Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phonological decoding enhances orthographic facilitation of vocabulary learning in first graders

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment examined orthographic facilitation of vocabulary learning, that is, whether showing students spellings of novel words during learning helps them remember the words when spellings are no longer present. The purpose was to determine whether having students decode the spellings of vocabulary words improves word learning over passive exposure to spellings, and whether both treatments boost word memory compared to no spelling exposure. Low SES, urban first graders (N = 55) were randomly assigned to one of two word learning conditions: a decoding condition (printed words sounded out and blended) or an exposure without decoding condition (print present but no attention drawn to it). Students were taught the pronunciations and meanings of unfamiliar words over several test trials with feedback, one set with spellings present during learning but not when recall was tested, and one set with no spellings present. Results revealed that students remembered words better when spellings were seen than not seen during learning and on delayed posttests. Students who decoded spellings learned pronunciations and meanings better during the learning trials compared to students who only viewed spellings, but the advantage of decoding declined one and 7 days later. The favored explanation is that exposure to spellings activated grapho-phonemic connections to better secure spellings to pronunciations in memory, especially when students’ had decoded them. This was supported by a posttest showing that spellings were written more accurately when students had seen them than when they had not, with decoding producing better recall than exposure. Results suggest that teachers should incorporate spellings into their vocabulary instruction, and they should direct students to decode them to enhance learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, K. (2011). What is orthographic knowledge? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,42(4), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0085).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Authors. (2017).

  • Authors. (2019).

  • Baron, L. S., Hogan, T. P., Alt, M., Gray, S., Cabbage, K. L., Green, S., et al. (2018). Children with dyslexia benefit from orthographic facilitation during spoken word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,61(8), 2002–2014. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher,55(1), 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. Elementary School Journal,107(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/511706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1999). Vocabulary development and instruction: A prerequisite for school learning. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 41–51). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In A. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M. A., & Cervetti, G. N. (2008). Teaching vocabulary through text and experience in content areas. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about vocabulary instruction (pp. 130–149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breit-Smith, A., Justice, L. M., McGinty, A. S., & Kaderavek, J. (2009). How often and how much? Intensity of print referencing intervention. Topics in Language Disorders,29(4), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181c29db0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colenbrander, D., Ricketts, J., & Miles, K. P. (2019). To see or not to see: How does seeing spellings support vocabulary learning? Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools,50(4), 609–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Kapp, S. (2007). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly,30(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology,33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. (1965). Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings. Elementary English,42(8), 895–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. F., Bitter, D. J., Setten, M., & Marinus, E. (2009). Does phonological recoding occur during silent reading, and is it necessary for orthographic learning? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,104(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A., Zhang, J., & Mattatall, C. (2015). Spelling instruction in the primary grades: Teachers’ beliefs, practices, and concerns. Reading Horizons,54(2), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly,35(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In U. Firth (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311–338). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In B. P. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading,9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling, memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading,18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology,71(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresch, M. J. (2003). A national survey of spelling instruction: Investigating teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Literacy Research,35(3), 819–848. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3503_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresch, M. J. (2007). Teachers’ concerns about spelling instruction: A national survey. Reading Psychology,28(4), 301–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710701545510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganske, K. (2013). Word journeys: Assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., et al. (2008). Teaching spelling in the primary grades: A national survey of instructional practices and adaptations. American Educational Research Journal,45(3), 796–825. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208319722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, E. B., & Dickinson, D. K. (2018). Measuring young children’s word knowledge: A conceptual review. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417753713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L., Bakeman, R., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A., Yust, P., et al. (2015). The contribution of early communication to low-income children’s language success. Psychological Science,26, 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615581493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, F. R. (2000). Exploring classroom teachers’ spelling practices and beliefs. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubenville, K., Sénéchal, M., & Malette, M. (2014). The moderating effect of orthographic consistency on oral vocabulary learning in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,12(6), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. A. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Zhang, J., Ehri, L., Chen, Y., Ruan, X., & Dong, Q. (2016). The role of orthography in oral vocabulary learning in Chinese children. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1363–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9641-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2014). Orthography facilitates vocabulary learning for children with autism spectrum disorders. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(7), 1317–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.859714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2013). How vocabulary interventions affect young children at risk: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,6(3), 223–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.755591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, B., & Kirk, C. (2014). Theoretical beliefs and instructional practices used for teaching spelling in elementary classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27(3), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9457-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengoni, S. E., Nash, H., & Hulme, C. (2013). The benefit of orthographic support for oral vocabulary learning in children with down syndrome. Journal of Child Language,40(1), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, K. P., Ehri, L. C., & Lauterbach, M. D. (2016). Mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning in monolinguals and language minority English-speaking college students. Journal of College Reading & Learning,46(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2015.1125818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mossenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2013). Reading assessments. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved November 1, 2017 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.

  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

  • Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: Can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,50(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2004.0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., McCormick, S. F., Bayliss, L., & Davis, C. J. (2011). Orthography influences the perception and production of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,37(6), 1588–1594. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. M., & Nation, K. (2009). Orthographic facilitation in oral vocabulary acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(10), 1948–1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802696104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Dockrell, J. E., Patel, N., Charman, T., & Lindsay, G. (2015). Do children with specific language impairment and autism spectrum disorders benefit from the presence of orthography when learning new spoken words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,13(4), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,100(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Pronouncing new words aloud during the silent reading of text enhances fifth graders’ memory for vocabulary words and their spellings. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,24(8), 921–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9239-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaiano, M. E., Compton, D. L., Hatton, D. D., & Lloyd, B. P. (2016). Vocabulary word instruction for students who read braille. Exceptional Children,82(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1, pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlagal, B. (2001). Traditional, developmental, and structured language approaches to spelling: Review and recommendations. Annals of Dyslexia,51, 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0009-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlagal, B. (2002). Classroom spelling instruction: History, research, and practice. Literacy Research and Instruction,42(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. Advances in Child Development and Behavior,36, 31–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00002-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition,55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. (2007). A comparison of three methods of vocabulary instruction during read-alouds in kindergarten. The Elementary School Journal,108(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1086/525549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research,56(1), 72–110. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory and Cognition,20, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology,37(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. G., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology,82(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised. Circles Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. S., & Cervetti, G. (2016). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly,52(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. S., & Neuman, S. B. (2014). Paucity and disparity in kindergarten oral vocabulary instruction. Journal of Literacy Research,46(3), 330–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X14551474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Susan J. Chambrè

    Present address: Department of Teacher Education, Marist College, 3399 North Road, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12601, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Curriculum and Teaching, Fordham University, New York, USA

    Susan J. Chambrè & Molly Ness

  2. Program in Educational Psychology, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, USA

    Linnea C. Ehri

Authors
  1. Susan J. Chambrè
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linnea C. Ehri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Molly Ness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan J. Chambrè.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chambrè, S.J., Ehri, L.C. & Ness, M. Phonological decoding enhances orthographic facilitation of vocabulary learning in first graders. Read Writ 33, 1133–1162 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09997-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09997-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation