The variable choice set logit model applied to the 2004 Canadian election
- 305 Downloads
Formal work on the electoral model often suggests that parties should locate at the electoral mean. Recent research has found no evidence of such convergence. In order to explain non-convergence, the stochastic electoral model is extended by including a competence and sociodemographic valance in a country where regional and national parties compete in the election. That is, the model allows voters to face different sets of parties in different regions. We introduce the notion of a convergence coefficient, c for regional and national parties and show that when c is high there is a significant centrifugal tendency acting on parties. An electoral survey of the 2004 election in Canada is used to construct a stochastic electoral model of the election with two regions: Québec and the rest of Canada. The survey allows us to estimate voter positions in the policy space. The variable choice set logit model is used to built a relationship between party position and vote share. We find that in the local Nash equilibrium for the election the two main parties with high competence valence, the Liberals and Conservatives, locate at the national electoral mean and the Bloc Québécois, with the highest competence valence, locates at the Québec electoral mean. The New Democratic Party has a low competence valence but remains at the national mean. The Greens, with lowest competence valence, locate away from the national mean to increase its vote share.
KeywordsStochastic vote model Valence Local Nash equilibrium Convergence coefficient
This paper was presented at the EPSA conference, Barcelona, June 2013; at the political economy panel at the SAET Meeting, Paris, July 2013; the Public Economic Theory (PET) conference in Lisbon, July 2013. We thank seminar participants for their comments. We also thank the two anonymous referees of this paper for their very helpful suggestions.
- Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
- Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
- Blais, A., Fournier, P., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N., & Everitt, J. (2006). Election 2006: how big were the changes…really? Working paper, Universite de Montreal. Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar
- Gallego, M., & Schofield, N. (2013). The convergence coefficient across political regimes. Working Paper, Washington University in St. Louis. Google Scholar
- Gelman, A., Park, D., Shor, B., Bafumi, J., & Cortina, J. (2008). Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state: why Americans vote the way they do. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
- Kramer, G. (1978). Existence of electoral equilibrium. In P. Ordeshook (Ed.), Game theory and political science (pp. 375–389). New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar
- Patty, J. W. (2006). Generic difference of expected vote share and probability of victory maximization in simple plurality elections with probabilistic voters. Social Choice and Welfare, 28(1), 149–173. Google Scholar
- Riker, W. H. (1964). In Federalism: origin, operation, maintenance. Boston: Little Brown. Google Scholar
- Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1973). An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
- Saari, D. (1997). The generic existence of a core for q-rules. Economic Theory, 9, 219–260. Google Scholar
- Schofield, N., Jeon, J. S., Muskhelishvili, M., Ozdemir, U., & Tavits, M. (2011e). Modeling elections in post-communist regimes: voter perceptions, political leaders and activists. In N. Schofield & G. Caballero (Eds.), The political economy of institutions, democracy and voting (pp. 259–301). Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schofield, N., Gallego, M., Jeon, J. S., & Mcalister, K. (2013). The variable choice set logit model applied to the 2004 Canadian election. Working Paper. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2309621.
- Yamamoto, T. (2011). A multinomial response model for varying choice sets, with application to partially contested multiparty elections. Working Paper. Google Scholar