Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic–kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential relative beneficial aspects of upright, weight-bearing (pMRI), dynamic–kinetic (kMRI) spinal imaging over that of recumbent MRI (rMRI) include the revelation of occult spinal disease dependent on true axial loading, the unmasking of kinetic-dependent spinal disease and the ability to scan the patient in the position of clinically relevant signs and symptoms. This imaging unit under study also demonstrated low claustrophobic potential and yielded comparatively high resolution images with little motion/magnetic susceptibility/chemical shift artifact. Overall, it was found that rMRI underestimated the presence and maximum degree of gravity-dependent spinal pathology and missed altogether pathology of a dynamic nature, factors that are optimally revealed with p/kMRI. Furthermore, p/kMRI enabled optimal linkage of the patient’s clinical syndrome with the medical imaging abnormality responsible for the clinical presentation, thereby allowing for the first time an improvement at once in both imaging sensitivity and specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Green CA, Greenhalgh JF, Gianni M, Gelbein M, Wolf R, Damadian J, Damadian RV (2002) Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic–kinetic MRI of the spine: pMRI/kMRI. Riv Neuroradiol 15:333–356

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Green CA, Greenhalgh JF, Gianni M, Gelbein M, Wolf R, Damadian J, Damadian RV (2003) Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic–kinetic magnetic resonance imaging of the spine—review of the first clinical results. J Hong Kong Coll Radiol 6:55–74

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith TJ, Fernie GR (1991) Functional biomechanics of the spine. Spine 16:1197–1203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith TJ (1991) In vitro spinal biomechanics: experimental methods and apparatus. Spine 16:1204–1210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marras WS, Granata KP (1995) A biomechanical assessment and model of axial twisting in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 20:1440–1451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Resnick DK, Weller SJ, Benzel EC (1997) Biomechanics of the thoracolumbar spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am 8:455–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berne D, Goubier JN, Lemoine J et al (1999) The aging of the spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 9:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boden SD, Wiesel SW (1990) Lumbosacral segmental motion in normal individuals: have we been measuring instability properly? Spine 15:571–576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Danielson BI, Willén J, Gaulitz A et al (1998) Axial loading of the spine during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol 39:604–611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frymoyer JW, Frymoyer WW, Wilder DG et al (1979) The Mechanical and kinematic analysis of the lumbar spine in normal living human subjects in vivo. J Biomech 12:165–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedman TP, Fernie GR (1995) In vivo measurement of lumbar spinal creep in two seated postures using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 20:178–183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hilton RC, Ball J, Benn RT (1979) In-vitro mobility of the lumbar spine. Ann Rheum Dis 38:378–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inufusa A, An HS, Lim T-H et al (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion–extension movement. Spine 21:2412–2420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Revel M, Aaron C et al (1989) A morphometric study of the lumbar foramen: influence of flexion–extension movements and of isolated disc collapse. Surg Radiol Anat 11:97–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nachemson AL, Schultz AB, Berkson MH (1979) Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments: influences of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration. Spine 4:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nowicki BH, Haughton VM, Schmidt TA et al (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. Am J Nueroradiol 17:1605–1614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pennal GF, Conn GS, McDonald G et al (1972) Motion studies of the lumbar spine: a preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg 54B:442–452

    Google Scholar 

  18. Penning L, Wilmink JT (1987) Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy: a dynamic CT-myelographic study. Spine 12:488–500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schönström N, Lindahl S, Willén J et al (1989) Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 7:115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sortland O, Magnes B, Hauge T (1977) Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol 355(Suppl):42–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. White AS, Panjabi MM (1978) The basic kinematics of the human spine: a review of past and current knowledge. Spine 3:12–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Willén J, Danielson B, Gaulitz A et al (1997) Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Spine 22:2968–2976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilmink JT, Penning L, van den Burg W (1984) Role of stenosis of spinal canal in L4–L5 nerve root compression assessed by flexion–extension myelography. Neuroradiology 26:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Friberg O (1987) Lumbar instability. A dynamic approach by traction–compression radiography. Spine 12:119–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujiwara A, An HS, Lim TH et al (2001) Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine 26:876–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayes MA, Howard TC, Gruel CR et al (1989) Roentgenographic evaluation of lumbar spine flexion–extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 14:327–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee RR, Abraham RA, Quinn CB (2001) Dynamic physiologic changes in lumbar CSF volume quantitatively measured by three-dimensional fast spin-echo MRI. Spine 26:1172–1178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel VK (1983) Kinematics of lumbar intervertebral foramen. Spine 8:348–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB (1984) Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 9:582–587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Penning L, Wilmink JT (1981) Biomechanics of lumbosacral dural sac. A study of flexion–extension myelography. Spine 6:398–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Revel M, Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Aaron C et al (1988) Morphological variations of the lumbar foramina. Rev Rhum Mal Osteo-artic 55:361–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stokes IA, Frymoyer JW (1987) Segmental motion and instability. Spine 12:688–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stokes IA, Wilder DG, Frymoyer JW et al (1981) Assessment of patients with low-back pain by biplanar radiographic measurement of intervertebral motion. Spine 6:233–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takayanagi K, Takahashi K, Yamagata M et al (2001) Using cineradiography for continuous dynamic-motion analysis of the lumbar spine. Spine 26:1858–1865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wildermuth S, Zanetti M, Duewell S et al (1998) lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Radiology 207:391–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wisleder D, Smith MB, Mosher TJ et al (2001) Lumbar spine mechanical response to axial compression load in vivo. Spine 26:E403–E409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wisleder D, Werner SL, Kraemer WJ et al (2001) A Method to study lumbar spine response to axial compression during magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 26:E416–E420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zamani AA, Moriarty T, Hsu L et al (1998) Functional MRI of the lumbar spine in erect position in a superconducting open-configuration MR system: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1329–1333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Leviseth G, Drerup B (1997) Spinal shrinkage during work in a sitting posture compared to work in a standing posture. Clin Biomech 12:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lowe RW, Hayes TD, Kaye J et al (1976) Standing roentgenograms in spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 117:80–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Devor M, Rappaport ZH (1996) Relation of foraminal (lateral) stenosis to radicular pain. Am J Nueroradiol 17:1615–1617

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM et al (1995) Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. J Bone Jt Surg 77-A:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pfirrmann CWA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shiwei Y, Haughton VM, Sether LA (1989) Criteria for classifying normal and degenerated lumbar intervertebral disks. Neuroradiology 170:523–526

    Google Scholar 

  45. Axelsson P, Johnson R, Strömqvist B (2000) Is there increased intervertebral mobility in isthmic adult spondylolisthesis? A matched comparative study using Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Spine 25:1701–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boden SD, Frymoyer JW (1997) Segmental instability: overview and classification. In: Frymoyer JW (ed) The adult spine: principles and practice. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 2137–2155

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dupuis PR, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy JD et al (1985) Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine 10:262–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Frymoyer JW, Selby DK (1985) Segmental instability: rationale for treatment. Spine 10:280–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fujiwara A, Lim T-H, An HS et al (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:3036–3044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pearcy M, Shepherd J (1985) Is there instability in spondylolisthesis? Spine 10:175–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ito M, Tadano S, Kaneda K (1993) A biomechanical definition of spinal segmental instability taking personal and disc level differences into account. Spine 18:2295–2304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pope MH, Panjabi M (1985) Biomechanical definitions of spinal instability. Spine 10:255–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sato H, Kikuchi S (1993) The natural history of radiographic instability of the lumbar spine. Spine 18:2075–2079

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Posner I, White AA, Edwards WT et al (1982) A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine 7:374–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wood KB, Popp CA, Transfeldt EE et al (1994) Radiographic evaluation of instability in spondylolisthesis. Spine 7:1697–1703

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yahia H, Drouin G, Maurais G et al (1989) Degeneration of the human lumbar spine ligaments. An ultrastructural study. Pathol Res Pract 184:369–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS et al (2000) The interspinous ligament of the lumbar spine: magnetic resonance images and their clinical significance. Spine 25:358–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Adams MA, Hutton WC, Stott JRR (1980) The resistance to flexion of the lumbar intervertebral joint. Spine 5:245–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dumas GA, Beaudoin L, Drouin G (1987) In situ mechanical behavior of posterior spinal ligaments in the lumbar region. An in vitro study. J Biomech 20:301–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hukins DWL, Kirby MC, Sikoryn TA et al (1990) Comparison of structure, mechanical properties, and functions of lumbar spinal ligaments. Spine 15:787–795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 1. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 5: 383–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Panjabi MM, Goel VK, Takata K (1982) Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments: an in vitro biomechanical study. Spine 7:192–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 20:887–900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:3036–3044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Haughton VM, Schmidt TA, Keele K et al (2000) Flexibility of lumbar spinal motion segments correlated to type of tears in the annulus fibrosis. J Neurosurg 92:81–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Thompson RE, Pearcy MJ, Downing KJW et al (2000) Disc lesions and the mechanics of the intervertebral joint complex. Spine 25:3026–3035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Twomey LT, Taylor JR (1983) Sagittal movements of the human lumbar vertebral column: a quantitative study of the role of the posterior vertebral elements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64:322–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Cartolari R, Argento G, Cardello M et al (1999) Axial loaded computed tomography (AL-CT) and cine AL-CT. Riv Neuroradiol 12:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jinkins JR (1997) Posttherapeutic neurodiagnostic imaging. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  70. Keller TS, Hansson TH, Holm SH et al (1989) In vivo creep behavior of the normal and degenerated porcine intervertebral disk: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 1:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  71. Jackson RP, Hales C (2000) Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 25:2808–2815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lee C-S, Lee C-K, Kim Y-T et al (2001) Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back. Spine 26:2029–2035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N et al (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 25:575–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC et al (1998) Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 23:1750–1767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Stephens GC, Yoo JU, Wilbur G (1996) Comparison of lumbar sagittal alignment produced by different operative positions. Spine 21:1802–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Vitzthum H-E, Konig A, Seifert V (2000) Dynamic examination of the lumbar spine by suing vertical, open magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 93:58–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Weishaupt D, Schmid MR, Zaneti M (2000) Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrated nerve root compromise not visible a conventional MR imaging? Radiology 215:247–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Jinkins JR (2001) Acquired degenerative changes of the intervertebral segments at and suprajacent to the lumbosacral junction: a radioanatomic analysis of the nondiskal structures of the spinal column and perispinal soft tissues. Radiol Clin North Am 39:73–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Jinkins JR (2004) Acquired degenerative changes of the intervertebral segments at and supradjacent to the lumbosacral junction: a radioanatomic analysis of the nondiscal structures of the spinal column and perispinal soft tissues. Eur J Radiol 50:134–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Jinkins JR (2002) Lumbosacral interspinous ligament rupture associated with acute intrinsic spinal muscle degeneration. Eur Radiol 12:2370–2376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW (2004) Longitudinal study of vertebral type-1 changes of MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 14:1084–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of C.A. Green, J.F. Greenhalgh, M. Gianni, M. Gelbien, R.B. Wolf, and J. Damadian.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA

    J. Randy Jinkins

  2. Fonar Corporation, 110 Marcus Drive, Melville, NY, 11747, USA

    J. Randy Jinkins, Jay S. Dworkin & Raymond V. Damadian

Authors
  1. J. Randy Jinkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jay S. Dworkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raymond V. Damadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Randy Jinkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jinkins, J.R., Dworkin, J.S. & Damadian, R.V. Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic–kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results. Eur Radiol 15, 1815–1825 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2666-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2666-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation