Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Missed cervical disc bulges diagnosed with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if adding flexion and extension MRI studies to the traditional neutral views would be beneficial in the diagnosis of cervical disc bulges.

Methods

Five hundred patients underwent MRI in neutral, flexion and extension positions. The images were analyzed using computer software to objectively quantify the amount of disc bulge.

Results

Compared to the neutral position, cervical disc bulges were significantly increased in the extension position (P < 0.05), but on flexion position, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). For patients without or <3 mm of disc bulge in neutral, 2.97 % demonstrated an increase in bulge to ≥3 mm bulge in flexion, and 16.41 % demonstrated an increase to ≥3 mm bulge in extension. For patients in the neutral view that had a baseline disc bulge of 3−5 mm, 3.73 % had increased bulges to ≥5 mm in flexion and 11.57 % had increased bulges to ≥5 mm in extension.

Conclusion

A significant increase in the degree of cervical disc bulge was found by examining extension views when compared with neutral views alone. Kinematic MRI views provide valuable added information, especially in situations where symptomatic radiculopathy is present without any abnormalities demonstrated on traditional neutral MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A (2010) National hospital discharge survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Report 29(1–20):24

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson GB (1999) Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354:581–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu WD, Williams SL (2006) Spinal imaging: radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. AAOS 6:57–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Damadian RV (2005) Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinematic MRI of the spine: initial results. Eur Radiol 15:1815–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou J, Yang H, Miyazaki M, Wei F, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2008) Missed lumbar disc herniations diagnosed with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 33:E140–E144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsig JP, Kaech DL (2007) Dynamic imaging of the spine with an open upright MRI: present results and future perspectives of fmri. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elsig JP, Naxera J, Kaech DL (2007) Dynamic cervical stenosis revealed by upright functional MRI (fmri). Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:335–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan Y, Aghdasi BG, Montgomery SR, Inoue H, Lu C, Wang JC (2012) Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant spondylosis. Eur Spine J 21:2673–2679

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sitte I, Kathrein A, Pedross F, Freund MC, Pfaller K, Archer CW (2012) Morphological changes in disc herniation in the lower cervical spine: an ultrastructural study. Eur Spine J 21:1396–1409

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kato F, Yukawa Y, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T (2012) Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21:1499–1507

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT (1963) Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine: a comparative study of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. JBJS (Am) 45:1171–1178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF, Lantz CA (1999) Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine 24:1571–1578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holmes A, Wang C, Han ZH, Dang GT (1994) The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Spine 19:2505–2510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuwazawa Y, Bashir W, Pope MH, Takahashi K, Smith FW (2006) Biomechanical aspects of the cervical cord: effects of postural changes in healthy volunteers using positional magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:348–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Urrutia J, Fadic R (2012) Cervical disc herniation producing acute Brown-Sequard syndrome: dynamic changes documented by intraoperative neuromonitoring. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 4):S418–S421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morishita Y, Hida S, Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Zou J, Wei F, Naito M, Wang JC (2008) The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine 33:E178–E182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daffner SD, Xin J, Taghavi CE, Hymanson HJ, Mudiyam C, Hongyu W, Wang JC (2009) Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 34:2389–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyazaki M, Hymanson HJ, Morishita Y, He W, Zhang H, Wu G, Kong MH, Tsumura H, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine. Spine 33:E870–E876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morishita Y, Falakassa J, Naito M, Hymanson HJ, Taghavi C, Wang JC (2009) The kinematic relationships of the upper cervical spine. Spine 34:2642–2645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morishita Y, Hymanson H, Miyazaki M, Zhang HH, He W, Wu G, Kong MH, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic evaluation of the spine: a kinetic magnetic resonance imaging study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16:348–350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Daubs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lao, L., Daubs, M.D., Scott, T.P. et al. Missed cervical disc bulges diagnosed with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J 23, 1725–1729 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3385-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3385-9

Keywords

Navigation