharma P, Kaur S, Chadha BS et al (2021) Anticancer and antimicrobial potential of enterocin 12a from Enterococcus faecium. BMC Microbiol 21:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02086-5
Sharma S, Vashist S, Lamba AK et al (2022) Novel strategies in the treatment of acne: a review. IJPI 12:123–128. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.2022.2.23
Sharp C, Bray J, Housden NG et al (2017) Diversity and distribution of nuclease bacteriocins in bacterial genomes revealed using hidden Markov models. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005652. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005652
Sheoran P, Tiwari SK (2021) Synergistically-acting enterocin LD3 and plantaricin LD4 against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 13:542–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09708-w
Shin JM, Gwak JW, Kamarajan P et al (2016) Biomedical applications of nisin. J Appl Microbiol 120:1449–1465. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13033
Silva CCG, Silva SPM, Ribeiro SC (2018) Application of bacteriocins and protective cultures in dairy food preservation. Front Microbiol 9:594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00594
Simons A, Alhanout K, Duval RE (2020) Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides from bacterial origin: overview of their biology and their impact against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050639
Siragusa GR (1992) Production of bacteriocin inhibitory to Listeria species by Enterococcus hirae. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3508–3513. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.11.3508-3513.1992
Siragusa GR, Cutter CN, Willett JL (1999) Incorporation of bacteriocin in plastic retains activity and inhibits surface growth of bacteria on meat. Food Microbiol 16:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1998.0239
Śmiałek-Bartyzel J, Bzowska M, Mężyk-Kopeć R et al (2023) BacSp222 bacteriocin as a novel ligand for TLR2/TLR6 heterodimer. Inflamm Res 72:915–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01721-3
Soleimanpour S, Hasanian SM, Avan A et al (2020) Bacteriotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer. Life Sci 254:117754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117754
Soliman W, Bhattacharjee S, Kaur K (2010) Adsorption of an antimicrobial peptide on self-assembled monolayers by molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem B 114:11292–11302. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp104024d
Soltani S, Hammami R, Cotter PD et al (2021a) Bacteriocins as a new generation of antimicrobials: toxicity aspects and regulations. FEMS Microbiol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuaa039
Soltani S, Zirah S, Rebuffat S et al (2021b) Gastrointestinal stability and cytotoxicity of bacteriocins from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative in vitro study. Front Microbiol 12:780355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.780355
Soltani S, Biron E, Ben Said L et al (2022a) Bacteriocin-based synergetic consortia: a promising strategy to enhance antimicrobial activity and broaden the spectrum of inhibition. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0040621. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00406-21
Soltani S, Boutin Y, Couture F et al (2022b) In vitro assessment of skin sensitization, irritability and toxicity of bacteriocins and reuterin for possible topical applications. Sci Rep 12:4570. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08441-4
Sosunov V, Mischenko V, Eruslanov B et al (2007) Antimycobacterial activity of bacteriocins and their complexes with liposomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:919–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm053
Spano G, Russo P, Lonvaud-Funel A et al (2010) Biogenic amines in fermented foods. Eur J Clin Nutr 64(Suppl 3):S95-100. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.218
Srionnual S, Yanagida F, Lin L-H et al (2007) Weissellicin 110, a newly discovered bacteriocin from Weissella cibaria 110, isolated from plaa-som, a fermented fish product from Thailand. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2247–2250. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02484-06
Stavric S, D’Aoust JY (1993) Undefined and defined bacterial preparations for the competitive exclusion of Salmonella in poultry—a review. J Food Prot 56:173–180. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-56.2.173
Steiner I, Errhalt P, Kubesch K et al (2008) Pulmonary pharmacokinetics and safety of nebulized duramycin in healthy male volunteers. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 378:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-008-0293-8
Stentiford GD, Peeler EJ, Tyler CR et al (2022) A seafood risk tool for assessing and mitigating chemical and pathogen hazards in the aquaculture supply chain. Nat Food 3:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00465-3
Stern NJ, Svetoch EA, Eruslanov BV et al (2005) Paenibacillus polymyxa purified bacteriocin to control Campylobacter jejuni in chickens. J Food Prot 68:1450–1453. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-68.7.1450
Su P, Henriksson A, Mitchell H (2007) Survival and retention of the probiotic Lactobacillus casei LAFTI L26 in the gastrointestinal tract of the mouse. Lett Appl Microbiol 44:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02063.x
Subramanian S, Smith DL (2015) Bacteriocins from the rhizosphere microbiome—from an agriculture perspective. Front Plant Sci 6:909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00909
Sudarsanan SE, Thangappan B (2017) Antimicrobial activity and anti-aflatoxigenic activity of bacteriocin isolated from Pediococcus acidilactici from fish wastes. Biotech Res 3:104–125. http://br.biomedpress.org/index.php/br/article/view/757
Sun S, Luo L, Liang W et al (2020) Bifidobacterium alters the gut microbiota and modulates the functional metabolism of T regulatory cells in the context of immune checkpoint blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:27509–27515. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921223117
Sung WS, Park Y, Choi C-H et al (2007) Mode of antibacterial action of a signal peptide, Pep27 from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363:806–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.041
Sutyak KE, Anderson RA, Dover SE et al (2008a) Spermicidal activity of the safe natural antimicrobial peptide subtilosin. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2008:540758. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/540758
Sutyak KE, Wirawan RE, Aroutcheva AA, Chikindas ML (2008b) Isolation of the Bacillus subtilis antimicrobial peptide subtilosin from the dairy product-derived Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. J Appl Microbiol 104:1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03626.x
Svetoch EA, Eruslanov BV, Kovalev YN et al (2009) Antimicrobial activities of bacteriocins E 50–52 and B 602 against antibiotic-resistant strains involved in nosocomial infections. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 1:136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-009-9027-6
Telhig S, Ben Said L, Torres C et al (2022) Evaluating the potential and synergetic effects of microcins against multidrug-resistant enterobacteriaceae. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0275221. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02752-21
Teneva-Angelova T, Hristova I, Pavlov A, Beshkova D (2018) Lactic acid bacteria—from nature through food to health. Advances in biotechnology for food industry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 91–133
Teng K, Huang F, Liu Y et al (2023) Food and gut originated bacteriocins involved in gut microbe-host interactions. Crit Rev Microbiol 49:515–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2022.2082860
Todorov SD (2008) Bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum AMA-K isolated from Amasi, a Zimbabwean fermented milk product and study of the adsorption of bacteriocin AMA-K to Listeria sp. Braz J Microbiol 39:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000100035
Todorov SD, Wachsman MB, Knoetze H et al (2005) An antibacterial and antiviral peptide produced by Enterococcus mundtii ST4V isolated from soya beans. Int J Antimicrob Agents 25:508–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.02.005
Todorov SD, Wachsman M, Tomé E et al (2010) Characterisation of an antiviral pediocin-like bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium. Food Microbiol 27:869–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.001
Todorov SD, Popov I, Weeks R, Chikindas ML (2022) Use of bacteriocins and bacteriocinogenic beneficial organisms in food products: benefits, challenges, concerns. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193145
Tong Z, Ni L, Ling J (2014) Antibacterial peptide nisin: a potential role in the inhibition of oral pathogenic bacteria. Peptides 60:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2014.07.020
Torres NI, Noll KS, Xu S et al (2013) Safety, formulation, and in vitro antiviral activity of the antimicrobial peptide subtilosin against herpes simplex virus type 1. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 5:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-012-9123-x
Torres C, Alonso CA, Ruiz-Ripa L et al (2018) Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. of animal origin. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0032-2018
Tran C, Horyanto D, Stanley D et al (2023) Antimicrobial properties of Bacillus probiotics as animal growth promoters. Antibiotics (Basel) 12:407. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020407
Tumbarski Y, Lante A, Krastanov A (2018) Immobilization of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria and possibilities for application in food biopreservation. Open Biotechnol J 12:25–32. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874070701812010025
Turovskiy Y, Ludescher RD, Aroutcheva AA et al (2009) Lactocin 160, a bacteriocin produced by vaginal Lactobacillus rhamnosus, targets cytoplasmic membranes of the vaginal pathogen, Gardnerella vaginalis. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 1:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-008-9003-6
Udompijitkul P, Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker MR (2012) Inhibitory effects of nisin against Clostridium perfringens food poisoning and nonfood-borne isolates. J Food Sci 77:M51–M56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02475.x
Ukuku DO, Huang L, Sommers C (2015) Efficacy of sanitizer treatments on survival and growth parameters of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut pieces of cantaloupe during storage. J Food Prot 78:1288–1295. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-233
Um S, Kim Y-J, Kwon H et al (2013) Sungsanpin, a lasso peptide from a deep-sea streptomycete. J Nat Prod 76:873–879. https://doi.org/10.1021/np300902g
Umair M, Jabbar S, Zhaoxin L et al (2022) Probiotic-based bacteriocin: immunity supplementation against viruses. An updated review. Front Microbiol 13:876058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.876058
Umu ÖCO, Bäuerl C, Oostindjer M et al (2016) The potential of class II bacteriocins to modify gut microbiota to improve host health. PLoS ONE 11:e0164036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164036
Vadyvaloo V, Hastings JW, van der Merwe MJ, Rautenbach M (2002) Membranes of class IIa bacteriocin-resistant Listeria monocytogenes cells contain increased levels of desaturated and short-acyl-chain phosphatidylglycerols. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5223–5230. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.11.5223-5230.2002
Vahedi Shahandashti R, Kasra Kermanshahi R, Ghadam P (2016) The inhibitory effect of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 8014 on planktonic cells and biofilms of Serratia marcescens. Turk J Med Sci 46:1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1505-51
Valledor SJD, Dioso CM, Bucheli JEV et al (2022) Characterization and safety evaluation of two beneficial, enterocin-producing Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from kimchi, a Korean fermented cabbage. Food Microbiol 102:103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103886
van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Montalbán-López M et al (2013) BAGEL3: automated identification of genes encoding bacteriocins and (non-)bactericidal posttranslationally modified peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W448–W453. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt391
van Staden ADP, Heunis T, Smith C et al (2016) Efficacy of lantibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced skin infections, monitored by in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3948–3955. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02938-15
Varas MA, Muñoz-Montecinos C, Kallens V et al (2020) Exploiting zebrafish xenografts for testing the in vivo antitumorigenic activity of microcin E492 against human colorectal cancer cells. Front Microbiol 11:405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00405
Vásquez A, Jakobsson T, Ahrné S et al (2002) Vaginal Lactobacillus flora of healthy Swedish women. J Clin Microbiol 40:2746–2749. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.8.2746-2749.2002
Velázquez-Suárez C, Cebrián R, Gasca-Capote C et al (2021) Antimicrobial activity of the circular bacteriocin AS-48 against clinical multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080925
Vera Pingitore E, Hébert EM, Nader-Macías ME, Sesma F (2009) Characterization of salivaricin CRL 1328, a two-peptide bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus salivarius CRL 1328 isolated from the human vagina. Res Microbiol 160:401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2009.06.009
Vieco-Saiz N, Belguesmia Y, Raspoet R et al (2019) Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters during food-animal production. Front Microbiol 10:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00057
Vijayabaskar P, Somasundaram ST (2008) Isolation of bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria from fish gut and probiotic activity against common fresh water fish pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Biotechnology 7:124–128. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2008.124.128
Villarante KI, Elegado FB, Iwatani S et al (2011) Purification, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity of the bacteriocin from Pediococcus acidilactici K2a2–3 against human colon adenocarcinoma (HT29) and human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:975–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0541-1
Wachsman MB, Farías ME, Takeda E et al (1999) Antiviral activity of enterocin CRL35 against herpesviruses. Int J Antimicrob Agents 12:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00078-3
Wachsman MB, Castilla V, de Ruiz Holgado AP et al (2003) Enterocin CRL35 inhibits late stages of HSV-1 and HSV-2 replication in vitro. Antiviral Res 58:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00099-2
Walls T, Power D, Tagg J (2003) Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) production by the normal flora of the nasopharynx: potential to protect against otitis media? J Med Microbiol 52:829–833. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.05259-0
Walsh AM, Leech J, Huttenhower C et al (2023) Integrated molecular approaches for fermented food microbiome research. FEMS Microbiol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuad001
Wang S, Huang S, Ye Q et al (2018) Prevention of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in mice with the antimicrobial peptide sublancin. J Immunol Res 2018:4353580. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4353580
Wang J, Zhang S, Ouyang Y, Li R (2019a) Current developments of bacteriocins, screening methods and their application in aquaculture and aquatic products. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101395
Wang S, Ye Q, Wang K et al (2019b) Enhancement of macrophage function by the antimicrobial peptide sublancin protects mice from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol Res 2019:3979352. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3979352
Wang G, Yu Y, Garcia-Gutierrez E et al (2019c) Lactobacillus acidophilus JCM 1132 strain and its mutant with different bacteriocin-producing behaviour have various in situ effects on the gut microbiota of healthy mice. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010049
Wang C-H, Hsieh Y-H, Powers ZM, Kao C-Y (2020a) Defeating antibiotic-resistant bacteria: exploring alternative therapies for a post-antibiotic era. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031061
Wang G, Song Q, Huang S et al (2020b) Effect of antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 on growth performance, immune regulation, and intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Animals (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020345
Wang X, Gu Q, Breukink E (2020c) Non-lipid II targeting lantibiotics. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1862:183244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183244
Wang Y, Haqmal MA, Liang Y-D et al (2022) Antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of a novel bacteriocin isolated from Pseudomonas sp. strain 166. Microb Biotechnol 15:2337–2350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14096
Wang X, Hao G, Zhou M et al (2023) Secondary metabolites of Bacillus subtilis L2 show antiviral activity against pseudorabies virus. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1277782
Wholey W-Y, Abu-Khdeir M, Yu EA et al (2019) Characterization of the competitive pneumocin peptides of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00055
Wiman E, Zattarin E, Aili D et al (2023) Development of novel broad-spectrum antimicrobial lipopeptides derived from plantaricin NC8 β. Sci Rep 13:4104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31185-8
Winkowski K, Montville TJ (1992) Use of meat isolate, Lactobacillus bavaricus mn, to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes growth in a model meat gravy system. J Food Saf 13:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.1992.tb00091.x
Wolden R, Ovchinnikov KV, Venter HJ et al (2023) The novel bacteriocin romsacin from Staphylococcus haemolyticus inhibits Gram-positive WHO priority pathogens. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0086923. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00869-23
Wolfe BE (2018) Using cultivated microbial communities to dissect microbiome assembly: challenges, limitations, and the path ahead. mSystems 3:e00161-e171. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00161-17
Wolfe BE (2023) Are fermented foods an overlooked reservoir of antimicrobial resistance? Curr Opin Food Sci 51:101018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101018
Wolfe BE, Button JE, Santarelli M, Dutton RJ (2014) Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell 158:422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.041
Woraprayote W, Malila Y, Sorapukdee S et al (2016) Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria and their applications in meat and meat products. Meat Sci 120:118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.004
Woraprayote W, Pumpuang L, Tosukhowong A et al (2018) Antimicrobial biodegradable food packaging impregnated with bacteriocin 7293 for control of pathogenic bacteria in pangasius fish fillets. LWT 89:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.026
World Health Organization (WHO) (2021) 10 global health issues to track in 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/10-global-health-issues-to-track-in-2021. Accessed 1 Sept 2023
World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) (2023) Annual report for antimicrobial agents intended for use in animals, 7th edn. Available at: https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2023/05/a-seventh-annual-report-amu-final.pdf. Accessed 19 Sept 2023
Wright EE (2017) Preliminary characterization of a nisin Z bacteriocin with activity against the fish pathogen Streptococcus iniae. OFOAJ. https://doi.org/10.19080/OFOAJ.2017.03.555610
Xiang Y-Z, Wu G, Zhang Y-P et al (2022) Inhibitory effect of a new bacteriocin RSQ04 purified from Lactococcus lactis on Listeria monocytogenes and its application on model food systems. LWT 164:113626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113626
Xu Y, Yang L, Li P, Gu Q (2019) Heterologous expression of Class IIb bacteriocin plantaricin JK in Lactococcus lactis. Protein Expr Purif 159:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2019.02.013
Yamada T, Mehta RR, Lekmine F et al (2009) A peptide fragment of azurin induces a p53-mediated cell cycle arrest in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 8:2947–2958. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0444
Yan H, Lu Y, Li X et al (2021) Action mode of bacteriocin BM1829 against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Food Biosci 39:100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100794
Yang E, Fan L, Yan J et al (2018) Influence of culture media, pH and temperature on growth and bacteriocin production of bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria. AMB Express 8:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0536-0
Ye K, Ke Z, Zhang X et al (2023) Bacterial peptides and bacteriocins as novel treatment for prostate cancer. Int J Pept Res Ther 29:78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-023-10544-z
Yıldırım Z, Yerlikaya S, Öncül N, Sakin T (2016) Inhibitory effect of lactococcin BZ against Listeria innocua and indigenous microbiota of fresh beef. Food Technol Biotechnol 54:317–323. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.54.03.16.4373
Ying J-P, Fu C-M, Wu Y-C et al (2024) Combined analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics provide insights into the antibacterial mechanism of bacteriocin XJS01 against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Total Environ 917:170412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170412
Yoon WH, Park HD, Lim K, Hwang BD (1996) Effect of O-glycosylated mucin on invasion and metastasis of HM7 human colon cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 222:694–699. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1996.0806
Yu H, Ding X, Shang L et al (2018) Protective ability of biogenic antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-induced intestinal epithelial dysfunction and inflammatory responses IPEC-J2 cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00242
Yu H, Li N, Zeng X et al (2019) A comprehensive antimicrobial activity evaluation of the recombinant microcin J25 against the foodborne pathogens salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 by using a matrix of conditions. Front Microbiol 10:1954. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01954
Yu W, Guo J, Liu Y et al (2023) Potential impact of combined inhibition by bacteriocins and chemical substances of foodborne pathogenic and spoilage bacteria: a review. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163128
Zacharof MP, Lovitt RW (2012) Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria a review article. APCBEE Proc 2:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.06.010
Zainodini N, Hassanshahi G, Hajizadeh M et al (2018) Nisin induces cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human asterocytoma cell line (SW1088). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 19:2217–2222. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.8.2217
Zalewska M, Churey JJ, Worobo RW et al (2018) Isolation of bacteriocin-producing Staphylococcus spp. strains from human skin wounds, soft tissue infections and bovine mastitis. Pol J Microbiol 67:163–169. https://doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2018-018
Zhang M, Gao X, Zhang H et al (2017) Development and antilisterial activity of PE-based biological preservative films incorporating plantaricin BM-1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw283
Zhang L, Suksanpaisan L, Jiang H et al (2019) Dual-isotope SPECT imaging with NIS reporter gene and duramycin to visualize tumor susceptibility to oncolytic virus infection. Mol Ther Oncolytics 15:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omto.2019.10.002
Zhang Y, Yang J, Liu Y et al (2020) A novel bacteriocin PE-ZYB1 produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus zy-B isolated from intestine of Mimachlamys nobilis: purification, identification and its anti-listerial action. LWT 118:108760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108760
Zhang L, Ben Said L, Hervé N et al (2022a) Effects of drinking water supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri, and a mixture of reuterin and microcin J25 on the growth performance, caecal microbiota and selected metabolites of broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 13:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00683-6
Zhang Y-M, Jiang Y-H, Li H-W et al (2022b) Purification and characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum-derived bacteriocin with activity against Staphylococcus argenteus planktonic cells and biofilm. J Food Sci 87:2718–2731. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16148
Zhao X, Chen L, Zhao L et al (2020) Antimicrobial kinetics of nisin and grape seed extract against inoculated Listeria monocytogenes on cooked shrimps: survival and residual effects. Food Control 115:107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107278
Zhao X, Wang W, Zeng X et al (2024) Klebicin E, a pore-forming bacteriocin of Klebsiella pneumoniae, exploits the porin OmpC and the Ton system for translocation. J Biol Chem 300:105694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105694
Zheng L, Cao T, Xiong P et al (2023) Characterization of the oral microbiome and gut microbiome of dental caries and extrinsic black stain in preschool children. Front Microbiol 14:1081629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1081629
Zhu L, Zeng J, Wang C, Wang J (2022) Structural basis of pore formation in the mannose phosphotransferase system by pediocin PA-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0199221. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01992-21
Zhu J, Chen Y, Imre K et al (2023) Mechanisms of probiotic Bacillus against enteric bacterial infections. One Health Adv 1:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44280-023-00020-0
Zielińska D, Kolożyn-Krajewska D (2018) Food-origin lactic acid bacteria may exhibit probiotic properties: review. Biomed Res Int 2018:5063185. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5063185
Zimina M, Babich O, Prosekov A et al (2020) Overview of global trends in classification, methods of preparation and application of bacteriocins. Antibiotics (Basel) 9:553. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9090553
Zipperer A, Konnerth MC, Laux C et al (2016) Human commensals producing a novel antibiotic impair pathogen colonization. Nature 535:511–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18634
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant agreement No 101034288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Rine Christopher Reuben carried out literature search and analysis, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and acquired funding. Carmen Torres organized the presentation of tables and figures, revised the manuscript draft, supervised the study, and acquired the funding together with Rine Christopher Reuben. The final manuscript was read and approved by all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
No ethical approval is required.
Additional information
Communicated by Yusuf Akhter.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Reuben, R.C., Torres, C. Bacteriocins: potentials and prospects in health and agrifood systems. Arch Microbiol 206, 233 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-03948-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-03948-y