Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cotton linter nano-fibers as the potential reinforcing agent for guar gum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cotton linter nano-fibers (CLNFs) were prepared from cotton linters by a refining process. The prepared CLNFs were characterized for morphology, crystallinity and degree of polymerization. CLNF was used as a reinforcing agent in guar gum to improve its performance properties. Guar gum/CLNF nanocomposite films were prepared by a solution-casting process. CLNF was added in concentrations of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 % (w/w) in guar gum. The prepared guar gum/CLNF nano-composite films were characterized for mechanical, thermal, rheological, crystallinity, water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) and light transparency properties. The enthalpy of melting and melting temperature of guar gum increased with increased concentration of CLNF; but up to 0.25 % (w/w) concentration, above which they started decreasing. Tensile strength and Young’s modulus of guar gum increased by 32 and 35 %, respectively, by 0.25 % (w/w) addition of CLNF; however, it decreased on further increase in the concentration of CLNF. The percentage elongation at break and WVTR decreased by 58 and 57 % for 0.25 % (w/w) CLNF-added guar gum. The observed improvements in the properties were due to better interaction between CLNF and guar gum. CLNF was found to have uniformly dispersed in guar gum on addition up to 0.25 % concentration; however, it started forming aggregates at higher concentration, as evident from scanning electron microscopy. Viscosity increased, whereas transparency decreased with increased concentration of CLNF in guar gum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu DR, Xiao CM, Xu SJ (2009) Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express Polym Lett 3:366–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tokiwa Y, Calabia BP, Ugwu CU, Aiba S (2009) Biodegradable plastics. Int J Mol Sci 10:3722–3742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bismarck A (2008) Are hierarchical composite structures the way forward to improve the properties of truly green composites? Express Polym Lett 2:687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thakur VK, Singha AS (2010) Natural fibres-based polymers: part 1-Mechanical analysis of pine needles reinforced biocomposites. Bull Mater Sci 33:257–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petersson L, Kvien I, Oksman K (2007) Structure and thermal properties of poly(lactic acid)/cellulose whiskers nanocomposite materials. Compos Sci Technol 67:2535–2544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hule RA, Pochan DJ (2007) Polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 32:354–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng X, Gan YX (2011) Advances in composite materials for medicine and nanotechnology, 1st edn. InTech, Croatia 119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SY, Mohan DJ, Kang IA, Doh GH, Lee S, Han SO (2009) Nanocellulose reinforced PVA composite films: effects of acid treatment and filler loading. Fibre Polym 10:77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang S, Cheng Q, Rials TG and, Lee SH (2006) Cellulose microfibril/nanofibril and its nanocompsites. Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Rim Bio-based Composites Symp, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 301–308

