Skip to main content
Log in

Possibilities and Limitations of Computer-Assisted Method Development in HILIC: A Case Study

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the possibilities and limitations of computer-assisted method development (CAMD) for the HILIC separation optimization of a mixture of 13 isomeric hydroxy- and aminobenzoic acids on a ZIC-HILIC column. The isocratically obtained Neue and Kuss retention parameters enabled the accurate gradient retention modeling for peaks eluting well within the gradient (mean error of 2.7 %). The prediction errors for peaks eluting at the end of the gradient could be reduced from 8.8 to 6.1 % by implementing the isocratic regime after the gradient into the expression for the gradient retention factor. The prediction of the corresponding peak widths improved significantly for certain compounds and gradient profiles using individual gradient N values for each compound compared to employing a single N value for all compounds and gradient profiles. Two gradient optimization strategies (constructing the R s map based on individual retention modeling and predictive elution stretching and shifting, PEWS2) resulted in a reasonable separation of the challenging mixture of 13 isomeric hydroxy- and aminobenzoic acids on the ZIC-HILIC column. Overall, the optimization was limited by the steep decrease in N (dropping to the isocratic N value) and corresponding increase in peak width when increasing the gradient time. The discrimination factors d 0 were used to assess the resolution between peaks varying widely in height. The best separation was found to be obtained via the PEWS2 approach. Both the individual retention modeling and PEWS2 strategies corresponded to a total instrument time less than 12 h (including equilibration). Finally, it was found that the salt concentration had a significant effect on both the retention and the peak shape of the compounds, resulting in a small “solution domain” at 10 mM. Coupled columns with higher efficiencies are suggested to improve the resolution and robustness of the separation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpert AJ (1990) J Chromatogr 499:177–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kokotou MG, Thomaidis NS (2012) Chromatographia 75:457–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Périat A, Kohler I, Veuthey J-L, Guillarme D (2013) LCGC Eur 26:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou T, Lucy CA (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:82–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCalley D (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3408–3417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahsay G, Song H, Van Schepdael A, Cabooter D, Adams E (2014) J Pharm Biomed Anal 87:142–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Valette JC, Demesmay C, Rocca JL, Verdon E (2004) Chromatographia 59:55–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohler I, Derks RJE, Giera M (2016) LCGC Eur 30:60–75

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duarte RMBO, Duarte AC (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:7556–7563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis JM, Giddings JC (1985) Anal Chem 57:2168–2177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beinert W, Eckert V, Kgaa M, Galushko S, Tanchuk V, Shishkina I (2001) LC-GC Europe on-line supplementary, pp 34–38

  12. Molnar I (2002) J Chromatogr A 965:175–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder LR, Dolan JW (1998) Adv Chromatogr 38:115–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenmakers PJ, Billiet HAH, Tijssen R, De Galan L (1978) J Chromatogr 149:519–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Neue UD, Mendeze A (2007) J Sep Sci 30:949–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baeza-Baeza JJ, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC (2014) J Sep Sci 37:2269–2277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neue UD, Kuss H-J (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3794–3803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tyteca E, Periat A, Rudaz S, Desmet G, Guillarme D (2014) J Chromatogr A 1337:116–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyteca E, Guillarme D, Desmet G (2014) J Chromatogr A 1368:125–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Noga S, Jandera P, Buszewski B (2013) Chromatographia 76:929–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng X-D, Peng X-T, Yu Q-W, Yuan B-F, Feng Y-Q (2013) Chromatographia 76:1569–1576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jandera P (2011) Anal Chim Acta 692:1–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Skeriková V, Jandera P (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:7981–7989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Periat A, Debrus B, Rudaz S, Guillarme D (2013) J Chromatogr A 1282:72–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo Y, Srinivasan S, Gaiki S (2007) Chromatographia 66:223–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Greco G, Grosse S, Letzel T (2012) J Chromatogr A 1235:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo Y, Gaiki S (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:5920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McCalley DV (2007) J Chromatogr A 1171:46–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tyteca E, Liekens A, Clicq D, Fanigliulo A, Debrus B, Rudaz S, Guillarme D, Desmet G (2012) Anal Chem 84:7823–7830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. El Fallah MZ, Martin M (1987) Chromatographia 24:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Karatapanis AE, Fiamegos YC, Stalikas CD (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:2871–2879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baeza-Baeza JJ, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC (2014) J Chromatogr A 1022:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Tyteca.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Dr. Eva Tyteca was awarded a post-doctoral fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen).

Conflict of interest

Dr. Eva Tyteca declares that she has no conflict of interest. Stefan Bieber declares that he has no conflict of interest. Prof. Thomas Letzel declares that he has no conflict of interest. Prof. Gert Desmet declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Young Investigators in Separation Science with editors D. Mangelings, G. Massolini, G. K. E. Scriba, R. M. Smith and A. M. Striegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyteca, E., Bieber, S., Letzel, T. et al. Possibilities and Limitations of Computer-Assisted Method Development in HILIC: A Case Study. Chromatographia 80, 771–781 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3127-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3127-8

Keywords

Navigation