Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are women truly “more emotional” than men? Sex differences in an indirect model-based measure of emotional feelings

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Common beliefs regard women as being more emotional than men. However, assessing differences in emotional feelings holds methodological challenges because of being based on explicit reports. Such research often lacks an explicit measurement model, and reports are potentially biased by stereotypical knowledge and because of existing sex differences in the ease of emotion-label retrieval. This pre-registered analysis employed an evidence accumulation model that has previously been validated for describing binary (un)pleasantness reports made in response to normed emotion-eliciting pictures. This measurement model links overt binary (un)pleasantness reports with the latent variables processing efficiency and a bias to report a certain emotional feeling. Employing online rather than retrospective reports that do not involve intensity rating, together with an explicit measurement model overcome the aforementioned methodological challenges. Across nine different experiments (N = 355) women generated negative emotions more efficiently than men. There was no sex difference in the bias to report negative emotions and in positive emotions. Post hoc account of the results emphasizes the greater relevance of negative emotions for women, given their evolutionary role as primary caregivers who should show enhanced sensitivity for dangers to their offspring (“fitness threat”), given their heightened likelihood of being themselves exposed to physical violence and given their traditional social roles that still remain relevant in many societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework (see links for each experiment in Method).

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1979). Attachment as related to mother-infant interaction. In J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer, & M.-C. Busnel (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 1–51). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60032-7

  • Babchuk, W. A., Hames, R. B., & Thompson, R. A. (1985). Sex differences in the recognition of infant facial expressions of emotion: The primary caretaker hypothesis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(2), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition & Emotion, 12(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovich, R., & Meiran, N. (2022). Pleasant emotional feelings follow one of the most basic psychophysical laws (weber’s law) as most sensations do. Emotion.‏

  • Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71(3), 425–440.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 300–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57(3), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., Chang, L., Yang, M., Huo, M., & Zhou, R. (2016). Gender differences in emotional response: Inconsistency between experience and expressivity. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0158666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158666

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: Different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donkin, C., & Brown, S. D. (2018). Response times and decision-making. Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience, 349–377‏.

  • Durik, A. M., Hyde, J. S., Marks, A. C., Roy, A. L., Anaya, D., & Schultz, G. (2006). Ethnicity and gender stereotypes of emotion. Sex Roles, 54(7), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9020-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T., & Trautner, H. M. (2012). The developmental social psychology of gender. Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2011). Evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory and universal gender differences in cognition and behavior. Sex Roles, 64(9), 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filkowski, M. M., Olsen, R. M., Duda, B., Wanger, T. J., & Sabatinelli, D. (2017). Sex differences in emotional perception: Meta analysis of divergent activation. NeuroImage, 147, 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & LaFrance, M. (2015). What drives the smile and the tear: Why women are more emotionally expressive than men. Emotion Review, 7(1), 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H., Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., van Vianen, A. E. M., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, J. M. B., Gouzoules, H., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Separating production from perception: Perceiver-based explanations for sex differences in emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 394–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, M. G., & Kring, A. M. (2007). Sex differences in the time course of emotion. Emotion, 7(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Givon, E., Itzhak-Raz, A., Karmon-Presser, A., Danieli, G., & Meiran, N. (2020). How does the emotional experience evolve? Feeling generation as evidence accumulation. Emotion, 20(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Givon, E., Udelsman-Danieli, G., Almagor, O., Fekete, T., Shriki, O., & Meiran, N. (2022). Can feelings “feel” wrong? Similarities between counter-normative emotion reports and perceptual errors. Psychological Science, 09567976211063915.

