Highlights
-
The tunable mechanisms of lateral heterostructures on both homogeneous junctions and heterogeneous junctions are summarized.
-
Electronic and photoelectronic devices with lateral heterostructures have been discussed.
-
Different types of contacts of 2D lateral heterostructures are classified.
-
Recent developments in synthesis and nanofabrication technologies of 2D lateral heterostructures are reviewed.
Abstract
Recent developments in synthesis and nanofabrication technologies offer the tantalizing prospect of realizing various applications from two-dimensional (2D) materials. A revolutionary development is to flexibly construct many different kinds of heterostructures with a diversity of 2D materials. These 2D heterostructures play an important role in semiconductor and condensed matter physics studies and are promising candidates for new device designs in the fields of integrated circuits and quantum sciences. Theoretical and experimental studies have focused on both vertical and lateral 2D heterostructures; the lateral heterostructures are considered to be easier for planner integration and exhibit unique electronic and photoelectronic properties. In this review, we give a summary of the properties of lateral heterostructures with homogeneous junction and heterogeneous junction, where the homogeneous junctions have the same host materials and the heterogeneous junctions are combined with different materials. Afterward, we discuss the applications and experimental synthesis of lateral 2D heterostructures. Moreover, a perspective on lateral 2D heterostructures is given at the end.
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40820-019-0276-y/MediaObjects/40820_2019_276_Figa_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The graphene monolayer, which was successfully prepared through micromechanical cleavage in 2004, triggered enormous research interests because of its exotic physical properties, such as high charge carrier mobility, high mechanical strength, high thermal conductivity, and broadband optical absorption [1,2,3,4]. More and more researchers pay attention to studies of monolayer materials with honeycomb structures as interesting as graphene [5, 6], which give birth to a new research field, i.e., two-dimensional (2D) materials. Because of their uncommon properties and related potential applications, other 2D materials beyond graphene, including hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) [7, 8], transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) [9, 10], black phosphorus (BP) [11, 12], and silicone [13], are extensively investigated.
Other than monolayer 2D materials, 2D heterostructures have been investigated theoretically and experimentally, and their new properties are tailored, which provide many potential applications. Vertical 2D heterostructures composed of different single layers show some novel electronic [14] and optical properties [15], such as high carrier mobility [16] and perfect photoresponse performance [17], which can be used to design transistors [18, 19] and photoelectronic devices [20]. Different from vertical stacking structures, the lateral stitching structures in monolayer plane are also utilized to build functional devices. Many devices fabricated with lateral heterostructures (LHSs) have demonstrated superior performance or shown unique properties. Based on monolayer WSe2–WS2 heterojunctions, high-mobility field-effect transistors (FETs), p–n diodes with large rectification behavior, superior photovoltaic devices (large open-circuit voltage of 0.47 V and short-circuit current of 1.2 nA), and CMOS inverter with large current gain (as large as 24) have been demonstrated [21]. It has been shown that a photodetector based on MoS2–MoSe2 LHSs demonstrated an optimal photoresponse performance. The responsivity, detectivity, and external quantum efficiency reach 1.3 A W−1, 2.6 × 1011 Jones, and 263.1%, respectively [22]. In 2D bipolar transistors based on lateral WSe2–MoS2 heterojunctions, common emitter current gain and negative differential resistance (NDR) phenomenon were observed [23]. A light-emitting device designed with lateral WSe2–MoS2 heterostructure exhibited a larger conversion efficiency of 1 m% (the ratio of the emitted photon to the injected carriers) in 70 kw cm−2 than a homojunction device based on monolayer MoS2 [24]. Furthermore, photodetectors built with lateral heterojunction graphene and thin amorphous carbon films have a high photodetectivity of 1013 Jones and short response time of sub-100 µs [25]. These devices built with LHSs can potentially be used in future electronic circuits and device applications.
To realize more controllable device functions, how to tune the properties by structure has become a main issue of researchers’ concerns. The tunability of heterostructures based on 2D materials has been demonstrated in graphene-based heterostructures [26]. For example, stack sequences, doping, and different geometries have been proved as effective ways to modify the properties. Up to now, a large number of 2D heterojunctions fabricated in the laboratory can be identified mainly into two different types according to their structures [27,28,29]: (1) vertical heterostructures stacked layer by layer; (2) LHSs where the 2D materials are stitched seamlessly in a panel. In vertical 2D heterostructures, the isolated atomic component can be assembled to form new layered materials stacked in a precisely selected sequence. The different layers in vertical heterostructures are generally combined by van der Waals (vdW) interaction. In lateral 2D heterostructures, different 2D atomic panels are stitched in a single atomic layer because of the similar structure and small lattice mismatch. The chemical bonding between the edges of different panels plays an important role in the combination of two different 2D materials. In general, the vdW interaction is weaker than the chemical bonding. Because of the different combination strengths of the two types of heterostructures at the interface, the synthesis of them has distinct differences. Owing to vdW weak interaction, mechanical exfoliation and mechanical transfer techniques are successfully used in fabricating the vertical heterostructure, which makes them become some of the hottest research fields in recent years. However, there are two main issues which restrict the performance of 2D devices based on vertical heterostructures: (1) contaminants between layers and (2) stacking orientation induced in the stacking process [30, 31]. To overcome these limitations, lateral heterojunction was proposed as one of the solutions. Enhanced intrinsic performances compared with those of graphene-based vertical transistors have been reported in LHSs [32]. The LHSs are synthesized by direct growth, and the two panels can be stitched seamlessly, which forms a sharp interface. The quality and orientation of the inner interfaces in LHSs can be precisely controlled. The interface between the two in-plane panels can induce many attractive properties, which are related to the microstructure of the interface. LHSs usually offer larger tunability of band offset and can easily modify electronic properties. These advantages make it valuable to design potential function devices using LHSs.
There are some reviews talking about the synthesis of 2D materials and their heterostructures [33,34,35]. The chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method is the main synthesis method for LHSs, which is mostly the concern. However, some novel methods for synthesizing LHSs have been ignored. Here, the one-step, two-step, and multi-step growths and some other methods for the fabrication of LHSs are summarized. Although some summaries of synthesis methods used in 2D materials and their heterojunctions have already been given [33,34,35,36], little is known about the developments of LHSs. A summary of physical properties, tunable or modulation mechanisms, device applications, and synthesis of LHSs is desirable. We hope our summary can provide an insight on recent developments of LHSs and can inspire future studies on LHSs.
In this review, we summarized the progresses on 2D LHSs properties, applications, and experimental synthesis. First, the properties of homogeneous and heterogeneous junction LHSs related to the structure (interface, width, nanohole, thickness, strain, and dielectric), doping, and passivation have been investigated. Second, electronic and optical device applications for lateral heterostructures have been summarized. Then, applications of LHSs in electronic and photoelectronic devices are given. In the fourth part, we talk about the synthesis status of LHSs. In the end, a short perspective on LHSs is given. In order to indicate the tunable properties and synthesis method simply, Scheme 1 is used to introduce the research status clearly.
2 The Properties of LHSs
With developments on theory and experiment in 2D LHSs, more and more heterostructures have been designed and synthesized. The properties of LHSs are important for device application. In order to introduce important developments about recent works on LHSs, we divide them into two types, as given in Table 1. The LHSs can be classified into two types, according to the materials on the sides of the interface: (1) homogeneous junctions (A|A), where the host materials are the same on both sides of the interface, and (2) heterogeneous junctions (A|B), where the host materials are different.
2.1 Homogeneous Junctions
Given the same materials across the junctions, many ways have been proposed to modulate the heterostructure. As we stated above, the doping and geometry structures provide the tunable mechanisms of the LHSs. Here, the variations of structure (interface, width, nanohole, and thickness), doping, passivation, strain, and dielectric have been used to tune the physical properties of host materials in the LHSs. We will discuss them, respectively.
2.1.1 Structure: Interface, Width, Nanohole, and Thickness
As we know, if graphene is cut along different directions (zigzag or armchair direction), different types of nanoribbon edges can be obtained. The zigzag graphene nanoribbons (zGNR) behaves as a metal at nonmagnetic state, and the armchair graphene nanoribbons (aGNR) behaves as a semiconductor. The energy gaps of armchair graphene nanoribbons oscillate with the ribbon width, which obeys the relation △3p + 1 ≥ △3p > △3p + 2 (p is an integer) [37, 38]. If the zigzag and armchair graphene nanoribbons are fused in an atomic layer, a semimetal and semiconductor junction can be formed. The different topological defects (the ring structures at the interface) can be found with different GNR units. It is shown that different ring structures at the interface can influence the transport properties and conductivity of the junctions. The most stable armchair–zigzag GNR junction is the 5–7–5-ring structure [39, 40]. Li et al. [41] designed a heterojunction combining a zGNR and an aGNR, which is shown in Fig. 1a. The structure has the defects of pentagon–heptagon pairs and clearly has rectification effect. The electronic properties of the heterojunction can be tuned by the width: When the width is 6p + 5 (p = 1, 2, …), it behaves as a metal; when the width is 6p + 1 or 6p + 3 (p = 1, 2, …), it behaves as a semiconductor. With different widths, the heterojunctions have oscillating conductance. The rectification properties mainly come from the destructive interferences. The rectification properties of this structure can also be tuned by the width of each of the components of the heterojunction. For this semiconducting junction, by changing the width of the zGNR, a large rectification ratio can be obtained, through reducing the backward current [41]. They also studied the graphene nanoribbon heterojunction, which was designed by combining an armchair graphene nanoribbon and a zigzag graphene nanoribbon side by side. By controlling the widths of the nanoribbons, the electronic properties of the heterojunctions can be tuned between metallic and semiconducting: When the width of armchair graphene nanoribbon is 3p + 2, the heterojunction behaves metallically; when the width is 3p or 3p + 1, it behaves as a semiconductor (p = 1, 2, 3, …). The rectification behaviors are influenced mainly by the side connection length between aGNR and zGNR. The different interface defects cause the asymmetrical transmission of electrons and holes, which induces the rectification [42]. In brief, the different edge connections can induce a different interface, which exhibits the powerful tunability of the electronic properties.
a Heterojunction of armchair25 (9)| zigzag14 (6) GNR. The interface is of pentagon–heptagon pairs, corresponding to red and green holes in the picture. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [41]. b Heterojunction of armchair20_armchair9 GNR; the edges are passivated with hydrogen atoms. c Top and side views of 5–5 black–blue phosphorene LHS with an octatomic-ring interface and a hexatomic-ring interface. The pink dashed line marks the interface region. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. d Simple drawing of the GNM heterostructures with circle nanoholes. (Color figure online)
The electronic properties of 2D materials can be tuned by the ribbon width. The armchair graphene nanoribbons can behave as semiconductors, and the energy gaps can be tuned by the ribbon width, which makes it an appropriate component for heterojunction design. When the widths of the aGNRs are 3p and 3p + 1, the aGNRs behave as semiconductors, whose bandgaps range from 0.4 to 2.5 eV; when the width is 3p + 2, the aGNRs behaves as a semimetal, whose bandgaps range from 0 to 0.3 eV (p = 1, 2, 3, …). An undoped armchair graphene heterojunction has been proposed with left and right parts having different widths, where the left part is a semimetal and the right part is a semiconductor [43]. The heterojunction has rectification effect induced by the interface, which is similar to the Schottky barrier, and the rectification ratio is affected by the ribbon width (left width/right width). The decreasing width of the semiconducting part makes electron transport more difficult and induces a larger rectification ratio. In Fig. 1b, a similar armchair graphene nanoribbon heterojunction has been shown, which has different widths in the left (20) and right (9). In the same way, the cross-bar and T-shaped configured heterojunctions based on armchair graphene and barbell-shaped graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions have been proposed; the transport electronic properties are investigated with the different geometry structures [44, 45]. The black–blue phosphorene lateral heterojunction has similar structure properties, as shown in Fig. 1c [46]. The black phosphorene and blue phosphorene composed of the same element have small lattice mismatch along the zigzag direction. There are two interfaces between them: octatomic-ring interface and hexatomic-ring interface. The octatomic-ring interface presents metallic features because of the in-gap state form of the interface and edges. The hexatomic-ring interface presents a metal-to-semiconductor transition feature with hydrogen passivation. By tuning the widths of the heterostructure component, the energy band can be modulated. The bandgap of N–N configuration heterojunctions (Fig. 1c, the black and blue phosphorene nanoribbons have the same width at 5:5) decreases with the increase in width N in the range of 1–10 nm. The electronic properties of N-5 configuration heterojunctions are similar to those of the N–N configuration heterojunctions. However, the electronic properties of the 5-N configuration heterojunctions are almost unchanged. Type-II and type-I band alignments can be observed in different width ranges. In the width ranges from 2.0 to 3.1 nm and 3.7 to 4.2 nm, type-II band alignment can be observed, because the conduction band minimum (CBM) state is mainly from the blue phosphorene and the valence band maximum (VBM) state is mainly from the black phosphorene. Outside of these width ranges, the band alignment is type I. When the width is very small, the CBM and VBM are mainly from the blue phosphorene; when the width is very large, the CBM and VBM are mainly located at the black phosphorene. With the strain on the heterostructure, the transition in type-II and type-I band alignments can also be observed. The newly found GeP3 2D materials follow the rules of even–odd oscillating bandgap with a changeable armchair nanoribbon width. The lateral heterojunction has been designed with different armchair GeP3 nanoribbon widths (the width of one segment is even, and the width of the other segment is odd) [47]. The odd-width segment has a smaller bandgap than that of the even-width segment. It is found that the CBM charge density comes from the wider part, while the VBM comes from the narrow part. The heterojunction exhibits a type-II band alignment which can be easily tuned by the ribbon width and can potentially be used in future photoelectronics.
The periodic nanoholes on single-layer graphene can open its bandgap [48]. This kind of defect is considered as a powerful way to modulate electronic properties. The defects of different sizes, shapes, and periodicities of the nanohole in the lattice have been widely discussed [49, 50]. Bai et al. [51] fabricated a novel graphene nanostructure called graphene nanomesh (GNM), which can open up a bandgap in monolayer 2D graphene using block copolymer lithography methods. This work intrigued a set of investigations about GNM, especially on the electronic properties of graphene nanomesh [52, 53]. The nanohole on monolayer 2D materials is an effective way to tune the materials’ properties and form heterojunctions. The nanoholes on graphene can open an energy gap, which makes it become a semiconductor. The negative differential conductance (NDC) effect has been found in GNM p–n junctions, which proved the possibility of constructing a device with nanoholes without electrostatic tuning [54]. In Fig. 1d, a simple GNM heterostructure model, which has circuit holes, has been shown. With a similar structure, the mechanical properties of GNM heterojunctions have been researched with different shapes of nanoholes, including circular, square, and triangular holes [55]. Because the strength and ductility are reduced with the introduction of nanoholes, the heterojunction based on GNM may have limits in applications.
Furthermore, a single material heterojunction can also be modulated with the thickness. Because of the quantum confinement effect, the bandgap of monolayer MoS2 increases from indirect 1.29 eV of multilayer MoS2 to direct 1.85 eV. The changing layer numbers lead a new path to form heterojunctions, which are modified only by the thickness rather than by changing the composition. Monolayer and multilayer MoS2 heterostructures, which have type-I band alignments, have been reported [56]. Photocurrent can clearly be observed in the LHSs, which suggests potential application in future optoelectronic devices.
2.1.2 Doping and Passivation
Doping is widely used in modulating the electronic properties of semiconductors and can also be used to design LHSs. N-doped and P-doped graphene nanoribbons have been investigated in detail. The graphene nanoribbons exhibit different electronic properties which depend on different deposition positions and deposition densities [57, 58]. N-doped and B-doped graphene nanoribbons have already been synthesized in experiments [59,60,61], which inspired the investigation of devices jointing the two differently doped graphene nanoribbons. As shown in Fig. 2a, the N- and B-doped m-aGNR junctions (where m represents the width of the aGNRs), which are tailored as a Z-type, have been designed, and the doping position has been kept relatively unchanged at the edge. The zGNR–aGNR atom interfaces have small contact resistance. The barrier is mainly attributed to the donor and acceptor doping on the aGNR. The different dopings on the semiconducting aGNR cause the rectification effect, which is related to the aGNR width. When the length of aGNR p–n junction is 3n and 3n + 2, positive rectification can be observed; when the length satisfied 3n + 1, negative rectification can be observed. The results suggest that the different rectification properties can be obtained by proper doping and adjusting the length of the junction [62]. Many p–n junctions by changing the doped position have been proposed, and the NDR or rectification phenomenon can be found there [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. These devices can potentially be used in nanoelectronics and nano-random memory or molecular rectifier.
a Model of 10-armchair GNR p–n junction; the electrode is semi-infinite 14-zigzag GNR. The gray, white, blue, and red balls are C, H, N, and B atoms, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. b Structure of H2–5zGNR–H. The blue, gray, and white balls represent N, C, and H atoms, respectively. L, C, and R denote the left electrode, scattering region, and right electrode, respectively. There are two unequal A and B sub-lattices in green rectangle. The atoms are labeled as 1B… 3B… 5B, and 1A is close to 1B; 3A is close to 3B; the sequence increases from top to bottom. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. c Heterostructure of hydrogen (gray balls) and oxide (red balls) atoms passivated zGNR on the left and right side, respectively; the brown balls are carbon atoms. d Heterostructure of dihydrogenated zGNR (left side of the structure is passivated by two hydrogen atoms) and monohydrogenated zGNR (right side of the structure is passivated by one hydrogen atom). (Color figure online)
Zigzag graphene nanoribbons are usually used to design spin electronic devices because of their edge states [72, 73]. Wang et al. investigated zGNR heterojunctions, in which the zGNR electrodes are doped with N or B atoms and the edges are asymmetric. (One of the zGNRs edges has C–H bonds, while the other edge has C–H2 bonds.) The structure with asymmetry edge hydrogenation is stable and has good spin properties. There are two states close to the Fermi energy: The valence states belong to the up spin, while the conduction states belong to the down spin. It is suitable for spin device design. The doping on the GNRs, especially with B or N atoms, can also change the spin transport properties of GNRs. The doping atoms can create holes/electrons carriers, which modulate the spin transport properties. A bipolar spin filtering effect with a spin polarization of 100% can be observed in these doped zGNR-based heterojunctions [74]. In the analogous structure doped with nitrogen, the rectification of spin-polarized current can be tuned by changing the doping atom positions, as shown in Fig. 2b [75]. The chemical doping position can modify the electronic properties by breaking the symmetry of the structure, which may cause the rectification effect. A large rectification ratio (~ 105) and a perfect spin filtering effect have been obtained with the structures. The boron nitride- and nitride-doped structures with asymmetry hydrogenation have also been studied to realize the spin filtering effect and rectification behavior [76]. These results are helpful in future spintronic devices designs.
For 2D graphene, the dangling bonds of edge atoms would be saturated by atoms or molecules to stabilize the edge structures. The edge modification of zGNRs can also influence the edge magnetism and reduce the edge state. Hydrogen atoms were mostly used to passivate the 1D nanoribbon [77]. Other atoms and different hydrogenation styles also have been adopted to modulate device electronic properties [78, 79]. As shown in Fig. 2c, the heterojunction is formed by passivating the left side with hydrogen atoms and the right side with oxide atoms. Heterojunctions with O atom-terminated zigzag graphene nanoribbon (O/zGNR) and H atom-terminated zigzag graphene nanoribbon (H/zGNR) have been discussed [80]. Different edge decoration atoms can modify the electronic properties of the GNRs and also the transport properties. In this case, the oxygen edge decoration nearly has no effect on current with positive bias but reduces current with negative bias. O/zGNR–H/zGNR heterojunctions show a clear rectification effect. Edge decoration atoms also influence the spin transport properties of the device. In this way, a remarkable dual spin filtering behavior has been observed on O–zGNR–H/H2–zGNR–H heterojunctions [81]. The spin degeneracy is lifted by the edge decoration. Different edge atomic groups can provide different band structures and produce different transport properties.
Heterojunctions with asymmetric edge hydrogenation (the left part of the structure saturated with one H atom, the right part saturated with two H atoms) have been fabricated, as shown in Fig. 2d. It is found that the C–H2 bonds showed an important influence on magnetic properties [82, 83]. Cao et al.[84] theoretically studied three kinds of heterojunctions: bare and dihydrogenated zGNR junction, bare and monohydrogenated zGNR junction, and dihydrogenated and monohydrogenated zGNR. (Bare zGNR is zGNR that is not saturated on both edges.) Their calculation results implied that the dihydrogenation edges lead to the blocking of electron transfer, which induced the rectification effect [72]. Therefore, it is clear that asymmetric edge hydrogenation can modulate electronic properties and form novel heterojunctions. Many similar heterojunctions have been fabricated this way. Zigzag-edged MoS2 nanoribbon passivated with one hydrogen atom (zMoS2NR–H) and zMoS2NR heterojunctions, which exhibit large NDR and rectification properties, have been designed; perfect spin filter effect reaches up to 95% spin polarization [85]. Zigzag-edged silicene nanoribbon (zSiNR) with different edge hydrogenation also shows some potential electronic and spin electronic applications [86]. H–6zSiNR–H/Ho–6zSiNR–Ho heterojunction exhibits perfect spin filtering effect with almost 100% spin polarization. H–6zSiNR–H/H2–6zSiNR–H2 heterojunction can exhibit dual spin filter effect and NDR phenomenon.
2.1.3 Strain and Dielectric Modulation
Applied strain is another effective way to tune the electronic structures of 2D materials and has been used to realize strain-tuned superlattices, which are important members of LHJs [87,88,89,90,91,92,93]. When the applied strain is large (e.g., ~ 20% in graphene), the in-plane strong covalent interaction of the 2D materials makes it helpful in keeping their structures from bond-breaking. As demonstrated in Fig. 3a–d, a stretching-transfer-releasing process can induce designed strain on monolayer 2D materials. The large strain caused by the mismatch of elastic modulus between 2D monolayer and its substrate results in the formation of a periodic rippled structure. This structure behaves like a superlattice containing two different materials and shows a strain-modulated electronic structure. This strategy has been proved in the fabrication of strain-modulated superlattice in ReSe2 [87] and black phosphorus [88]. The local strain engineering can induce a controllable strain on the bandgap and then tailor the optoelectronic properties, which opens the door for a variety of applications including photovoltaics, quantum optics, and two-dimensional optoelectronic devices. Along this route, how to apply strain with different directions (tensile or compressive) and magnitudes is one of the key steps to modulate the bandgap. Besides this, the ability to apply a spatially controllable strain is even more crucial and desirable because graded bandgap semiconductors are eagerly needed in device designs. Designed dielectric nanopillar structures on a substrate, which sometimes are named as corrugated substrates, supply us more controllable degrees of freedom in tuning electronic structures of 2D materials and become a powerful synthesis route for strain superlattices in macroscale. According to this route, the nanopillars, which are made of a dielectric material, are placed between 2D monolayer materials and the substrate. The size and separation of the pillars control the strength and spatial pattern of the strain. The periodic pillars induce large strains with controllable patterns, as shown in Fig. 3e–g. The structures of the pillars provide the strain-dependent tenability of the electronic structures and strain-modulated graphene superlattice [89, 91,92,93]; MoS2 superlattice [90] has been fabricated successfully using this method. By inducing designed strain distributions, optical properties of 2D materials show a great improvement. For example, it is shown experimentally that strain-engineered MoS2 has a broad band light absorption with absorption bandwidth from 677 (unstrained MoS2) to 905 nm (most strained MoS2), which covers the entire visible wavelength and most intensive wavelengths of the solar spectrum [90].
Schematic illustration of the fabrication steps of ReSe2 wrinkles. a Prepared the elastomeric gel–film substrate. b Deposited the monolayer ReSe2 with mechanical exfoliation method. c Released the strain with different rates. d Formation of ReSe2 wrinkles, which are perpendicular to the initial axis. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. e Schematic diagram of graphene film, which is deposited on SiO2 nanopillars substrate. f AFM image of graphene membrane that deposits on the SiO2 nanopillars substrate. g Schematic diagram of transferring the graphene on the SiO2 nanopillars substrate, which has different density arrays. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [91]
As summary, through the two strategies mentioned above, nonuniform strain field and related considerable energy gap variation can be controllably realized, which enables strain-engineered 2D materials to be potentially applied to optoelectronic device designs. Furthermore, pseudomagnetic fields provided by the engineered nonuniform strain interact with electrons and induce changes in the bandgap, which show very interesting physical phenomena and have aroused studies on pseudomagnetic fields in 2D materials [94].
Under a strain-engineering mechanism with corrugated substrates, the structure of nanopillars (size and separation) controls the strength and spatial pattern of the strain. However, the complex morphology makes the interpretation of stress more difficult especially when the pitch and sharpness of the corrugated array are taken into account. It is an interesting question on whether other substrate properties show modulation on the electronic properties of the above 2D materials. A recent work confirmed this with their theoretical and experimental investigations on a dielectric-defined lateral heterojunction in a monolayer semiconductor MoS2 [95]. The bandgap renormalization due to the dielectric screening effect by substrate(s) is dramatic, especially when the 2D materials have a low intrinsic dielectric constant. In this work, a continuous monolayer MoS2 was prepared on a substrate with a high dielectric constant (ε) and an adjacent segment on a substrate with a low ε. Because of the dielectric constant-dependent renormalization of the electronic bandgap, the bandgaps of MoS2 introduced by the two substrates on each segment show a difference, and the monolayer MoS2 forms an in-plane type-I heterojunction above the boundary of the two substrates. This type-I heterojunction generated by the dielectric constant-induced bandgap renormalization in atomic 2D materials will have profound effects on their electrical transport properties. Both the structure and dielectric distribution can be used to tune physical properties of 2D materials and construct lateral heterojunctions.
2.2 Heterogeneous Junctions
LHSs based on one material are monotonous. However, heterostructures based on different materials have been designed and studied a lot, with a variety of 2D materials. Vertical heterostructures based on heterogeneous materials have been widely investigated by changing the rotations of different stacking layers [96, 97], or the stacking components in consideration of the great quality of the 2D materials [98, 99], or the layer thickness [100], or the interlayer spacing [101,102,103], or the stacking mode [104,105,106]. However, while the tunable mechanisms of vertical structures based on different materials have been discussed a lot, the tunable mechanisms of LHSs with different materials are of less concern. Here, we discuss mainly the tunable mechanisms of LHSs based on two different materials. When LHSs are formed with different materials, the band alignment is important in determining the electronic and optical properties. Hence, the LHSs are classified as metal/semiconductor and semiconductor/semiconductor contacts, as follows.
2.2.1 Heterogeneous Junctions with Semiconductor/Semiconductor Contact
Lateral TMDCs 2D heterostructures have been researched a lot because of their unique electronic properties, especially potential type-II band alignment and the wide distribution from semimetal to semiconductor. The electronic properties and inner mechanisms of more and more TMDCs LHSs have been discussed. The 2D square TMDCs (1S–MX2) (M = Mo, W, X = S/Se) with metallic properties were reported [different from the conventional phase of 2D MX2 (named 1H–MX2)], and having a similar structure to that of 1H–MX2, a 1S–WS2 and 1S–MoSe2 lateral monolayer heterostructure has been built, as shown in Fig. 4a. The wanted type-II band alignment can be observed with black phosphorus as substrate. The theoretical researches on 1S–MX2 LHSs provide opportunities in new device physics and optical application [107]. MoS2–(MX2)n (M = Mo/W, X = S/Se) LHSs have been studied with first-principal calculations, as shown in Fig. 4b [108]. The band levels and optical absorption of the structures are influenced mainly by the width n of the MX2 region, where MX2 represents MoSe2, WS2, or WSe2. The CBM states and VBM states of MoS2-(WS2)n lateral heterostructures are contributed mainly by the MoS2 region and (WS2)n region, respectively. This property is related to the width n. When the width n > 2, the MoS2–(MX2)n lateral heterostructures show type-II band alignment. The free electrons and holes are separated in the MoS2 and MX2 regions, respectively, which induce the long electrons’ and holes’ lifetimes. The width-tuned heterostructure provides desired electronic, optical, and photocatalytic properties. The 2D WS2/WSe2/MoS2 in-plane structures are also discussed [109]. The bandgap of the heterostructures can be tuned by adjusting the lengths of the components, which are induced mainly by the confinement effects. When the width increases from 1 to 5 (unit cell), the bandgap decreases.
a Atomic structure of 1S–MX2 (M = Mo/W, X = S/Se) LHS from the top views. Yellow: S, indigo: Se, red: Mo, green balls: W. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. b Top view of MoS2/(MX2)n LHSs, where MX2 represents MoSe2, WS2, or WSe2; n refers to the width of the substitution region. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [108]. c Atomic structures of lateral graphene/BN heterostructures, which have different contact types. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. d Top and side view of the heterostructure of 15-aPNR/15-aGNR (aPNR is armchair phosphorene nanoribbon; aGNR is armchair graphene nanoribbon). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [118]. (Color figure online)
In addition, the strain can modify the electronic structures and band offsets. With the strain-tuned transition of type-I and type-II band alignment, LHSs have potential application in light-emitting and photovoltaics. Uniaxial tensile strain can modulate the electronic and optical properties of TMDCs LHSs, MoX2–WX2 (X = S, Se, Te). With the bandgaps and band offset tuned by the uniaxial tensile strain, the light conversion efficiency of the structure can be elevated [110].
The interface of heterogeneous junctions is the current research focus. The lateral interfaces, both zigzag and armchair, of monolayer TMDCs, such as MoSe2–WSe2 and MoS2–WS2, have been investigated. The interface of LHSs plays an important role in device properties. It is found that these interfaces behave as 1D state with noticeable features [111]. Of course, heterogeneous junctions can combine different kinds of materials, which provide opportunities to tune novel electronic properties. Some TMDCs materials of less concern, such as lateral monolayer ZrS2 and HfS2 nanoribbons, have also been used to fabricate heterostructures [112]. The AlN–GaN nanoribbons heterostructure has been investigated [113]. The stability of AlN–GaN nanoribbons increased when the GaN ratio increased. The bandgap can vary inversely when the GaN content increased. All the nanoribbons show semiconductor behavior with indirect bandgap. An arsenene/blue phosphorene LHS is formed from a zigzag arsenene monolayer and a zigzag blue phosphorene monolayer [114]. Its bandgap can be tuned by the component ratio of the structure and tensile strain along different directions. Given the same component ratio, the bandgaps will decrease when the widths of the heterostructures increase. While the width increases, the VBM of the heterojunction shifts upward and the CBM shifts downward at the г point. As2P2 LHSs behave as quasi-type-II indirect semiconductors. AsmPn (m = n = 4, 6, 8, 10) LHSs behave as type-II direct semiconductors, with the VBM localized around arsenene and the CBM localized around blue phosphorene. The electronic properties can change from indirect bandgap to direct bandgap as the width increases. Heterostructures of different component ratios have been discussed. For heterostructures of AsmP20-m (m = 2, 4, 6, 8 …18), when m < 10, the CBM shifts downward while the VBM shifts upward. When m > 10, the CBM shifts upward while the VBM shifts downward. With increasing width, the bandgap first decreases and then increases. The tensile strain will not change the direct bandgap property. However, the strain has a strong effect on the CBM and VBM states. When the applied strains exceed 6%, the band alignment transition from type II to type I can be observed. The tunable heterostructures have type-II band alignment and high carrier mobility, which can potentially be used in photovoltaic, optoelectronic, and photocatalytic devices.
2.2.2 Heterogeneous Junctions with Metal/Semiconductor Contact
Gapless graphene can easily form M/S contact with other 2D materials, such as BN, phosphorene, and TMDCs. The electronic properties of LHSs are highly related to the M/S interface. Lateral graphene/BN heterostructures with different kinds of interfaces, armchair or zigzag, have been studied [115]. The intrinsic strength is highly related to the misorientation angle of the interface, and the interface following Clar’s rule has higher tensile strengths. Under uniaxial strain, the bandgap of the heterostructure with zigzag interface is nearly unchanged, but the bandgap with the armchair interface is changed. The theoretical results show the interface effect on the mechanical and electronic properties, which can give guidance to the design of lateral hybrid heterostructures. In-plane graphene and h-BN heterostructures with different contacts have been investigated, as shown in Fig. 4c [116]. When the interface is left–right-type contact, rectification phenomenon can be observed. The up–down contact heterostructure clearly exhibits the NDR effect. When the contact is left bank or right bank, it displays the NDR effect and a large rectification ratio. With change in the contact structure, different NDR and rectification properties can be obtained. To get knowledge on the growth mechanism of graphene–h-BN heterostructures, the growth pathways, including the influence of Cu substrate, electronic properties that proved to be metallic, and chemical bonds of graphene/BN LHS, have also been discussed based on DFT theory [117]. The work promotes the understanding of the evolution of the characteristics of the graphene/BN heterostructures’ growth. Because of a small mismatch of phosphorene and graphene along the armchair direction, in-plane phosphorene/graphene heterostructures(aPNR/aGNR) can be built, as shown in Fig. 4d [118]. The theoretical results imply that the electronic properties, such as bandgaps of the heterostructure, can be tuned by the widths of GNR and PNR. Furthermore, the doping hydrogen in the heterostructures can reduce the bandgap and induce transition from semiconductor to metal. A two-probe graphene/phosphorene/graphene device has been designed, which behaves with tunneling transport characteristics.
The electronic transport properties of four different edge contacts (armchair–armchair, armchair–zigzag, zigzag–zigzag, zigzag–armchair) between graphene and MoS2 have been studied [119]. The MoS2 become more metallic because of the gap state from the interface. The difference potential of the four contact geometries implies that the interface plays an important role in carrier transport of graphene/MoS2 junctions. The structure preference with C–S or C–Mo on growth condition, the charge transfer, and the mid-gap states of the boundary in the lateral graphene–MoS2 interface have also been discussed [120]. These properties are helpful in future electronic device design.
3 Applications of LHSs: Electronic and Photoelectronic Devices
3.1 Electronic Devices
Electronic devices based on lateral heterostructures, such as FETs [121,122,123], resonators [124], and logic circuits [125], which exhibit unique device properties, have been fabricated. In FET devices based on graphene/h-BN heterostructure film, the drain current, which is along and perpendicular to the heterostructure, has been measured, as shown in Fig. 5a, b [124]. The inset depicts the linear I–V curves obtained in zero gate, which implies tunable transport properties under different biases. The calculated mobilities of the two devices are ~ 1700 and 520 cm2 v−1 s−1, respectively, which exhibit good field-effect mobility. Moreover, such devices have good plane integration properties. With this kind of heterostructure, flat electrically isolated graphene devices can be fabricated [126]. Monolayer h-BN has a sheet resistance larger than 400 TΩ. Two-terminal devices and their I–V characteristics are shown in Fig. 5c. Graphene contact devices show conducting behavior, and h-BN contact device shows insulator behaviors. The electrically isolated graphene devices can be used in ultra-flat three-dimensional electronics.
Electrical measurement of graphene/h-BN FET with current flowing a along the stripes and b perpendicular to the stripes (inset: C–V curves and diagram of the device). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. c Optical image of graphene/h-BN heterostructure with electrodes on the graphene (indicated by the dash lines) and two-terminal current–voltage curves of different devices. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [126]. d Transfer and transconductance (gm) plots of graphene–MoS2 FETs at Vds = 1 V. e Output plots of graphene–MoS2 FETs at gate voltage ranging from 0 to 5 V. f Field-effect mobility of different MoS2 FETs, including as-grown, transferred MoS2, and graphene–MoS2 FETs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [121]. g Linear regression (Rsquare) in Id–Vds at different temperatures (normalized with the Id at Vds = 1 V). h Measured Schottky barrier of MoS2–graphene and MoS2–metal FETs. i Noise amplitude of MoS2–graphene and MoS2–metal FETs at different Vg. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123]. j Optical image of NbS2–WS2 FET device. k Transport property of NbS2–WS2 FET. l Output plots of NbS2–WS2 FET at different backward voltages. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [122]
Lateral graphene–TMDC heterostructures exhibit some good electronic properties. Top-gate FETs with graphene as source and drain and with MoS2 as channel, have an on/off ratio of ~ 109 and maximum transconductance gm of ~ 6 µs [121]. The transfer and transconductance (gm) curves are shown in Fig. 5d, and the inset depicts the schematic diagram of the FETs. The output curves in the gate voltages range of 0–5 V are shown in Fig. 5e. The mobility of this FET is also higher than that of an as-grown and transferred MoS2, which is shown in Fig. 5f. Compared with the MoS2–metal heterostructures FETs, the MoS2–graphene FETs have a lower Schottky barrier [123]. Linear regression (Rsquare) in Id–Vds at different temperatures is plotted in Fig. 5g. To get knowledge on the linearity of the Id–Vds trends in MoS2–graphene and MoS2–metal FETs, the inset is plotted at a temperature of 270 K. Compared with MoS2–graphene FETs, MoS2–metal FETs have larger nonlinearity in the Id–Vds curves, which means the presence of a larger barrier. The Schottky barrier extracted from Arrhenius measurements in different Vg shows that the MoS2–metal heterostructures FETs have a larger barrier, as shown in Fig. 5h. In Fig. 5i, it is shown that the MoS2–graphene heterostructures also have lower noise than the MoS2–metal devices, because of the lower barrier in the contact.
Based on TMDC–TMDC heterostructures, NbS2 and WS2 FETs have been built [122]. The triangular NbS2 and WS2 lateral heterostructure is etched as a ribbon, and then Cr/Au is deposited on the ribbon as electrons. The optical image is shown in Fig. 5j. The transfer characteristic curves of this device are shown in Fig. 5k, which show an n-type behavior. The device has a large on–off ratio of 105. The output characteristic (Ids–Vds) is shown in Fig. 5l. The Ids decreases with the Vds from 80 to 30 V. From the output characteristic, a current rectification behavior can be observed. Although the calculated field-effect mobility is 0.14 cm2 V−1 s−1, the electronic properties can be improved in the future. The devices are hopeful future integrated electric devices and integrated circuit applications.
3.2 Optoelectronic Devices
The optoelectronic properties of lateral heterostructure devices have been investigated intensively. Some optoelectronic devices exhibit superior optical performance [127,128,129,130]. In lateral graphene–TMDC heterostructures, photons excite electron–hole pairs from the TMDC and rapidly transfer the electrons to the graphene in the Schottky junction, which provides a good photoresponse property. The lateral graphene–WSe2–graphene photodetecting transistors exhibit photoresponsivity reaching up to 121 A W−1 under 2.7 × 105 mW cm−2 illumination, as shown in Fig. 6a, b; the photoresponsivity of on (Vg = 30 V) and off (Vg = 0 V) states is given under different laser powers [127]. In Fig. 6c, d, the photoresponsivities of the heterostructure with two different structures are measured in the same experimental conditions, and the lateral heterostructures synthesized with CVD method have better photoresponsivities than those of the transferred heterostructure. The superior photoresponsivities of the devices are mainly attributed to the low barrier in the graphene and WSe2 contact. The band diagram of graphene–WSe2–graphene heterostructures is depicted in Fig. 6e, f. The structure grown with CVD method has smaller contact resistance and lower barrier than the transferred structure, which promote electron transfer and increase photoresponsivity. With lateral graphene–MoS2 heterostructures, the photodetector has a specific detectivity D* of up to 1.4 × 1014, which is of importance in future applications [129].
Photoresponsivity of graphene–WS2–graphene under a 0 V, b 30 V gate voltage. Photoresponsivity of FET formed by c transferring, and d CVD method. e, f Devices and band diagram of graphene–WS2–graphene FETs made by transfer and CVD method. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [127]. g Diagram of photodiode built with WSe2–WS2 heterostructure. h Optical image of the photodiode in g. i Drain current of the WSe2–WS2 photodiode without light illumination. j Transport curves (Ids–Vds) under different illumination powers (Vg = 0). k Transport curves in voltage ranging from − 0.5 to 0.5 V. l Band alignment of the WSe2–WS2 heterostructure with zero bias. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [130]
Because of their desirable type-II band alignment, TMDC–TMDC LHSs have attracted a lot of attention. The type-II band alignment promotes the separation of electrons and holes, leads to the long lifetime of photoexcited charge carriers, and reduces the recombination of electrons and holes at the surface. Heterostructures with type-II band alignment is suitable for optoelectronic device design. The schematic and optical image of a lateral doped WSe2–WS2 heterojunction photodiode [130] built by CVD method is shown in Fig. 6g, h. The drain current of the device changing with gate voltage in Fig. 6i without illumination indicates the p-type behavior of the materials. The electronic transfer curves under different illumination powers ranging from 0 to 0.59 mW in Fig. 6j, k show that the photocurrent becomes larger when the illumination power increases. In Fig. 6l, because of the type-II band alignment diagram at the zero bias, the electrons prefer to migrate from WSe2 to WS2. A forward bias can easily shift the electrons, but a reverse bias cannot always shift the electrons in the reverse direction. The highest photoresponsivity of this device is 6.5 A W−1 in a light illumination of 0.32 µW at a wavelength of 532 nm. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of this heterostructure can also reach up to 15.2%. Above results confirm that WSe2–WS2 heterostructures are proper elements for high-performance optoelectronic devices.
3.3 Brief Summary
In order to obtain a brief insight on LHSs, we list typical LHSs in Table 2. In this table, we summarized the main properties of the LHSs, including structures, properties, remarkable parameters and performances, synthesis, and applicable devices.
4 The Experimental Synthesis of LHSs
The excellent properties of the LHSs discussed above inspire more works about the synthesis of LHSs. It is expected that the synthesis of LHSs can promote more device applications. In this section, we review the experimental synthesis of the LHSs.
Although the previous proposed LHS devices have great performance, their applications are hindered by the synthesis technology. Recently, with the developments in synthesis technology, many LHS devices, such as graphene heterostructures and graphene devices, have been successfully fabricated. Graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions were synthesized with a bottom-up method in 2014. These devices behave in a similar way to traditional p-n junctions [131]. Moreover, width-modulated armchair graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions have also been synthesized with a bottom-up method [132]. In LHS synthesis, CVD methods are the most widely used and effective ways. These CVD methods can be classified as one-step, two-step, and multi-step growths according to the process steps. One-step growth is a self-assembled process where it is difficult to control the shape and size of the interface. The two-step and multi-step methods move forward in solving these difficulties by introducing additional process steps. Different LHSs have been synthesized through one-step growth, two-step, and multi-step growths and some other methods. We summarized the synthesis methods for LHSs as follows.
4.1 CVD Synthesis Route I: One-Step Growth
The lateral graphene–h-BN heterostructure was synthesized. In 2010, an h-BN and graphene heterostructure was synthesized using a CVD method, which randomly distributed h-BN and graphene domains in the monolayer hybrid structure. The hybrid structure has a different bandgap compared to those of h-BN and graphene [133]. Fabricated h-BN and graphene LHSs with one-step growth are scarce; nonetheless, TMDC LHS fabrication with this method has developed a lot. TMDCs, especially MoS2 and WSe2, are extremely popular 2D materials which were used to build 2D heterostructures. These structures usually have type-II band alignment, which is desirable and can be used to build potential electronic and optoelectronic devices [134]. The synthesis of TMDC heterostructures had drawn the interest of many researchers and was developed very fast. In 2014, Duan et al. built WS2–WSe2 and MoS2–MoSe2 LHSs laterally through an epitaxial process with the CVD synthesis method. The built heterostructure has a gradual and seamless interface and exhibits good electronic and optical properties [21]. Gong et al. reported a one-step synthesis method for the creation of both vertical and lateral WS2–MoS2 heterostructures with a vapor-phase growth process. The monolayer WS2 vertically grown on the MoS2 forms a bilayer heterostructure in high temperature, and the WS2 laterally grown on the edge of MoS2 forms an in-plane heterostructure in a lower temperature [135]. The lateral structure has a clean and atomically sharp interface. The LHS can serve as an intrinsic p-n diode without external gating. A one-step atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) strategy is proposed to synthesize a lateral WS2–MoS2 heterostructure, which is simplified and low cost. The built heterostructure has a high-quality, sharp subnanometer interface. The built-in potential of the heterostructure has been characterized, which is significant in future photoelectrical applications [136]. The 2D WS2/Mo1−xWxS2/WS2 LHSs with a concise one-step CVD method on Si substrates have been achieved, by which the formation of different structure components of the LHSs was tuned by the growth temperature and chronology [137]. With the synthesis technology development of 2D heterostructures, time–temperature–architecture (TTA) diagrams were proposed to describe the synthesis of MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = Se, S) heterostructures with the single-step CVD method [138]. With control over the CVD process, the different structures, such as lateral, vertical, or hybrid, and alloys, can be synthesized, respectively. The time and temperature are the main factors to control the process. The established TTA framework generalizes the one-step CVD process and complemented the works mainly on vertical heterostructures and alloys, also concerned with LHS synthesis. This diagram may promote applications of the synthesis technique.
Graded doped lateral WSe2–WS2 heterostructure has been fabricated using the one-step growth technique in ambient pressure [130]. The one-step CVD method only has one heating cycle, showing merits of simplicity and cheapness. The elemental substitution enables graded composition distribution and provides a tunable bandgap, which reduces the large band bending at the interface. The one-step growth can be divided into three processes, as shown in Fig. 7a. The monolayer WS2 is grown first, followed by the epitaxial growth of WS2 doped with Se, and then, the central part is converted into WSe2 because of the overloaded Se. To confirm this, the second and third processes are further observed in an experiment. In the second process, WS2 epitaxial growth is achieved with overloaded S. The Raman image in Fig. 7b depicts the structure of WS2 in the center region. Se-doped WS2 can be observed at the edge from Fig. 7c. The nonexistent peak of WSe2 in the Raman shift in Fig. 7d confirms that epitaxial growth happened in this process. After processing in the furnace for the third step, S-doped WSe2 is clearly shown in Fig. 7e, f in the central region. The appearing WSe2 peak in the Raman spectra in Fig. 7g indicates the formation of WSe2. With this method, graded doped lateral heterostructures can be synthesized through the above-mentioned three sequential processes.
a Growth processes of doped WSe2–WS2 LHS. Raman image of the sample in b–d second and e–g third process. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [130]
4.2 CVD Synthesis Route II: Two-Step Growth
Because the mentioned one-step growth techniques are self-assembled, it is difficult to control the shape and size of the heterostructures. In this section, we discuss mainly the two-step growth process based on CVD method, including metal/semiconductor contact (graphene–h-BN, graphene–TMDC) and semiconductor/semiconductor contact (TMDC–TMDC) LHSs, in which most researchers are interested.
4.2.1 The Two-Step Growth of M/S LHSs
In 2012, hybrid graphene and hexagonal boron nitride sheets have been synthesized with a two-step CVD method. The graphene was grown from Cu foil, and then, the h-BN grew from the graphene grains on the bare Cu foils [139]. The h-BN/graphene heterostructures with spatial control were fabricated [126], which was combined with photolithography and etching techniques. The graphene layer was first grown with the CVD method, then patterned with photolithography, and had the unwanted areas etched, followed by the selective growth of the h-BN layer. The LHSs have high carrier mobility and plane integration, which are suitable for integrated circuit fabrication. An in-plane monolayer graphene and h-BN heterostructure, which has controlled shape, sharp interface, and large size, has been built with similar synthesis methods [124]. The LHSs have nice portability, which can be easily transferred to other platforms. The sequence of growing such a structure is different from the previous one; the h-BN film is grown first with the CVD method and had some h-BN lithographically etched, followed by the growth of graphene on the etched area. Furthermore, a graphene and h-BN heterostructure with a straight-line interface has been demonstrated along the graphene crystallographic orientation with an APCVD method [140]. The graphene is grown on the Cu foil, followed by the h-BN grown from the graphene template. The sharpness of the interface can be controlled by the conditions during growth. A zigzag boundary graphene and h-BN heterostructure has been achieved with a two-step CVD method on Cu foil; the zigzag boundaries were formed with a hydrogen etch, and the h-BN can keep the lattice orientation of graphene [141].
In 2016, lateral graphene–MoS2 heterostructure synthesized with aromatic molecules as the seed has been reported [142]. The process is illustrated simply in Fig. 8a. The aromatic molecules are used to control the reaction speed. The monolayer graphene was first transferred on the substrate as seed, followed by the aromatic molecules sowed on the nearby bare substrate which made a hydrophilic surface; the second layer MoS2 can grow rapidly along the first layer. The schematic diagram, optical image, and spectroscopy intensity mapping image of graphene–MoS2 heterostructure are given in Fig. 8b, c. This method can also provide a route for other 2D building blocks and plane-integrated device designs. Later, the lateral MoS2–graphene heterostructure is fabricated with seed-free direct growth method. The graphene flake is transformed on SiO2/Si substrate, and then, the MoS2 grows along the graphene with atmospheric pressure CVD method. The device based on it has high mobility and low noise, which has better performance than MoS2–metal devices [123]. Large-scale and high-quality graphene and WS2 LHS have been fabricated without using seeding. The graphene is synthesized first and then lithographically etched by oxygen plasma. The WS2 is selectively grown on the etched area, forming a film. The LHS has an ohmic contact between graphene and n-doped WS2 [143]. A graphene/MoS2/graphene LHS has been fabricated with a similar two-step method. The MoS2 was grown between two stripes of graphene on Cu foil. The photodetector based on it has a quick photoresponse and specific detectivity [128].
a Schematic diagram of the synthesis of parallel-stitched 2D-TMDC heterostructure. b, d, f Schematic diagrams of graphene–MoS2, WS2–MoS2, and h-BN–MoS2. c, e, g Optical image and spectroscopy intensity mapping images of graphene–MoS2, WS2–MoS2, and h-BN–MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [142]
4.2.2 The Two-Step Growth of S/S LHSs
With the one-step process, it is difficult to grow p-n heterostructures like WSe2–MoS2, in which both the metal and chalcogen elements are changed at the same time. The two-step growth methods can overcome these difficulties. In 2015, a lateral WSe2–MoS2 heterostructure was synthesized with the two-step lateral epitaxial growth method. The process avoided alloy formation and formed an atomically sharp interface. Although there is a large lattice mismatch, the method provides a reliable means to produce monolayer components for future monolayer electronics [144]. Almost at the same time, Gong et al. demonstrated a two-step CVD method for growing TMDCs heterostructures: The MoSe2 was grown first and then the WSe2 epitaxy grew on the edge and on top of the MoSe2 layer. With control over the growth time, different types of heterostructures can be formed. Because the size of each 2D component can be controlled, the two-step methods can grow large heterostructures with sizes of up to 169 µm, and the cross-contamination can be reduced, compared with the one-step growth method [145]. Chen et al. used a simplified two-step CVD technique to fabricate an in-plane MoS2–WS2 heterostructure with a facile growth process in ambient pressure. The lateral heterojunctions behave as intrinsic p–n diodes and clearly exhibit the photovoltaic effect. The technique can potentially be applied to the growth of TMDC superlattices [146].
The method with aromatic molecules as seeds, which can accelerate growth, can also be used to synthesize TMDC–TMDC and h-BN–TDMC lateral heterostructures [142], as shown in Fig. 8a. This general method has been successfully applied in fabricating the graphene–TMDC heterostructure, which is mentioned in the previous section. This method is expected to have a large-scale production capability. With this method, the 2D materials and TMDC parallel-stitched heterostructure can be formed, without consideration for the lattice mismatch. The schematic diagram of WS2–MoS2 and h-BN–MoS2 heterostructures, and the optical image and spectroscopy intensity mapping image of these two heterostructures are depicted in Fig. 8d, f and e, g, respectively. The boundary of the heterostructure is marked with the white dash lines, and the heterojunction structure is confirmed with an optical image of the AFM in the inset picture, which shows the clear interface of the heterojunction. A large-area, high-quality, mosaic MoS2–MoSe2 LHS was synthesized with a two-step CVD method. In this method, the triangle monolayer MoS2 is synthesized first, and then, the MoSe2 is grown along the MoS2 edges, filling the black of the substrate, which forms a clear interface. The photodetector based on the heterojunction film exhibits perfect photoresponse performance. The method can provide a route for other mosaic lateral heterojunction films, which may have optimal photoelectric properties [22]. A novel two-step growth method with and without ion exchange has been demonstrated. If the MoS2 grows first in 730 °C, then the WSe2 grows at 875 °C, the selenium atoms replace the sulfur atoms, and the WSe2 and MoSe2 heterostructure are formed. If the growth is in reverse order, the WSe2 grows at 875 °C first and then the MoS2 grows in 730 °C, and the WSe2 and MoS2 heterostructure can be formed without ion exchange. Using this method, the monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 domain sizes can grow up to 100 µm on SiO2/Si substrates [147].
4.3 CVD Synthesis Route III: Multi-step Growth
With the development of the one-step and two-step growth methods, many lateral heterostructures, which grow the second materials at the edge of the first materials, have been synthesized. However, it is still difficult to synthesize lateral heterostructures with multiple distinct materials blocks, which need continuous growth steps [148]. In the CVD process, the sequential growth cannot tolerate thermal-induced degradation. In addition, it is hard to control the chemical vapor sources in different temperature stages, which may lead to unwanted homogeneous nucleation. Therefore, the synthesized monolayer must endure the temperature and chemical environment swing in multiple steps. The unwanted homogeneous nucleation must be minimized. A step-by-step thermal CVD process has been designed, as shown in Fig. 9a. The source power is heated in a flow of argon carrier gas for each step, and the epitaxial layer is grown at the edge of the last monolayer crystal. To overcome the problem of excessive thermal degradation and uncontrolled nucleation in the multiple steps, a reverse flow is used to flush the existing monolayer materials on the substrate during the temperature swing. The forward flow is only applied at the exact growth temperature. With precise control over each step, the heterostructure, multi-junction heterostructure, and superlattices can be fabricated, as shown in Fig. 9b. Moreover, the built multi-junction heterostructure and superlattice have sharp interfaces, which provide desirable electronic properties. This method also provides a path to complex heterostructure synthesis with controlled location and orientation.
a Schematic diagram of multi-step CVD system for the growth of lateral heterostructures. b Schematic diagram of monolayer seed A, A–B heterostructure, A–B–C multi-heterostructure, and A–B–A–B superlattice. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [148]. Optical image of c three-junction and d, e five-junction MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure; the thickness of MoSe2 can be distinguished with different colors. f Optical image of seven-junction MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure with different domain widths. g Raman and photoluminescence spectra of positions 1–4 in c. h PL intensity maps for the heterojunction in d. i Contour color plots of the normalized PL intensity of three and five junctions. j HAADF-STEM image of the sharp interface of MoSe2–WSe2 heterojunction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [149]. (Color figure online)
A one-pot synthesis method provides a solution to synthesize lateral multi-junction TMDC heterostructures [149]. MoSe2–WSe2 multi-junction heterostructures have been synthesized by controlling the gas-switching cycles. The number of junctions is determined by the cycles, and the domain size is controlled by the growth time of each cycle. The optical image in Fig. 9c indicates the synthesis of lateral three-junction MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure, which has a size of up to 285 µm. As shown in the inset of Fig. 9c, the darker region is MoSe2 and the brighter region is WSe2. The optical images of five-junction heterostructure with different thicknesses are shown in Fig. 9d, e. The optical image of seven-junction heterostructure with different domain widths is depicted in Fig. 9f. The Raman and photoluminescence spectra can further confirm the composition distribution of the heterojunctions. The measured Raman spectra and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of positions 1, 2, 3, and 4 in Fig. 9c are demonstrated in Fig. 9g. The phone modes of positions 1 and 3 correspond to MoSe2, and the phone modes of positions 2 and 4 correspond to WSe2. The spatial distribution of the lateral heterojunction can also be confirmed with the Raman spectra. According to the PL spectra, there is a peak at around 1.52 eV for MoSe2 in regions 1 and 3 and a peak at around 1.6 eV for WSe2 in regions 2 and 4. The photoluminescence intensity maps for MoSe2 in 1.52 eV and for WSe2 in 1.6 eV are depicted in Fig. 9h. The composite photoluminescence map in the right panel of Fig. 9h exhibits the alternating concentric triangle domains. The contour plots of the normalized photoluminescence can characterize the interface quality; the three junctions and five junctions along the arrows in the inset are shown in Fig. 9i. From the left panel in Fig. 9i, it can be seen that the MoSe2 peak at 1.53 eV gradually shifts to the WSe2 peak at 1.6 eV in the first junction (labeled as ‘1’ in the figure). Nevertheless, the junctions in positions 2 and 3 have an abrupt shift, which indicates a sharp interface with fewer alloys. The sharp interface and high-quality crystal are confirmed in Fig. 9j with high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM). With the above methods, the high-quality multi-junction heterostructure and superlattice can be fabricated.
The CVD method can also be adopted to fabricate thickness-modulated LHSs. Zhang et al. formed bilayer–monolayer (BL–ML) thickness terraces with zigzag orientation lateral heterojunction with the CVD method, with which the second layer TMDC was grown on the monolayer TMDC [150]. The layer-modulated gap processed the type-I band alignment, which is different to the other CVD-method-synthesized type-II band alignment. He et al. [151] used the CVD method and obtained the different layers of MoSe2 junctions with uniform and smooth domain boundaries, which depend mainly on the control of temperature. It is a wonderful example on building layer-controlled large-scale 2D materials and heterojunctions.
4.4 Synthesis Methods Other Than CVD
Many other methods have been proposed for the synthesis of LHSs. A lateral MoSe2–MoS2 heterojunction has been fabricated with electron beam lithography [152], as shown in Fig. 10a: The monolayer MoSe2 was first synthesized with CVD method followed by the deposition of SiO2 as a mask, lithographically patterned with e-beam, and had the uncovered part converted into MoS2 by pulsed laser vaporization of sulfur. To totally complete the conversion, the substrate temperature of MoSe2 should be higher than 600 °C, and the laser-vaporized sulfur pulses should be higher than 300. The total conversion is proved by the Raman and PL spectroscopy. The optical and atomic force microscopy images of monolayer MoSe2 are shown in Fig. 10b. The contrast of Raman maps between original MoSe2 and converted MoS2 is shown in Fig. 10c. The Raman and PL spectra of monolayer region before and after the conversion process are shown in Fig. 10d. It can be seen that the MoSe2 completely converted to MoS2 with this method and also lateral heterostructures and array can be formed, which can provide a sharp heterojunction interface (~ 5 nm) with easy spatial control. Different from the conversion method using sulfur plume, the laser-assisted method has been proven to be an effective way to modify the TMDCs, which can replace selenium with sulfur atoms [153], as shown in Fig. 11a. The photoconversion process happens in a controlled reactive gas environment. The spatially localized photoconversion process can form a TMDC heterostructure. The experimental conversion has been realized in suspended WSe2 and MoSe2 monolayer, with laser-induced modification in H2S environment. The selenide atoms can change to sulfide atoms in the process with the assistance of a laser whose power is in the range of 0.3–1 mW. The Raman peak intensities of WSe2 in H2S change with exposure time in Fig. 11b: The A1g mode of WSe2 decreases over time, suggesting the reduction in W–Se chemical bonds; on the contrary, the A1g and \(E_{{2{\text{g}}}}^{1}\) of WS2 increase with time. It is suggested that the sulfur atoms increase in the lattices with exposure time. The Raman and PL spectra for different exposure times in Fig. 11c, d show that the chemical conversion from WSe2 to WS2 happened with the laser exposure time. This method provides an effective way to construct in-plane lateral heterojunctions.
a Illustration of the steps for the formation of MoSe2–MoS2 heterojunction. b Optical and AFM images of MoSe2 in the size of ~ 40 μm. c Raman maps of the nanosheet before and after the conversion process (400 pulses at 700 °C). d Raman and PL spectra of original MoSe2 and converted MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [152]
a Schematics illustration of laser-induced chalcogen atom exchange in H2S environment. b Raman intensity of WSe2 and WS2 under laser irradiation (523 nm, 0.7 mW) in H2S environment. c Raman spectra in different exposure times. d PL spectra in different times. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [153]
Strain as an effective way to modify the physical properties of materials is a hopeful technique to realize the LHSs. The strain engineering of materials has been proposed for a long time. The 2D graphene has superior mechanical property, which can sustain elastic deformation of more than 25%. The wrinkles fabricated by applying uniaxial strain lead to additional damping on the graphene. The wrinkles on ReSe2 also have been achieved by introducing local strain [87] in the process shown in Fig. 3a–d. The monolayer ReSe2 is obtained by mechanical exfoliation method from ReSe2 crystal. Then, it is deposited on elastomeric substrates, which are prestretched by 30–100%. The wrinkles on ReSe2 can be formed by releasing the prestrain of elastomeric substrates. The defect tuned by the stress can provide a way to generate electrical gap and tune the optical properties.
The surface morphology of the substrate can also induce strain on the 2D materials. For example, the strain ripples have been generated by transferring the graphene membrane on the substrate which is corrugated by an array of SiO2 nanopillars [91], as shown in Fig. 3e. The different patterns of strain can be tuned by adjusting the pillar array geometry (size and separation) of the substrate. The atomic force micrograph of graphene deposited on SiO2 nanopillars in Fig. 3f provides geometry information on nanopillar arrays. The schematic steps of transferring graphene onto the nanopillar arrays are shown in Fig. 3g. The graphene is synthesized by the CVD method on the copper foil. Then, the SiO2 substrate is etched into nanopillars. The graphene is deposited on the substrate after acid-etching the copper foil under the graphene. Different nanopillar arrays induce different strain distributions in graphene. With the high-density arrays (a < a*), the graphene is suspended between the nanopillars. With the low-density arrays (a > a*), the graphene is fitted on the substrate, with highly symmetric rippers. Depending on the array geometry and pitch, graphene film can conform on the substrate, partially collapse, fakir-like, or suspend. The different configurations of strain domain will provide tunability for the electronic properties.
Through CVD, thermal [154] and plasma treatments [155] have been used to realize LHSs. The methods need multi-step fabrication processes and can apply only on specific materials. A simple micromechanical exfoliation technique is also used to form a mono–multilayer MoS2 type-I heterojunction [56]. This structure can exhibit some good photoelectric properties. Along this way, the lateral junction modulated by the thickness can be fabricated. Using bipolar electrodeposition (BPE) technique, Jamilpanah et al. [156] built a lateral heterostructure with type-I and II band alignments. Because of the renewal of the BPE technique in materials science, a one-step method including a quick growth of gradients of molybdenum sulfide and oxides along a conductive substrate was proposed. The experiment is processed at room temperature and requires only cheap experimental equipment. All these methods provide feasible means to conduct the synthesis of 2D lateral heterostructures, which provide potential prospects in future nanoscale devices.
5 Perspectives
In this review, we summarized the physical properties of LHSs that can be tuned by the structures (interface, width, nanohole, and thickness), doping, passivation, strain, and dielectric. The device applications and experimental synthesis of LHSs have also been discussed. One-step, two-step, and multi-step growths based on CVD and other growth techniques have been used in the synthesis of heterogeneous junctions. Although there are a large number of works about LHSs, there are still a lot of unsolved issues. For example, in view of the tunable mechanisms, the doping- and passivation-induced heterogeneous junctions are seldom investigated, although the doping and passivation have worked as effective tuning methods in homogeneous junctions. Among the fields of LHSs, researchers pay most attention to the differences in materials in the heterogeneous junctions but neglect the geometrical effects on the properties of heterogeneous junctions. The strain or dielectric modulation has been used to construct homogeneous junctions, but there are very few works published so far. There is a lot of work that needs to be done. In view of the synthesis, the biggest challenge is to develop synthesis technology to fabricate homogeneous junctions where structures, doping, and passivation are precisely controlled. Studies of LHSs offer opportunities to design novel electronic, spin, and optical devices with desirable high performance.
References
K.S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T.J. Booth, V.V. Khotkevich, S.V. Morozov, A.K. Geim, Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(30), 10451–10453 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502848102
K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696), 666–669 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896
M.J. Allen, V.C. Tung, R.B. Kaner, Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem. Rev. 110(1), 132–145 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900070d
A.H.C. Neto, F. Guinea, N.M.R. Peres, K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(1), 109–162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109
C.L. Tan, X.H. Cao, X.J. Wu, Q.Y. He, J. Yang et al., Recent advances in ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 117(9), 6225–6331 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00558
M. Xu, T. Liang, M. Shi, H. Chen, Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem. Rev. 113(5), 3766–3798 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300263a
Y. Lin, T.V. Williams, J.W. Connell, Soluble, exfoliated hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1(1), 277–283 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz9002108
Q.H. Weng, X.B. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Bando, D. Golberg, Functionalized hexagonal boron nitride nanomaterials: emerging properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45(14), 3989–4012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00869g
R. Lv, J.A. Robinson, R.E. Schaak, D. Sun, Y.F. Sun, T.E. Mallouk, M. Terrones, Transition metal dichalcogenides and beyond: synthesis, properties, and applications of single- and few-layer nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 48(1), 56–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5002846
C.L. Tan, H. Zhang, Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(9), 2713–2731 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00182f
H. Liu, Y.C. Du, Y.X. Deng, P.D. Ye, Semiconducting black phosphorus: synthesis, transport properties and electronic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(9), 2732–2743 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00257a
P.F. Chen, N. Li, X.Z. Chen, W.J. Ong, X.J. Zhao, The rising star of 2D black phosphorus beyond graphene: synthesis, properties and electronic applications. 2D Mater. 5(1), 014002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa8d37
A. Kara, H. Enriquez, A.P. Seitsonen, L. Voon, S. Vizzini, B. Aufray, H. Oughaddou, A review on silicene-new candidate for electronics. Surf. Sci. Rep. 67(1), 1–18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2011.10.001
B. Hunt, J.D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, A.F. Young, M. Yankowitz, B.J. LeRoy et al., Massive dirac fermions and hofstadter butterfly in a van der waals heterostructure. Science 340(6139), 1427–1430 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237240
L. Britnell, R.M. Ribeiro, A. Eckmann, R. Jalil, B.D. Belle et al., Strong light-matter interactions in heterostructures of atomically thin films. Science 340(6138), 1311–1314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235547
A.K. Geim, I.V. Grigorieva, Van der waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12385
W. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, A.T.S. Wee, Van der waals stacked 2D layered materials for optoelectronics. 2D Mater. 3(2), 022001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/022001
L. Britnell, R.V. Gorbachev, R. Jalil, B.D. Belle, F. Schedin et al., Field-effect tunneling transistor based on vertical graphene heterostructures. Science 335(6071), 947–950 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218461
T. Georgiou, R. Jalil, B.D. Belle, L. Britnell, R.V. Gorbachev et al., Vertical field-effect transistor based on graphene–WS2 heterostructures for flexible and transparent electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(2), 100–103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.224
Y.Z. Xue, Y.P. Zhang, Y. Liu, H.T. Liu, J.C. Song et al., Scalable production of a few-layer MoS2/WS2 vertical heterojunction array and its application for photodetectors. ACS Nano 10(1), 573–580 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05596
X. Duan, C. Wang, J.C. Shaw, R. Cheng, Y. Chen et al., Lateral epitaxial growth of two-dimensional layered semiconductor heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(12), 1024–1030 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.222
X. Chen, Y. Qiu, H. Yang, G. Liu, W. Zheng, W. Feng, W. Cao, W. Hu, P. Hu, In-plane mosaic potential growth of large-area 2D layered semiconductors MoS2–MoSe2 lateral heterostructures and photodetector application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 9(2), 1684–1691 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13379
C.Y. Lin, X. Zhu, S.H. Tsai, S.P. Tsai, S.D. Lei et al., Atomic-monolayer two-dimensional lateral quasi-heterojunction bipolar transistors with resonant tunneling phenomenon. ACS Nano 11(11), 11015–11023 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b05012
M.Y. Li, J. Pu, J.K. Huang, Y. Miyauchi, K. Matsuda, T. Takenobu, L.J. Li, Self-aligned and scalable growth of monolayer WSe2–MoS2 lateral heterojunctions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(17), 1706860 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706860
D.R. Chen, M. Hofmann, H.M. Yao, S.K. Chiu, S.H. Chen, Y.R. Luo, C.C. Hsu, Y.P. Hsieh, Lateral two-dimensional material heterojunction photodetectors with ultrahigh speed and detectivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 11(6), 6384–6388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b19093
P. Solis-Fernandez, M. Bissett, H. Ago, Synthesis, structure and applications of graphene-based 2D heterostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(15), 4572–4613 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00160f
R. Frisenda, E. Navarro-Moratalla, P. Gant, D.P. De Lara, P. Jarillo-Herrero, R.V. Gorbachev, A. Castellanos-Gomez, Recent progress in the assembly of nanodevices and van der waals heterostructures by deterministic placement of 2D materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(1), 53–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00556c
H. Wang, F.C. Liu, W. Fu, Z.Y. Fang, W. Zhou, Z. Liu, Two-dimensional heterostructures: fabrication, characterization, and application. Nanoscale 6(21), 12250–12272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr03435j
K.S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, A.H.C. Neto, 2D materials and van der waals heterostructures. Science 353(aac6298), 9439 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9439
S.J. Haigh, A. Gholinia, R. Jalil, S. Romani, L. Britnell et al., Cross-sectional imaging of individual layers and buried interfaces of graphene-based heterostructures and superlattices. Nat. Mater. 11(9), 764–767 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3386
W. Yang, G. Chen, Z. Shi, C.C. Liu, L. Zhang et al., Epitaxial growth of single-domain graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 12(9), 792–797 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3695
D. Logoteta, G. Fiori, G. Iannaccone, Graphene-based lateral heterostructure transistors exhibit better intrinsic performance than graphene-based vertical transistors as post-CMOS devices. Sci. Rep. 4, 6607 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06607
P. Chen, Z. Zhang, X. Duan, X. Duan, Chemical synthesis of two-dimensional atomic crystals, heterostructures and superlattices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(9), 3129–3151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00887B
X. Cai, Y. Luo, B. Liu, H.M. Cheng, Preparation of 2D material dispersions and their applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(16), 6224–6266 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00254A
K. Chen, X. Wan, J. Xu, Epitaxial stitching and stacking growth of atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenides(TMDCs) heterojunctions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(19), 1603884 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201603884
Z. Cai, B. Liu, X. Zou, H.M. Cheng, Chemical vapor deposition growth and applications of two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Chem. Rev. 118(13), 6091–6133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00536
Y.W. Son, M.L. Cohen, S.G. Louie, Energy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(21), 216803 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216803
M.Y. Han, B. Özyilmaz, Y. Zhang, P. Kim, Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(20), 206805 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206805
G.X. Wu, Q.Y. Meng, Y.H. Jing, Computational design for interconnection of graphene nanoribbons. Chem. Phys. Lett. 531, 119–125 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.01.084
G.X. Wu, C.L. Li, Y.H. Jing, C.Y. Wang, Y. Yang, Z.Q. Wang, Electronic transport properties of graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions with 5–7–5 ring defect. Comput. Mater. Sci. 95, 84–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.023
X.F. Li, L.L. Wang, K.Q. Chen, Y. Luo, Design of graphene–nanoribbon heterojunctions from first principles. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(25), 12616–12624 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202188t
X.F. Li, L.L. Wang, K.Q. Chen, Y. Luo, Electronic transport through zigzag/armchair graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24(9), 095801 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/24/9/095801
W. Zhang, C. Basaran, T. Ragab, Impact of geometry on transport properties of armchair graphene nanoribbon heterojunction. Carbon 124, 422–428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.005
L. Rosales, P. Orellana, Z. Barticevic, M. Pacheco, Transport properties of graphene nanoribbon heterostructures. Microelectron. J. 39(3), 537–540 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2007.07.080
M.D.S. Price, E. Cruz-Silva, A.L.M.T. Costa, F.M.D. Vasconcelos, E.C. Girão, S.B. Zhang, V. Meunier, Electronic and transport properties of graphene nanoribbon barbell-shaped heterojunctions. Phys. Status Solidi B 250(11), 2417–2423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201349224
Y. Li, F. Ma, Size and strain tunable band alignment of black-blue phosphorene lateral heterostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19(19), 12466–12472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP00940B
R. Li, X.W. Huang, X.Y. Ma, Z.L. Zhu, C. Li, C.X. Xia, Z.P. Zeng, Y. Jia, Even-odd oscillation of bandgaps in GeP3 nanoribbons and a tunable 1D lateral homogenous heterojunction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21(1), 275–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp06310a
F.P. Ouyang, S.L. Peng, Z.F. Liu, Z.R. Liu, Bandgap opening in graphene antidot lattices: the missing half. ACS Nano 5(5), 4023–4030 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn200580w
W. Liu, Z.F. Wang, Q.W. Shi, J.L. Yang, F. Liu, Band-gap scaling of graphene nanohole superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 80(23), 233405 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.233405
L. Rosales, M. Pacheco, Z. Barticevic, A. Leon, A. Latge, P.A. Orellana, Transport properties of antidot superlattices of graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 80(7), 073402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.073402
J.W. Bai, X. Zhong, S. Jiang, Y. Huang, X.F. Duan, Graphene nanomesh. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5(3), 190–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.8
W. Oswald, Z.G. Wu, Energy gaps in graphene nanomeshes. Phys. Rev. B 85(11), 115431 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115431
H.Y. Chen, K.H. Jin, H. Guo, B.J. Wang, A.O. Govorov, X.B. Niu, Z.M. Wang, Nanoperforated graphene with alternating gap switching for optical applications. Carbon 126, 480–488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.028
V.H. Nguyen, F. Mazzamuto, J. Saint-Martin, A. Bournel, P. Dollfus, Graphene nanomesh-based devices exhibiting a strong negative differential conductance effect. Nanotechnology 23(6), 065201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/6/065201
J. Zhang, W.X. Zhang, T. Ragab, C. Basaran, Mechanical and electronic properties of graphene nanomesh heterojunctions. Comput. Mater. Sci. 153, 64–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.026
M. Tosun, D.Y. Fu, S.B. Desai, C. Ko, J.S. Kang et al., MoS2 heterojunctions by thickness modulation. Sci. Rep. 5, 10990 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10990
T.B. Martins, R.H. Miwa, A.J.R. da Silva, A. Fazzio, Electronic and transport properties of boron-doped graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(19), 196803 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.196803
A. Lherbier, X. Blase, Y.M. Niquet, F. Triozon, S. Roche, Charge transport in chemically doped 2D graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(3), 036808 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.036808
D.C. Wei, Y.Q. Liu, Y. Wang, H.L. Zhang, L.P. Huang, G. Yu, Synthesis of n-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties. Nano Lett. 9(5), 1752–1758 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803279t
L.S. Panchokarla, K.S. Subrahmanyam, S.K. Saha, A. Govindaraj, H.R. Krishnamurthy, U.V. Waghmare, C.N.R. Rao, Synthesis, structure, and properties of boron- and nitrogen-doped graphene. Adv. Mater. 21(46), 4726–4730 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200901285
X.R. Wang, X.L. Li, L. Zhang, Y. Yoon, P.K. Weber, H.L. Wang, J. Guo, H.J. Dai, N-doping of graphene through electrothermal reactions with ammonia. Science 324(5928), 768–771 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170335
J.X. Zheng, X. Yan, L.L. Yu, H. Li, R. Qin et al., Family-dependent rectification characteristics in ultra-short graphene nanoribbon p–n junctions. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(17), 8547–8554 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp200982w
Y. Zhou, N. Qiu, R. Li, Z. Guo, J. Zhang et al., Negative differential resistance and rectifying performance induced by doped graphene nanoribbons p–n device. Phys. Lett. A 380(9), 1049–1055 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.01.010
D.H. Zhang, K.L. Yao, G.Y. Gao, The peculiar transport properties in p–n junctions of doped graphene nanoribbons. J. Appl. Phys. 110(1), 013718 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3605489
J. Zeng, K.Q. Chen, J. He, Z.Q. Fan, X.J. Zhang, Nitrogen doping-induced rectifying behavior with large rectifying ratio in graphene nanoribbons device. J. Appl. Phys. 109(12), 124502 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3600067
A. Pramanik, S. Sarkar, P. Sarkar, Doped GNR p–n junction as high performance NDR and rectifying device. J. Phys. Chem. C 116(34), 18064–18069 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp304582k
P. Zhao, D.S. Liu, S.J. Li, G. Chen, Giant low bias negative differential resistance induced by nitrogen doping in graphene nanoribbon. Chem. Phys. Lett. 554, 172–176 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.10.045
T. Chen, X.F. Li, L.L. Wang, K.W. Luo, L. Xu, Rectification induced in N AA2 -doped armchair graphene nanoribbon device. J. Appl. Phys. 116(1), 013702 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4884975
P. Zhao, D.S. Liu, S.J. Li, G. Chen, Modulation of rectification and negative differential resistance in graphene nanoribbon by nitrogen doping. Phys. Lett. A 377(15), 1134–1138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.02.048
Y.H. Zhou, J.J. Wu, P. He, T.F. Deng, S.Y. Du, C. Ye, The electronic transport properties in boron-doped armchair graphene nanoribbon junctions. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 7(8), 630–636 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1166/nnl.2015.2013
Y. Zhou, J. Zhang, D. Zhang, C. Ye, X. Miao, Phosphorus-doping-induced rectifying behavior in armchair graphene nanoribbons devices. J. Appl. Phys. 115(1), 013705 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4861176
J. Zeng, K.Q. Chen, J. He, X.J. Zhang, C.Q. Sun, Edge hydrogenation-induced spin-filtering and rectifying behaviors in the graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(50), 25072–25076 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp208248v
O.V. Yazyev, M.I. Katsnelson, Magnetic correlations at graphene edges: basis for novel spintronics devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(4), 047209 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.047209
L.H. Wang, Z.Z. Zhang, J.G. Zhao, B.J. Ding, Y. Guo, C. Jin, Bipolar spin-filtering effect in B- or N-doped zigzag graphene nanoribbons with asymmetric edge hydrogenation. Phys. Lett. A 379(43–44), 2860–2865 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.09.020
L.H. Wang, Z.Z. Zhang, J.G. Zhao, B.J. Ding, Y. Guo, Nitrogen doping position-dependent rectification of spin-polarized current and realization of multifunction in zigzag graphene nanoribbons with asymmetric edge hydrogenation. J. Electron. Mater. 45(2), 1165–1174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-4233-3
D. Zhang, M.Q. Long, X.J. Zhang, F.P. Ouyang, M.J. Li, H. Xu, Designing of spin-filtering devices in zigzag graphene nanoribbons heterojunctions by asymmetric hydrogenation and B–N doping. J. Appl. Phys. 117(1), 014311 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905503
J. Kunstmann, C. Ozdogan, A. Quandt, H. Fehske, Stability of edge states and edge magnetism in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 83(4), 045414 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.045414
I. Maity, K. Ghosh, H. Rahaman, P. Bhattacharyya, Spin dependent electronic transport in edge oxidized zigzag graphene nanoribbon. Mater. Today: Proc. 5(3), 9892–9898 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.10.184
C. Cao, L.N. Chen, M.Q. Long, W.R. Huang, H. Xu, Electronic transport properties on transition-metal terminated zigzag graphene nanoribbons. J. Appl. Phys. 111(11), 113708 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4723832
M. Nazirfakhr, A. Shahhoseini, Negative differential resistance and rectification effects in zigzag graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions: induced by edge oxidation and symmetry concept. Phys. Lett. A 382(10), 704–709 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.01.001
L.L. Cui, M.Q. Long, X.J. Zhang, X.M. Li, D. Zhang, B.C. Yang, Spin-dependent transport properties of hetero-junction based on zigzag graphene nanoribbons with edge hydrogenation and oxidation. Phys. Lett. A 380(5), 730–738 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.10.050
X.Q. Deng, Z.H. Zhang, G.P. Tang, Z.Q. Fan, C.H. Yang, Spin filter effects in zigzag-edge graphene nanoribbons with symmetric and asymmetric edge hydrogenations. Carbon 66, 646–653 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.061
X.Q. Deng, Z.H. Zhang, C.H. Yang, H.L. Zhu, B. Liang, The design of spin filter junction in zigzag graphene nanoribbons with asymmetric edge hydrogenation. Org. Electron. 14(12), 3240–3248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.041
C. Cao, L.N. Chen, M.Q. Long, H. Xu, Rectifying performance in zigzag graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions with different edge hydrogenations. Phys. Lett. A 377(31–33), 1905–1910 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.05.004
L. Peng, K. Yao, S. Zhu, Y. Ni, F. Zu, S. Wang, B. Guo, Y. Tian, Spin transport properties of partially edge-hydrogenated MoS2 nanoribbon heterostructure. J. Appl. Phys. 115(22), 223705 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4882195
J. Zhao, C. Fang, B. Cui, D. Zou, W. Zhao, X. Li, D. Li, D. Liu, Spin transport properties in silicene-based heterojunctions with different edge hydrogenation. Org. Electron. 41, 333–339 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2016.11.025
S.X. Yang, C. Wang, H. Sahin, H. Chen, Y. Li et al., Tuning the optical, magnetic, and electrical properties of ReSe2 by nanoscale strain engineering. Nano Lett. 15(3), 1660–1666 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504276u
J. Quereda, P. San-Jose, V. Parente, L. Vaquero-Garzon, A.J. Molina-Mendoza et al., Strong modulation of optical properties in black phosphorus through strain-engineered rippling. Nano Lett. 16(5), 2931–2937 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04670
H. Tomori, A. Kanda, H. Goto, Y. Ootuka, K. Tsukagoshi, S. Moriyama, E. Watanabe, D. Tsuya, Introducing nonuniform strain to graphene using dielectric nanopillars. Appl. Phys. Express 4(7), 075102 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1143/apex.4.075102
H. Li, A.W. Contryman, X. Qian, S.M. Ardakani, Y. Gong et al., Optoelectronic crystal of artificial atoms in strain-textured molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 6, 8080 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8381
A. Reserbat-Plantey, D. Kalita, Z. Han, L. Ferlazzo, S. Autier-Laurent et al., Strain superlattices and macroscale suspension of graphene induced by corrugated substrates. Nano Lett. 14(9), 5044–5051 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5016552
M. Neek-Amal, L. Covaci, F.M. Peeters, Nanoengineered nonuniform strain in graphene using nanopillars. Phys. Rev. B 86(4), 041405 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.041405
R. Banerjee, V.-H. Nguyen, T. Granzier-Nakajima, L. Pabbi, A. Lherbier et al., Strain modulated superlattices in graphene (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10468
P. Kun, G. Kukucska, G. Dobrik, J. Koltai, J. Kürti, L.P. Biró, L. Tapasztó, P. Nemes-Incze, Large intravalley scattering due to pseudo-magnetic fields in crumpled graphene. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 3(1), 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-019-0094-6
M.I.B. Utama, H. Kleemann, W. Zhao, C.S. Ong, F.H. da Jornada et al., A dielectric-defined lateral heterojunction in a monolayer semiconductor. Nat. Electron. 2(2), 60–65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0207-4
Z.B. Wu, Y.Y. Zhang, G. Li, S.X. Du, H.J. Gao, Electronic properties of silicene in BN/silicene van der waals heterostructures. Chin. Phys. B 27(7), 077302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/27/7/077302
J. Kang, J.B. Li, S.S. Li, J.B. Xia, L.W. Wang, Electronic structural moire pattern effects on MoS2/MoSe2 2D heterostructures. Nano Lett. 13(11), 5485–5490 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4030648
M.L. Sun, J.P. Chou, J. Yu, W.C. Tang, Electronic properties of blue phosphorene/graphene and blue phosphorene/graphene-like gallium nitride heterostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19(26), 17324–17330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp01852e
V.A. Skachkova, M.S. Baranava, D.C. Hvazdouski, V.R. Stempitsky, Electronic properties of graphene-based heterostructures. IOP Conf. Ser.: J. Phys. 917, 092012 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/917/9/092012
Z.Y. Huang, C.Y. He, X. Qi, H. Yang, W.L. Liu, X.L. Wei, X.Y. Peng, J.X. Zhong, Band structure engineering of monolayer MoS2 on h-BN: first-principles calculations. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 47(7), 075301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/7/075301
H.V. Phuc, N.N. Hieu, B.D. Hoi, C.V. Nguyen, Interlayer coupling and electric field tunable electronic properties and Schottky barrier in a graphene/bilayer-GaSe van der waals heterostructure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20(26), 17899–17908 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp02190b
B. Liu, L.J. Wu, Y.Q. Zhao, L.Z. Wang, M.Q. Cai, First-principles investigation of the schottky contact for the two-dimensional MoS2 and graphene heterostructure. RSC Adv. 6(65), 60271–60276 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra12812b
H.V. Phuc, N.N. Hieu, B.D. Hoi, L.T.T. Phoung, N.V. Hieu, C.V. Nguyen, Out-of-plane strain and electric field tunable electronic properties and schottky contact of graphene/antimonene heterostructure. Superlattices Microstruct. 112, 554–560 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.10.011
J. Lee, G. Kim, Electronic properties of a graphene/periodic porous graphene heterostructure. Carbon 122, 281–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.049
H.V. Phuc, V.V. Ilyasov, N.N. Hieu, B. Amin, C.V. Nguyen, Van der waals graphene/g-GaSe heterostructure: tuning the electronic properties and schottky barrier by interlayer coupling, biaxial strain, and electric gating. J. Alloys Compd. 750, 765–773 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.030
X.P. Chen, X. Sun, D.G. Yang, R.S. Meng, C.J. Tan, Q. Yang, Q.H. Liang, J.K. Jiang, SiGe/h-BN heterostructure with inspired electronic and optical properties: a first-principles study. J. Mater. Chem. C 4(42), 10082–10089 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tc03838g
Q. Sun, Y. Dai, N. Yin, L. Yu, Y.D. Ma, W. Wei, B.B. Huang, Two-dimensional square transition metal dichalcogenides with lateral heterostructures. Nano Res. 10(11), 3909–3919 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1605-4
L.P. Feng, J. Su, Z.T. Liu, Characteristics of lateral and hybrid heterostructures based on monolayer MoS2: a computational study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19(6), 4741–4750 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp07825g
C. Mu, W. Wei, J.J. Li, B.B. Huang, Y. Dai, Electronic properties of two-dimensional in-plane heterostructures of WS2/WSe2/MoS2. Mater. Res. Express 5(4), 046307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aabddf
J. Lee, J.S. Huang, B.G. Sumpter, M. Yoon, Strain-engineered optoelectronic properties of 2D transition metal dichalcogenide lateral heterostructures. 2D Mater. 4(2), 021016 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa5542
O. Avalos-Ovando, D. Mastrogiuseppe, S.E. Ulloa, Lateral interfaces of transition metal dichalcogenides: a stable tunable one-dimensional physics platform. Phys. Rev. B 99(3), 035107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.035107
J.H. Yuan, N.N. Yu, J.F. Wang, K.H. Xue, X.S. Miao, Design lateral heterostructure of monolayer ZrS2 and HfS2 from first principles calculations. Appl. Surf. Sci. 436, 919–926 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.093
Z. Zhang, Y. Xu, First-principles study on the structural stability and electronic properties of AlN/GaN heterostructure nanoribbons. Superlattices Microstruct. 57, 37–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2013.02.001
Q.F. Li, X.F. Ma, L. Zhang, X.G. Wan, W.F. Rao, Theoretical design of blue phosphorene/arsenene lateral heterostructures with superior electronic properties. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 51(25), 255304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aac563
M. Ge, C. Si, Mechanical and electronic properties of lateral graphene and hexagonal boron nitride heterostructures. Carbon 136, 286–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.069
Y.P. An, M.J. Zhang, D.P. Wu, T.X. Wang, Z.Y. Jiao, C.X. Xia, Z.M. Fu, K. Wang, The rectifying and negative differential resistance effects in graphene/h-BN nanoribbon heterojunctions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18(40), 27976–27980 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp05912k
G.C. Loh, R. Pandey, A graphene–boron nitride lateral heterostructure—first-principles study of its growth, electronic properties, and chemical topology. J. Mater. Chem. C 3(23), 5918–5932 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tc00539f
X.Q. Tian, L. Liu, Y. Du, J. Gu, J.B. Xu, B.I. Yakobson, Variable electronic properties of lateral phosphorene–graphene heterostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17(47), 31685–31692 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp05443e
J. Sun, N. Lin, C. Tang, H.Y. Wang, H. Ren, X. Zhao, First principles studies on electronic and transport properties of edge contact graphene–MoS2 heterostructure. Comput. Mater. Sci. 133, 137–144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.004
W. Chen, Y. Yang, Z.Y. Zhang, E. Kaxiras, Properties of in-plane graphene/MoS2 heterojunctions. 2D Mater. 4(4), 045001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa8313
W. Hong, G.W. Shim, S.Y. Yang, D.Y. Jung, S.-Y. Choi, Improved electrical contact properties of MoS2–graphene lateral heterostructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(6), 1807550 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201807550
Y. Zhang, L. Yin, J. Chu, T.A. Shifa, J. Xia et al., Edge-epitaxial growth of 2D NbS2–WS2 lateral metal-semiconductor heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 30(40), 1803665 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803665
A. Behranginia, P. Yasaei, A.K. Majee, V.K. Sangwan, F. Long et al., Direct growth of high mobility and low-noise lateral MoS2–graphene heterostructure electronics. Small 13(30), 1604301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201604301
Z. Liu, L.L. Ma, G. Shi, W. Zhou, Y.J. Gong et al., In-plane heterostructures of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride with controlled domain sizes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(2), 119–124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.256
M. Zhao, Y. Ye, Y. Han, Y. Xia, H. Zhu et al., Large-scale chemical assembly of atomically thin transistors and circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11(11), 954–959 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.115
M.P. Levendorf, C.J. Kim, L. Brown, P.Y. Huang, R.W. Havener, D.A. Muller, J. Park, Graphene and boron nitride lateral heterostructures for atomically thin circuitry. Nature 488(7413), 627–632 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11408
T.X. Chen, Y.W. Sheng, Y.Q. Zhou, R.J. Chang, X.C. Wang et al., High photoresponsivity in ultrathin 2D lateral graphene:WS2: graphene photodetectors using direct CVD growth. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 11(6), 6421–6430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b20321
B.Y. Liu, Y.F. Chen, C.Y. You, Y.W. Liu, X.Y. Kong et al., High performance photodetector based on graphene/MoS2/graphene lateral heterostructure with schottky junctions. J. Alloys Compds. 779, 140–146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.165
W.J. Deng, Y.F. Chen, C.Y. You, B.Y. Liu, Y.H. Yang et al., High detectivity from a lateral graphene–MoS2 schottky photodetector grown by chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Electron. Mater. 4(9), 1800069 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201800069
Z.P. Li, J.L. Zheng, Y.P. Zhang, C.X. Zheng, W.Y. Woon et al., Synthesis of ultrathin composition graded doped lateral WSe2/WS2 heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 9(39), 34204–34212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08668
J.M. Cai, C.A. Pignedoli, L. Talirz, P. Ruffieux, H. Söde et al., Graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(11), 896–900 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.184
Y.C. Chen, T. Cao, C. Chen, Z. Pedramrazi, D. Haberer et al., Molecular bandgap engineering of bottom-up synthesized graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(2), 156–160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.307
L. Ci, L. Song, C.H. Jin, D. Jariwala, D.X. Wu et al., Atomic layers of hybridized boron nitride and graphene domains. Nat. Mater. 9(5), 430–435 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2711
P. Rivera, J.R. Schaibley, A.M. Jones, J.S. Ross, S.F. Wu et al., Observation of long-lived interlayer excitons in monolayer MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 6, 6242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7242
Y.J. Gong, J.H. Lin, X.L. Wang, G. Shi, S.D. Lei et al., Vertical and in-plane heterostructures from WS2/MoS2 monolayers. Nat. Mater. 13(12), 1135–1142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4091
K. Chen, X. Wan, W.G. Xie, J.X. Wen, Z.W. Kang, X.L. Zeng, H.J. Chen, J.B. Xu, Lateral built-in potential of monolayer MoS2–WS2 in-plane heterostructures by a shortcut growth strategy. Adv. Mater. 27(41), 6431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502375
X.D. Fang, Q.Q. Tian, Y. Sheng, G.F. Yang, N.Y. Lu et al., Chemical vapor deposition of WS2/Mo1−xWxS2/MoS2 lateral heterostructures. Superlattices Microstruct. 123, 323–329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2018.09.017
J.D. Cain, E.D. Hanson, V.P. Dravid, Controlled synthesis of 2D MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = S, Se) heterostructures and alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 123(20), 204304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5025710
Y. Miyata, E. Maeda, K. Kamon, R. Kitaura, Y. Sasaki, S. Suzuki, H. Shinohara, Fabrication and characterization of graphene/hexagonal boron nitride hybrid sheets. Appl. Phys. Express 5(8), 085102 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1143/apex.5.085102
G.H. Han, J.A. Rodriguez-Manzo, C.W. Lee, N.J. Kybert, M.B. Lerner et al., Continuous growth of hexagonal graphene and boron nitride in-plane heterostructures by atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 7(11), 10129–10138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn404331f
L. Liu, J. Park, D.A. Siegel, K.F. McCarty, K.W. Clark, W. Deng, L. Basile, J.C. Idrobo, A.P. Li, G. Gu, Heteroepitaxial growth of two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride templated by graphene edges. Science 343(6167), 163–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246137
X. Ling, Y. Lin, Q. Ma, Z. Wang, Y. Song et al., Parallel stitching of 2D materials. Adv. Mater. 28(12), 2322–2329 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201505070
C. Zheng, Q. Zhang, B. Weber, H. Ilatikhameneh, F. Chen et al., Fuhrer, direct observation of 2D electrostatics and ohmic contacts in template-grown graphene/WS2 heterostructures. ACS Nano 11(3), 2785–2793 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b07832
M.Y. Li, Y.M. Shi, C.C. Cheng, L.S. Lu, Y.C. Lin et al., Epitaxial growth of a monolayer WSe2–MoS2 lateral p–n junction with an atomically sharp interface. Science 349(6247), 524–528 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab4097
Y.J. Gong, S.D. Lei, G.L. Ye, B. Li, Y.M. He et al., Two-step growth of two-dimensional WSe2/MoSe2 heterostructures. Nano Lett. 15(9), 6135–6141 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02423
K. Chen, X. Wan, J. Wen, W. Xie, Z. Kang, X. Zeng, H. Chen, J.-B. Xu, Electronic properties of MoS2–WS2 heterostructures synthesized with two-step lateral epitaxial strategy. ACS Nano 9(10), 9868–9876 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03188
Y.H. Cai, K. Xu, W.J. Zhu, Synthesis of transition metal dichalcogenides and their heterostructures. Mater. Res. Express 5(9), 095904 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aad950
Z.W. Zhang, P. Chen, X.D. Duan, K.T. Zang, J. Luo, X.F. Duan, Robust epitaxial growth of two-dimensional heterostructures, multiheterostructures, and superlattices. Science 357(6353), 788–792 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan6814
P.K. Sahoo, S. Memaran, Y. Xin, L. Balicas, H.R. Gutiérrez, One-pot growth of two-dimensional lateral heterostructures via sequential edge-epitaxy. Nature 553(7876), 63–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25155
C.D. Zhang, Y.X. Chen, J.K. Huang, X.X. Wu, L.J. Li, W. Yao, J. Tersoff, C.K. Shih, Visualizing band offsets and edge states in bilayer–monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides lateral heterojunction. Nat. Commun. 7, 10349 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10349
Y.M. He, A. Sobhani, S.D. Lei, Z.H. Zhang, Y.J. Gong et al., Layer engineering of 2D semiconductor junctions. Adv. Mater. 28(25), 5126–5132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600278
M. Mahjouri-Samani, M.W. Lin, K. Wang, A.R. Lupini, J. Lee et al., Patterned arrays of lateral heterojunctions within monolayer two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 6, 7749 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8749
T. Afaneh, P.K. Sahoo, I.A.P. Nobrega, Y. Xin, H.R. Gutiérrez, Laser-assisted chemical modification of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(37), 1802949 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201802949
Z. Tian, M.X. Zhao, X.X. Xue, W. Xia, C.L. Guo, Y.F. Guo, Y.X. Feng, J.M. Xue, Lateral heterostructures formed by thermally converting n-type SnSe2 to p-type SnSe. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 10(15), 12831–12838 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b01235
N. Choudhary, M.R. Islam, N. Kang, L. Tetard, Y. Jung, S.I. Khondaker, Two-dimensional lateral heterojunction through bandgap engineering of MoS2 via oxygen plasma. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28(36), 364002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/36/364002
L. Jamilpanah, S. Azizmohseni, S.A. Hosseini, M. Hasheminejad, N. Vesali, A.I. Zad, M. Pourfath, S.M. Mohseni, Simple one-step fabrication of semiconductive lateral heterostructures using bipolar electrodeposition. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 12(12), 1800418 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201800418
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFA0306100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61604140) and Thousand Talents Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Li, Z., Chen, H. et al. Recent Advances in 2D Lateral Heterostructures. Nano-Micro Lett. 11, 48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0276-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0276-y