Abstract
The aim of this work is to study and compare the morphology and rheology of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from bleached softwood kraft pulp by several mechanical treatment methods. Three different kinds of CNFs were prepared in this work: (i) ones produced by PFI milling and microfluidic homogenization (RM-CNFs), (ii) ones produced by grinding and microfluidic homogenization (GM-CNFs), and (iii) ones produced by ball milling and ultrasonication (BU-CNFs). RM-CNFs had a high aspect ratio and the highest viscosity, storage modulus, and loss modulus. GM-CNFs had homogeneous size distributions, but low aspect ratio due to severe shearing of narrower orifice of chamber in microfluidic homogenization process. For BU-CNFs, the size distributions were heterogeneous, but they had a high aspect ratio. The three kinds of CNFs all had a lower crystallinity index than BSKP, and the degree of polymerization decreased with the increase of treatment intensity. Results of rheology measurements showed that those CNFs had a high degree of fibrillation and had a wider linear viscoelastic region in oscillatory strain measurements. Also the CNFs with high aspect ratio had a high viscosity and modulus. Additional treatments did not always increase the viscosity and modulus due to too severe treatments, which could cause the decrease of aspect ratio of CNFs. The RM-CNFs had a high viscosity and modulus, which means they are suitable in applications of rheology control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All the data and materials are accessible.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abral H, Lawrensius V, Handayani D, Sugiarti E (2018) Preparation of nano-sized particles from bacterial cellulose using ultrasonication and their characterization. Carbohydr Polym 191:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.026
Ang S, Haritos V, Batchelor W (2019) Effect of refining and homogenization on nanocellulose fiber development, sheet strength and energy consumption. Cellulose 26:4767–4786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02400-5
Bian H, Gao Y, Yang Y, Fang G, Dai H (2018) Improving cellulose nanofibrillation of waste wheat straw using the combined methods of prewashing, p-toluenesulfonic acid hydrolysis, disk grinding, and endoglucanase post-treatment. Bioresour Technol 256:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.038
Chen P, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang X, Ouyang M (2013) Concentration effects on the isolation and dynamic rheological behavior of cellulose nanofibers via ultrasonic processing. Cellulose 20:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9829-7
Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen P, Zhang M, Hai Y (2011) Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym 83:1804–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.040
Chen Y, Fan D, Han Y, Li G, Wang S (2017) Length-controlled cellulose nanofibrils produced using enzyme pretreatment and grinding. Cellulose 24:5431–5442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1499-z
Cheng Q, Tong Z, Dempere L, Ingram L, Wang L, Zhu JY (2012) Disk refining and ultrasonication treated sugarcane bagasse residues for poly(vinyl alcohol) bio-composites. J Polym Environ 21:648–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0562-y
Cheng Z et al (2019) Tuning chiral nematic pitch of bioresourced photonic films via coupling organic acid hydrolysis. Adv Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201802010
Deepa B et al (2020) Nanofibrils vs nanocrystals bio-nanocomposites based on sodium alginate matrix: an improved-performance study. Heliyon 6:e03266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03266
Deng S, Huang R, Zhou M, Chen F, Fu Q (2016) Hydrophobic cellulose films with excellent strength and toughness via ball milling activated acylation of microfibrillated cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 154:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.101
Dilamian M, Noroozi B (2019) A combined homogenization-high intensity ultrasonication process for individualizaion of cellulose micro-nano fibers from rice straw. Cellulose 26:5831–5849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02469-y
Dong H et al (2015) Highly transparent and toughened poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite films containing networks of cellulose nanofibrils. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:25464–25472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08317
Du H, Liu C, Zhang Y, Yu G, Si C, Li B (2016) Preparation and characterization of functional cellulose nanofibrils via formic acid hydrolysis pretreatment and the followed high-pressure homogenization. Ind Crops Prod 94:736–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.059
Grüneberger F, Künniger T, Zimmermann T, Arnold M (2014) Rheology of nanofibrillated cellulose/acrylate systems for coating applications. Cellulose 21:1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0248-9
Henriksson M, Berglund LA (2007) Structure and properties of cellulose nanocomposite films containing melamine formaldehyde. J Appl Polym Sci 106:2817–2824. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26946
Herrera M, Thitiwutthisakul K, Yang X, Rujitanaroj P-O, Rojas R, Berglund L (2018) Preparation and evaluation of high-lignin content cellulose nanofibrils from eucalyptus pulp. Cellulose 25:3121–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1764-9
Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci: Appl Polym Symp; (United States), No. CONF-8205234-Vol. 2. ITT Rayonier Inc., Shelton, WA
Iotti M, Gregersen ØW, Moe S, Lenes M (2010) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2
Jiang E et al (2017) Cellulose nanofibers as rheology modifiers and enhancers of carbonization efficiency in polyacrylonitrile. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:3296–3304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03144
Jonoobi M, Khazaeian A, Tahir PM, Azry SS, Oksman K (2011) Characteristics of cellulose nanofibers isolated from rubberwood and empty fruit bunches of oil palm using chemo-mechanical process. Cellulose 18:1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9546-7
Karande VS, Bharimalla AK, Hadge GB, Mhaske ST, Vigneshwaran N (2011) Nanofibrillation of cotton fibers by disc refiner and its characterization. Fibers Polym 12:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-011-0399-3
Kargarzadeh H, Mariano M, Huang J, Lin N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Thomas S (2017) Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: a review. Polymer 132:368–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.043