  • Grossman, M., & Wood, W. (1993). Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: A social role interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, T. (2022). The human fear paradox: Affective origins of cooperative care. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–43.‏

  • Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehman, J. A., & Salmon, C. A. (2020). Beyond sex differences: Predictors of negative emotions following casual sex. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, C. H., Rosengren, K. S., & Smith, D. P. (2004). Emotion and motivated behavior: Postural adjustments to affective picture viewing. Biological Psychology, 66(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, R. L., & Bradley, D. B. (2007). The sex difference in depression across 29 countries. Social Forces, 85(4), 1483–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A. H., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression: Integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychological Review, 115(2), 291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itkes, O., Kimchi, R., Haj-Ali, H., Shapiro, A., & Kron, A. (2017). Dissociating affective and semantic valence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(7), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.2) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/

  • Jones, L. L., Wurm, L. H., Norville, G. A., & Mullins, K. L. (2020). Sex differences in emoji use, familiarity, and valence. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. M., Forsyth, J. P., & Karekla, M. (2006). Sex differences in response to a panicogenic challenge procedure: An experimental evaluation of panic vulnerability in a non-clinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(10), 1421–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. D. (1978). Toward a sociology of emotions: Some problems and some solutions. The American Sociologist, 30–41.‏

  • Kret, M. E., & De Gelder, B. (2012). A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Jornal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Boyer, M., Drake, B., Gainsburg, I., Vickers, B., Ybarra, O., & Jonides, J. (2019). Does counting emotion words on online social networks provide a window into people’s subjective experience of emotion? A case study on Facebook. Emotion, 19(1), 97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). The subjective experience of emotion: A fearful view. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-S., & Strickland, L. (2020). Evidence accumulation models with R: A practical guide to hierarchical Bayesian methods. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei, A., & Angrilli, A. (2019). E-MOVIE-Experimental MOVies for Induction of Emotions in neuroscience: An innovative film database with normative data and sex differences. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0223124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marchewka, A., Żurawski, Ł, Jednoróg, K., & Grabowska, A. (2014). The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDuff, D., Kodra, E., Kaliouby, R. E., & LaFrance, M. (2017). A large-scale analysis of sex differences in facial expressions. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0173942.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. T., & Troisi, A. (1998). Prevalence differences in depression among males and females: Are there evolutionary explanations? British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71(4), 479–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rae, B., Heathcote, A., Donkin, C., Averell, L., & Brown, S. (2014). The hare and the tortoise: Emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rattel, J. A., Mauss, I. B., Liedlgruber, M., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2020). Sex differences in emotional concordance. Biological Psychology, 151, 107845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1987). Toward a dynamic theory of emotion: The component process model of affective states. Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 1, 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2015). The evolution of culturally-variable sex differences: Men and women are not always different, but when they are… it appears not to result from patriarchy or sex role socialization. In The evolution of sexuality (pp. 221–256). Springer, Cham.

  • Schubert, A.-L., Hagemann, D., Voss, A., & Bergmann, K. (2017). Evaluating the model fit of diffusion models with the root mean square error of approximation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 77, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life, 22‏.

  • Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behavior? American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1137–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer-Landau, E., & Meiran, N. (2021). Cognitive appraisal contributes to feeling generation through emotional evidence accumulation rate: Evidence from instructed fictional reappraisal. Emotion, 21(7), 1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA. 1980. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10012870999/

  • Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1578–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, J. L., & Morgan, R. E. (2014). Nonfatal domestic violence. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 383–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Volynets, S., Glerean, E., Hietanen, J. K., Hari, R., & Nummenmaa, L. (2020). Bodily maps of emotions are culturally universal. Emotion, 20(7), 1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Grant 1547/20 from the Israel Science Foundation to Nachshon Meiran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel

    Ella Givon, Rotem Berkovich, Elad Oz-Cohen, Kim Rubinstein, Ella Singer-Landau, Gal Udelsman-Danieli & Nachshon Meiran

Authors
  1. Ella Givon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rotem Berkovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elad Oz-Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kim Rubinstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ella Singer-Landau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gal Udelsman-Danieli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nachshon Meiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ella Givon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Givon, E., Berkovich, R., Oz-Cohen, E. et al. Are women truly “more emotional” than men? Sex differences in an indirect model-based measure of emotional feelings. Curr Psychol 42, 32469–32482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04227-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04227-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation