Volume 158, Issue 3-4

Search all Public Choice articles

March 2014

Special Issue: Empirical Social Choice / Guest Edited by Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard

16 articles in this issue

Empirical social choice: an introduction
Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard
OriginalPaper 04 February 2014 Pages: 297 - 310
On the empirical relevance of Condorcet’s paradox
Adrian Van Deemen
OriginalPaper 01 November 2013 Pages: 311 - 330
Which voting rule is most likely to choose the “best” candidate?
T. Nicolaus Tideman
Florenz Plassmann
OriginalPaper 11 February 2014 Pages: 331 - 357
An experimental study of the efficiency of unanimity rule and majority rule
Keith Dougherty
Brian Pitts
Robi Ragan
OriginalPaper 11 February 2014 Pages: 359 - 382
Cycles and instability in politics. Evidence from the 2009 Danish municipal elections
Malthe Munkøe
OriginalPaper 19 October 2012 Pages: 383 - 397
The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule versus First-Past-the-Post: a social choice analysis of simulated data based on English elections, 1992–2010
Nicholas R. Miller
OriginalPaper 07 February 2013 Pages: 399 - 425
The variable choice set logit model applied to the 2004 Canadian election
Maria Gallego
Norman Schofield
Jee Seon Jeon
OriginalPaper 02 October 2013 Pages: 427 - 463
Modeling the effects of changing issue salience in two-party competition
Scott L. Feld
Samuel Merrill III
Bernard Grofman
OriginalPaper 11 February 2014 Pages: 465 - 482
Picking a loser? A social choice perspective on the Danish government formation of 1975
Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard
OriginalPaper 15 October 2013 Pages: 483 - 497
Insincere voting under the successive procedure
Bjørn Erik Rasch
OriginalPaper 15 January 2013 Pages: 499 - 511
A Danish killer amendment—when judicial review was banned from the 1849 Constitution
Mogens N. Pedersen
OriginalPaper 27 November 2012 Pages: 513 - 523
Coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: 1969–2009
Steven J. Brams
Gustavo Camilo
Alexandra D. Franz
OriginalPaper 11 February 2014 Pages: 525 - 539
Sophisticated and myopic? Citizen preferences for Electoral College reform
John Aldrich
Jason Reifler
Michael C. Munger
OriginalPaper 15 January 2013 Pages: 541 - 558
Equilibrium institutions: the federal-proportional trade-off
Josep M. Colomer
OriginalPaper 11 February 2014 Pages: 559 - 576
Institutions, information, and faction: an experimental test of Riker’s federalism thesis for political parties
John Aldrich
Michael Munger
Jason Reifler
OriginalPaper 21 November 2012 Pages: 577 - 588
Erratum to: The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule Versus First-Past-The-Post: A Social Choice Analysis of Simulated Data Based on English Elections, 1992–2010
Nicholas R. Miller
Erratum 18 June 2013 Pages: 589 - 589

Volume 158, Issue 3-4

Empirical social choice: an introduction

On the empirical relevance of Condorcet’s paradox

Which voting rule is most likely to choose the “best” candidate?

An experimental study of the efficiency of unanimity rule and majority rule

Cycles and instability in politics. Evidence from the 2009 Danish municipal elections

The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule versus First-Past-the-Post: a social choice analysis of simulated data based on English elections, 1992–2010

The variable choice set logit model applied to the 2004 Canadian election

Modeling the effects of changing issue salience in two-party competition

Picking a loser? A social choice perspective on the Danish government formation of 1975

Insincere voting under the successive procedure

A Danish killer amendment—when judicial review was banned from the 1849 Constitution

Coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: 1969–2009

Sophisticated and myopic? Citizen preferences for Electoral College reform

Equilibrium institutions: the federal-proportional trade-off

Institutions, information, and faction: an experimental test of Riker’s federalism thesis for political parties

Erratum to: The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule Versus First-Past-The-Post: A Social Choice Analysis of Simulated Data Based on English Elections, 1992–2010

Navigation