  10. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamel S (2007) Nanotechnology and its applications in lingo-cellulosic composites, a mini review. Express Polym Lett 1:546–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hult EL, Iversen T, Sugiyama J (2003) Characterization of the supermolecular structure of cellulose in wood pulp fibers. Cellulose 10:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Q, Renneckar S (2009) Molecularly thin nanoparticles from cellulose: isolation of sub-microfibrillar structures. Cellulose 16(6):1025–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SY, Chun SJ, Kang IA, Park JY (2009) Preparation of cellulose nanofibrils by high-pressure composite films. J Ind Engg Chem 15:50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi B, Shannon TG, Pelky E (2010) Novel use of waste keratin and cotton linter fibres for prototype tissue papers and their evaluation. Bioresources 5:1425–1435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahola S, Salmi J, Johansson LS, Laine J, Osterberg M (2008) Model films from native cellulose nanofibrils. Preparation, swelling, and surface interactions. Biomacromolecues 9:1273–1282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2005) Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure. Appl Phys A 80:155–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymer 2:728–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Mello D, Sabnis A, Shenoy MA, Kathalewar M (2012) Preparation of acetylated guar gum—unsaturated polyester composites and effect of water on their properties. Curr Chem Lett 1:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Savadekar NR, Mhaske ST (2012) Synthesis of nano cellulose fibers and effect on thermoplastics starch based films. Carbohydr Polym 89:146–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi Y, Simonsen J (2006) Cellulose nanocrystal-filled carboxymethyl cellulose nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:633–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu Y, Weng L, Cao X (2006) Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallites—reinforced plasticized starch biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 63:198–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu Y, Weng L, Zhang L (2004) Morphology and properties of soy protein isolate thermoplastics reinforced with chitin whiskers. Biomacromolecules 5:1046–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wongpanit P, Sanchavanakit N, Pavasant P, Bunaprasert T, Tabata Y, Rujiravanit R (2007) Preparation and characterization of chitin whisker-reinforced silk fibroin nanocomposite sponges. Eur Polym J 43:4123–4135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang M, Yu J, Ma X (2006) High mechanical performance MMT-urea and formamide-plasticized thermoplastic cornstarch biodegradable nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 63:393–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang J, Elder TJ, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ (2007) Facile synthesis of spherical cellulose nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 69:607–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ljungberg N, Bonini C, Bortolussi F, Boisson C, Heux L, Cavaillé JY (2005) New nanocomposite materials reinforced with cellulose whiskers in atactic polypropylene: effect of surface and dispersion characteristics. Biomacromolecules 6:2732–2739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chazeau L, Cavaill JY, Perez J (2000) Plasticized PVC reinforced with cellulose whiskers II. Plastic behavior. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 38:383–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13:171–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shimazaki Y, Miyazaki Y, Takezawa Y, Nogi M, Abe K, Ifuku S, Yano H (2007) Excellent thermal conductivity of transparent cellulose nanofiber/epoxy resin nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 8:2976–2978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type part II. A new infrared ratio for estimation of crystallinity in celluloses I and II. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1325–1341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Terinte N, Ibbett R, Schuster KC (2011) Overview on native cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose I structure studied by X-ray diffraction (WAXD): comparison between measurement techniques. Lenzing Ber 89:118–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grobe A, Brandrup J, Immergut EH (1989) Polymer handbook, Chapter 5. Wiley, NY, pp 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sun Y, Lin L, Pang C, Deng H, Peng H, Li J, He B, Liu S (2007) Hydrolysis of cotton fibre cellulose in formic acid. Energy Fuels 21:2386–2389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang L, Kumar R, Zhang L (2009) Investigation into hemp fiber- and whisker- reinforced soy protein composites. Frontiers Chem China 4:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues—wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99:1664–1671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Y, Liu C, Chang PR, Anderson DP, Huneault MA (2009) Pea starch-based composite films with pea hull fibers and pea hull fiber-derived nanowhiskers. Polym Eng Sci 49:369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Svagan AJ, Hedenqvist MS, Berglund L (2009) Reduced water vapour sorption in cellulose nanocomposites with starch matrix. Compos Sci Technol 69:500–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vilas K, Bharimalla AK, Vighneswaran VN, Mhaske ST (2012) Effect of cellulose nanowhiskers on performance properties of guar gum. ANTEC Mumbai 2012, paper no: 1456451

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) for providing financial support for this work, through a project entitled “Synthesis and characterization of nanocellulose and its applications as biodegradable polymer composites to enhance their performance properties” (code number 417101). We are also thankful to the Society of Plastic Engineers (SPE) for giving us the opportunity to participate in Antec-Mumbai 2012 [39].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Polymer and Surface Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai, 400019, India

    V. S. Karande, P. G. Kadam & S. T. Mhaske

  2. Nanotechnology Research Group, Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Adenwala Road, Matunga, Mumbai, 400019, India

    A. K. Bharimalla & N. Vigneshwaran

Authors
  1. V. S. Karande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. K. Bharimalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Vigneshwaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. G. Kadam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. T. Mhaske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. G. Kadam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karande, V.S., Bharimalla, A.K., Vigneshwaran, N. et al. Cotton linter nano-fibers as the potential reinforcing agent for guar gum. Iran Polym J 23, 869–879 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-014-0283-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-014-0283-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation