Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Volume Responsiveness During Mechanical Ventilation: Recent Advances

  • Chapter
Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2013

Part of the book series: Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine ((AUICEM))

Abstract

Predicting which patients with acute circulatory failure will respond to fluid by a significant increase in cardiac output is a daily challenge, in particular in the setting of the intensive care unit (ICU). This challenge has become even more crucial because evidence is growing that administering excessive amounts of fluid is a risk factor in critically ill patients, in particular in patients with lung injury. However, some tests and indices allow prediction of fluid responsiveness before intravenous fluids are infused.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL (2011) Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 1:1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL et al (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA (2011) Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 39:259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR et al (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354:2564–2575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A (2002) Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest 122:2080–2086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jozwiak M, Silva S, Persichini R, et al (2013) Extra-vascular lung water is an independent prognostic factor in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121:2000–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B (2008) Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 134:172–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Michard F, Teboul JL (2000) Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 4:282–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A (2009) Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 37:2642–2647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al (2005) Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 31:1195–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2001) Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 119:867–873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M et al (2001) Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 92:984–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L et al (2011) The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAPTM device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg 113:523–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Monnet X, Dres M, Ferre A et al (2012) Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth 109:330–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Marano C, Falcone C, De Santis P, Antonelli M (2012) Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 38:1429–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2004) The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 30:1834–1837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A et al (2004) Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1734–1739

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Teboul JL, Monnet X (2008) Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. Curr Opin Crit Care 14:334–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL (2006) How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care 10:R102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34:1402–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Soubrier S, Saulnier F, Hubert H et al (2007) Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med 33:1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ et al (2010) The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 36:496–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferré A et al (2012) Passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 40:152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL (2009) Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 110:1092–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP (2011) Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care 15:R33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tavernier B, Robin E (2011) Assessment of fluid responsiveness during increased intra-abdominal pressure: keep the indices, but change the thresholds. Crit Care 15:134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF (2009) Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 37:510–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL (2009) Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 37:951–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vincent JL, Weil MH (2006) Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 34:1333–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vincent JL (2011) “Let’s give some fluid and see what happens” versus the “mini-fluid challenge”. Anesthesiology 115:455–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ et al (2011) An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 115:541–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, Ginies G (2002) Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 121:1245–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, Monnet X (2009) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med 35:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Monnet X, Jabot J, Maizel J, Richard C, Teboul JL (2011) Norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and reduces preload dependency assessed by passive leg raising in septic shock patients. Crit Care Med 39:689–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2008) Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 34:659–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 36:1475–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ et al (2007) Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27–28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 33:575–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lafanechere A, Pene F, Goulenok C et al (2006) Changes in aortic blood flow induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Crit Care 10:R132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Biais M, Vidil L, Sarrabay P, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F (2009) Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device. Crit Care 13:R195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Benomar B, Ouattara A, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Squara P (2010) Fluid responsiveness predicted by noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test. Intensive Care Med 36:1875–1881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marik PE, Levitov A, Young A, Andrews L (2013) The use of NICOM (Bioreactance) and Carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Dalbera A, Massetti M, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL (2012) Can endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising following cardiac surgery? Ann Intensive Care 2:26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Guinot PG, Zogheib E, Detave M et al (2011) Passive leg raising can predict fluid responsiveness in patients placed on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care 15:R216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL (2007) Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med 33:1125–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lukito V, Djer MM, Pudjiadi AH, Munasir Z (2012) The role of passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:e155–e160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W (2009) Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study. Crit Care 13:R111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M, Monterroso Pintado R, Perez Madueno V, Diaz Monrove JC (2012) Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness by changes in partial end-tidal CO2 pressure during a passive leg-raising maneuver. Ann Intensive Care 2:9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Monnet X, Bataille A, Magalhaes E, et al (2012) End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med 39:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  52. De Backer D, Pinsky MR (2007) Can one predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Intensive Care Med 33:1111–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Monnet X, Letierce A, Hamzaoui O et al (2011) Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine. Crit Care Med 39:1394–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Scolletta S, Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL (2012) Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock? Intensive Care Med 38:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chemla D, Hebert JL, Coirault C et al (1998) Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 274:H500–H505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Monnet X, Julien F, Ait-Hamou N et al (2013) Lactate and veno-arterial carbon dioxide difference/arterial-venous oxygen difference ratio, but not central venous oxygen saturation, predict increase in oxygen consumption in fluid responders. Crit Care Med (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Teboul JL, Hamzaoui O, Monnet X (2011) SvO2 to monitor resuscitation of septic patients: let’s just understand the basic physiology. Crit Care 15:1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Velissaris D, Pierrakos C, Scolletta S, De Backer D, Vincent JL (2011) High mixed venous oxygen saturation levels do not exclude fluid responsiveness in critically ill septic patients. Crit Care 15:R177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Teboul JL, Monnet X (2009) Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution. Crit Care 13:175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Sud, rue du Général Leclerc 78, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    X. Monnet & J.-L. Teboul

Authors
  1. X. Monnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J.-L. Teboul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Monnet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Jean-Louis Vincent Prof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and BioMed Central Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monnet, X., Teboul, JL. (2013). Assessment of Volume Responsiveness During Mechanical Ventilation: Recent Advances. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2013. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35109-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35109-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35108-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35109-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation