Abstract
Interpersonal entrainment or moving together in time, has been shown to cultivate pro-social behaviours amongst those who take part. Converging evidence suggests that its pro-social effects may be intertwined with how we classify ourselves and our co-actor in group terms. However, it is not currently clear if a well-established collective identity, such as national identities, influences entrainment’s effects on our actual behaviours, such as cooperation. The current studies tested whether greater cooperation was seen following synchronous versus asynchronous movements when people were moving with somebody of the same vs. a different nationality. As expected, results showed greater cooperation following synchronous vs asynchronous movements amongst people of different socio-cultural backgrounds, but not amongst those with a common socio-cultural background. Potential explanations for these results are explored, suggesting that entrainment and its social effects may be modulated by our group identities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.01.007.
Allsop, J. S., Vaitkus, T., Marie, D., & Miles, L. K. (2016). Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Anshell, A., & Kipper, D. A. (1988). The influence of group singing on trust and cooperation. Journal of Music Therapy, 25(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/25.3.145.
Ashton-James, C., Van Baaren, R. B., Chartrand, T. L., Decety, J., & Karremans, J. (2007). Mimicry and me: The impact of mimicry on self-construal. Social Cognition, 25(4), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609355718.
Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology (Vol. 371). London: Academic press, New York.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Cirelli, L. (2018). How interpersonal synchrony facilitates early prosocial behaviour. Current opion in Psychology, 20, 35–39.
Cirelli, L.K., Wan, S.J., & Trainor, L.J. (2014a). Fourteen-month-old infants use interpersonal synchrony as a cue to direct helpfulness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 19, 369(1658). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0400.
Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2014b). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 1003–1011.
Cross, L., Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2016). How moving together brings us together: When coordinated rhythmic movement affects cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01983.
Cross, L., Atherton, G., Wilson, A. D. & Golonka, S. (2017). Imagined Steps: Mental Simulation of Coordinated Rhythmic Movements Effects on social affiliation. Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01798, Imagined Steps: Mental Simulation of Coordinated Rhythmic Movements Effects on Pro-sociality.
De Cremer, D., & Stouten, J. (2003). When do people find cooperation most justified?: The effect of trust and self-other merging in social dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 16, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022974027023.
Durkheim, E. (1965). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
Ehrenreich, B. (2007). Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy. London: Granta Books.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155.
Feldman, R. (2006). From biological rhythms to social rhythms: Physiological precursors of mother-infant synchrony. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 175–188.
Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2012). The impact of social ties on group interactions: Evidence from minimal groups and randomly assigned real groups. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 4(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.4.1.101.
Good, A., Choma, B., & Russo, F. A. (2017). Movement synchrony influences intergroup relations in a minimal groups paradigm. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 231–238.
Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signalling system. Human Nature, 14(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1015-z.
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949.
Jasp Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.9). Computer software. https://jasp-stats.org/
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369(1658), 20130394.
Kelso, S. J. A. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self Organisation of brain and behaviour. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3?, Perception 36 ECVP Abstract Supplement.
Kokal, I., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates pro-social commitment — If the rhythm comes easily. PLoS One, 6(11), e27272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027272.
Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 183–207.
Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19(1), 68–76.
Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015.
Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1.
McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2011). Social interactions and the salience of social identity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003.
McNeill, W. H. (1997). Keeping together in time. Harvard University Press.
Merker, B. (2000). Synchronous chorusing and human origins (pp. 315–327). In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (eds.) (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Miles, L. K., Lumsden, J., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioural synchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2641-z.
Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behaviour: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843020100400400.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS One, 8(8), e71182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071182.
Reddish, P., Bulbulia, J., & Fischer, R. (2014). Does synchrony promote generalized Prosociality? Religion, Brain & Behaviour., 4(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.764545.
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452.
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.
Tunçgenç, B., & Cohen, E. (2016). Movement synchrony forges social bonds across group divides. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01737.
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693–695.
Vicaria, I. M., & Dickens, L. (2016). Meta-analyses of the intra- and interpersonal outcomes of interpersonal coordination. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0238-8.
Wilson, A.D., Collins, D.R., & Bingham, G.P. (2005a) a. Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase. Experimental Brain Research, 165(3), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2301-2.
Wilson, A.D., Collins, D.R., & Bingham, G.P. (2005b) b. Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: Stable perception leads to stable action. Experimental Brain Research, 164(4), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2272-3.
Wiltermuth, S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. This work received ethical approval form the relevant ethics committees, and all participants gave their full informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cross, L., Turgeon, M. & Atherton, G. Moving with the in-crowd: Cooperation and interpersonal entrainment in in- vs. out- groups. Curr Psychol 40, 3393–3400 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00283-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00283-0