Abstract
Aquatic plant decomposition is typically studied on species held separately, whereas diverse plant communities are usually found in lake littoral zones and decomposition occurs as mixtures of multiple species. Here, we examined whether detrital mixing affects the rate of aquatic macrophyte decomposition. Specifically, we measured decomposition rates of detritus from four species (Myriophyllum heterophyllum, Ceratophyllum demersum, Typha × glauca, and Potamogeton robinsii) in single, double, triple, and quadruple species mixtures held over two summer months in a mesotrophic lake in southern Ontario, Canada. We measured detrital mass loss after different time periods for all combinations. There were limited effects of mixing on decomposition rates with inhibitory effects observed in only two of the eleven multi-species mixtures. Decomposition rates of single and mixed species detritus varied with initial C:N and C:P ratios with faster rates seen for more nutrient-rich detritus. Overall, there was no effect of detrital species richness on macrophyte decomposition rates other than smaller differences among the averages of more species-rich mixtures. Our results were inconsistent with interactive effects of mixing on decomposition rates of multiple aquatic plant taxa. Instead, we found decomposition rates of mixed species communities were largely predicted by biomass composition and single-species decomposition estimates. There were also no apparent effects of species mixing on N- or P-specific fluxes or the ratio of these fluxes that resulted during decomposition during our experiment. Our results indicate that future changes in aquatic plant biodiversity may affect rates of decomposition in these ecosystems, but these should be largely predictable based on changes in plant communities and their biomass-weighted stoichiometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts R, deCaluwe H (1997) Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78:244–260
Alexander ML, Woodford MP, Hotchkiss SC (2008) Freshwater macrophyte communities in lakes of variable landscape position and development in northern Wisconsin, USA. Aquat Bot 88:77–86
American Public Health Association (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. APHA
Asaeda T, Trung VK, Manatunge J (2000) Modeling the effects of macrophyte growth and decomposition on the nutrient budget in shallow lakes. Ecol Eng 68:217–237
Battle JM, Mihuc TB (2000) Decomposition dynamics of aquatic macrophytes in the lower Atchafalaya, a large floodplain river. Hydrobiologia 418:123–136
Carpenter SR (1980) Enrichment of Lake Wingra, Wisconsin, by submersed macrophyte decay. Ecology 61:1145–1155
Chapman K, Whittaker JB, Heal OW (1988) Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 24:33–40
Chimney MJ, Pietro KC (2006) Decomposition of macrophyte litter in a subtropical constructed wetland in south Florida (USA). Ecol Eng 27:301–321
Crow GE, Hellquist CB (2000) Aquatic and wetland plants of northeastern North America, vol 1: pteridophytes, gymnosperms, and angiosperms: dicotyledons, vol 2: angiosperms: monocotyledons. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Dodson SI, Arnott SE, Cottingham KL (2000) The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 81:2662–2679
Elias JE, Meyer MW (2003) Comparisons of undeveloped and developed shorelands, Northern Wisconsin, and recommendations for restoration. Wetlands 23:800–816
Enríquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K (1993) Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: the importance of detritus C:N:P content. Oecologia 94:457–471
Fox J (2002) An R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks
Frost PC, Hicks AL (2012) Human shoreline development and the nutrient stoichiometry of aquatic plant communities in Canadian Shield lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:1642–1650
Frost PC, Stelzer RS, Lamberti GA, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry of trophic interactions in the benthos: Understanding the role of C:N:P ratios in lentic and lotic habitats. J North Am Benthol Soc 21:515–528
Fyles J, Fyles I (1993) Interaction of Douglas-fir with red ader and salal foliage litter during decomposition. Can J Forestry Res 23:358–361
Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2004) Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–246
Gessner MO, Chauvet E (1994) Importance of stream microfungi in controlling breakdown rates of leaf litter. Ecology 75:1807–1817
Gessner, MO, Gulis V, Kuehn KA, Chauvet E, Suberkropp K (2007) 17 fungal decomposers of plant litter in aquatic ecosystems. In: Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (eds) Environmental and microbial relationships, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 301–324
Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25:372–380
Godshalk GL, Wetzel RG (1978a) Decomposition of aquatic angiosperms II. Particulate components. Aquat Bot 5:301–327
Godshalk GL, Wetzel RG (1978b) Decomposition in the littoral zone of lakes. In: Whigham DF, Simpson RL (eds) Freshwater wetlands: ecological processes and management potential. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 131–143
Harris AG, Kershaw L, Newmaster SG (1997) Wetland plants of Ontario. Lone Pine Publishing, Edmonton
Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek PM (2000) The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 15:238–243.
Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218
Hicks AL, Frost PC (2011) Shifts in aquatic macrophyte abundance and community composition in cottage developed lakes of the Canadian Shield. Aquat Bot 94:9–16
Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M (2003) Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition? Oecologia 137:578–586
Kominoski JS, Hoellein TJ, Kelly JJ, Pringle CM (2009) Does mixing litter of different qualities alter stream microbial diversity and functioning on individual litter species? Oikos 118:457–463
Lan Y, Cui B, You Z, Li X, Han Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Y (2012) Litter decomposition of six macrophytes in a eutrophic shallow lake (Baiyangdian Lake, China). Clean Soil Air Water 40:1159–1166
Lecerf A, Risnoveanu G, Popescu C, Gessner MO, Chauvet E (2007) Decomposition of diverse litter mixtures in streams. Ecology 88:219–227
Lecerf A, Guillaume M, Kominoski JS, LeRoy CJ, Bernadet C, Swan CM (2011) Incubation time, functional litter diversity, and habitat characteristics predict litter-mixing effects on decomposition. Ecology 92:160–169
Li X, Cui B, Yang Q, Tian H, Lan Y, Wang T, Han Z (2012) Detritus quality controls macrophyte decomposition under different nutrient concentrations in a eutrophic shallow lake, North China. PLoS One 7:1–10
Li X, Cui B, Yang Q, Lan Y, Wang T, Han Z (2013) Effects of plant species on macrophyte decomposition under three nutrient conditions in a eutrophic shallow lake, North China. Ecol Model 252:121–128
Likens GE, Bormann FH (1995) Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
McArthur JV, Aho JM, Rader RB, Mills GL (1994) Interspecific leaf interactions during decomposition in aquatic and floodplain ecosystems. JNABS 13:57–67
McTiernan KB, Ineson P, Coward PA (1997) Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf litter mixtures. Oikos 78:527–538
Petersen RC, Cummins KW (1974) Leaf processing in a woodland stream. Freshw Biol 4:343–368
R Core Team (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Flaig E, Gale PM (1999) Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 29:83–146
Rejmánková E, Houdková K (2006) Wetland plant decomposition under different nutrient conditions: what is more important, litter quality or site quality? Biogeochemistry 80:245–262
Schindler MH, Gessner MO (2009) Functional leaf traits and biodiversity effects on litter decomposition in a stream. Ecology 90:1641–1649
Shilla D, Asaeda T, Fujino T, Sanderson B (2006) Decomposition of dominant submerged macrophytes: implications for nutrient release in Myall Lake, NSW, Australia. Wetl Ecol Manag 14:427–433
Srivastava DS, Cardinale BJ, Downing AL, Duffy EJ, Jouseau C, Sankaran M, Wright JP (2009) Diversity has stronger top-down than bottom-up effects on decomposition. Ecology 90:1073–1083
Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS (1997) Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79:247–258
White M (2006) Phosphorus and the Kawartha Lakes. Kawartha Lakes Steward Association
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Jade Laycock for her assistance with field sampling and Clay Prater for his assistance in preparing graphical art for the manuscript. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banks, L.K., Frost, P.C. Biomass loss and nutrient release from decomposing aquatic macrophytes: effects of detrital mixing. Aquat Sci 79, 881–890 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-017-0539-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-017-0539-y