Skip to main content
Log in

Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS)

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Likert-type scale was developed to provide a feminist attitude measure that taps the domains of gender role attitudes, goals of feminism, and feminist ideology. The development and testing of the scale involved two studies. First, a pilot study was conducted to help generate themes and items for the scale. Second, the validity and reliability of the scale was empirically tested. The pilot study was conducted with two samples, an undergraduate sample (N =99; ethnic breakdown unknown) and a group of participants in a women's studies conference (N =54; ethnic breakdown unknown). Subsequent empirical testing was conducted on two samples, an additional group of undergraduates (N =209; 43% Asian American, 37% Caucasian, 12% Hispanic, 4% African American, 2% Native American) and a subsample of the Women's Studies conference participants (N =25; 79% Caucasian, 17% Asian American, and 4% Hispanic). Results demonstrate that the final 60-item form of the Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS) scale and each of its domains are highly reliable. Furthermore, the LFAIS has good convergent, divergent, concurrent, and known-groups validity. The scale was not susceptible to social desirability bias. Although tested on samples with fairly narrow demographics, the LFAIS shows promise as a reliable and valid measure of liberal feminist attitudes for use by researchers interested in an overtly sociopolitical measure of feminist attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aneshensel, C., & Rosen, B. (1980). Domestic roles and sex differences in occupational expectations.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anquist, S., Mickelson, R., & Penna, A. (1977). Sex differences in sex-role conceptions and family orientation of high school students.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. (1975). Sexist students in American colleges: A descriptive note.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, L., & Houser, B. (1979). Perceived satisfactions and costs of motherhood and employment among married women.Journal of Population, 2, 306–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, C. (1990).Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, C., King, D., Beere, D., & King, L. (1984). The sex-role egalitarianism scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes.Sex Roles, 10, 563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bers, T. (1980). Perceptions of women's role among community college women.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 492–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N., & Fitzgerald, L. (1987).The career psychology of women. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A., Elmore, P., & Naffziger, N. (1976). Development of the attitudes toward feminist issues scale.Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 9, 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. (1984). Women candidates and support for feminism concerns: The closet feminist syndrome.The Western Political Quarterly, 37, 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978).The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clingman, J., Lushene, R., & Calvo, L. (1981). Attributed motivations for feminism as a function of occupation, marital status, and age.Sex Roles, 7, 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condor, S. (1986). Sex role beliefs and ‘traditional’ women: Feminist and intergroup perspectives. In S. Wilkerson (Ed.),Feminist social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Maracek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories.American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender.Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1974).The second sex (H. M. Parshley, trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckard, B. (1975).The women's movement. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempewolff, J. A. (1974). Development and validation of a feminism scale.Psychological Review, 34, 651–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, N., Woods, N., & James, S. (1981). ISRO: A scale to measure sex-role orientation.Sex Roles, 7, 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, L., & Orbach, S. (1983).Understanding women. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, H. (1983).Contemporary feminist thought. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, H. (1989).A social learning model explaining women's career and achievement motivation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Fassinger, R. (1985). A causal model of career choices in college women.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 123–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1983). The women's movement in the working class.Sex Roles, 9, 493–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira-McDonough, J. (1985). Gender, race and class: Differences in levels of feminist orientation.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963).The feminine mystique. New York: Dell Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1981).The second stage. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulenwider, C. K. (1981). Feminist ideology and the political attitudes and participation of white and minority women.Western Political Quarterly, 34, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (1985).Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (1987). Emerging social divisions among women: Implications for welfare state politics.Politics and Society, 15, 213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, M. (1980). The lure of motherhood.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffaradli-Doty, P., & Carlson, E. (1979). Consistency in attitude and behavior of women with a liberated attitude toward the rights and roles of women.Sex Roles, 5, 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C. (1976). Women's Liberation Scale (WLS): A measure of attitude toward positions advocated by women's groups.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, J., Gergen, M., Quigley, K., & Gergen, K. (1974). The women's liberation movement: Attitudes and action.Journal of Personality, 42, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1979). The struggle for reproductive freedom: Three stages of feminism. In Z. R. Eisenstein (Ed.)Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, G. (1971).The female eunuch. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P. (1985). Women's gender consciousness.Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A., & Bachman, J. (1982).Sex role attitudes among high school seniors. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1981).Ain't I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. (1979). A rose by any other name: Attitudes toward feminism as function of its label.Sex Roles, 5, 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. (1981). You say potato and I say potahto: Attitudes toward feminism as function of its subject-selected label.Sex Roles, 7, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (1983).Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Roman and Allanheld Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joesting, J. (1982). Sex-role attitudes of Australian and United States women's rights activities.Psychological Reports 51, 839–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale.Psychological Reports, 42, 731–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. (1984).Liberalism and conservatism. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, B. (1989). The experience of feminism.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, C. (1936). The construction of a belief-pattern scale for measuring attitudes toward feminism.Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. (1984).Gender politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1985).Women in college: Shaping new feminine identities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornbluh, F. (1991). Feminism: Still hazy after all these years.Tikkun, 6, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korth, B. (1978). Superficiality and dimensionality of sexism.Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H., & Thiemann, S. (1987).How many subjects? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravetz, D., Marecek, J., & Finn, S. (1983). Factors influencing women's participation in consciousness-raising groups.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian?Sex Roles, 19, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Let's get real about feminism: The backlash, the myth, the movement. (1993, Sept./Oct.).Ms, 4, 34–43.

  • Lewin, M., & Tragos, L. (1987). Has the feminist movement influenced adolescent sex role attitudes? A reassessment after a quarter century.Sex Roles, 16, 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1972). How ideology shapes women's lives.Scientific American, 226, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips, H. (1988).Sex and gender. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. E. (1993). Who wants the children? Some relationships among attitudes toward children, parents, and the liberation of women.American Psychologist, 28, 573–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (1987).Women's lives. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loxley, W. (1982).The relationship between feminism and other social attitudes: Female and male differences. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Mason, K., & Bumpass, L. (1975). U.S. women's sex-role ideology, 1970.American Journal of Sociology, 80, 1213–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K., Czajka, J., & Arber, A. (1976). Change in U.S. women's sex-role attitudes, 1964–1974.American Sociological Review, 41, 573–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millett, K. (1970).Sexual politics. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milo, T., Badger, L., & Coggins, D. (1983). Conceptual Analysis of the Sex-Role Ideology Scale.Psychological Reports, 53, 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. L. (1994).The relationship of feminist attitudes to behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1970).Sisterhood is powerful. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parelius, A. (1975). Emerging sex-role attitudes, expectations, and strains among college women.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 146–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991).How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1253–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.).Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlicki, R., & Almqist, C. (1973). Authoritarianism, locus of control, and tolerance of ambiguity as reflected in membership and nonmembership in a women's liberation group.Psychological Reports, 32, 1331–1337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1978). Men's traditional perceptions and attitudes about women: Correlates of adjustment or maladjustment.Psychological Reports, 42, 975–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutzer, E. (1988). Work life, family life, and women's support of feminism.American Sociological Review, 53, 640–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransford, H. E., & Miller, J. (1983). Race, sex, and feminist outlooks.American Sociological Review, 48, 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. (1987). New wave or second stage? Attitudes of college women toward feminism.Sex Roles, 16, 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984).Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, R. (1984).Women who do and women who don't join the women's movement. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., Phillips, D., & McCartney, K. (1989). Working mothers and their families.American Psychologist, 44, 1402–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R., & Christiansen, J. (1976). The construct validation of a short form attitudes toward feminism scale.Social Science Research, 61, 294–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R., Feree, M. M., & Miller, F. (1975). A short scale of attitudes toward feminism.Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D., & Self, G. (1981). Feminists and traditionalists: An attitudinal comparison.Sex Roles, 7, 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The attitudes toward women scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1978).Masculinity and Femininity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snitow, A. (1989, Spring). Pages from a gender diary.Dissent, 205–224.

  • Steinem, G. (1983).Outrageous acts and everyday rebellions. New York: Plume Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleporos, E. (1977). Motivational patterns in attitudes towards the women's liberation movement.Journal of Personality, 45, 484–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, L. (1970).Voices from women's liberation. New York: Signet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C. (1973). Who likes women's liberation and why: The case of the unliberated liberals.Journal of Social Issues, 29, 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomeh, A. (1978). Sex-role orientation: An analysis of structural and attitudinal predictors.Journal of Marriage and Family, 40, 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R. (1989).Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction. San Francisco: CA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towner, L. (1990).California women survey results. California Women. 2, 6.

  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1972).A vindication of the rights of women. C. Poston (Ed.), New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levonian Morgan, B. Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles 34, 359–390 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547807

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547807

Keywords

Navigation