How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In Studies 1 to 3, German female students (total N = 326) rated the likability and typicality of male targets: a nonsexist, a benevolent sexist, a hostile sexist, and (in Studies 2 and 3) an ambivalent sexist. When targets were presented as response profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick and Fiske 1996) (Studies 2 and 3), the benevolent sexist was rated to be most likable but least typical, whereas the ambivalent sexist was rated to be highly typical. Thus, women were aware of a link between benevolent and hostile sexism and approved of men’s benevolent sexism, especially when it was not paired with hostile sexism. Likability ratings were moderated by participants’ own benevolent sexism and feminist attitude.
- Abrams, D., Viki, G. T. N., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125. CrossRef
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
- Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. CrossRef
- Branscombe, N. R., & Deaux, K. (1991). Feminist attitude accessibility and behavioral intentions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 411–418. CrossRef
- Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary pespective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. CrossRef
- Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
- Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Harpercollins College Publishers.
- Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779. CrossRef
- Ditto, P. H., & Jemmott, J. B. I. I. I. (1989). From rarity to evaluative extremity: Effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 16–26. CrossRef
- Eckes, T. (2001). Ambivalenter Sexismus und die Polarisierung von Geschlechterstereotypen [Ambivalent sexism and the polarization of gender stereotypes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 235–247. CrossRef
- Eckes, T., & Six-Materna, I. (1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des ambivalenten Sexismus [Hostility and benevolence: A scale for the assessment of ambivalent sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211–228. CrossRef
- Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. CrossRef
- Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 97–115. CrossRef
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. CrossRef
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. CrossRef
- Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. CrossRef
- Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. CrossRef
- Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352. CrossRef
- Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489. CrossRef
- Morgan, B. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a liberal feminist attitude and ideology scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34, 359–390. CrossRef
- Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., de Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.
- Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
- Siebler, F., Sabelus, S., & Bohner, G. (2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 22–35. CrossRef
- Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measurs and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411. CrossRef
- United Nations (2008). Human development report 2007/2008. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from the United Nations Development Programme Web site: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_20072008_EN_Complete.pdf.
- Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The "true" romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533–537. CrossRef
- How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Volume 62, Issue 7-8 , pp 568-582
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Ambivalent sexism
- Feminist attitudes
- Gender relations
- Person perception
- Industry Sectors