Abstract
Purpose
This study was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and postoperative outcomes of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH).
Methods
A prospective study was conducted between February and March 2010. PSH was performed with single-window anoscopes for single isolated hemorrhoids, bi-window anoscopes for two isolated hemorrhoids, and tri-window anoscopes for three isolated hemorrhoids or circumferential hemorrhoids. The data pertaining to demographics, preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.
Results
Forty-four eligible patients underwent PSH. Single-window anoscopes were used in 2 patients, and bi- and tri-window anoscopes in 6 and 36 patients. The blood loss in patients with single-window, bi-window, and tri-window anoscopes was 6.0 ml (range 5.0–7.0 ml), 5.0 ml (range 5.0–6.5 ml), and 5.0 ml (4.5–14.5 ml) (P = 0.332). The mean postoperative visual analog scale score for pain was 3 (range, 1–4), 2 (range 1–4), 3 (range 2–6), 1 (range 0–3), 1 (range 0–2) and 2 (range 2–4) at 12 h, days 1, 2, 3, and 7, and at first defecation. The rate of urgency was 9.1%. No patients developed anal incontinence or stenosis. The 1-year recurrence rate of prolapsing hemorrhoids was 2.3%.
Conclusions
Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy appears to be a safe and effective technique for grade III–IV hemorrhoids. Encouragingly, PSH is associated with mild postoperative pain, few urgency episodes, and no stenosis or anal incontinence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CSH:
-
Conventional stapled hemorrhoidopexy
- PSH:
-
Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy
- SW:
-
Single-window
- BW:
-
Bi-window
- TW:
-
Tri-window
- MMH:
-
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- CAD:
-
Circular anal dilator
- VAS:
-
Visual analog scale
References
Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:477–81.
Whitehead W. The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Br Med J. 1882;1:148–50.
Wolff BG, Culp CE. The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. An unjustly maligned procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:587–90.
Ommer A, Wenger FA, Rolfs T, Walz MK. Continence disorders after anal surgery—a relevant problem? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1023–31.
Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Lond MB, Officer R, Melb BS. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937;2:1119.
Khubchandani IT. Operative hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Clin N Am. 1988;68:1411–6.
Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1998:777–84.
Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:147–60.
Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:335–44.
Hachiro Y, Kunimoto M, Abe T, Kitada M, Ebisawa Y. Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) injection as the mainstay of treatment for internal hemorrhoids. Surg Today. 2011;41:806–9.
Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:204–12.
Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F, Marniga G, Mazzeo P, Brandara F, et al. Surgical treatment of anal stenosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1921–8.
Salvati EP. Nonoperative management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:989–93.
Z’graggen K, Maurer CA, Birrer S, Giachino D, Kern B, Büchler MW. A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection. Ann Surg. 2001;234:780–7.
Katdare MV, Ricciardi R. Anal stenosis. Surg Clin N Am. 2010;90:137–45.
Thomson WHF. The nature of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 1975;62:542–52.
Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000;356:730–3.
Gao XH, Fu CG, Nabieu PF. Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence. World J Surg. 2010;34:344–52.
Gerjy R, Nyström PO. Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:754–7.
Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg. 2005;242:29–35.
Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:164–8.
Yao LQ, Zhong YS, Xu JM, Zhou PH, Xu MD, Song LJ, et al. Rectal stenosis following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44:897–9.
Brisinda G. How to treat haemorrhoids. Prevention is best; haemorrhoidectomy needs skilled operators. BMJ. 2000;321:582–3.
Conflict of interest
Hong-Cheng Lin and co-authors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, HC., He, QL., Ren, DL. et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids. Surg Today 42, 868–875 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0085-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0085-5