Abstract
Since the second half of the 20th century, bioceramics are widely used as a substitute for hard tissue engineering. Bioceramics including zirconia, alumina, hydroxyapatite, and bioactive glass plays a vital role in the design of tissue engineering scaffolds with tailor-made properties. The bioceramics scaffold has been used to replace or regenerate the tissue of the human body due to its excellent mechanical strength, biocompatibility, chemical stability, corrosion restriction behavior, and wear resistance. The advancement in technology has made the form of bioceramics and their function, structure, and composition more diversified, and manifold. Considering the promising role of the use of bioceramics in tissue engineering, we proposed this review, presenting the classification of bioceramics, their physiochemical properties, degradation pathway, product development so far, and their application in tissue engineering. The calcium phosphate and bioglass-based composite scaffold have also been discussed in detail. Furthermore, this paper also discussed the toxicity evaluation and market perspective of bioceramics. Thus, this review gives a complete insight into bioceramics for tissue engineering applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fiume E, Ciavattini S, Verné E, Baino F (2021) Foam replica method in the manufacturing of bioactive glass scaffolds: out-of-date technology or still underexploited potential? Materials (Basel) 14:2795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112795
Singh P, Yu X, Kumar A, Dubey AK (2022) Recent advances in silicate-based crystalline bioceramics for orthopedic applications: a review. J Mater Sci 57:13109–13151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07444-w
Ouyang J, Sun X, Chen X et al (2014) Preparation of layered bioceramic hydroxyapatite/sodium titanate coatings on titanium substrates using a hybrid technique of alkali-heat treatment and electrochemical deposition. J Mater Sci 49:1882–1892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7879-3
Dorozhkin S (2009) Calcium Orthophosphates in nature, biology and medicine. Materials (Basel) 2:399–498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2020399
Sadat-Shojai M, Atai M, Nodehi A (2011) Design of experiments (DOE) for the optimization of hydrothermal synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Braz Chem Soc 22:571–582. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532011000300023
Aggarwal A, Singh RP, Saggu HS (2022) Novel mesoporous cationic substituted hydroxyapatite particles for multipurpose applications. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 32:803–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-021-02175-y
Ploux L, Mateescu M, Guichaoua L et al (2016) New colloidal fabrication of bioceramics with controlled porosity for delivery of antibiotics. J Mater Sci 51:8861–8879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0133-z
Mohan Babu M, Syam Prasad P, Venkateswara Rao P et al (2020) Influence of ZrO2 addition on structural and biological activity of phosphate glasses for bone regeneration. Materials (Basel) 13:4058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184058
Sadat-Shojai M, Khorasani MT, Dinpanah-Khoshdargi E, Jamshidi A (2013) Synthesis methods for nanosized hydroxyapatite with diverse structures. Acta Biomater 9:7591–7621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.012
Ali A, Ershad M, Hira S et al (2020) Mechanochemical and in vitro cytocompatibilityevaluation of zirconia modified silver substituted1393 bioactive glasses. Bol la Soc Esp Ceram y Vidr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2020.07.002
Ng Z-N, Chan K-Y, Low C-Y et al (2015) Al and Ga doped ZnO films prepared by a sol–gel spin coating technique. Ceram Int 41:S254–S258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.183
Wei Z, Chen L, Thompson DM, Montoya LD (2014) Effect of particle size on in vitro cytotoxicity of titania and alumina nanoparticles. J Exp Nanosci 9:625–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2012.683534
Dziadek M, Stodolak-Zych E, Cholewa-Kowalska K (2017) Biodegradable ceramic-polymer composites for biomedical applications: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 71:1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.014
Narayanan R, Seshadri SK, Kwon TY, Kim KH (2008) Calcium phosphate-based coatings on titanium and its alloys. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 85:279–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30932
Abbas Z, Dapporto M, Tampieri A, Sprio S (2021) Toughening of bioceramic composites for bone regeneration. J Compos Sci 5:259. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5100259
Bhatt A, Anbarasu A (2019) Rapid and economic synthesis of bone like apatite using simulated body fluid (SBF). Mater Res Innov 23:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2017.1404203
