Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A critical review of ash slagging mechanisms and viscosity measurement for low-rank coal and bio-slags

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gasification or combustion of coal and biomass is the most important form of power generation today. However, the use of coal/biomass at high temperatures has an inherent problem related to the ash generated. The formation of ash leads to a problematic phenomenon called slagging. Slagging is the accumulation of molten ash on the walls of the furnace, gasifier, or boiler and is detrimental as it reduces the heat transfer rate, and the combustion/gasification rate of unburnt carbon, causes mechanical failure, high-temperature corrosion and on occasions, superheater explosions. To improve the gasifier/combustor facility, it is very important to understand the key ash properties, slag characteristics, viscosity and critical viscosity temperature. This paper reviews the content, compositions, and melting characteristics of ashes in differently ranked coal and biomass, and discusses the formation mechanism, characteristics, and structure of slag. In particular, this paper focuses on low-rank coal and biomass that have been receiving increased attention recently. Besides, it reviews the available methodologies and formulae for slag viscosity measurement/prediction and summarizes the current limitations and potential applications. Moreover, it discusses the slagging behavior of different ranks of coal and biomass by examining the applicability of the current viscosity measurement methods to these fuels, and the viscosity prediction models and factors that affect the slag viscosity. This review shows that the existing viscosity models and slagging indices can only satisfactorily predict the viscosity and slagging propensity of high-rank coals but cannot predict the slagging propensity and slag viscosity of low-rank coal, and especially biomass ashes, even if they are limited to a particular composition only. Thus, there is a critical need for the development of an index, or a model or even a measurement method, which can predict/measure the slagging propensity and slag viscosity correctly for all low-rank coal and biomass ashes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peters G P, Andrew R M, Canadell J G, Fuss S, Jackson R B, Korsbakken J I, Le Quéré C, Nakicenovic N. Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(2): 118–122

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dudley B. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. 2016

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Maraver A, Mata-Sanchez J, Carpio M, Perez-Jimenez J A. Critical review of predictive coefficients for biomass ash deposition tendency. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2017, 90(2): 214–228

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fang X, Jia L. Experimental study on ash fusion characteristics of biomass. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 104: 769–774

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rajamma R, Ball R J, Tarelho L A C, Allen G C, Labrincha J A, Ferreira V M. Characterisation and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172(2-3): 1049–1060

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen S, Lior N, Xiang W. Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture. Applied Energy, 2015, 146: 298–312

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fang X, Jia L, Yin L. A weighted average global process model based on two-stage kinetic scheme for biomass combustion. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 48: 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yin C, Rosendahl L A, Kær S K. Grate-firing of biomass for heat and power production. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2008, 34(6): 725–754

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinhans U, Wieland C, Frandsen F J, Spliethoff H. Ash formation and deposition in coal and biomass fired combustion systems: progress and challenges in the field of ash particle sticking and rebound behavior. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 68: 65–168

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du S, Yang H, Qiani K, Wang X, Chen H. Fusion and transformation properties of the inorganic components in biomass ash. Fuel, 2014, 117(Part B): 1281–1287

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li G, Li S, Huang Q, Yao Q. Fine particulate formation and ash deposition during pulverized coal combustion of high-sodium lignite in a down-fired furnace. Fuel, 2015, 143: 430–437

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hosseini S, Gupta R. Inorganic matter behavior during coal gasification: effect of operating conditions and particle trajectory on ash deposition and slag formation. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(3): 1503–1519

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garba M U, Ingham D B, Ma L, Degereji M U, Pourkashanian M, Williams A. Modelling of deposit formation and sintering for the co-combustion of coal with biomass. Fuel, 2013, 113: 863–872

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fryda L, Sobrino C, Cieplik M, van de Kamp W L. Study on ash deposition under oxyfuel combustion of coal/biomass blends. Fuel, 2010, 89(8): 1889–1902

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shen Z, Liang Q, Xu J, Liu H, Lin K. Study on the fragmentation behaviors of deposited particles on the molten slag surface and their effects on gasification for different coal ranks and petroleum coke. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(9): 9243–9254

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yan T, Kong L, Bai J, Bai Z, Li W. Thermomechanical analysis of coal ash fusion behavior. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 147: 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ma T, Fan C, Hao L, Li S, Song W, Lin W. Fusion characterization of biomass ash. Thermochimica Acta, 2016, 638: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou H, Zhou B, Zhang H, Li L. Behavior of fouling deposits formed on a probe with different surface temperatures. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(12): 7701–7711

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang G, Silva R, Azevedio J, Martins-Dias S, Costa M. Evaluation of the combustion behaviour and ash characteristics of biomass waste derived fuels, pine and coal in a drop tube furnace. Fuel, 2014, 117(Part A): 809–824

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khoshnaw F M. WIT Transactions on State-of-the-art in Science and Engineering. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2015, 85: 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niu Y, Tan H, Hui S. Ash-related issues during biomass combustion: alkali-induced slagging, silicate melt-induced slagging (ash fusion), agglomeration, corrosion, ash utilization, and related countermeasures. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2016, 52: 1–61

    Google Scholar 

  22. Loo S V, Koppejan J. The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-Firing. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2012

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tortosa Masiá A A, Buhre B J P, Gupta R P, Wall T F. Characterising ash of biomass and waste. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(11–12): 1071–1081

    Google Scholar 

  24. Park H Y, Lee J E, Kim H H, Park S, Baek S H, Ye I, Ryu C. Thermal resistance by slagging and its relationship with ash properties for six coal blends in a commercial coal-fired boiler. Fuel, 2019, 235: 1377–1386

    Google Scholar 

  25. Demirbas A. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2005, 31(2): 171–192

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pronobis M. Evaluation of the influence of biomass co-combustion on boiler furnace slagging by means of fusibility correlations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28(4): 375–383

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh A, Sharma V, Mittal S, Pandey G, Mudgal D, Gupta P. An overview of problems and solutions for components subjected to fireside of boilers. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 2018, 9(1): 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  28. Baxter L L, Miles T R, Miles T R Jr, Jenkins B M, Milne T, Dayton D, Bryers R W, Oden L L. The behavior of inorganic material in biomass-fired power boilers: field and laboratory experiences. Fuel Processing Technology, 1998, 54(1-3): 47–78

    Google Scholar 

  29. Szemmelveisz K, Szűcs I, Palotás Á B, Winkler L, Eddings E G. Examination of the combustion conditions of herbaceous biomass. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(6): 839–847

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aho M, Silvennoinen J. Preventing chlorine deposition on heat transfer surfaces with aluminium-silicon rich biomass residue and additive. Fuel, 2004, 83(10): 1299–1305

    Google Scholar 

  31. Knudsen J N, Jensen P A, Dam-Johansen K. Transformation and release to the gas phase of Cl, K, and S during combustion of annual biomass. Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18(5): 1385–1399

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guan G. Clean coal technologies in Japan: a review. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 25(6): 689–697

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhuang Q, Biondi M, Yan S, Bhagat K, Vansickle R, Chen C, Tan H, Zhu Y, You W, Xia W. TRIGTM: an advanced gasification technology to utilize low rank coals for power. Fuel, 2015, 152: 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  34. Falcke T J, Hoadley A F A, Brennan D J, Sinclair S E. The sustainability of clean coal technology: IGCC with/without CCS. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2011, 89(1): 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mondal P, Dang G, Garg M. Syngas production through gasification and cleanup for downstream applications—recent developments. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(8): 1395–1410

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang P, Massoudi M. Slag behavior in gasifiers. Part I: influence of coal properties and gasification conditions. Energies, 2013, 6(2): 784–806

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kurowski M P, Spliethoff H. Deposition and slag flow modeling with SPH for a generic gasifier with different coal ashes using fusibility data. Fuel, 2016, 172: 218–227

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maurstad O. An Overview of Coal based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology. MIT LFEE 2005-002 WP. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  39. Duane Brooker D, Oh M S. Iron sulfide deposition during coal gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 1995, 44(1-3): 181–190

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brooker D. Chemistry of deposit formation in a coal gasification syngas cooler. Fuel, 1993, 72(5): 665–670

    Google Scholar 

  41. Higman C, Van der Burgt M. Gasification Processes. 2nd ed. Burlington: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2008, 91–191

    Google Scholar 

  42. Guo Z Q, Han B Q, Dong H. Effect of coal slag on the wear rate and microstructure of the ZrO2-bearing chromia refractories. Ceramics International, 1997, 23(6): 489–496

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liu G, Zhang H, Gao L, Zheng L, Peng Z. Petrological and mineralogical characterizations and chemical composition of coal ashes from power plants in Yanzhou mining district, China. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 85(15): 1635–1646

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jenkins B M, Baxter L L, Miles T R Jr, Miles T R. Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Processing Technology, 1998, 54(1-3): 17–46

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sami M, Annamalai K, Wooldridge M. Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2001, 27(2): 171–214

    Google Scholar 

  46. Plaza P. The development of a slagging and fouling predictive methodology for large scale pulverised boilers fired with coal/ biomass blends. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Cardiff, UK: Cardiff University, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  47. van Dyk J C, Keyser M J, Coertzen M. Syngas production from South African coal sources using Sasol-Lurgi gasifiers. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2006, 65(3-4): 243–253

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vassilev S V, Baxter D, Andersen L K, Vassileva C G. An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel, 2010, 89 (5): 913–933

    Google Scholar 

  49. Obernberger I, Brunner T, Bärnthaler G. Chemical properties of solid biofuels—significance and impact. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30(11): 973–982

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liao C, Wu C, Yani Y, Huang H. Chemical elemental characteristics of biomass fuels in China. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2004, 27(2): 119–130

    Google Scholar 

  51. Werkelin J, Skrifvars B J, Hupa M. Ash-forming elements in four Scandinavian wood species. Part 1: summer harvest. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 29(6): 451–466

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hatt R M. Fireside deposits in coal-fired utility boilers. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1990, 16(4): 235–241

    Google Scholar 

  53. Baxter L, DeSollar R. Applications of Advanced Technology to Ash-Related Problems in Boilers. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  54. Joseph G, Singer P E. Combustion Fossil Power. 4th ed. Connecticut: Combustion Engineering, Inc., 1991

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dick E P, Ryabov G A, Tugov A N, Soboleva A N. Comparing properties of coal ash and alternative-fuel ash. Thermal Engineering, 2007, 54(3): 231–235

    Google Scholar 

  56. The British Coal Utilisation Research Association (BCUR). The BCURA Coal Sample Bank: a User's Handbook. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  57. Laursen K, Frandsen F J. Classification system for ash deposits based on SEM analyses. In: Gupta R P, Wall T F, Baxter L., eds. Impact of Mineral Impurities in Solid Fuel Combustion. Boston: Springer, 2002, 205–216

    Google Scholar 

  58. Raask E. Mineral Impurities in Coal Combustion: Behavior, Problems, and Remedial Measures. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  59. Given P H, Cronauer D C, Spackman W, Lovell H L, Davis A, Biswas B. Dependence of coal liquefaction behaviour on coal characteristics. 2. Role of petrographic composition. Fuel, 1975, 54(1): 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vuthaluru H B, French D. Ash chemistry and mineralogy of an Indonesian coal during combustion: part 1—drop-tube observations. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(6): 595–607

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vuthaluru H B, French D. Ash chemistry and mineralogy of an Indonesian coal during combustion: part II—pilot scale observations. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(6): 608–621

    Google Scholar 

  62. Misra M K, Ragland K W, Baker A J. Wood ash composition as a function of furnace temperature. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1993, 4(2): 103–116

    Google Scholar 

  63. Demirbas A. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2004, 30(2): 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bryers R W. Fireside slagging, fouling, and high-temperature corrosion of heat-transfer surface due to impurities in steam-raising fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1996, 22(1): 29–120

    Google Scholar 

  65. Miles T R, Miles T R Jr, Baxter L L, Bryers R W, Jenkins B M, Oden L L. Alkali deposits found in biomass power plants: a preliminary investigation of their extent and nature. Volume 1. Technical Report, USA: NREL/TP-433-8142-Vol.1, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  66. Moilanen A. Thermogravimetric characterisations of biomass and waste for gasification processes. VTT Publications, 2006, 607: 3–103

    Google Scholar 

  67. Scurlock J M O, Dayton D C, Hames B. Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource? Biomass and Bioenergy, 2000, 19(4): 229–244

    Google Scholar 

  68. Thy P, Jenkins B, Grundvig S, Shiraki R, Lesher C. High temperature elemental losses and mineralogical changes in common biomass ashes. Fuel, 2006, 85(5-6): 783–795

    Google Scholar 

  69. Werther J, Saenger M, Hartge E U, Ogada T, Siagi Z. Combustion of agricultural residues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, 26(1): 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  70. Thy P, Lesher C, Jenkins B M. Experimental determination of high-temperature elemental losses from biomass slag. Fuel, 2000, 79(6): 693–700

    Google Scholar 

  71. Theis M, Skrifvars B J, Hupa M, Tran H. Fouling tendency of ash resulting from burning mixtures of biofuels. Part 1: deposition rates. Fuel, 2006, 85(7-8): 1125–1130

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vassilev S V, Vassileva C G. A new approach for the classification of coal fly ashes based on their origin, composition, properties, and behaviour. Fuel, 2007, 86(10-11): 1490–1512

    Google Scholar 

  73. Vassilev S V, Vassileva C G. A new approach for the combined chemical and mineral classification of the inorganic matter in coal. 1. Chemical and mineral classification systems. Fuel, 2009, 88(2): 235–245

    Google Scholar 

  74. Li C Z. Advances in the Science of Victorian Brown Coal. Elsevier Inc., 2004

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wu X, Zhang X, Yan K, Chen N, Zhang J, Xu X, Dai B, Zhang J, Zhang L. Ash deposition and slagging behavior of Chinese Xinjiang high-alkali coal in 3 MWth pilot-scale combustion test. Fuel, 2016, 181: 1191–1202

    Google Scholar 

  76. Russell N V, Méndez L B, Wigley F, Williamson J. Ash deposition of a Spanish anthracite: effects of included and excluded mineral matter. Fuel, 2002, 81(5): 657–663

    Google Scholar 

  77. Andersen K H, Frandsen F J, Hansen P F B, Wieck-Hansen K, Rasmussen I, Overgaard P, Dam-Johansen K. Deposit formation in a 150 MWe utility PF-boiler during co-combustion of coal and straw. Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14(4): 765–780

    Google Scholar 

  78. Beck J, Brandenstein J, Unterberger S, Hein K R G. Effects of sewage sludge and meat and bone meal co-combustion on SCR catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2004, 49(1): 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vassilev S V, Kitano K, Takeda S, Tsurue T. Influence of mineral and chemical composition of coal ashes on their fusibility. Fuel Processing Technology, 1995, 45(1): 27–51

    Google Scholar 

  80. Berkowitz N. An Introduction to Coal Technology. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jia Y, Lighty J S. Ash particulate formation from pulverized coal under oxy-fuel combustion conditions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(9): 5214–5221

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wei X, Schnell U, Hein K R. Behaviour of gaseous chlorine and alkali metals during biomass thermal utilisation. Fuel, 2005, 84(7-8): 841–848

    Google Scholar 

  83. Niu Y, Tan H, Wang X, Liu Z, Liu Y, Xu T. Study on deposits on the surface, upstream, and downstream of bag filters in a 12 MW biomass-fired boiler. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(3): 2127–2132

    Google Scholar 

  84. Mu L, Zhao L, Liu L, Yin H. Elemental distribution and mineralogical composition of ash deposits in a large-scale wastewater incineration plant: a case study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(25): 8684–8694

    Google Scholar 

  85. Lindberg D, Backman R, Chartrand P, Hupa M. Towards a comprehensive thermodynamic database for ash-forming elements in biomass and waste combustion—current situation and future developments. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 105: 129–141

    Google Scholar 

  86. Garba M U, Ingham D B, Ma L, Porter R T J, Pourkashnian M, Tan H Z, Williams A. Prediction of potassium chloride sulfation and its effect on deposition in biomass-fired boilers. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(11): 6501–6508

    Google Scholar 

  87. Niu Y, Tan H, Ma L, Pourkashanian M, Liu Z, Liu Y, Wang X, Liu H, Xu T. Slagging characteristics on the superheaters of a 12 MW biomass-fired boiler. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(9): 5222–5227

    Google Scholar 

  88. Niu Y, Tan H, Wang X, Liu Z, Liu H, Liu Y, Xu T. Study on fusion characteristics of biomass ash. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(23): 9373–9381

    Google Scholar 

  89. Li Q H, Zhang Y G, Meng A H, Li L, Li G X. Study on ash fusion temperature using original and simulated biomass ashes. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 107: 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  90. Niu Y, Zhu Y, Tan H, Hui S, Jing Z, Xu W. Investigations on biomass slagging in utility boiler: criterion numbers and slagging growth mechanisms. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 128: 499–508

    Google Scholar 

  91. Seggiani M. Modelling and simulation of time varying slag flow in a Prenflo entrained-flow gasifier. Fuel, 1998, 77(14): 1611–1621

    Google Scholar 

  92. Song W, Tang L, Zhu X, Wu Y, Rong Y, Zhu Z, Koyama S. Fusibility and flow properties of coal ash and slag. Fuel, 2009, 88(2): 297–304

    Google Scholar 

  93. Seetharaman S, Mukai K, Sichen D. Viscosities of slags—an overview. Steel Research International, 2005, 76(4): 267–278

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ji F. Studies on viscosites of some multicomponent slags. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Techology (KTH), 1998

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kondratiev A, Jak E, Hayes P. Predicting slag viscosities in metallurgical systems. JOM, 2002, 54(11): 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  96. Seetharaman S. Pertinent properties for metals and slags in continuous casting. In: The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel. 11th ed. Warrendale, PA: Association for Iron & Steel Technology, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  97. Mills K C. Structure and properties of slags used in the continuous casting of steel: part 1 conventional mould powders. ISIJ International, 2016, 56(1): 1–13

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  98. Henderson G S. The structure of silicate melts: a glass perspective. Canadian Mineralogist, 2005, 43(6): 1921–1958

    Google Scholar 

  99. Mysen B, Richet P. Silicate Glasses and Melts. 2nd ed. Elsevier B. V., 2018

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kondratiev A, Zhao B, Raghunath S, Hayes P C, Jak E. New tools for viscosity measurement and modelling of fully liquid and partly crystallised slags. In: Proceedings—European Metallurgical Conference, 2007, 2: 953–973

    Google Scholar 

  101. Shankar A. Studies on high alumina blast furnace slags. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Stockolm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2007

    Google Scholar 

  102. Mysen B O. Relationships between silicate melt structure and petrologic processes. Earth-Science Reviews, 1990, 27(4): 281–365

    Google Scholar 

  103. Sichen D, Bygd'en J, Seetharaman S. A model for estimation of viscosities of complex metallic and ionic melts. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 1994, 25(4): 519–525

    Google Scholar 

  104. Mills K. The estimation of slag properties. 2019-10-19, available at the website of pyro.co.za

  105. Van Dyk J C, Benson S A, Laumb M L, Waanders B. Coal and coal ash characteristics to understand mineral transformations and slag formation. Fuel, 2009, 88(6): 1057–1063

    Google Scholar 

  106. Couch G. Understanding Slagging and Fouling during PF Combustion. IEACR/72. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  107. Kekkonen M, Oghbasilasie H, Louhenkilpi S. Viscosity models for molten slags. Technical Report, Finland: Aalto University publication series-Science + Technology, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  108. Dai B, Wu X, Zhang L. Establishing a novel and yet simple methodology based on the use of modified inclined plane (M-IP) for high-temperature slag viscosity measurement. Fuel, 2018, 233: 299–308

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kondratiev A, Hayes P C, Jak E. Development of a quasi-chemical viscosity model for fully liquid slags in the Al2O3-CaO-‘FeO’-MgO-SiO2 system. Part 1. description of the model and its application to the MgO, MgO-SiO2, Al2O3-MgO and CaO-MgO sub-systems. ISIJ International, 2006, 46(3): 359–367

    Google Scholar 

  110. Urbain G. Viscosity estimation of slags. Steel Research, 1987, 58(3): 111–116

    Google Scholar 

  111. Kondratiev A, Jak E. Review of experimental data and modeling of the viscosities of fully liquid slags in the Al2O3-CaO-‘FeO’-SiO2 system. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2001, 32(6): 1015–1025

    Google Scholar 

  112. Riboud P V, Roux Y, Lucai L D, Gaye H. Improvement of continuous casting powders. Fachberichte Huttenpraxis Metallweiterverarbeitung, 1981, 19(8): 859–869

    Google Scholar 

  113. Mills K C, Sridhar S. Viscosities of ironmaking and steelmaking slags. Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 1999, 26(4): 262–268

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ray H, Pal S. Simple method for theoretical estimation of viscosity of oxide melts using optical basicity. Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 2004, 31(2): 125–130

    Google Scholar 

  115. Iida T, Sakai H, Kita Y, Shigeno K. An equation for accurate prediction of the viscosities of blast furnace type slags from chemical composition. ISIJ International, 2000, 40(Suppl): S110–S114

    Google Scholar 

  116. Sichen F Z, Du S, Seetharaman S. Experimental studies of the viscosities in the CaO-FenO-SiO2 slags. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 1997, 28(5): 827–834

    Google Scholar 

  117. Sridhar S. Estimation models for molten slag and alloy viscosities. JOM, 2002, 54(11): 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  118. Mills K C, Halali M, Löez H P, Kinder A, Pomfref R, Walker B. A simple test for the measurement of slag viscosities. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, Sydney, Australia, 1997: 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  119. Li F, Li Z, Huang J, Fang Y. Understanding mineral behaviors during anthracite fluidized-bed gasification based on slag characteristics. Applied Energy, 2014, 131: 279–287

    Google Scholar 

  120. Kong L, Bai J, Li W, Wen X, Li X, Bai Z, Guo Z, Li H. The internal and external factor on coal ash slag viscosity at high temperatures, Part 1: effect of cooling rate on slag viscosity, measured continuously. Fuel, 2015, 158: 968–975

    Google Scholar 

  121. Patterson J H, Hurst H J. Ash and slag qualities of Australian bituminous coals for use in slagging gasifiers. Fuel, 2000, 79(13): 1671–1678

    Google Scholar 

  122. Hurst H J, Novak F, Patterson J H. Viscosity measurements and empirical predictions for fluxed Australian bituminous coal ashes. Fuel, 1999, 78(15): 1831–1840

    Google Scholar 

  123. Oh M S, Brooker D D, de Paz E F, Brady J J, Decker T R. Effect of crystalline phase formation on coal slag viscosity. Fuel Processing Technology, 1995, 44(1-3): 191–199

    Google Scholar 

  124. Schobert H H, Streeter R C, Diehl E K. Flow properties of low-rank coal ash slags: implications for slagging gasification. Fuel, 1985, 64(11): 1611–1617

    Google Scholar 

  125. Ilyushechkin A Y, Roberts D. Slagging behaviour of Australian brown coals and implications for their use in gasification technologies. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 147: 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  126. Moza A K, Austin L G. A new test for characterizing the slag deposition properties of a coal ash: the sticking temperature. Journal of the Institute of Energy, 1979, 52(410): 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  127. Wu X, Zhang X, Dai B, Xu X, Zhang J, Zhang L. Ash deposition behaviours upon the combustion of low-rank coal blends in a 3 MWth pilot-scale pulverised coal-fired furnace. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 152: 176–182

    Google Scholar 

  128. Li F, Fan H, Fang Y. Exploration of slagging behaviors during multistage conversion fluidized-bed (MFB) gasification of low-rank coals. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(12): 7816–7824

    Google Scholar 

  129. Wu X, Ji H, Dai B, Zhang L. Xinjiang lignite ash slagging and flowability under the weak reducing environment at 1300°C—a new method to quantify slag flow velocity and its correlation with slag properties. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 171: 173–182

    Google Scholar 

  130. Dai B, Wu X, Zhao J, Zhang L. Xinjiang lignite ash slagging and flow under the weak reducing environment at high temperatures —slag viscosity and its variation with ash type and addition of clay. Fuel, 2019, 245: 438–446

    Google Scholar 

  131. Amini S H, Brungs M P, Ostrovski O, Jahanshani S. Effects of additives and temperature on dissolution rate and diffusivity of lime in Al2O3-CaO-SiO2 based slags. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2006, 37(5): 773–780

    Google Scholar 

  132. Jones E T R, Fishburn R A. Additives to improve slag formation in steelmaking furnaces. US Patent: 3964899, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  133. Wu G, Yazhenskikh E, Hack K, Müller M. Viscosity model for oxide melts relevant to fuel slags. Part 2: the system SiO2-Al2O3-CaO-MgO-Na2O-K2O. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 138: 520–533

    Google Scholar 

  134. Wu G, Yazhenskikh E, Hack K, Wosch E, Müller M. Viscosity model for oxide melts relevant to fuel slags. Part 1: pure oxides and binary systems in the system SiO2-Al2O3-CaO-MgO-Na2O-K2O. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 137: 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  135. Benson S A, Austin L G. Crystallization in coal ash slags and its effect on slag strength. In: American Chemical Society Division of Fuel Chemistry Meeting, Toronto, Canada, 1988, 33: CONF-8806136

  136. Kondratiev A, Ilyushechkin A. Flow behaviour of crystallising coal ash slags: shear viscosity, non-Newtonian flow and temperature of critical viscosity. Fuel, 2018, 224: 783–800

    Google Scholar 

  137. Lejeune A M, Richet P. Rheology of crystal-bearing silicate melts: an experimental study at high viscosities. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, 100(B3): 4215–4229

    Google Scholar 

  138. Mueller S, Llewellin E W, Mader H M. The rheology of suspensions of solid particles. Proceedings-Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2010, 466 (2116): 1201–1228

    Google Scholar 

  139. Song W, Tang L, Zhu X, Wu Y, Zhu Z, Koyama S. Flow properties and rheology of slag from coal gasification. Fuel, 2010, 89(7): 1709–1715

    Google Scholar 

  140. Seok S H, Jung S M, Lee Y S, Min D J. Viscosity of highly basic slags. ISIJ International, 2007, 47(8): 1090–1096

    Google Scholar 

  141. Xuan W, Whitty K J, Guan Q, Bi D, Zhan Z, Zhang J. Influence of SiO2/Al2O3 on crystallization characteristics of synthetic coal slags. Fuel, 2015, 144: 103–110

    Google Scholar 

  142. Stam A, Livingston W, Cremers M, Brem G. Review of models and tools for slagging and fouling prediction for biomass co-combustion. In: Workshop on High Cofiring Percentages in New Coal Fired Power Plants, Hamburg, Germany, 2009: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  143. Teixeira P, Lopes H, Gulyurtlu I, Lapa N, Abelha P. Evaluation of slagging and fouling tendency during biomass co-firing with coal in a fluidized bed. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 39: 192–203

    Google Scholar 

  144. Degereji M U, Gubba S R, Ingham D B, Ma L, Pourkashanian M, Williams A, Williamson J. Predicting the slagging potential of co-fired coal with sewage sludge and wood biomass. Fuel, 2013, 108: 550–556

    Google Scholar 

  145. Heinzel T, Siegle V, Spliethoff H, Hein K R G. Investigation of slagging in pulverized fuel co-combustion of biomass and coal at a pilot-scale test facility. Fuel Processing Technology, 1998, 54(1-3): 109–125

    Google Scholar 

  146. Näzelius I L, Fagerström J, Boman C, Boström D, Öhman M. Slagging in fixed-bed combustion of phosphorus-poor biomass: critical ash-forming processes and compositions. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(2): 894–908

    Google Scholar 

  147. Chen M, Zhao B. Viscosity measurements of the SiO2-K2O-CaO system relevant to biomass slags. Fuel, 2016, 180: 638–644

    Google Scholar 

  148. Bale C W, Bélisle E, Chartrand P, Decterov S A, Eriksson G, Hack K, Jung I H, Kang Y B, Melançon J, Pelton A D, Robelin C, Petersen S. FactSage thermochemical software and databases—recent developments. Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 2009, 33(2): 295–311

    Google Scholar 

  149. Suzuki M, Jak E. Quasi-chemical viscosity model for fully liquid slag in the Al2O3-CaO-MgO-SiO2 system. Part II: evaluation of slag viscosities. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2013, 44(6): 1451–1465

    Google Scholar 

  150. Zhang G H, Chou K C. Measuring and modeling viscosity of CaO-Al2O3-SiO2(-K2O) melt. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2012, 43 (4): 841–848

    Google Scholar 

  151. Lakatos T, Johansson L G, Simmingskold B. Viscosity-temperature relations in the glass system SiO2-Al2O3-Na2O-K2O-CaO-MgO in the composition range of technical glasses. Glass Technology, 1972, 13(3): 88–95

    Google Scholar 

  152. Bläsing M, Müller M. Mass spectrometric investigations on the release of inorganic species during gasification and combustion of Rhenish lignite. Fuel, 2010, 89(9): 2417–2424

    Google Scholar 

  153. Bläsing M, Müller M. Mass spectrometric investigations on the release of inorganic species during gasification and combustion of German hard coals. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7): 1374–1381

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) under its Industrial Research Training Hub (IH170100009) scheme for the joint project between Monash University and Shanghai Boiler Works Co Ltd. Md Tanvir Alam would like to thank Monash University for his Ph.D Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    Md Tanvir Alam, Baiqian Dai, Andrew Hoadley & Lian Zhang

  2. R&D Division, Shanghai Boiler Works Co. Ltd., Shanghai, 200245, China

    Xiaojiang Wu

Authors
  1. Md Tanvir Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baiqian Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaojiang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Hoadley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lian Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, M.T., Dai, B., Wu, X. et al. A critical review of ash slagging mechanisms and viscosity measurement for low-rank coal and bio-slags. Front. Energy 15, 46–67 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0807-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0807-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation