Skip to main content
Log in

Partial Purification and Characterization of a Bacteriocin DT24 Produced by Probiotic Vaginal Lactobacillus brevis DT24 and Determination of its Anti-Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Potential

  • Published:
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic resistance has increased the interest for finding new antimicrobials in the past decade. Probiotic Lactic acid bacteria producing antimicrobial proteins like bacteriocin can be excellent agents for development as novel therapeutic agents and complement to conventional antibiotic therapy. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli, most causative agent of Urinary tract infection, has developed resistance to various antibiotics. In the present investigation, antibacterial substance like bacteriocin (Bacteriocin DT24) produced by probiotic Lactobacillus brevis DT24 from vaginal sample of healthy Indian woman was partially purified and characterized. It was efficiently working against various pathogens, that is, Uropathogenic E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The antimicrobial peptide was relatively heat resistant and also active over a broad range of pH 2–10. It has been partially purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation and gel filtration chromatography and checked on reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of bacteriocin DT24 was approximately 7-kDa protein. The peptide is inactivated by proteolytic enzymes, trypsin and lipase but not when treated with catalase, α-amylase and pepsin. It showed bacteriostatic mode of action against uropathogenic E. coli. Such characteristics indicate that this bacteriocin-producing probiotic may be a potential candidate for alternative agents to control urinary tract infections and other pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aasen IM, Markussen S, Møretrø T, Katla T, Axelsson L, Naterstad K (2003) Interactions of the bacteriocins sakacin P and nisin with food constituents. Int J Food Microbiol 87:35–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Akram M, Shahid M, Khan AU (2007) Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C Hospital Aligarh, India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrobial 6(4). doi:10.1180/1476-0711-6-4

  3. Albano H, Todorov SD, Van Reenen CA, Hogg T, Dicks LMT, Teixeira P (2007) Characterization of a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidilactici isolated from “Alheira”, afermented sausage traditionally produced in Portugal. Int J Food Microbiol 116:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aroutcheva A, Simoes JA, Faro S (2001) Antimicrobial protein produced by vaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus that inhibits Gardnerella vaginalis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 9:33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Audisio MC, Oliver G, Apella MC (2001) Effect of different complex carbon sources on growth and bacteriocin synthesis of Enterococcus faecium. Int J Food Microbiol 63:235–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boris S, Suarez JE, Barbes C (1997) Characterization of the aggregation promoting factor from Lactobacillus gasseri, a vaginal isolate. J Appl Microbiol 83:s413–s420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casey PG, Casey GD, Gardiner GE, Tangney M, Stanton C, Ross RP et al (2004) Isolation and characterization of anti-Salmonella lactic acid bacteria from the porcine gastrointestinal tract. Lett Appl Microbiol 39:431–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S (2007) Measurement of aggregation properties between probiotics and pathogens: in vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Methods 71(1):71–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Colloca ME, Ahumada MC, López ME, Macías MEN (2000) Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from healthy subjects. Oral Dis 6(4):227–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corsetti A, Settanni L, Van Sinderen D (2004) Characterization of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) from Sourdough lactic acid bacteria and evaluation of their in vitro and in situ activity. J Appl Microbiol 96:521–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2005) Bacterial lantibiotics: strategies to improve therapeutic potential. Curr Protein Pept Sci 6:61–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2005) Bacteriocin: developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:777–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Czaja CA, Scholes D, Hooton TM, Stamm WE (2007) Population based epidemiologic analysis of acute pyelonephritis. Clin Infect Dis 45:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Vuyst L, Vandamme EJ (1994) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: Microbiology, genetics and applications. In: de Vuyst L, Vandamme EJ (eds) Lactic acid bacteria and bacteriocins: their practical importance. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 1–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Del Re B, Sgorbati B, Miglioli M, Palenzona D (2000) Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Lett Appl Microbiol 31:438–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunne C, O’Mahony L, Murphy L, Thornton G, Morrissey D et al (2001) In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am J Clin Nutr 73:386S–392S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dethlefsen L, Huse S, Sogin ML, Relman DA (2008) The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol 6(11):2382–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ekmicki H, Belma A, Sahlan O (2009) Characterization of vaginal Lactobacilli coaggregation ability with Escherichia coli. Microbiol Immunol 53:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eschenbach DA, Davick PR, Williams BL, Klebanoff SJ, Young-Smith K, Critchlow CM et al (1989) Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide–producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 27:251–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Foxman B, Ki M, Brown P (2007) Antibiotic resistance and pyelonephritis. Clin Infect Dis 45:281–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gänzle MG, Weber S, Hammes WP (1999) Effect of ecological factors on the inhibitory spectrum and activity of bacteriocins. Int J Food Microbiol 46:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garneau S, Martin NI, Vederas JC (2002) Two-peptide bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. Biochimie 84:577–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giri SS, Sukumaran V, Sen SS, Vinumoni J, Nazeema BB, Jena PK (2011) Antagonistic activity of cellular components of potential probiotic bacteria, isolated from the gut of Labeo rohita, against Aeromonas hydrophila. Probiotics Antimicrob Prot 3:214–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gong HS, Meng XC, Wang H (2010) Plantaricin MG active against Gram-negative bacteria produced by Lactobacillus plantarum KLDS1.0391 isolated from “Jiaoke”, a traditional fermented cream from China. Food Control 21:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guillilan SE (1979) Beneficial interrelationships between certain microorganisms and humans:candidate microorganisms for use as dietary adjuncts. J Food Prot 42:164–167

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Wobbe CL, Stamm WE (1999) The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in young women. Int J Antimicrob Agents 11:305–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hernandez D, Cardell E, Zarate V (2005) Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tenerife cheese: initial characterization of plantaricin TF711, a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Lactobacillus plantarum TF711. J Appl Microbiol 99:77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Heu S, Oh JH, Kang YS, Ryu S, Cho SK, Cho YS et al (2001) Cloning, expression, and purification of glycinecin A, a bacteriocin produced by Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines 8ra. App Environ Microbiol 67:4105–4110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jena PK, Trivedi D, Chaudhary H, Sahoo TK et al (2013) Bacteriocin PJ4 active against enteric pathogen produced by Lactobacillus helveticus PJ4 isolated from gut microflora of Wistar Rat (Rattus norvegicus): partial purification and characterization of bacteriocin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. doi:10.1007/s12010-012-0044-7

  30. Johnson JR, Stamm WE (1989) Urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med 111:906–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jung DS, Bodyfelt FW, Daeschel MA (1992) Influence of fat and emulsifiers on the efficacy of nisin in inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes in fluid milk. J Dairy Science 75:387–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaewsrichan J, Peeyananjarassri K, Kongprasertkit J (2006) Selection and identification of anaerobic lactobacilli producing inhibitory compounds against vaginal pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 48:75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim PI, Jung MY, Chang YH, Kim S, Kim SJ et al (2007) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains isolated from porcine gastrointestinal tract. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:1103–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Klaenhammer TR (1993) Genetics of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:39–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar M, Tiwari SK, Srivastava S (2010) Purification and characterization of enterocin LR/6, a new bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium LR/6. Appl Biochem Biotech 160:40–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar H, Rangrez A, Dayananda K, Atre A, Patole M et al (2011) Lactobacillus plantarum (VR1) isolated from an Ayurvedic medicine (Kutajarista) ameliorates in vitro cellular damage caused by Aeromonas veronii. BMC Microbiol 11:152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Macias MEN, Romero NC, Apella MC, Gonzalez SN, Oliver G (1993) Prevention of infections produced by E. coli and L. monocytogenes feeding milk fermented with lactobacilli. J Food Prot 56:401–405

    Google Scholar 

  38. Murray BE, Alvarado T, Kim KH, Vorachit M, Jayanetra P (1985) Increasing resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole among isolates of Escherichia coli in developing countries. J Infect Dis 152:1107–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nueno-Palop C, Narbad A (2011) Probiotic assessment of Enterococcus faecalis CP58 isolated from human gut. Int J Food Microbiol 145:390–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Hanlon DE, Lanier BR, Moench TR, Cone RA (2010) Cervicovaginal fluid and semen block the microbicidal activity of hydrogen peroxide produced by vaginal lactobacilli. BMC Infect Dis 10(120):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pelletier C, Bouley C, Cayuela C, Boutier S, Bourlioux P, Bellon-Fontaine MN (1997) Cell surface characteristics of L. casei ss casei, L. paracasei ss paracasei and L. rhamnosus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1725–1731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rattanachaikunsopon P, Phumkhachorn P (2006) Isolation and preliminary characterization of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum N014 isolated from nham, traditional Thai fermented pork. J Food Prot 69(8):1937–1943

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Reid G (2001) Probiotic agents to protect urogenital tract against infection. Am J Clin Nutr 73(2): 437–443

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ronald A (2003) The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Am J Med 113(1):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schägger H, VonJagow G (1987) Tricine-Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of Proteins in the Range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Servin AL (2004) Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28:405–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sobel JD, Chaim W (1996) Vaginal microbiology of women with acute recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol 34:2497–2499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Stergiou VA, Thomas LV, Adams MR (2006) Interactions of nisin with glutathione in a model protein system and meat. J Food Protect 69:951–956

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Succi M, Tremonte P, Reale A, Sorrentino E, Grazia L, Pacifico S, Coppola R (2005) Bile salt and acid tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. FEMS Microbiol Lett 244(1):129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sung C, Kim BG, Kim S, Joo HS, Kim PI (2010) Probiotic potential of Staphylococcus hominis MBBL 2–9 as anti-Staphylococcus aureus agent isolated from the vaginal microbiota of a healthy woman. J Appl Microbiol 108:908–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Todorov S, Onno B, Sorokin O, Chobert JM, Ivanova I, Dousset X (1999) Detection and characterization of a novel antibacterial substance produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST31 isolatedfrom sourdough. Int J Food Microbiol 48:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2004) Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by four lactic acid bacteria isolated from regional South African barley beer. Ann Microbiol 54(4):403–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2005) Characterization of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from spoiled black olives. J Basic Microb 45:312–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Todorov SD, Danova ST, VanReenen CA, Meincken M, Dinkova G et al (2006) Characterization of bacteriocin HV219, produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. Lactis HV219isolated from human vaginal secretions. J Basic Microbiol 46:226–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Todorov SD, Wachsman M, Tomé E, Dousset X, Destro MT, Dicks LMT et al (2010) Characterization of an antiviral pediocin-like bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium. Food Microbiol 27:869–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Todorov SD, Furtado DN, Saad SMI, de Melo G, Franco BD (2011) Bacteriocin production and resistance to drugs are advantageous features for Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, a potential probiotic strain. New Microbiol 34:357–370

    Google Scholar 

  57. Todorov SD, Prevost H, Lebosis M, Dousset X, LeBlanc JG, de Melo G et al (2011) Bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus plantarum ST16 Pa isolated from papaya (Carica papaya)—from isolation to application: characterization of a bacteriocin. Food Res Int 44:1351–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Nirma Education and Research Foundation (NERF), Ahmedabad for providing infrastructure and financial support.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) herewith certifies that there is no financial or commercial or proprietary interest in the products or companies described in the manuscript. There is no Conflict of Interest among the authors.

Ethical Standard

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation as per Institutional ethical committee, Nirma University (Ahmedabad). Protocol No. IEC/NU/I/IS/03 and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all patients for which identifying information is included in this article. This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sriram Seshadri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trivedi, D., Jena, P.k., Patel, J.k. et al. Partial Purification and Characterization of a Bacteriocin DT24 Produced by Probiotic Vaginal Lactobacillus brevis DT24 and Determination of its Anti-Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Potential. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 5, 142–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9132-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9132-4

Keywords

Navigation