Ruksudjarit A, Pengpat K, Rujijanagul G, Tunkasiri T (2008) Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from natural bovine bone. Curr Appl Phys 8:270–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2007.10.076
Fiume E, Tulyaganov D, Ubertalli G et al (2020) Dolomite-foamed bioactive silicate scaffolds for bone tissue repair. Materials (Basel) 13:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030628
Evis Z, Webster TJ (2011) Nanosize hydroxyapatite: doping with various ions. Adv Appl Ceram 110:311–320. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676110Y.0000000005
Faure J, Drevet R, Lemelle A et al (2015) A new sol–gel synthesis of 45S5 bioactive glass using an organic acid as catalyst. Mater Sci Eng C 47:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.045
Niu W, Chen M, Guo Y et al (2021) A multifunctional bioactive glass-ceramic nanodrug for post-surgical infection/cancer therapy-tissue regeneration. ACS Nano 15:14323–14337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c03214
Rial R, González-Durruthy M, Liu Z, Ruso JM (2021) Advanced materials based on nanosized hydroxyapatite. Molecules 26:3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113190
Kumar R, Mohanty S (2022) Hydroxyapatite: a versatile bioceramic for tissue engineering application. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-022-02454-2
Mohamad Yunos D, Bretcanu O, Boccaccini AR (2008) Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci 43:4433–4442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2552-y
Adhikari J, Perwez MS, Das A, Saha P (2021) Development of hydroxyapatite reinforced alginate–chitosan based printable biomaterial-ink. Nano Struct Nano Object 25:100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100630
Wang W, Zhang B, Li M et al (2021) 3D printing of PLA/n-HA composite scaffolds with customized mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering. Compos Part B Eng 224:109192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109192
Jodati H, Yılmaz B, Evis Z (2020) A review of bioceramic porous scaffolds for hard tissue applications: effects of structural features. Ceram Int 46:15725–15739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.192
Shekhawat D, Singh A, Banerjee MK et al (2021) Bioceramic composites for orthopaedic applications: a comprehensive review of mechanical, biological, and microstructural properties. Ceram Int 47:3013–3030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.214
Baino F, Fiume E (2019) Elastic mechanical properties of 45S5-based bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193244
Vallet-Regí M (2019) Bioceramics: from bone substitutes to nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pure Appl Chem 91:687–706. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0505
Dorozhkin SV (2018) Current state of bioceramics. J Ceram Sci Technol 9:353–370. https://doi.org/10.4416/JCST2018-00026
Punj S, Singh J, Singh K (2021) Ceramic biomaterials: properties, state of the art and future prospectives. Ceram Int 47:28059–28074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.238
Durgalakshmi D, Balakumar S, Raja CA et al (2015) Structural, morphological and antibacterial investigation of Ag-impregnated sol-gel-derived 45S5 nanoBioglass systems. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:4285–4295. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.9724
Balasubramanian S, Gurumurthy B, Balasubramanian A (2017) Biomedical applications of ceramics nanomaterials: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Res 8:4950–4959. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(12).4950-59
Jordan DR, Mawn LA, Brownstein S et al (2000) The bioceramic orbital implant: a new generation of porous implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16:347–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-200009000-00008
Thomas S, Harshita BSP, Mishra P, Talegaonkar S (2015) Ceramic nanoparticles: fabrication methods and applications in drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des 21:6165–6188. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612821666151027153246
Karthiga P, Ponnanikajamideen M, Samuel Rajendran R et al (2019) Characterization and toxicology evaluation of zirconium oxide nanoparticles on the embryonic development of zebrafish, danio rerio. Drug Chem Toxicol 42:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2018.1523186
Colombo M, Cavallo M, Miegge M et al (2017) Color stability of CAD/CAM Zirconia ceramics following exposure to acidic and staining drinks. J Clin Exp Dent 9:e1297–e1303. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54404
Alnassar TM (2022) Color stability of monolithic zirconia in various staining liquids: an in vitro study. Appl Sci 12:9752. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199752
