Abstract
The observed statistical seismic quantity is critical to understanding the nature of earthquakes and potential hazards in earthquake-prone areas. We have studied the nowcasting concept, which examines the current uncertain situation of earthquake risk assessment in Sarpol-e Zahab and the surrounding areas. In order to evaluate the statistical distribution of the interevent counts of small events that occur between large events, we used the natural time concept rather than clock time. The earthquake potential score (EPS) was calculated as the total number of small earthquakes after the last large occurrence in the studied area. We have determined the EPS values to consider events of M ≥ 4.4 within two different radius (250 and 350 km) around the city center studied. The EPS values for Sarpol-e Zahab at 250 km corresponding to M ≥ 5.5 and six events found to be almost 0.86 and 0.97, respectively, while at 350 km these values are equal to 0.73 and 0.50 for M ≥ 5.5 and six events, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel Hafiez, H. E., & Toni, M. (2020). Magnitude of completeness for the Northern stations of the Egyptian National Seismological Network. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05461-0
Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N=a−bM and its confidence limits. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute of the University of Tokyo, 43, 237–239.
Ambraseys, N. N., & Melville, C. P. (1982). A history of Persian earthquakes (p. 240). Cambridge University Press.
Bevington, P. R., & Robinson, D. K. (2003). Data reduction and error analysis in the physical sciences. McGraw-Hill.
Flores-Márquez, E. L., Ramírez-Rojas, A., Perez-Oregon, J., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., & Varotsos, P. A. (2020). Natural time analysis of seismicity within the Mexican Flat Slab before the M7.1 earthquake on 19 September 2017. Entropy, 22(7), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22070730
Gentili, S., Peresan, A., Talebi, M., Zare, M. & Di Giovambattista, R. (2019). A seismic quiescence before the 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol Zahab (Iran) earthquake: Detection and analysis by improved RTL method. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 290, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2019.02.010
U.S. Geological Survey (2017). Earthquake facts and statistics. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/browse/stats.php. Accessed 22 Mar 2018.
Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1942). Earthquake magnitude, energy, intensity and acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 32, 163–191.
Hamilton, R. M. (1967). Mean magnitude of an earthquake sequence. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 57(5), 1115–1116.
Hessami, F., Jamali, F., Tabassi, H. (2003). Major active faults of Iran. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran.
Holliday, J. R., Graves, W. R., Rundle, J. B., et al. (2016). Computing earthquake probabilities on global scales. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173, 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0951-3
Holliday, J. R., Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., et al. (2006). Using earthquake intensities to forecast earthquake occurrence times. Physical Review Letters, 97, 238501. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-13-585-2006
International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES). (2017). Report of the earthquake on November 12, 2017, sarpole-zahab, Kermanshah province, first part. In: Seismological aspects, 5th Ed.
International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (2017). Preliminary report of Azgale earthquake (in Persian).
Jamali, F., Hessami, K., & Ghorashi, M. (2011). Active tectonics and strain partitioning along dextral fault system in Central Iran: Analysis of geomorphological observations and geophysical data in the Kashan region. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 40(4), 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.013
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions. Wiley.
Luginbuhl, M., Rundle, J. B., Hawkins, A., et al. (2018a). Nowcasting earthquakes: A comparison of induced earthquakes in oklahoma and at the Geysers, California. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1678-8
Luginbuhl, M., Rundle, J. B., & Turcotte, D. L. (2018b). Natural time and nowcasting earthquakes: Are large global earthquakes temporally clustered? Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1778-0
Maleki Asayesh, B., Zafarani, H., & Najafi, N. (2018). Correlation between Coulomb stress change and aftershocks distribution in Sarpol-e-Zahab earthquake. 18th Iranian geophysical conference, pp 1−4.
Nishenko, S. P., & Bullard, R. (1987). A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77(4), 1382–1399.
Palano, M., Imprescia, P., Agnon, A., et al. (2018). An improved evaluation of the seismic/geodetic deformation-rate ratio for the Zagros fold-and-thrust collisional belt. Geophysical Journal International, 213, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx524
Pasari, S. (2015). Understanding Himalayan tectonics from geodetic and stochastic modeling. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India.
Pasari, S. (2018). Stochastic modelling of earthquake inter occurrence times in Northwest Himalaya and adjoining regions. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk, 9(1), 568–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1466730
Pasari, S. (2019). Nowcasting earthquakes in the Bay of Bengal Region. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176, 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2037-0
Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2014a). Impact of three-parameter Weibull models in probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171(7), 1251–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0704-8
Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2014b). Three-parameter generalized exponential distribution in earthquake recurrence interval estimation. Natural Hazards, 73, 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1092-9
Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2015a). Distribution of earthquake interevent times in Northeast India and adjoining regions. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172(10), 2533–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0776-0
Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2015b). Earthquake interevent time distribution in Kachchh, Northwestern India. Earth, Planets and Space, 67, 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0295-y
Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2018). Stochastic earthquake interevent time modelling from exponentiated Weibull distributions. Natural Hazards, 90(2), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3074-1
Ramezani, A., Abbaspour, R. A., & Mojarab, M. (2018). Assessment of the M8 algorithm by spatial integrating of alarms (case study: Sarpol-e Zahab earthquake). Environmental Hazards management, 4(4), 1–5.
Rundle, J. B., Giguere, A., Turcotte, D. L., Crutchfield, J. P., & Donnellan, A. (2019). Global seismic nowcasting with Shannon information entropy. Earth and Space Science, 6(1), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000464
Rundle, J. B., Luginbuhl, M., Giguere, A., et al. (2018). Natural time, nowcasting and the physics of earthquakes: estimation of seismic risk to global megacities. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1720-x
Rundle, J. B., Luginbuhl, M., Khapikova, P., Turcotte, D. L., Donnellan, A., & McKim, G. (2020). Nowcasting great global earthquake and tsunami sources. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2039-y
Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Donnellan, A., et al. (2016). Nowcasting earthquakes. Earth and Space Science, 3, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000185
Scholz, C. H. (1990). The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University.
Sornette, D., & Knopoff, L. (1997). The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87, 789–798.
Tchalenko, J. S., & Braud, J. (1974). Seismicity and structure of the Zagros (Iran): The main recent fault between 33° and 35° N. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 277, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1974.0044
Tiampo, K. F., Rundle, J. B., Klein, W., et al. (2003). Ergodic dynamics in a natural threshold system. Physical Review Letters, 91(1–4), 238501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.238501
Utsu, T. (1984). Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 59, 53–66.
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., & Skordas, E. S. (2011). Natural time analysis: The new view of time. Springer.
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Tanaka, H. K., et al. (2005). Some properties of the entropy in the natural time. Physical Review E, 71, 032102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.032102
Vernant, P., Nilforoushan, F., Hatzfeld, D., et al. (2004). Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in the middle east constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and Northern Oman. Geophysical Journal International, 157(1), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02222.x
Walpersdorf, A., Hatzfeld, D., Nankali, H., et al. (2006). Difference in the GPS deformation pattern of north and Central Zagros (Iran). Geophysical Journal International, 167(3), 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03147.x
Wiemer, S. (2001). A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters, 72(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.373
Wiemer, S., & Wyss, M. (2000). Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990114
Wyss, M., & Wiemer, S. (1997). Two current seismic quiescences within 40 km of Tokyo. Geophysical Journal International, 128(2), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01568.x
Yadav, R. B. S., Tripathi, J. N., Rastogi, B. K., Das, M. C., & Chopra, S. (2010). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in northeast India and adjoining regions. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167, 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0105-1
Acknowledgements
The authors thank anonymous reviewers for stimulating objections and highly relevant comments. They would also like to acknowledge Dr. Sumanta Pasari for his useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirhoseini, S.F., Mahood, M., Tahernia, N. et al. Case Study of Earthquake Probability Using Natural Time and Nowcasting of the Sarpol-e Zahab Region in Kermanshah, Iran. Pure Appl. Geophys. 178, 1181–1191 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02699-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02699-x