Abstract
Production of coffee beans generates various types of biomass that can be applied as bioenergy for drying and roasting the beans. Thus, the aims of this study were to explore the characteristics of coffee biomass pellets (CBPs) produced from coffee cherry pulp (CCP), coffee parchment (CPM), and expired green coffee beans (ECB) by single and co-pelletization. The CBPs were then used to produce the synthesis gas in a downdraft gasifier, and the syngas properties were investigated for further heat applications. The results showed that single and co-pelletization of CCP and CPM performed well. The CBPs had good physiochemical properties in shape, size, and atomic ratios. The higher heating value and energy density of CBPs were 19.25–24.29 MJ/kg and 12.09–14.87 GJ/m3. The ash from CBPs was rich in K2O, CaO and MgO oxides, and the CPM ash had the lowest initial deformation temperature at 1136 °C. The ash samples from CBPs also had different slagging and fouling indexes. The syngas from CBPs mainly contained H2 (6.85–9.30%), CO (12.15–18.85%), and CO2 (10.85–13.75%). The heating value and tar concentration of syngas from CBPs were 3.24–4.32 MJ/m3 and 21.75–30.92 g/m3. The main chemical compounds in tar were styrene, phenol, caffeine, and pyrrole according to GC–MS. These results indicate that CCP and CPM have potential for pelletization and gasification to generate heat needed for coffee bean processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abreu P, Casaca C, Costa M (2010) Ash deposition during the co-firing of bituminous coal with pine sawdust and olive stones in a laboratory furnace. Fuel 89:4040–4048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.04.012
Adeleke AA, Odusote JK, Ikubanni PP, Lasode OA, Malathi M, Paswan D (2021) Essential basics on biomass torrefaction, densification and utilization. Int J Energy Res 45:1375–1395. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5884
Alam MT, Dai B, Wu X, Hoadley A, Zhang L (2021) A critical review of ash slagging mechanisms and viscosity measurement for low-rank coal and bio-slags. Front Energy 15:46–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0807-8
Alauddin ZABZ, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR (2010) Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review. Sust Energ Rev 14:2852–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.026
Alves JLF, da Silva JCG, Sellin N et al (2022) Upgrading of banana leaf waste to produce solid biofuel by torrefaction: physicochemical properties, combustion behaviors, and potential emissions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:25733–25747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17381-x
Araujo RO, Ribeiro FCP, Santos VO, Lima VMR, Santos JL, Vilaça JES, Chaar JS, Falcão NPS, Pohlit AM, de Souza LKC (2022) Renewable Energy from Biomass: an Overview of the Amazon Region. Bioenergy Res 15:834–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10308-x
Asghar N, Majeed MT, Khan MW, Anwar A (2023) Biomass energy consumption and sustainable development: empirical evidence from Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22132-7
Azeta O, Ayeni AO, Agboola O, Elehinafe FB (2021) A review on the sustainable energy generation from the pyrolysis of coconut biomass. Sci Afr 13:e00909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00909
Bandara JC, Jaiswal R, Nielsen HK, Moldestad BME, Eikeland MS (2021) Air gasification of wood chips, wood pellets and grass pellets in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Energy 233:121149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121149
Bhavsar PA, Jagadale M, Khandetod Y, Mohod A (2018) Proximate Analysis of Selected Non Woody Biomass. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7:2846–2849. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.353
Blinová L, Sirotiak M, Pastierova A, Soldán M (2017) Review: Utilization of Waste From Coffee Production. Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology 25. https://doi.org/10.1515/rput-2017-0011
Collard F-X, Blin J (2014) A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: Mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:594–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.013
Davies A, Simmons MD (2021) Demand for ‘advantaged’ hydrocarbons during the 21st century energy transition. Energy Rep 7:4483–4497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.013
Du S, Yang H, Qian K, Wang X, Chen H (2014) Fusion and transformation properties of the inorganic components in biomass ash. Fuel 117:1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.085
Fang X, Jia L (2012) Experimental study on ash fusion characteristics of biomass. Bioresour Technol 104:769–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.055
Garcia E, Ejim IF, Liu H (2022) Thermogravimetric analysis of co-combustion of a bituminous coal and coffee industry by-products. Thermochim Acta 715:179296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2022.179296
García-Maraver A, Popov V, Zamorano M (2011) A review of European standards for pellet quality. Renew Energ 36:3537–3540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.013
Garcia-Maraver A, Mata-Sanchez J, Carpio M, Perez-Jimenez JA (2017) Critical review of predictive coefficients for biomass ash deposition tendency. J Energy Inst 90:214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.02.002
Geroing and Van Soest (1970) Forage fiber analysis: apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some application. In: Volume 379 of Agricultural Handbook. USDA Agricultural ResearchService, Washington DC
Gilbert P, Ryu C, Sharifi V, Swithenbank J (2009) Effect of process parameters on pelletisation of herbaceous crops. Fuel 88:1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.03.015
Guo M, Song W, Buhain J (2015) Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:712–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.013
Gupta N, Mahur BK, Izrayeel AMD, Ahuja A, Rastogi VK (2022) Biomass conversion of agricultural waste residues for different applications: a comprehensive review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:73622–73647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22802-6
Han J, Kim H (2008) The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12:397–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.015
Hoseini M, Cocco S, Casucci C, Cardelli V, Corti G (2021) Coffee by-products derived resources. A Review. Biomass Bioenergy 148:106009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106009
Huynh CV, Kong S-C (2013) Combustion and NOx emissions of biomass-derived syngas under various gasification conditions utilizing oxygen-enriched-air and steam. Fuel 107:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.016
Jagtap A, Kalbande S (2023) Statistical optimization, characterization and effect of process variables on cotton stalk pellets using tractor drive pelleting machine. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27971-6
Jifara B, Diriba M, Mengesha A (2022) Pelletization of mixed torrefied corn cob and khat stem to enhance the physicochemical and thermal properties of solid biofuel and parametric optimization. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02627-6
Kaewluan S, Pipatmanomai S (2011) Potential of synthesis gas production from rubber wood chip gasification in a bubbling fluidised bed gasifier. Energy Convers Manag 52:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.044
Kar Y (2011) Co-pyrolysis of walnut shell and tar sand in a fixed-bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 102:9800–9805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.022
Khempila J, Kongto P, Meena P (2021) Comparative study of solid biofuels derived from sugarcane leaves with two different thermochemical conversion methods: wet and dry torrefaction. Bioenergy Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10348-3
Kleinhans U, Wieland C, Frandsen FJ, Spliethoff H (2018) Ash formation and deposition in coal and biomass fired combustion systems: Progress and challenges in the field of ash particle sticking and rebound behavior. Prog Energy Combust Sci 68:65–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.02.001
Kongto P, Palamanit A, Chaiprapat S, Tippayawong N (2021) Enhancing the fuel properties of rubberwood biomass by moving bed torrefaction process for further applications. Renew Energ 170:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.012
Kumar Sarangi P, Subudhi S, Bhatia L, Saha K, Mudgil D, Prasad Shadangi K, Srivastava RK, Pattnaik B, Arya RK (2023) Utilization of agricultural waste biomass and recycling toward circular bioeconomy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:8526–8539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20669-1
Lestander TA, Weiland F, Grimm A, Rudolfsson M, Wiinikka H (2022) Gasification of pure and mixed feedstock components: Effect on syngas composition and gasification efficiency. J Clean Prod 369:133330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133330
Li C, Suzuki K (2009) Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification—An overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.009
Li W, Bu W, Guo W, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Yin X (2020) Preparation for industrial pellet production from blends of eucalyptus sawdust and hydrolysis lignin: the optimal variable combinations of co-pelletization. Biomass Convers Biorefin 10:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00444-y
Li J, Xu K, Yao X, Chen S (2021) Prediction and optimization of syngas production from steam gasification: Numerical study of operating conditions and biomass composition. Energy Convers Manag 236:114077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114077