Alvarado A (2018) Clinical approach in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In: Garbuzenko DV (ed) Current issues in the diagnostics and treatment of acute appendicitis. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75530
Chan MH, Liu RS, Hsiao M (2019) Graphitic carbon nitride-based nanocomposites and their biological applications: a review. Nanoscale 11:14993–15003. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr04568f
Heimann RB (2021) Silicon nitride, a close to ideal ceramic material for medical application. Ceramics 4:208–223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4020016
Dejob L, Toury B, Tadier S et al (2021) Electrospinning of in situ synthesized silica-based and calcium phosphate bioceramics for applications in bone tissue engineering: a review. Acta Biomater 123:123–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.032
Malavasi G, Pedone A (2022) The effect of the incorporation of catalase mimetic activity cations on the structural, thermal and chemical durability properties of the 45s5 bioglass®. Acta Mater 229:117801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117801
Ruiz-Aguilar C, Aguilar-Reyes EA, Flores-Martínez M et al (2017) Synthesis and characterisation of β-TCP/bioglass/zirconia scaffolds. Adv Appl Ceram 116:452–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1356043
Mazzoni E, Iaquinta MR, Lanzillotti C et al (2021) Bioactive materials for soft tissue repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.613787
Ben-Arfa BAE, Miranda Salvado IM, Ferreira JMF, Pullar RC (2017) A hundred times faster: novel, rapid sol-gel synthesis of bio-glass nanopowders (Si–Na–Ca–P system, Ca: P=1.67) without aging. Int J Appl Glas Sci 8:337–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12255
Hench LL, Thompson I (2010) Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials. J R Soc Interf 7:S379–S391. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0151.focus
Bento R, Gaddam A, Ferreira JMF (2021) Sol-gel synthesis and characterization of a quaternary bioglass for bone regeneration and tissue engineering. Materials (Basel) 14:4515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164515
Kim YB, Lim JY, Yang GH et al (2019) 3D-printed PCL/bioglass (BGS-7) composite scaffolds with high toughness and cell-responses for bone tissue regeneration. J Ind Eng Chem 79:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.027
Miculescu F, Maidaniuc A, Voicu SI et al (2017) Progress in hydroxyapatite-starch based sustainable biomaterials for biomedical bone substitution applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8491–8512. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02314
Ismail SA, Abdullah HZ (2020) Extraction and characterization of natural hydroxyapatite from goat bone for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Forum 1010:573–578. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1010.573
Backes EH, Fernandes EM, Diogo GS et al (2021) Engineering 3D printed bioactive composite scaffolds based on the combination of aliphatic polyester and calcium phosphates for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.111928
Ramesh N, Moratti SC, Dias GJ (2018) Hydroxyapatite–polymer biocomposites for bone regeneration: a review of current trends. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 106:2046–2057. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33950
Nedaipour F, Bagheri H, Mohammadi S (2020) “Polylactic acid-polyethylene glycol-hydroxyapatite composite” an efficient composition for interference screws. Nanocomposites 6:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2020.1794688
Marew T, Birhanu G (2021) Three dimensional printed nanostructure biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Regen Ther 18:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2021.05.001
Aldhuwayhi SD, Sajjad A, Bakar WZW et al (2021) Evaluation of fracture toughness, color stability, and sorption solubility of a fabricated novel glass ionomer nano zirconia-silica-hydroxyapatite hybrid composite material. Int J Polym Sci 2021:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6626712
Thomas MV, Puleo DA (2009) Calcium sulfate: properties and clinical applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 88:597–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31269
Orsini G, Ricci J, Scarano A et al (2004) Bone-defect healing with calcium-sulfate particles and cement: an experimental study in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 68:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.20012
Ene R, Nica M, Ene D et al (2021) Review of calcium-sulphate-based ceramics and synthetic bone substitutes used for antibiotic delivery in pji and osteomyelitis treatment. EFORT Open Rev 6:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200083
Fiume E, Magnaterra G, Rahdar A et al (2021) Hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications: a short overview. Ceramics 4:542–563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics4040039
Sasikumar S, Ravy L (2015) Influence of needle-like morphology on the bioactivity of nanocrystalline wollastonite and ndash; an in vitro study. Int J Nanomed 129:129. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S79986
Sunil BR, Jagannatham M (2016) Producing hydroxyapatite from fish bones by heat treatment. Mater Lett 185:411–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.039
Sprio S, Dapporto M, Preti L et al (2020) Enhancement of the biological and mechanical performances of sintered hydroxyapatite by multiple ions doping. Front Mater 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00224
He LH, Standard OC, Huang TTY et al (2008) Mechanical behaviour of porous hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater 4:577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.002
Kannan S, Ferreira JMF (2006) Synthesis and thermal stability of hydroxyapatite-β-tricalcium phosphate composites with cosubstituted sodium, magnesium, and fluorine. Chem Mater 18:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm051966i
Noshirvani N, Hong W, Ghanbarzadeh B et al (2018) Study of cellulose nanocrystal doped starch-polyvinyl alcohol bionanocomposite films. Int J Biol Macromol 107:2065–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.083
Barabashko M, Ponomarev A, Rezvanova A et al (2022) Young’s modulus and vickers hardness of the hydroxyapatite bioceramics with a small amount of the multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155304
Zheng K, Solodovnyk A, Li W et al (2015) Aging time and temperature effects on the structure and bioactivity of gel-derived 45S5 glass-ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 98:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13258
Ma J, Chen CZ, Wang DG, Hu JH (2011) Synthesis, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of magnesium-doped sol-gel glass and glass-ceramics. Ceram Int 37:1637–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.043
Ballouze R, Marahat MH, Mohamad S et al (2021) Biocompatible magnesium-doped biphasic calcium phosphate for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 109:1426–1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34802
Rezabeigi E, Wood-Adams PM, Drew RAL (2014) Synthesis of 45S5 Bioglass® via a straightforward organic, nitrate-free sol-gel process. Mater Sci Eng C 40:248–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.03.042
Karamian E, Abdellahi M, Khandan A, Abdellah S (2016) Introducing the fluorine doped natural hydroxyapatite-titania nanobiocomposite ceramic. J Alloys Compd 679:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.068
Mohd Pu’adAbdul HaqMohd Noh NASRHH et al (2019) Synthesis method of hydroxyapatite: a review. Mater Today Proc 29:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.536
Sheikh Z, Abdallah MN, Hanafi AA et al (2015) Mechanisms of in vivo degradation and resorption of calcium phosphate based biomaterials. Materials (Basel) 8:7913–7925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8115430
Dias AG, Gibson IR, Santos JD, Lopes MA (2007) Physicochemical degradation studies of calcium phosphate glass ceramic in the CaO-P2O5-MgO-TiO2 system. Acta Biomater 3:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.009
Barrère F, Ni M, Habibovic P et al (2008) Degradation of bioceramics. Tissue engineering. Elsevier, NY, pp 223–254
Thomas NG, Manoharan A, Anbarasu A (2021) Preclinical evaluation of sol-gel synthesized modulated 45S5-bioglass based biodegradable bone graft intended for alveolar bone regeneration. J Hard Tissue Biol 30:303–308. https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.30.303
Bingel L, Groh D, Karpukhina N, Brauer DS (2015) Influence of dissolution medium pH on ion release and apatite formation of Bioglass® 45S5. Mater Lett 143:279–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.124
Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL (2002) In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 61:301–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10207
Kartsogiannis V, Ng KW (2004) Cell lines and primary cell cultures in the study of bone cell biology. Mol Cell Endocrinol 228:79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2003.06.002
Raynaud S, Champion E, Lafon J, Bernache-Assollant D (2002) Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/P atomic ratio III. Mechanical properties and degradation in solution of hot pressed ceramics. Biomaterials 23:1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00220-4
Sathiyavimal S, Vasantharaj S, LewisOscar F et al (2020) Natural organic and inorganic–hydroxyapatite biopolymer composite for biomedical applications. Prog Org Coat 147:105858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105858
