Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics Behind Sexual Incompatibility in Plants: How Much We Know and What More to Uncover?

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-incompatibility (SI) is an adaptive strategy in plants that increase genetic variability by promoting cross-pollination and reducing the chances of inbreeding depression. After pollination, the pistil can recognize genetically related (self) or different (non-self) pollen grains that fall on the stigma surface. Plants have adapted diverse biological mechanisms to reject self-pollens. The SI response of pollen is determined either by the genotype of the diploid parent plants that produce pollen (sporophytic self-incompatibility, SSI) or the genotype of the haploid microspores (gametophytic self-incompatibility, GSI). In either case, the incompatibility reaction is controlled by genes located in the multi-allelic S loci. In the event of SSI, the recognition of pollen by the stigma is rapid. Both hydration and germination of self-pollen are prevented at the stigma surface. On the other hand, in case of GSI, self- as well as non-self-pollens are initially allowed to germinate. However, only non-self-pollen can enter the ovary for fertilization; while growth of self-pollen is prevented in style. In SSI, a receptor kinase-based interaction between S LOCUS CYSTEINE RICH (SCR) and S LOCUS RECEPTOR KINASE (SRK) genes determines the incompatibility response. During GSI, the interaction between a pistil-specific S-RNase gene and the pollen determinant S locus F box (SLF) prevents the growth of self-pollen. In contrast, an additional GSI response is dependent on Ca2+-mediated receptor-ligand signaling. This review discusses on important genes related to GSI and SSI, their evolutionary divergence caused by duplication, and targeted editing of SI/SC-associated genes converting SI plants to SC and vice versa. It also illuminates the genetics of GSI in Poaceae and presents experimental challenges associated with it. Furthermore, emerging scopes for further research for crop improvement with special emphasis on genome editing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

SC acknowledges CSIR-Direct-Senior Research Fellowship [08/0155(11864)/2021-EMR-I] and SD acknowledges CSIR-Direct-Senior Research Fellowship [08/155(0055)/2019-EMR-I]. MD acknowledges financial support from CSIR funded by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [38(1386)/14/EMR-II], [38(1493)/19/EMR-II] and Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India (BT/PR10778/PBD/16/1070/2014) and DBT_BUILDER program (BT/INF/22/SP45088/2022). A part of the study was sponsored by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MD designed the outline of the article. SC and MD wrote the manuscript. SC and SD prepared the figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malay Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Heather Nonhebel.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, S., Dutta, S. & Das, M. Genetics Behind Sexual Incompatibility in Plants: How Much We Know and What More to Uncover?. J Plant Growth Regul 42, 7164–7188 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11005-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11005-z

Keywords

Navigation