Abstract
Certain types of masculinity undergird gender inequality, but different contexts may encourage individuals to conceptualize gender in new and unique ways. Women’s and Gender Studies (WGS) university courses support this for women, but less is known about men’s experiences. Through an analysis of interview data from 15 men who have taken WGS courses, we ask: What do men experience in the WGS classroom and how do men perceive that their experiences in WGS courses shape their conceptualizations of gender and gender relations? Men described developing their understandings of gender inequality after taking a WGS course and they applied this knowledge beyond the classroom. We address the different ways men negotiate gendered classroom dynamics, with some men articulating that their gender provided a unique position from which to participate and others reporting more discomfort. We discuss the findings’ implications regarding men disrupting or perpetuating hegemonic understandings of masculinity within educational contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alilunas, P. (2011). The (in)visible people in the room: Men in women’s studies. Men and Masculinities, 14, 210–229.
Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 378–395.
Arendell, T. (1997). Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: A woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 341–368.
Armstrong, A. H., & Huber, J. (2015). Where are we headed? What’s in our way? How can we get there? Thoughts from directors of women’s and gender studies programs. Afillia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 30, 216–231.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Berger, M. T., & Radeloff, C. L. (2014). Transforming scholarship: Why women’s and gender studies’ students are changing themselves and the world. New York: Routledge.
Berila, B., Keller, J., Krone, C., Laker, J., & Mayers, O. (2005). His story/her story: A dialogue about including men and masculinities in the women’s studies curriculum. Feminist Teacher, 16, 34–52.
Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137–152.
Bridges, T. (2014). A very “gay” straight? Hybrid masculinities, sexual aesthetics, and the changing relationship between masculinity and homophobia. Gender & Society, 28, 58–82.
Broadhurst, C. J. (2014). Campus activism in the 21st century: A historical framing. New Directions for Higher Education, 2014, 3–15.
Broom, A., Hand, K., & Tovey, P. (2009). The role of gender, environment and individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 51–65.
Case, K. A. (2007). Raising male privilege awareness and reducing sexism: An evaluation of diversity courses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 426–435.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 347–365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Connell, R. W. (2014). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities and gender equality in the global arena. Signs, 40, 1801–1825.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.
Coston, B. M., & Kimmel, M. (2012). Seeing privilege where it isn’t: Marginalized masculinities and the intersectionality of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 97–111.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DiAngelo, R., & Sensoy, Ö. (2014). Leaning in: A student’s guide to engaging constructively with social justice content. Radical Pedagogy, 11, 1–10.
Doull, M., Oliffe, J., Knight, R., & Shoveller, J. A. (2013). Sex and straight young men: Challenging and endorsing hegemonic masculinities and gender regimes. Men and Masculinities, 16, 329–346.
Flood, M. (2011). Men as students and teachers of feminist scholarship. Men and Masculinities, 14, 135–154.
Griffin, G. (2002). Co-option or transformation? Women’s and Gender Studies worldwide. In H. Fleber & L. Potts (Eds.), Societies in transition: Challenges to women’s and gender studies (pp. 13–31). Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Guckenheimer, D., & Schmidt, J. K. (2013). Contradictions within the classroom: Masculinities in feminist studies. Women’s Studies, 42, 486–508.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.
Harris, K. L., Melaas, K., & Rodacker, E. (1999). The impact of women’s studies courses on college students of the 1990s. Sex Roles, 40, 969–977.
Heasley, R. (2005). Queer masculinities of straight men: A typology. Men and Masculinities, 7, 310–320.
Houvouras, S., & Carter, J. S. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234–256.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129.
Jones, S. R., & Abes, E. S. (2004). Enduring influences of service-learning on college students’ identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 149–166.
Katz, J., Swindell, S., & Farrow, S. (2004). Effects of participation in a first women’s studies course on collective self-esteem, gender-related attitudes, and emotional well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2179–2199.
Kazyak, E. (2012). Midwest or lesbian? Gender, rurality, and sexuality. Gender & Society, 26, 825–848.
Kaufman, M. (1999). Men, feminism, and men’s contradictory experiences of power. In J. A. Kuypers (Ed.), Men and power (pp. 59–83). Halifax: Fernwood Books.
Kimmel, M. S. (2004). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (pp. 81–93). New York: Worth.
Kimmel, M. S. (1998). Who’s afraid of men doing feminism? In T. Digby (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 57–68). New York: Routledge.
Kivel, P. (2013). The act-like-a-man box. In M. S. Kimmel & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives (pp. 14–16). New York: Pearson.
Marchbank, J., & Letherby, G. (2006). Views and perspectives of women’s studies: A survey of women and men students. Gender and Education, 18, 157–182.
Messerschmidt, J. W. (2012). Engendering gendered knowledge: Assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 15, 56–76.
Messner, M. A., Greenberg, M. A., & Peretz, T. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moi, T. (2006). “I am not a feminist, but…”: How feminism became the f-word. The Modern Language Association of America, 121, 1735–1741.
Murphy, M. J. (2011). “You’ll never be more of a man”: Gay male masculinities in academic Women’s Studies. Men and Masculinities, 14, 173–189.
Nash, R. J., Johnson, R. G., III, & Murray, M. C. (2012). Teaching college students communication strategies for effective social justice advocacy. New York: Peter Lang.
Nilan, P. (2000). “You’re hopeless I swear to god”: Shifting masculinities in classroom talk. Gender and Education, 12, 53–68.
Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84, 1273–1289.
Padfield, M., & Procter, I. (1996). The effect of interviewer’s gender on the interviewing process: a comparative enquiry. Sociology, 30, 355–366.
Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Patai, D. (2001). Rhetoric and reality in women’s studies. Gender Issues, 19, 21–60.
Pini, B. (2005). Interviewing men: Gender and the collection and interpretation of qualitative data. Journal of Sociology, 41, 201–216.
Pleasants, R. K. (2011). Men learning feminism: Protecting privileges through discourses of resistance. Men and Masculinities, 14, 230–250.
Renn, K. A. (2007). LGBT student leaders and queer activists: Identities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identified college student leaders and activists. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 311–330.
Reynolds, M. J., Shagle, S., & Venkataraman, L. (2007). A national census of women’s and gender studies programs in US institutions of higher education. University of Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85–102.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Gender inequality and the intensity of men’s collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 75–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schwalbe, M., & Wolkomir, M. (2001). The masculine self as problem and resource in interview studies of men. Men and Masculinities, 4, 90–103.
Sevelius, J. M., & Stake, J. E. (2003). The effects of prior attitudes and attitude importance on attitude change and class impact in women’s and gender studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2341–2353.
Stake, J. E. (2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women’s and gender studies. Sex Roles, 57, 43–54.
Stake, J. E. (2006). Pedagogy and student change in the women’s and gender studies classroom. Gender and Education, 18, 199–212.
Stake, J. E., & Malkin, C. (2003). Students’ quality of experience and perceptions of intolerance and bias in the women’s and gender studies classroom. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 174–185.
Stake, J. E., & Hoffman, F. L. (2001). Changes in student social attitudes, activism, and personal confidence in higher education: The role of women’s studies. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 411–436.
Stake, J. E., & Hoffmann, F. L. (2000). Putting feminist pedagogy to the test: The experience of women’s studies from student and teacher perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 30–38.
Stake, J. E., & Rose, S. (1994). The long-term impact of women’s studies on students’ personal lives and political activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 403–412.
Thomsen, C. J., Basu, A. M., & Reinitz, M. T. (1995). Effects of women’s studies courses on gender-related attitudes of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 419–426.
Funding
No funding was received to support this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Rachel M. Schmitz and Emily Kazyak have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standard
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitz, R.M., Kazyak, E. Checking Privilege at the Door: Men’s Reflections on Masculinity in Women’s and Gender Studies Courses. Gend. Issues 34, 129–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9178-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9178-1