Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Expert laparoscopist performance on virtual reality simulation tasks with and without haptic features

  • 2023 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Virtual reality (VR) simulation for laparoscopic training is available with and without haptic feedback features. Currently, there is limited data on haptic feedback’s effect on skill development. Our objective is to compare expert laparoscopists’ skills characteristics using VR delivered laparoscopic tasks via haptic and nonhaptic laparoscopic surgical interfaces.

Methods

Five expert laparoscopists performed seven skills tasks on two laparoscopic simulators, one with and one without haptic features. Tasks consisted of 2-handed instrument navigation, retraction and exposure, cutting, electrosurgery, and complicated object positioning. Laparoscopists alternated platforms at default difficulty settings. Metrics included time, economy of movement, completed task elements, and errors. Progressive change in performance for the final three iterations were determined by repeated measures ANOVA. Iteration quartile means were determined and compared using paired t-tests.

Results

No change in performance was noted in the last three iterations for any metric. There were no significant differences between platforms on the final two quartiles for most metrics except avoidance of over-stretch error for retraction; and cutting task was significantly better with haptics on all iteration quartiles (p < 0.03). Economy of movement was significantly better with haptics for both hands for clip application (p < 0.01) and better for right hand on complex object positioning (p < 0.05). Accuracy was better with haptics for retraction and cutting (p < 0.05) and clip application (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Results showed higher performance in accuracy, efficient instrument motion, and avoidance of excessive traction force on selected tasks performed on VR simulator with haptic feedback compared to those performed without haptics feedback. Laparoscopic surgeons interpreted machine-generated haptic cues appropriately and resulted in better performance with VR task requirements. However, our results do not demonstrate an advantage in skills acquisition, which requires additional study.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Satava RM (1993) Virtual reality surgical simulator: the first steps. Surg Endosc 7:203–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coles TR, Meglan D, John NW (2011) The role of haptics in medical training simulators: a survey of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Haptics 4(1):51–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2010.19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95(9):1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Våpenstad C, Hofstad EF, Bø LE, Kuhry E, Johnson G, Marvik R, Lange T, Hernes TN (2017) Lack of transfer of skills after virtual reality simulator training with haptic feedback. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 26(6):346–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2017.1319866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson JR, Leonard AC, Doarn CR, Roesch MJ, Broderick TJ (2011) Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Surg Endosc 25(4):1107–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1325-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou M, Tse S, Derevianko A, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CG (2012) Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition. Surg Endosc 26(4):1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2011-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Botden SMBI, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2007) Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg 31(4):764–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Guedes HG, Câmara Costa Ferreira ZM, Ribeiro de Sousa Leão L, Souza Montero EF, Otoch JP, Artifon ELA (2019) Virtual reality simulator versus box-trainer to teach minimally invasive procedures: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 61:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ko JKY, Cheung VYT, Pun TC, Tung WK (2018) A randomized controlled trial comparing trainee-directed virtual reality simulation training and box trainer on the acquisition of laparoscopic suturing skills. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 40(3):310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salkini MW, Doarn CR, Kiehl N, Broderick TJ, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K (2010) The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. J Endourol 24(1):99–102. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Våpenstad C, Hofstad EF, Langø T, Mårvik R, Chmarra MK (2013) Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators. Surg Endosc 27(7):2391–2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Overtoom EM, Horeman T, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, Schreuder HWR (2019) Haptic feedback, force feedback, and force-sensing in simulation training for laparoscopy: a systematic overview. J Surg Educ 76(1):242–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber T, Paschold M, Hansen C, Wunderling T, Lang H, Kneist W (2017) New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff. Surg Endosc 31(11):4472–4477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5500-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horeman T, Rodrigues SP, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW, Dankelman J (2012) Visual force feedback in laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 26(1):242–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1861-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rangarajan K, Davis H, Pucher PH (2020) Systematic review of virtual haptics in surgical simulation: a valid educational tool? J Surg Educ 77(2):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery Baystate Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA

    Margaret Siu, Kaitlin Debbink, Amanda Duda, George Orthopoulos, John Romanelli, Jacqueline Wu & Neal E. Seymour

Authors
  1. Margaret Siu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaitlin Debbink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amanda Duda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. George Orthopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John Romanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jacqueline Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Neal E. Seymour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal E. Seymour.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Margaret Siu, Dr. Kaitlin Debbink, Amanda Duda, Dr. George Orthopoulos, Dr. John Romanelli, Dr. Jacqueline Wu, and Dr. Neal E. Seymour have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclosure. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research was presented at the SAGES 2023 Annual Meeting on March 30, 2023 in Montreal, Canada, as an oral presentation for the Education Quickshot Session; program S145.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siu, M., Debbink, K., Duda, A. et al. Expert laparoscopist performance on virtual reality simulation tasks with and without haptic features. Surg Endosc 37, 8748–8754 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10321-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10321-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation