Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic control of wheat quality: interactions between chromosomal regions determining protein content and composition, dough rheology, and sponge and dough baking properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the genetic control of wheat processing characteristics such as dough rheology is well understood, limited information is available concerning the genetic control of baking parameters, particularly sponge and dough (S&D) baking. In this study, a quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis was performed using a population of doubled haploid lines derived from a cross between Australian cultivars Kukri × Janz grown at sites across different Australian wheat production zones (Queensland in 2001 and 2002 and Southern and Northern New South Wales in 2003) in order to examine the genetic control of protein content, protein expression, dough rheology and sponge and dough baking performance. The study highlighted the inconsistent genetic control of protein content across the test sites, with only two loci (3A and 7A) showing QTL at three of the five sites. Dough rheology QTL were highly consistent across the 5 sites, with major effects associated with the Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 loci. The Glu-D1 5 + 10 allele had consistent effects on S&D properties across sites; however, there was no evidence for a positive effect of the high dough strength Glu-B1-al allele at Glu-B1. A second locus on 5D had positive effects on S&D baking at three of five sites. This study demonstrated that dough rheology measurements were poor predictors of S&D quality. In the absence of robust predictive tests, high heritability values for S&D demonstrate that direct selection is the current best option for achieving genetic gain in this product category.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AACC (1999) Approved methods, 10th edn. Method no 39-11 Near Infrared Reflectance method for protein determination in wheat flour. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • AACC (2000a) Approved methods, 10th edn. Methods 26-10A and 26-21A. Experimental Milling–Bühler Method for Hard Wheat. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • AACC (2000b) Approved method of the AACC. Methods 54-21 and 54-40. Farinograph method for flour. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • AACC (2000c) Approved method of the AACC. Method 55-30. Particle size index for wheat hardness. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson OD, Green FC (1989) The characterisation and comparative analysis of high-molecular-weight glutenin genes from genomes A and B of hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 77:689–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angioloni A, Rosa MD (2007) Effects of cysteine and mixing conditions on white/whole dough rheological properties. J Food Eng 80:18–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arbelbide M, Bernardo R (2006) Mixed-model QTL mapping for kernel hardness and dough strength in bread. Wheat Theor Appl Genet 112:885–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batey IL, Gupta RB, MacRitchie F (1991) Use of size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography in the study of wheat flour proteins: an improved chromatographic procedure. Cereal Chem 68:207–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bekes F, Lukow OM, Uthayakumaran S, Mann G (2002) Small-scale quality measurements. In: Shewry PR, Lookhart GL (eds) Wheat gluten protein analysis. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, pp 173–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco A, Pasqualone A, Troccoli A, Di Fonzo N, Simeone R (2002) Detection of grain protein content Qtls across environments in tetraploid wheats. Plant Mol Biol 48:615–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brabender CW (1932) Studies with the Farinograph for predicting the most suitable types of American export wheats and flours for mixing with European soft wheats and flours. Cereal Chem 9:S917

    Google Scholar 

  • Broman K, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill G (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19:889–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bushuk W (1998) Wheat breeding for end-product use. Euphytica 100:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butow BJ, Ma W, Gale KR, Larroque O, Rampling L, Cornish GB, Morell MK, Békés F (2003) Molecular discrimination of Bx7 alleles demonstrates that a highly expressed high molecular weight glutenin allele has a major impact on wheat flour dough strength. Theor Appl Genet 107:1524–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WP, Wrigley CW, Cressey PJ, Slack CR (1987) Statistical correlations between quality attributes and grain protein composition for 71 hexaploid wheats used as breeding parents. Cereal Chem 64:293–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cane K, Spackman M, Eagles HA (2004) Purpindoline genes and their effects on grain quality traits in southern Australian wheat cultivars. Aust J Agric Res 55:89–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cauvain SP (2003) Breadmaking: an overview. In: Cauvain SP (ed) Breadmaking, improving quality. Woodhead, USA, pp 8–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish GB, Békés F, Allen HM, Martin DJ (2001) Flour proteins linked to quality traits in an Australian doubled haploid wheat population. Aust J Agric Res 52:1339–1348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crepieux S, Lebreton C, Flament P, Charmet G (2005) Application of a new IBD-based QTL mapping method to common wheat breeding population: analysis of kernel hardness and dough strength. Theor Appl Genet 111:1409–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullis BR, Smith AB, Panozzo JF, Lim P (2003) Barley malting quality: are we selecting the best? Aust J Agric Res 54:1261–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita P, Nicosia OLD, Nigro F, Platani C, Riefolo C, Di Fonzo N, Cattivelli L (2007) Breeding progress in morpho-physiological, agronomical and qualitative traits of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy during the 20th century. Eur J Agron 26:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobraszczyk BJ, Morgenstern MP (2003) Rheology and the breadmaking process. J Cereb Sci 38:229–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Don C, Lichtendonk WJ, Plijter JJ, van Vliet T, Hamer RJ (2005) The effect of mixing on glutenin particle properties: aggregation factors that affect gluten function in dough. J Cereal Sci 41:69–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faridi H, Rasper VF, Launey B (1987) The Alveograph handbook. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, pp 17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao S, Gu YQ, Wu J, Coleman-Derr D, Huo N, Crossman C, Jia J, Zuo Q, Ren Z, Anderson OD, Kong X (2007) Rapid evolution and complex structural organization in genomic regions harboring multiple prolamin genes in the polyploid wheat genome. Plant Mol Biol 65:189–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Gogel BJ, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2002) ASReml User Guide Release 1.0, VSN International Ltd

  • Goesaert H, Brijs K, Veraverbeke WS, Courtin CM, Gebruers K, Delcour JA (2005) Wheat flour constituents: how they impact bread quality, and how to impact their functionality. Trends Food Sci Technol 16:12–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Elias EM, Kianian SF (2004) Mapping genes for grain protein concentration and grain yield on chromosome 5b of Triticum Turgidum (L.) Var. Dicoccoides Euphytica 139:217–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gras PW, Békés F (1996) Small-scale testing: the development of instrumentation and application as a research tool. In: Gluten ’96-proceedings of the sixth international gluten workshop Wrigley CW (ed), RACI, Melbourne, Australia pp. 506–510

  • Gras PW, Hibberd GE, Walker CE (1990) Electronic sensing and interpretation of dough properties using a 35 g Mixograph. Cereal Foods World 35:568–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Gras PW, Anderssen RS, Keentok M, Békés F, Appels R (2001) Gluten protein functionality in wheat flour processing: a review. Aust J Agric Res 52:1311–1323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groos C, Bervas E, Charmet G (2004) Genetic analysis of grain protein content, grain hardness and dough rheology in a hard × hard bread wheat progeny. J Cereal Sci 40:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groos C, Bervas E, Chanliaud E, Charmet G (2007) Genetic analysis of bread-making quality scores in bread wheat using a recombinant inbred line population. Theor Appl Genet 115:313–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harjit-Singh MP, Varshney RK, Roy JK, Balyan HS, Dhaliwal HS, Gupta PK (2001) STMS markers for grain protein content and their validation using near-isogenic lines in bread wheat. Plant Breeding 120:273–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang XQ, Cloutier S, Lycar L, Radovanovic N, Humphreys DG, Noll JS, Somers DJ, Brown PD (2006) Molecular detection of QTL for agronomic and quality traits in a doubled haploid population derived from two Canadian wheats (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 113:753–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner FR, Bietz JA (1984) Separation of wheat gliadins by preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Cereal Chem 61:544–547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kammholz SJ, Campbell AW, Sutherland MW, Hollamby GJ, Martin PJ, Eastwood RF, Barclay I, Wilson RE, Brennan PS, Sheppard JA (2001) Establishment and characterisation of wheat genetic mapping populations. Aust J Agric Res 52:1079–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer R, Kim JJ, Belitz HD (1981a) Zugversuche mit weizenkleber im Micromabstab. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 172:190–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer R, Garnreiter F, Belitz HD (1981b) Beurteilung von teigeigen-schaften durch zugversuche im Micromabstab. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 172:193–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchel H, Langridge P, Mosionek L, Williams K, Jefferies SP (2006) The genetic control of milling yield, dough rheology and baking quality of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 112:1487–1495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lafiandra D, D’Ovidio R, Porceddu E, Margiotta B, Colaprico G (1993) New data supporting high M r glutenin subunit 5 as the determinant of quality differences among the Pairs 5 + 10 vs. 2 + 12. J Cereal Sci 18:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law CN, Bhandari DG, Salmon SE, Greenwell PW, Foot IM, Cauvain SP, Sayers EJ, Worland AJ (2005) Novel genes on chromosome 3A influencing breadmaking quality in wheat, including a new gene for loaf volume, Lvl 1. J Cereal Sci 41:317–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lever T, Kelly A, De Faveri J, Martin D, Sheppard J, Quail K, Miskelly D (2005) Australian wheat for the sponge and dough bread making process. Aust J Agricult Res 56:1049–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma W, Appels R, Bekes F, Larroque O, Morell MK, Gale KR (2005) Genetic characterisation of dough rheological properties in a wheat doubled haploid population: additive genetic effects and epistatic interactions. Theor Appl Genet 111:410–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacRitchie F (1992) Physicochemical properties of wheat proteins in relation to functionality. Adv Food Nutr Res 36:1–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann G (2002) PhD thesis. New crop phenomenon in wheat and the mechanisms involved. University of Reading, UK

  • Mann G, Békés F, Morell MK (2003) Extensional rheology measurements as predictors of wheat quality. In: Lafiandra D, Masci S, D’ovidio R (eds) 8th international workshop on gluten proteins. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann G, Allen H, Morell MK, Nath Z, Martin P, Oliver J, Cullis B, Smith A (2005) Comparison of small-scale and large-scale extensibility of dough produced from wheat flour. Aust J Agric Res 56:1387–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann G, Diffey S, Allen H, Pumpa J, Nath Z, Morell MK, Cullis B, Smith A (2007) Comparison of small-scale and large-scale mixing characteristics: correlations between small-scale and large-scale mixing and extensional characteristics of wheat flour dough. J Cereal Sci 47:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartney CA, Somers DJ, Lukow O, Ames N, Noll J, Cloutier S, Humphreys DG, McCallum BD (2006) QTL analysis of quality traits in the spring wheat cross RL4452 ×  AC Domain. Plant Breed 125:565–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh RA, Hart GE, Gale MD (1995) Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. In: Li ZS, Xin ZY (eds) Proceedings of 8th international Wheat Genet symposium. China Agricultural Scientech Press, Beijing, pp 1333–1500

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris CF (2002) Puroindolines: the molecular genetic basis of wheat grain hardness. Plant Mol Biol 48:633–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JC, Andreescu C, Breseghello F, Finney PL, Daisy G, Gualberto DG, Bergman CJ, Pena RJ, Perretant MR, Leroy P, Qualset CO, Sorrells ME (2006) Quantitative trait locus analysis of wheat quality traits. Euphytica 149:145–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JR, Allen HM (1992) The prediction of bread baking performance using the farinograph and extensograph. J Cereal Sci 15:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne BG, Anderssen RS (2003) Single-kernel characterization principles and applications. Cereal Chem 80:613–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panozzo JF, Eagles HA (2000) Cultivar and environmental effects on quality characters in wheat. II: protein. Aust J Agric Res 51:629–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne PI (1987) Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effect of allelic variation on bread making quality. Annu Rev Plant Phys 38:141–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne PI, Lawrence GJ (1983) Catalogue of alleles for the complex gene loci Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 which code for the high-molecular-weight subunits of glutenin in hexaploid wheat. Cereal Res Comm 11:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Perretant MR, Cadalen T, Charmet G, Sourdille P, Nicolas P, Boeuf C, Tixier MH, Branlard G, Bernard S (2000) QTL analysis of bread-making quality in wheat using a doubled haploid population. Theor Appl Genet 100:1167–1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RACI (2003a) Official testing methods of the cereal chemistry Division of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute, method 02-03. Dumas (Combustion) total nitrogen determination

  • RACI (2003b) Official testing methods of the Cereal Chemistry Division of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute, method 06-01. Extensograph testing

  • RACI (2003c) Official testing methods of the cereal chemistry Division of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute, method 06-02. Farinograph testing

  • Rath CR, Gras PW, Wrigley CW, Walker CE (1990) Evaluation of dough properties from two grams of flour using the Mixograph principle. Cereal Foods World 35:572–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath CR, Gras PW, Zhen Z, Appels R, Bekes F, Wrigley CW (1994) A prototype extension tester for two-gram dough samples. In: Panozzo JF, Downie PG (eds) Proceedings 44th RACI Cereal Chemistry Division; RACI, pp 122–126

  • Ravel C, Praud S, Murigneux A, Linossier L, Dardevet M, Balfourier F, Dufour P, Brunel D, Charmet G (2006) Identification of Glu-B1-1 as a candidate gene for the quantity of high-molecular-weight glutenin in bread wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) by means of an association study. Theor Appl Genet 112:738–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset M, Brabant P, Kota RS, Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J (2001) Use of recombinant substitution lines for gene mapping and QTL analysis of bread making quality in wheat. Euphytica 119:81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelke K, Walker CE (1990) A water jacketed bowl for Mixograph temperature control. Cereal Foods World 35:575–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewry PR, Tatham AS, Halford NG (1999) The prolamins of the Triticeae. In: Shewry PR, Casey R (eds) Seed proteins. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 35–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivri D, Batey IL, Skylas DJ, Daqiq L, Wrigley CW (2004) Changes in the composition and size distribution of endosperm proteins from bug-damaged wheats. Aust J Agric Res 55:477–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sluimer P (2005) Principles of breadmaking. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Smewing J (1995) The measurement of dough and gluten extensibility using the SMS/Kieffer rig and the TA.TX2 texture analyser handbook. SMS Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton KH (1991) Qualitative and quantitative variation among high-molecular weight subunits of glutenin detected by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J Cereal Sci 14:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson CO, Working EB (1933) Testing of the quality of flour by the recording dough mixer. Cereal Chem 10:1–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trethowan RM, Pena RJ, van Ginkel M (2001) The effect of indirect tests for grain quality on the grain yield and industrial quality of bread wheat. Plant Breeding 120:509–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbyla AP, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2007) The analysis of QTL by simultaneous use of the full linkage map. Theor Appl Genet (in press)

  • Weegels PL, Van de Pijpekamp MA, Graveland A, Hamer RJ, Schofield JD (1996) Depolymerisation and re-polymerisation of wheat glutenin during dough processing. I: relationship between glutenin macropolymer content and quality parameters. J Cereal Sci 23:103–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetti S, Winzeler M, Feuillet C, Keller B, Messmer M (2001) Genetic analysis of bread-making quality in wheat and spelt. Plant Breeding 120:13–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Oscar Larroque for assistance in HPLC, Russell Heywood and Mark Cmiel for the assistance in the field trials, and Odile Argilier from Syngenta Orgerus laboratories in France for molecular marker analysis. We also would like to thank Sonya Richard, Connie Chow, Jeff Fielke, and Bill Hogan from BRI Australia for their contribution to the end product quality testing. Research on the Narrabri and Hillston trials was initiated with support by GrainGene, a joint venture involving CSIRO, the Grains Research and Development Corporation, AWB Ltd and Syngenta, and completed with funding from the Grains Research and Development Corporation. The Queensland-based component of this work was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation of Australia through the Australian Winter Cereals Molecular Marker Program. For this component the authors wish to thank other members of the Northern Region Wheat Molecular Marker Program for their input and in particular John Sheppard and staff from DPI&F wheat breeding group for conducting the various field trials and providing samples for analysis. We are also very grateful to Bruce Stewart, Lorelei Bartkowski, Janina Koltys, Linda Tredwell, William Spence and Christine Perrett from the DPI&F Wheat Quality Laboratory for their technical assistance in analyzing samples for the various wheat quality traits.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew K. Morell.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Sorrells.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 198 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mann, G., Diffey, S., Cullis, B. et al. Genetic control of wheat quality: interactions between chromosomal regions determining protein content and composition, dough rheology, and sponge and dough baking properties. Theor Appl Genet 118, 1519–1537 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1000-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1000-y

Keywords

Navigation