Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pronouncing new words aloud during the silent reading of text enhances fifth graders’ memory for vocabulary words and their spellings

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment with random assignment examined the effectiveness of a strategy to learn unfamiliar English vocabulary words during text reading. Lower socioeconomic status, language minority fifth graders (M = 10 years, 7 months; n = 62) silently read eight passages each focused on an unknown multi-syllabic word that was underlined, embedded in a meaningful context, defined, depicted, and repeated three times. Students were grouped by word reading ability, matched into pairs, and randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the strategy condition, students orally pronounced the underlined words during silent reading. In the control condition, students penciled a check if they had seen the underlined words before but did not say the words aloud. Results of ANOVAs showed that the oral strategy enhanced vocabulary learning (ps < .01), with poorer readers showing bigger effect sizes than better readers in remembering pronunciation-meaning associations and spellings of the words. In a second experiment, 32 fifth graders from the same school described the strategies they use when encountering unfamiliar words in context. Better readers reported more word-level strategies whereas poorer readers reported more text-based strategies. Our explanation is that application of the word-level strategy of decoding new words aloud strengthened connections between spellings, pronunciations, and meanings in memory compared to silent reading of new words, particularly among poor readers who were less skilled and less likely to use this strategy unless instructed to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumann, J. F., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 789–814). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1999). Comprehension: The sine qua non of reading. Teaching & Change, 6(2), 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Robust vocabulary instruction: Bringing words to life. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A., & Miller, R. (2007). Correlates of orthographic learning in third-grade children’s silent reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A., & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders’ silent reading: A critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J., Jacobs, V., & Baldwin, L. (1990). The reading crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In E. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 45–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. (2006). Accounting for children’s orthographic learning while reading text: Do children self-teach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 56–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Share, D. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. F., Bitter, D. J. L., & van Setten, M. (2009). Does phonological recoding occur during silent reading, and is it necessary for orthographic learning? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P., & Share, D. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1978). Beginning reading from a psycholinguistic perspective: Amalgamation of word identities. In F. Murray (Ed.), The development of the reading process (pp. 1–33). International Reading Association Monograph (No. 3). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

  • Ehri, L. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311–338). London, England: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading, a handbook (pp. 135–154). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ganske, K. (2000). Word journeys: Assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, May, 126–135.

  • Goswami, U., Ziegler, J., & Richardson, U. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: A comparison on English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. (2006). The vocabulary book. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1980). Comparison of word identification strategies with varying context, word type, and reader skill. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kame’enui, E. J., Dixon, R. C., & Carnine, D. W. (1987). Issues in the design of vocabulary instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 129–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyte, C., & Johnson, C. (2006). The role of phonological recoding in orthographic learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 166–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B. (2004). Teaching expository text structures through information trade book retellings. Reading Teacher, 57, 710–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Angell, P., & Castles, A. (2007). Orthographic learning via self-teaching in children learning to read English: Effects of exposure, durability, and context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Levin, J., & McDaniel, M. (1987). Remembering versus inferring what a word means: Mnemonic and contextual approaches. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 107–127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, J., Tunmer, W., & Greaney, K. (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in Whole Language classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, S. J. (2002). Reading fluency: Its development and assessment. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 166–183). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senechal, M. (1997). The differential effect of storybook reading on preschoolers’ acquisition of expressive and receptive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 24, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: One the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D., & Shalev, C. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 769–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F., & Goodman, K. S. (2008). “On the psycholinguistic method of teaching reading” revisited. Language Arts, 86, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanborn, M. S. L., & deGlopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E., & Lorge, I. (1972). The teachers word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1993). To guess or not to guess, that is the question: Metacognitive strategy training, phonological recoding skill, and beginning reading. Reading Forum N.Z., 1, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2002). The relation of beginning readers’ reported word identification strategies to reading achievement, reading-related skills, and academic self-perceptions. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2003). The reading recovery approach to preventive early intervention: As good as it gets? Reading Psychology, 24, 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. (1997). Expressive vocabulary test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linnea C. Ehri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenthal, J., Ehri, L.C. Pronouncing new words aloud during the silent reading of text enhances fifth graders’ memory for vocabulary words and their spellings. Read Writ 24, 921–950 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9239-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9239-x

Keywords

Navigation