Kashani Rahimi S, Otaigbe JU (2016) The role of particle surface functionality and microstructure development in isothermal and non-isothermal crystallization behavior of polyamide 6/cellulose nanocrystals nanocomposites. Polymer 107:316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.023
Lee H, Mani S (2017) Mechanical pretreatment of cellulose pulp to produce cellulose nanofibrils using a dry grinding method. Ind Crops Prod 104:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.04.044
Li M-C, Wu Q, Song K, Lee S, Qing Y, Wu Y (2015a) Cellulose nanoparticles: structure–morphology–rheology relationships. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:821–832. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144
Li MC, Wu Q, Song K, Qing Y, Wu Y (2015b) Cellulose nanoparticles as modifiers for rheology and fluid loss in bentonite water-based fluids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:5006–5016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00498
Liu X et al (2019) Transparent and strong polymer nanocomposites generated from Pickering emulsion gels stabilized by cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 224:115202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115202
Lowys MP, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M (2001) Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives. Food Hydrocoll 15:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-005x(00)00046-1
Lu P, Liu R, Liu X, Wu M (2018a) Preparation of self-supporting bagasse cellulose nanofibrils hydrogels induced by zinc ions. Nanomaterials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8100800
Lu J, Zhu W, Dai L, Si C, Ni Y (2019) Fabrication of thermo- and pH-sensitive cellulose nanofibrils-reinforced hydrogel with biomass nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 215:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.100
Mohtaschemi M, Sorvari A, Puisto A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J, Alava MJ (2014) The vane method and kinetic modeling: shear rheology of nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 21:3913–3925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0409-x
Mukherjee S et al (2019) Nanocellulose-reinforced organo–inorganic nanocomposite for synergistic and affordable defluoridation of water and an evaluation of its sustainability metrics. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04822
Naderi A, Lindström T (2015) Rheological measurements on nanofibrillated cellulose systems: a science in progress. In: Mondal M (ed) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives: synthesis, modification and applications. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 187–202
Nagarajan KJ, Balaji AN, Ramanujam NR (2019) Extraction of cellulose nanofibers from cocos nucifera var aurantiaca peduncle by ball milling combined with chemical treatment. Carbohydr Polym 212:312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.063
Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016a) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016
Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2016b) Current progress in rheology of cellulose nanofibril suspensions. Biomacromol 17:2311–2320. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00668
Nechyporchuk O, Pignon F, Belgacem MN (2014) Morphological properties of nanofibrillated cellulose produced using wet grinding as an ultimate fibrillation process. J Mater Sci 50:531–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8609-1
Quennouz N, Hashmi SM, Choi HS, Kim JW, Osuji CO (2016) Rheology of cellulose nanofibrils in the presence of surfactants. Soft Matter 12:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm01803j
Rezayati Charani P, Dehghani-Firouzabadi M, Afra E, Shakeri A (2013) Rheological characterization of high concentrated MFC gel from kenaf unbleached pulp. Cellulose 20:727–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9862-1
Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behaviour. Cellulose 19:647–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9661-0
Saarinen T, Haavisto S, Sorvari A, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2014) The effect of wall depletion on the rheology of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions by optical coherence tomography. Cellulose 21:1261–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0187-5
Sanchez-Salvador JL, Monte MC, Batchelor W, Garnier G, Negro C, Blanco A (2020) Characterizing highly fibrillated nanocellulose by modifying the gel point methodology. Carbohydr Polym 227:115340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115340
Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003
Shafiei-Sabet S, Martinez M, Olson J (2016) Shear rheology of micro-fibrillar cellulose aqueous suspensions. Cellulose 23:2943–2953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1040-9
Shogren RL, Peterson SC, Evans KO, Kenar JA (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose gels from corn cobs. Carbohyd Polym 86:1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.035
Silva MJ, Sanches AO, Medeiros ES, Mattoso LHC, McMahan CM, Malmonge JA (2014) Nanocomposites of natural rubber and polyaniline-modified cellulose nanofibrils. J Therm Anal Calorim 117:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-3719-1
Silvério HA, Flauzino Neto WP, Dantas NO, Pasquini D (2013) Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from corncob for application as reinforcing agent in nanocomposites. Ind Crops Prod 44:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.014
Sofla MRK, Brown RJ, Tsuzuki T, Rainey TJ (2016) A comparison of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibres extracted from bagasse using acid and ball milling methods. Adv Natl Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/7/3/035004
Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18:1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z
Sun X, Wu Q, Lee S, Qing Y, Wu Y (2016) Cellulose nanofibers as a modifier for rheology curing and mechanical performance of oil well cement. Sci Rep 6:31654. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31654
Tanaka R, Saito T, Hondo H, Isogai A (2015) Influence of flexibility and dimensions of nanocelluloses on the flow properties of their aqueous dispersions. Biomacromol 16:2127–2131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00539
Thomas B et al (2018) Nanocellulose, a versatile green platform: from biosources to materials and their applications. Chem Rev 118:11575–11625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00627
Tian C, Yi J, Wu Y, Wu Q, Qing Y, Wang L (2016) Preparation of highly charged cellulose nanofibrils using high-pressure homogenization coupled with strong acid hydrolysis pretreatments. Carbohydr Polym 136:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.055
Turpeinen T, Jäsberg A, Haavisto S, Liukkonen J, Salmela J, Koponen AI (2019) Pipe rheology of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 27:141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02784-4
Varanasi S, He R, Batchelor W (2013) Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point. Cellulose 20:1885–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9972-9
Vadodaria SS, Onyianta AJ, Sun D (2018) High-shear rate rheometry of micro-nanofibrillated cellulose (CMF/CNF) suspensions using rotational rheometer. Cellulose 25:5535–5552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1963-4
Wang W, Mozuch MD, Sabo RC, Kersten P, Zhu JY, Jin Y (2014a) Production of cellulose nanofibrils from bleached eucalyptus fibers by hyperthermostable endoglucanase treatment and subsequent microfluidization. Cellulose 22:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0465-2
Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Kuster TA, Baxa U, McNeil SE (2012) Morphological development of cellulose fibrils of a bleached eucalyptus pulp by mechanical fibrillation. Cellulose 19:1631–1643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9745-x
Wang R et al (2019) Morphology and flow behavior of cellulose nanofibers dispersed in glycols. Macromolecules 52:5499–5509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01036
Wang S, Cheng Q (2009) A novel process to isolate fibrils from cellulose fibers by high-intensity ultrasonication, part 1: process optimization. J Appl Polym Sci 113:1270–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30072
Wang S, Gao W, Chen K, Xiang Z, Zeng J, Wang B, Xu J (2018) Deconstruction of cellulosic fibers to fibrils based on enzymatic pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 267:426–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.067
Wang W, Sabo RC, Mozuch MD, Kersten P, Zhu JY, Jin Y (2015) Physical and mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibril films from bleached eucalyptus pulp by endoglucanase treatment and microfluidization. J Polym Environ 23:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-015-0726-7
Xiang Z, Gao W, Chen L, Lan W, Zhu JY, Runge T (2015) A comparison of cellulose nanofibrils produced from Cladophora glomerata algae and bleached eucalyptus pulp. Cellulose 23:493–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0840-7
Xiao S, Gao R, Gao L, Li J (2016) Poly(vinyl alcohol) films reinforced with nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) isolated from corn husk by high intensity ultrasonication. Carbohydr Polym 136:1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.115
Xie J, Hse CY, De Hoop CF, Hu T, Qi J, Shupe TF (2016) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from bamboo using microwave liquefaction combined with chemical treatment and ultrasonication. Carbohydr Polym 151:725–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.011
Xu X, Liu F, Jiang L, Zhu JY, Haagenson D, Wiesenborn DP (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2999–3009. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302624t
Yang Z et al (2017) Biomimetic composite scaffolds based on surface modification of polydopamine on electrospun poly(lactic acid)/cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 174:750–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.010
Yao W, Weng Y, Catchmark JM (2020) Improved cellulose X-ray diffraction analysis using Fourier series modeling. Cellulose 27:5563–5579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03177-8
Ying Z, Wu D, Wang Z, Xie W, Qiu Y, Wei X (2018) Rheological and mechanical properties of polylactide nanocomposites reinforced with the cellulose nanofibers with various surface treatments. Cellulose 25:3955–3971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1862-8
Yuan T, Zeng J, Wang B, Cheng Z, Chen K (2021) Lignin containing cellulose nanofibers (LCNFs): lignin content-morphology–rheology relationships. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117441
Zhang L, Tsuzuki T, Wang X (2015) Preparation of cellulose nanofiber from softwood pulp by ball milling. Cellulose 22:1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0582-6
Zhang Y, Ling Q, Zhao S, Lu X, Fu S, Jin Z (2019) Effect of cellulose nanofiber on the dynamically asymmetric phase separation in epoxy/polysulfone blends. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 57:1357–1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24877
Zhao Y, Moser C, Lindstrom ME, Henriksson G, Li J (2017) Cellulose nanofibers from softwood, hardwood, and tunicate: preparation-structure-film performance interrelation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:13508–13519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b01738
Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79:1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.045
Funding
This research was financially supported by Characterization and instrument development of cross-scale nanofiber based on microfluidic technology (2020ZD01), National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0307902), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Provincial (2019A1515010996), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078113), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019TQ0100), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019MS085), Joint Foundation of the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholar (2020A1515110855).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jinsong Zeng: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing—Review and Editing. Fugang Hu: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Software, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing. Zheng Cheng: Validation, Writing—Review and Editing. Bin Wang: Visualization, Validation. Kefu Chen: Supervision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, J., Hu, F., Cheng, Z. et al. Isolation and rheological characterization of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) produced by microfluidic homogenization, ball-milling, grinding and refining. Cellulose 28, 3389–3408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03702-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03702-3