Lasprilla AJR, Martinez AGR, Lunelli BH et al (2011) Synthesis and characterization of poly (lactic acid) for use in biomedical field. Chem Eng Trans 24:985–990. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1124165
Veeman D, Sai MS, Sureshkumar P et al (2021) Additive manufacturing of biopolymers for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: an overview, potential applications, advancements, and trends. Int J Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4907027
Wei S, Ma JX, Xu L et al (2020) Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair. Mil Med Res 7:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00280-6
Kawakami T, Antoh M, Hasegawa H et al (1992) Experimental study on osteoconductive properties of a chitosan-bonded hydroxyapatite self-hardening paste. Biomaterials 13:759–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(92)90014-F
Anjaneyulu U, Swaroop VK, Vijayalakshmi U (2016) Preparation and characterization of novel Ag doped hydroxyapatite-Fe3O4-chitosan hybrid composites and in vitro biological evaluations for orthopaedic applications. RSC Adv 6:10997–11007. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra21479c
Maji K, Dasgupta S, Kundu B, Bissoyi A (2015) Development of gelatin-chitosan-hydroxyapatite based bioactive bone scaffold with controlled pore size and mechanical strength. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 26:1190–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2015.1082809
Vozzi G, Corallo C, Carta S et al (2014) Collagen-gelatin-genipin-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds colonized by human primary osteoblasts are suitable for bone tissue engineering applications: in vitro evidences. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 102:1415–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34823
Ding H, Xiong HM (2015) Exploring the blue luminescence origin of nitrogen-doped carbon dots by controlling the water amount in synthesis. RSC Adv 5:66528–66533. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra11796h
Shi H, Zhou Z, Li W et al (2021) Hydroxyapatite based materials for bone tissue engineering: a brief and comprehensive introduction. Crystals 11:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020149
Henriques Lourenço A, Neves N, Ribeiro-Machado C et al (2017) Injectable hybrid system for strontium local delivery promotes bone regeneration in a rat critical-sized defect model. Sci Rep 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04866-4
Mahmoud EM, Sayed M, El-Kady AM et al (2020) In vitro and in vivo study of naturally derived alginate/hydroxyapatite bio composite scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol 165:1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.014
Ishikawa Y, Komotori J, Senna M (2012) Properties of hydroxyapatite hyaluronic acid nano-composite sol and its interaction with natural bones and collagen fibers. Curr Nanosci 2:191–196. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413710602030191
Esposito Corcione C, Gervaso F, Scalera F et al (2019) Highly loaded hydroxyapatite microsphere/ PLA porous scaffolds obtained by fused deposition modelling. Ceram Int 45:2803–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.297
Zhang H, Fu Q-W, Sun T-W et al (2015) Amorphous calcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite and poly( d, l -lactic acid) composite nanofibers: electrospinning preparation, mineralization and in vivo bone defect repair. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 136:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.015
Carfì Pavia F, Conoscenti G, Greco S et al (2018) Preparation, characterization and in vitro test of composites poly-lactic acid/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 119:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.007
Shikinami Y, Okuno M (2001) Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly L-lactide (PLLA). Part II: Practical properties of miniscrews and miniplates. Biomaterials 22:3197–3211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00072-2
Wan Y, Wu C, Xiong G et al (2015) Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of nanoplate-like hydroxyapatite/polylactide nanocomposites prepared by intercalation technique. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 47:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.009
Smith IO, McCabe LR, Baumann MJ (2006) MC3T3-E1 osteoblast attachment and proliferation on porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated with nanophase powder. Int J Nanomed 1:189–194. https://doi.org/10.2147/nano.2006.1.2.189
Goloshchapov DL, Kashkarov VM, Rumyantseva NA et al (2013) Synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite by precipitation using hen’s eggshell. Ceram Int 39:4539–4549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.050
Ge M, Ge K, Gao F et al (2018) Biomimetic mineralized strontium-doped hydroxyapatite on porous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds for bone defect repair. Int J Nanomed 13:1707–1721. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S154605
Niaza KV, Senatov FS, Stepashkin A et al (2017) Long-term creep and impact strength of biocompatible 3D-printed PLA-based scaffolds. Nano Hybrids Compos 13:15–20. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.13.15
Huang YX, Ren J, Chen C et al (2008) Preparation and properties of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)/ Nano-Hydroxyapatite (NHA) scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation and rabbit MSCs culture on scaffolds. J Biomater Appl 22:409–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328207077632
Petricca SE, Marra KG, Kumta PN (2006) Chemical synthesis of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/hydroxyapatite composites for orthopaedic applications. Acta Biomater 2:277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2005.12.004
Ródenas-Rochina J, Ribelles JLG, Lebourg M (2013) Comparative study of PCL-HAp and PCL-bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24:1293–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4878-5
Eshraghi S, Das S (2012) Micromechanical finite-element modeling and experimental characterization of the compressive mechanical properties of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared by selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8:3138–3143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.022
Baji A, Wong SC, Srivatsan TS et al (2006) Processing methodologies for polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composites: a review. Mater Manuf Process 21:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1081/AMP-200068681
Backes EH, de Nóbile Pires L, Selistre-de-Araujo HS et al (2021) Development and characterization of printable PLA/β-TCP bioactive composites for bone tissue applications. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49759
Idowu AT, Benjakul S, Sinthusamran S et al (2020) Effect of alkaline treatment on characteristics of bio-calcium and hydroxyapatite powders derived from Salmon bone. Appl Sci 10:4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10124141
Zou C, Weng W, Cheng K et al (2008) Porous β-tricalcium phosphate/collagen composites prepared in an alkaline condition. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 87:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31686
Liao F, Chen Y, Li Z et al (2010) A novel bioactive three-dimensional β-tricalcium phosphate/chitosan scaffold for periodontal tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3931-x
Sarikaya B, Aydin HM (2015) Collagen/beta-tricalcium phosphate based synthetic bone grafts via dehydrothermal processing. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/576532
Arafat MT, Lam CXF, Ekaputra AK et al (2011) Biomimetic composite coating on rapid prototyped scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 7:809–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.010
Makarov C, Cohen V, Raz-Pasteur A, Gotman I (2014) In vitro elution of vancomycin from biodegradable osteoconductive calcium phosphate-polycaprolactone composite beads for treatment of osteomyelitis. Eur J Pharm Sci 62:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.05.008
Huang SH, Hsu TT, Huang TH et al (2017) Fabrication and characterization of polycaprolactone and tricalcium phosphate composites for tissue engineering applications. J Dent Sci 12:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.05.003
Sen SG, Li YY, Luo YP et al (2020) Bioactive PLGA/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds incorporating phytomolecule icaritin developed for calvarial defect repair in rat model. J Orthop Transl 24:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.008
Bohner M, Galea L, Doebelin N (2012) Calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes: failures and hopes. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:2663–2671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.028
Chen Y, Liu Z, Jiang T et al (2020) Strontium-substituted biphasic calcium phosphate microspheres promoted degradation performance and enhanced bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res 108:895–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36867
Pourreza E, Alshemary AZ, Yilmaz B et al (2017) Strontium and fluorine co-doped biphasic calcium phosphate: Characterization and in vitro cytocompatibility analysis. Biomed Phys Eng Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aa768c
Sokolova V, Kostka K, Shalumon KT et al (2020) Synthesis and characterization of PLGA/HAP scaffolds with DNA-functionalised calcium phosphate nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 31:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06442-1
