Skip to main content
Log in

Antagonistic Activity of Cellular Components of Potential Probiotic Bacteria, Isolated from the Gut of Labeo rohita, Against Aeromonas hydrophila

  • Published:
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterise the antagonistic activity of cellular components of potential probiotic bacteria isolated from the gut of healthy rohu (Labeo rohita), a tropical freshwater fish, against the fish pathogen, Aeromonas hydrophila. Three potential probiotic strains (referred to as R1, R2, and R5) were screened using a well diffusion, and their antagonistic activity against A. hydrophila was determined. Biochemical tests and 16S rRNA gene analysis confirmed that R1, R2, and R5 were Lactobacillus plantarum VSG3, Pseudomonas aeruginosa VSG2, and Bacillus subtilis VSG1, respectively. Four different fractions of cellular components (i.e. the whole-cell product, heat-killed whole-cell product [HKWCP], intracellular product [ICP], and extracellular product) of these selected strains were effective in an in vitro sensitivity test against 6 A. hydrophila strains. Among the cellular components, the ICP of R1, HKWCP of R2, and ICP of R5 exhibited the strongest antagonistic activities, as evidenced by their inhibition zones. The antimicrobial compounds from these selected cellular components were partially purified by thin-layer and high-performance liquid chromatography, and their properties were analysed. The ranges of pH stability of the purified compounds were wide (3.0–10.0), and compounds were thermally stable up to 90 °C. Considering these results, isolated probiotic strains may find potential applications in the prevention and treatment of aquatic aeromonosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aly SM, Abd-El-Rahman AM, John G, Mohamed MF (2008) Characterization of some bacteria isolated from Oreochromis niloticus and their potential use as probiotics. Aquaculture 277:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin B, Stuckey LE, Robertson PAW, Effendi I, Griffith DRW (1995) A probiotic strain of Vibrio alginolyticus effective in reducing disease caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio ordalli. J Fish Dis 18:93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balcázar JL, Vendrell D, Blas ID, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Girones O, Muzquiz JL (2007) In vitro competitive adhesion and production of antagonistic compounds by lactic acid bacteria against fish pathogens. Vet Microbiol 122:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balcázar JL, Vendrell D, Blas ID, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Muzquiz JL, Girones O (2008) Characterization of probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from intestinal microbiota of fish. Aquaculture 278:188–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruun MS, Schmidt AS, Madsen L, Dalsgaard I (2000) Antimicrobial resistance patterns in Danish isolates of Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Aquaculture 187:201–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chythanya R, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I (2002) Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas I-2 strain. Aquaculture 208:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das BK, Samal SK, Samantaray BR, Sethi S, Pattnaik P, Mishra BK (2006) Antagonistic activity of cellular components of Pseudomonas species against Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture 253:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Direkbusarakom S, Yoshimizu M, Ezura Y, Ruangpan L, Danayadol Y (1998) Vibrio species, the dominant flora in shrimp hatchery against some fish pathogenic viruses. J Marine Biotechnol 6:266–267

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eckart K (1994) Mass spectrometry of cyclic peptides. Mass spectrometry Rev 13:23–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. EI-Rhman AMA, Khattab YAE, Shalaby AME (2009) Micrococcus luteus and Pseudomonas species as probiotics for promoting the growth performance and health of Nile-tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 27:175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fabregas J, Munoz A, Otero A, Barja JL, Roruaris M (1991) A preliminary study on antimicrobial activities of some bacteria isolated from the marine environment. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57:1377–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuller R (1987) A review, probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 66:365–378

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gatesoupe FJ (1999) The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture 180:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh S, Sinha A, Sahu C (2007) Isolation of putative probionts from the intestines of Indian major carps. The Israeli J Aquaculture—Bamidgeh 59(3):127–132