Liu H, Zhang S, Feng S, Jia C, Guo S, Sun B, Wang Q (2021) Combustion characteristics and typical pollutant emissions of corn stalk blending with municipal sewage sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:9792–9805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11463-y
Mahanta B, Saikia A, Gupta UN, Saikia P, Saikia BK, Jayaramudu J, Sellamuthu PS, Sadiku ER (2020) Study of low-rank high sulfur coal fine with biomass. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem 3:100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100023
Mamimin C, Thongdumyu P, Hniman A, Prasertsan P, Imai T, O-Thong S (2012) Simultaneous thermophilic hydrogen production and phenol removal from palm oil mill effluent by Thermoanaerobacterium-rich sludge. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:15598–15606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.062
Marcantonio V, Del Zotto L, Ouweltjes JP, Bocci E (2022) Main issues of the impact of tar, H2S, HCl and alkali metal from biomass-gasification derived syngas on the SOFC anode and the related gas cleaning technologies for feeding a SOFC system: A review. Int J Hydrog Energy 47:517–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.023
Mendoza Martinez CL, Saari J, Melo Y, Cardoso M, de Almeida GM, Vakkilainen E (2021) Evaluation of thermochemical routes for the valorization of solid coffee residues to produce biofuels: A Brazilian case. Renew Sust Energ Rev 137:110585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110585
Mora-Villalobos J-A, Aguilar F, Carballo-Arce A-F, Vega-Baudrit J-R, Trimino-Vazquez H, Villegas-Peñaranda LR, Stöbener A, Eixenberger D, Bubenheim P, Sandoval-Barrantes M, Liese A (2021) Tropical agroindustrial biowaste revalorization through integrative biorefineries—review part I: coffee and palm oil by-products. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01442-9
Mostafa ME, Hu S, Wang Y, Su S, Hu X, Elsayed SA, Xiang J (2019) The significance of pelletization operating conditions: An analysis of physical and mechanical characteristics as well as energy consumption of biomass pellets. Renew Sust Energ Rev 105:332–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.053
Motta IL, Marchesan AN, Maciel Filho R, Wolf Maciel MR (2022) Correlating biomass properties, gasification performance, and syngas applications of Brazilian feedstocks via simulation and multivariate analysis. Ind Crops Prod 181:114808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114808
Munawar MA, Khoja AH, Naqvi SR, Mehran MT, Hassan M, Liaquat R, Dawood UF (2021) Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 150:111451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111451
Murthy PS, Madhava Naidu M (2012) Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition—A review. Resour Conserv Recycl 66:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.005
Niu Y, Tan H, Hui S (2016) Ash-related issues during biomass combustion: Alkali-induced slagging, silicate melt-induced slagging (ash fusion), agglomeration, corrosion, ash utilization, and related countermeasures. Prog Energy Combust Sci 52:1–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003
Nobre C, Longo A, Vilarinho C, Gonçalves M (2020) Gasification of pellets produced from blends of biomass wastes and refuse derived fuel chars. Renew Energ 154:1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.077
Office of Agricultural Economics (2022) Agricultural Economic Information. https://www.oae.go.th/view/1/Information/EN-US. Accessed 3 November 2022
Othman M, Rahim M, Nazri M, Mohd Jaafar MN, Said M, Othman N, Syahiran M, Abdul Malik M, Athirah A, Mohd Azli AA, Bahru J (2019) Study of Combustion Performance of Syngas from Biomass Waste (Wood Waste) in a Gas Burner. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci 60:247–257
Oyebode WA, Ogunsuyi HO (2021) Impact of torrefaction process temperature on the energy content and chemical composition of stool tree (Alstonia congenisis Engl) woody biomass. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem 4:100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100115
Ozyuguran A, Akturk A, Yaman S (2018) Optimal use of condensed parameters of ultimate analysis to predict the calorific value of biomass. Fuel 214:640–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.082
Palamanit A, Khongphakdi P, Tirawanichakul Y, Phusunti N (2019) Investigation of yields and qualities of pyrolysis products obtained from oil palm biomass using an agitated bed pyrolysis reactor. Biofuel Res J 6:1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2019.6.4.3
Papież M, Śmiech S, Frodyma K, Borowiec J (2022) Decoupling is not enough - Evidence from fossil fuel use in over 130 countries. J Clean Prod 379:134856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134856
Poyilil S, Palatel A, Chandrasekharan M (2022) Physico-chemical characterization study of coffee husk for feasibility assessment in fluidized bed gasification process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:51041–51053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17048-7
Pradhan P, Arora A, Mahajani SM (2018a) Pilot scale evaluation of fuel pellets production from garden waste biomass. Energy Sustain Dev 43:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.11.005
Pradhan P, Mahajani SM, Arora A (2018b) Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass: A review. Fuel Process Technol 181:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.021
Reid WV, Ali MK, Field CB (2020) The future of bioenergy. Glob Chang Biol 26:274–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14883
Remón J, Ravaglio-Pasquini F, Pedraza-Segura L, Arcelus-Arrillaga P, Suelves I, Pinilla JL (2021) Caffeinating the biofuels market: Effect of the processing conditions during the production of biofuels and high-value chemicals by hydrothermal treatment of residual coffee pulp. J Clean Prod 302:127008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127008
Resende DR, da Silva AE, Lorenço MS, Lira Zidanes U, Akira Mori F, Fernando Trugilho P, Lúcia Bianchi M (2022) Use of neural network and multivariate statistics in the assessment of pellets produced from the exploitation of agro-industrial residues. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:71882–71893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20883-x
Rodriguez Correa C, Gordillo G (2011) Adiabatic Gasification and Pyrolysis of Coffee Husk Using Air-Steam for Partial Oxidation. J Combust 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/303168
Sadhukhan J, Martinez-Hernandez E, Murphy RJ, Ng DKS, Hassim MH, Siew Ng K, Yoke Kin W, Jaye IFM, Leung Pah Hang MY, Andiappan V (2018) Role of bioenergy, biorefinery and bioeconomy in sustainable development: Strategic pathways for Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1966–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.007
Saiyud N, Deethayat T, Asanakham A, Duongbia N, Kamopas W, Kiatsiriroat T (2022) Biochar production from co-pyrolysis of coffee ground and native microalgae consortium. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02954-8
Sakulkit P, Palamanit A, Dejchanchaiwong R, Reubroycharoen P (2020) Characteristics of pyrolysis products from pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis of rubber wood and oil palm trunk biomass for biofuel and value-added applications. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104561
Santana DAR, Scatolino MV, Lima MDR, de Oliveira Barros Junior U, Garcia DP, Andrade CR, de Cássia Oliveira Carneiro A, Trugilho PF, de Paula Protásio T (2021) Pelletizing of lignocellulosic wastes as an environmentally friendly solution for the energy supply: insights on the properties of pellets from Brazilian biomasses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11598–11617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11401-y
Seco A, Espuelas S, Marcelino S, Echeverría AM, Prieto E (2020) Characterization of Biomass Briquettes from Spent Coffee Grounds and Xanthan Gum Using Low Pressure and Temperature. Bioenergy Res 13:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-10069-8
Shrivastava P, Khongphakdi P, Palamanit A, Kumar A, Tekasakul P (2020) Investigation of physicochemical properties of oil palm biomass for evaluating potential of biofuels production via pyrolysis processes. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00596-x
Singh R, Kumar Sarkar A, Chakraborty JP (2019) Effect of torrefaction on the physicochemical properties of pigeon pea stalk (Cajanus cajan) and estimation of kinetic parameters. Renew Energ 138:805–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.022
Solarin SA (2020) An environmental impact assessment of fossil fuel subsidies in emerging and developing economies. Environ Impact Assess Rev 85:106443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106443
Solarte-Toro JC, Chacón-Pérez Y, Cardona-Alzate CA (2018) Evaluation of biogas and syngas as energy vectors for heat and power generation using lignocellulosic biomass as raw material. Electron J Biotechnol 33:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2018.03.005
Srisang S, Phetpan K, Ruttanadech N, Limmun W, Youryon P, Kongtragoul P, Srisang N, Chungcharoen T (2022) Charcoal briquette production from waste in the coffee production process using hydrothermal and torrefaction techniques: A comparative study with carbonization technique. J Clean Prod 372:133744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133744
Sultan S, Palamanit A, Techato K, Amin M, Baloch K, Asadullah A (2020) Syngas Production from Rubberwood Biomass in Downdraft Gasifier Combined with Wet Scrubbing: Investigation of Tar and Solid Residue. Sains Malays 49:1729–1743. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2020-4907-23
Tan C, Saritpongteeraka K, Kungsanant S, Charnnok B, Chaiprapat S (2018) Low temperature hydrothermal treatment of palm fiber fuel for simultaneous potassium removal, enhanced oil recovery and biogas production. Fuel 234:1055–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.137
Thapa S, Bhoi PR, Kumar A, Huhnke RL (2017) Effects of Syngas Cooling and Biomass Filter Medium on Tar Removal. Energies 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030349
Tumuluru JS (2018) Effect of pellet die diameter on density and durability of pellets made from high moisture woody and herbaceous biomass. Carbon Resour Convers 1:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.06.002
Ubando AT, Felix CB, Chen W-H (2020) Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review. Bioresour Technol 299:122585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122585
Uchegbulam I, Momoh EO, Agan SA (2022) Potentials of palm kernel shell derivatives: a critical review on waste recovery for environmental sustainability. Clean Mater 6:100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100154
Valderrama Rios ML, González AM, Lora EES, Almazán del Olmo OA (2018) Reduction of tar generated during biomass gasification: A review. Biomass Bioenergy 108:345–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.002
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG, Morgan TJ (2012) An overview of the organic and inorganic phase composition of biomass. Fuel 94:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.030
Wang S, Song T, Yin S, Hartge E-U, Dymala T, Shen L, Heinrich S, Werther J (2020) Syngas, tar and char behavior in chemical looping gasification of sawdust pellet in fluidized bed. Fuel 270:117464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117464
Wei F, Tanokura M (2015) Chapter 10 - Chemical Changes in the Components of Coffee Beans during Roasting. In: Preedy VR (ed) Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409517-5.00010-3
Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013
Yao X, Zhao Z, Xu K, Zhou H (2020) Determination of ash forming characteristics and fouling/slagging behaviours during gasification of masson pine in a fixed-bed gasifier. Renew Energ 160:1420–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.008
Yin S, Shen L, Dosta M, Hartge E-U, Heinrich S, Lu P, Werther J, Song T (2018) Chemical Looping Gasification of a Biomass Pellet with a Manganese Ore as an Oxygen Carrier in the Fluidized Bed. Energy Fuels 32:11674–11682. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02849
Yu LY, Wang LW, Li PS (2014) Study on prediction models of biomass ash softening temperature based on ash composition. J Energy Inst 87:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2014.03.011
Yue D, You F, Snyder SW (2014) Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: Overview, key issues and challenges. Comput Chem Eng 66:36–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.016
Zhou H, Xu K, Yao X, Li J, Zhao Z, Chen S (2022) Syngas composition and ash characteristics of corn straw under a CO2 atmosphere. Biomass Bioenergy 166:106630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106630
Zhu Y, Niu Y, Tan H, Wang X (2014) Short Review on the Origin and Countermeasure of Biomass Slagging in Grate Furnace. Front Energy Res 2:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00007
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere appreciation to Doi Tung Project (Mae Fah Luang Foundation) for supporting the coffee biomass samples. The appreciation also covers Office of Scientific Instrument and Testing (OSIT), Prince of Songkla University, for analysis support. Lastly, the authors thank the Research and Development Office (RDO), Prince of Songkla University, and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Seppo Karrila for assistance with the English language.
Funding
This research was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (Industry Division) (Grant No. RDG6050115).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Arkom Palamanit prepared the biomass and other materials, analyzed the results, and wrote and revised the manuscript. Pumin Kongto did the experiments, prepared the results, and wrote the draft manuscript. Sumate Chaiprapat provided the conceptualization and edited the manuscript. Racha Dechanchaiwong provided the conceptualization, reviewed and edited the manuscript. Thatchapol Chungcharoen prepared the results and reviewed the manuscript. Asif Hayat reviewed and edited the manuscript. Makatar Wae-Hayee analyzed the results and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ta Yeong Wu
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Palamanit, A., Kongto, P., Chaiprapat, S. et al. Exploration of characteristics and synthesis gas suitability for heat generation of coffee biomass pellets produced by single and co-pelletization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 125889–125906 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31050-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31050-1