Franco RA, Sadiasa A, Seo HS, Lee BT (2014) Biphasic calcium phosphate loading on polycaprolactone/poly(lacto-co- glycolic acid) membranes for improved tensile strength, in vitro biocompatibility, and in vivo tissue regeneration. J Biomater Appl 28:1164–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328213500544
Bleach NC, Nazhat SN, Tanner KE et al (2002) Effect of filler content on mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of particulate biphasic calcium phosphate-polylactide composites. Biomaterials 23:1579–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00283-6
Nevado P, Lopera A, Bezzon V et al (2020) Preparation and in vitro evaluation of PLA/biphasic calcium phosphate filaments used for fused deposition modelling of scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 114:111013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111013
Lee EU, Kim DJ, Lim HC et al (2015) Comparative evaluation of biphasic calcium phosphate and biphasic calcium phosphate collagen composite on osteoconductive potency in rabbit calvarial defect. Biomater Res 19:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-014-0026-7
Amirian J, Linh NTB, Min YK, Lee BT (2015) Bone formation of a porous Gelatin-Pectin-biphasic calcium phosphate composite in presence of BMP-2 and VEGF. Int J Biol Macromol 76:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.021
Amudha S, Ramya JR, Arul KT et al (2020) Enhanced mechanical and biocompatible properties of strontium ions doped mesoporous bioactive glass. Compos Part B Eng 196:108099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108099
Kumar A, Murugavel S, Aditya A, Boccaccini AR (2017) Mesoporous 45S5 bioactive glass: synthesis,: in vitro dissolution and biomineralization behavior. J Mater Chem B 5:8786–8798. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb01738c
Bellucci D, Salvatori R, Giannatiempo J et al (2019) A new bioactive glass/collagen hybrid composite for applications in dentistry. Materials (Basel) 12:2–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132079
Zurita-Méndez NN, Carbajal-De la Torre G, Flores-Merino MV, Espinosa-Medina MA (2022) Development of bioactive glass-collagen-hyaluronic acid-polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.825903
Luz GM, Mano JF (2012) Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticles composites for biomedical applications. Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/5/054104
Distler T, Fournier N, Grünewald A et al (2020) Polymer-bioactive glass composite filaments for 3d scaffold manufacturing by fused deposition modeling: fabrication and characterization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00552
Mehboob H, Bae JH, Han MG, Chang SH (2016) Effect of air plasma treatment on mechanical properties of bioactive composites for medical application: composite preparation and characterization. Compos Struct 143:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.012
Canales D, Saavedra M, Flores MT et al (2020) Effect of bioglass nanoparticles on the properties and bioactivity of poly(lactic acid) films. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 108:2032–2043. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36963
Ali W, Mehboob A, Han MG, Chang SH (2020) Novel biodegradable hybrid composite of polylactic acid (PLA) matrix reinforced by bioactive glass (BG) fibres and magnesium (Mg) wires for orthopaedic application. Compos Struct 245:112322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112322
Yang L, Liu S, Fang W et al (2019) Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-bioactive glass composites as nanoporous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: In vitro and in vivo studies. Exp Ther Med. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8121
Thrivikraman G, Madras G, Basu B (2014) In vitro/In vivo assessment and mechanisms of toxicity of bioceramic materials and its wear particulates. RSC Advances 4(25):12763. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44483j
Sonmez E, Cacciatore I, Bakan F et al (2016) Toxicity assessment of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in rat liver cell model in vitro. Hum Exp Toxicol 35:1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327115619770
Zhao X, Ong KJ, Ede JD et al (2013) Evaluating the toxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in catfish cells and zebrafish embryos. Small 9:1734–1741. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201200639
Pappus SA, Ekka B, Sahu S et al (2017) A toxicity assessment of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on development and behaviour of drosophila melanogaster. J Nanoparticle Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3824-8
Bakry AS, Tamura Y, Otsuki M et al (2011) Cytotoxicity of 45S5 bioglass paste used for dentine hypersensitivity treatment. J Dent 39:599–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.06.003
Rismanchian M, Khodaeian N, Bahramian L et al (2013) In-vitro comparison of cytotoxicity of two bioactive glasses in micropowder and nanopowder forms. Iran J Pharm Res 12:437–443
Furlan RG, Correr WR, Russi AFC et al (2018) Preparation and characterization of boron-based bioglass by sol−gel process. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 88:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4806-8
Zhao R, Shi L, Gu L et al (2021) Evaluation of bioactive glass scaffolds incorporating SrO or ZnO for bone repair: in vitro bioactivity and antibacterial activity. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000211040910
Lee JH, Ryu HS, Seo JH et al (2010) A 90-day intravenous administration toxicity study of CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 glass-ceramics (BGS-7) in rat. Drug Chem Toxicol 33:38–47. https://doi.org/10.3109/01480540903373647
Wang W, Liu Y, Yang C et al (2019) Mesoporous bioactive glass combined with graphene oxide scaffolds for bone repair. Int J Biol Sci 15:2156–2169. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.35670
Atalay H, Çelik A, Ayaz F (2018) Investigation of genotoxic and apoptotic effects of zirconium oxide nanoparticles (20 nm) on L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. Chem Biol Interact 296:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.09.017
Soltaninejad H, Zare-Zardini H, Hamidieh AA et al (2020) Evaluating the toxicity and histological effects of Al2O3 nanoparticles on bone tissue in animal model: a case-control study. J Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8870530
Zhang Q, Ding Y, He K et al (2018) Exposure to alumina nanoparticles in female mice during pregnancy induces neurodevelopmental toxicity in the offspring. Front Pharmacol 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00253
Thrivikraman G, Madras G, Basu B (2014) In vitro/In vivo assessment and mechanisms of toxicity of bioceramic materials and its wear particulates. RSC Adv 4:12763–12781. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44483j
Sun X, Chen J, Rao C-Y, Ouyang J-M (2020) Size-dependent cytotoxicity of hydroxyapatite crystals on renal epithelial cells. Int J Nanomed 15:5043–5060. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S232926
Zhao X, Ng S, Heng BC et al (2013) Cytotoxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles is shape and cell dependent. Arch Toxicol 87:1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0827-1
Patel DK, Jin B, Dutta SD, Lim K (2020) Osteogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells on eggshells-derived hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 108:1953–1960. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34536
Jahangir MU, Islam F, Wong SY, Jahan RA, Matin MA, Li X, Arafat MT (2020) Comparative analysis and antibacterial properties of thermally sintered apatites with varied processing conditions. J Am Ceram Soc 104:1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17525
Westhauser F, Wilkesmann S, Nawaz Q et al (2021) Effect of manganese, zinc, and copper on the biological and osteogenic properties of mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 109:1457–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37136
Zheng K, Kang J, Rutkowski B et al (2019) Toward highly dispersed mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles with high cu concentration using cu/ascorbic acid complex as precursor. Front Chem 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00497
Kazi GAS, Yamagiwa R (2020) Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of high mol% yttria containing zirconia. Restor Dent Endod 45:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e52
Schwarz F, Langer M, Hagena T et al (2019) Cytotoxicity and proinflammatory effects of titanium and zirconia particles. Int J Implant Dent 5:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0178-2
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Department of chemicals and petrochemicals, ministry of chemicals and fertilizers (DCPC), Government of India for sponsoring of “Centers of Excellence” in the field of Petrochemicals.
Funding
This research was funded by the Department of chemicals and petrochemicals, ministry of chemicals and fertilizers (DCPC), Government of India (F:No 25012/01/2020-PC-II (FTS:16020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no any conflict of interest that could influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Annela M. Seddon.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, R., Pattanayak, I., Dash, P.A. et al. Bioceramics: a review on design concepts toward tailor-made (multi)-functional materials for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci 58, 3460–3484 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08226-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08226-8