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goa Y, Jia S, Goa Q, Tan Z (2010) A novel bacteriocin with a broad inhibitory spectrum produced by Lactobacillus sake C2, isolated from traditional Chinese fermented cabbage. Food Cont 21:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hjelm M, Bergh Ø, Riaza A, Nielsen J, Melchiorsen J, Jensen S, Duncan H, Ahrens P, Birkbeck H, Gram L (2004) Selection and identification of autochthonous potential probiotic bacteria from turbot larvae (Scophtalmus maximus) rearing units. Syst Appl Microbiol 27:360–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hubert E, Lobos O, Brevis P, Padilla C (1998) Purification and characterization of the bacteriocin PsVP-10 produced by Pseudomonas sp. J Appl Microbiol 84:910–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee NK, Yeo IC, Park JW, Kang BS, Hahm YT (2010) Isolation and characterization of a novel analyte from Bacillus subtilis SC-8 antagonistic to Bacillus cereus. J Biosc Bioeng 110(3):298–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ljungh A, Wadström T (2006) Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 7:73–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma CW, Cho YS, Oh KH (2009) Removal of pathogenic bacteria and nitrogens by Lactobacillus spp. JK-8 and JK-11. Aquaculture 287:266–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Motta AS, Cannavan FS, Tsai SM, Brandelli A (2007) Characterization of a broad range antibacterial substance from a new Bacillus species isolated from Amazon basin. Arch Microbiol 188:367–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mutaz A, Sheikh MA, Ahmed Z, Hasnain S (2007) Production of surfactin from Bacillus subtilis MZ-7 grown on pharmamedia commercial medium. Microb Cell Fac 6:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Panigrahi A, Azad IS (2007) Microbial intervention for better fish health in aquaculture: the Indian scenario. Fish Physiol Biochem 33:429–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pangsomboon K, Kaewnopparat S, Pitakpornpreecha T, Srichana T (2006) Antibacterial activity of a bacteriocin from Lactobacillus paracasei HL32 against Porphyromonas gingivalis. Arch Oral Biol 51:784–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson PAW, O’Dowd C, Burrells C, Williams P, Austin B (2000) Use of Carnobacterium sp as a probiotic for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Aquaculture 185:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberta F, Spada JC, Silveira ST, Tsai SM, Brandelli A (2009) Purification and characterization of an antimicrobial peptide produced by Pseudomonas sp. strain 4B. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sahul H, Balasubramanian G (2000) Antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from Artemia nauplii and efficacy of formaldehyde to control bacterial load. Aquaculture 183:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah K, Mody K, Keshri J, Jha B (2010) Purification and characterization of a solvent, detergent and oxidizing agent tolerant protease from Bacillus cereus isolated from the Gulf of Khambhat. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 67:85–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sugita H, Matsuo N, Shibuya K, Deguchi Y (1996) Production of antimicrobial substances by intestinal bacteria isolated from coastal crab and fish species. J Mar Biotechnol 4:220–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugita H, Hirose Y, Matsuo N, Deguchi Y (1998) Production of antibacterial substances by Bacillus sp. strain NM 12, an intestinal bacterium of Japanese coastal fish. Aquaculture 165:269–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Swain SM, Singh C, Arul V (2009) Inhibitory activity of probiotics Streptococcus phocae PI80 and Enterococcus faecium MC13 against Vibriosis in shrimp Penaeus monodon. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:697–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weisburg WG, Barn SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) Ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P (2003) Control of pathogenic Vibrio spp. by Bacillus subtilis BT23, a possible probiotic treatment for black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Lett in Appl Microbiol 36:83–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vázquez JA, González MP, Murado MA (2005) Effects of lactic acid bacteria cultures on pathogenic microbiota from fish. Aquaculture 245:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vendrell D, Balcázar JL, Blas ID, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Gironés I, Múzquiz JL (2008) Protection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from lactococcosis by probiotic bacteria. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 31:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vijayan KK, Bright Singh IS, Jayaprakash NS, Alavandi SV, Pai SS, Preetha R, Rajan JJS, Santiago TC (2006) A brackishwater isolate of Pseudomonas PS-102, a potential antagonistic bacterium against pathogenic vibrios in penaeid and non-penaeid rearing systems. Aquaculture 251:192–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yoshida T, Hayashi KI, Ohmoto H (2002) Dissolution of iron hydroxides by marine bacterial siderophore. Chem Geol 184:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

S. S. Giri gratefully acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for awarding “Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research [INSPIRE] Fellowship” [IF10575] to pursue Doctoral research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sib Sankar Giri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giri, S.S., Sukumaran, V., Sen, S.S. et al. Antagonistic Activity of Cellular Components of Potential Probiotic Bacteria, Isolated from the Gut of Labeo rohita, Against Aeromonas hydrophila . Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 3, 214–222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-011-9078-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-011-9078-3

Keywords

Navigation