Skip to main content
Log in

Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and postoperative outcomes of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH).

Methods

A prospective study was conducted between February and March 2010. PSH was performed with single-window anoscopes for single isolated hemorrhoids, bi-window anoscopes for two isolated hemorrhoids, and tri-window anoscopes for three isolated hemorrhoids or circumferential hemorrhoids. The data pertaining to demographics, preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results

Forty-four eligible patients underwent PSH. Single-window anoscopes were used in 2 patients, and bi- and tri-window anoscopes in 6 and 36 patients. The blood loss in patients with single-window, bi-window, and tri-window anoscopes was 6.0 ml (range 5.0–7.0 ml), 5.0 ml (range 5.0–6.5 ml), and 5.0 ml (4.5–14.5 ml) (P = 0.332). The mean postoperative visual analog scale score for pain was 3 (range, 1–4), 2 (range 1–4), 3 (range 2–6), 1 (range 0–3), 1 (range 0–2) and 2 (range 2–4) at 12 h, days 1, 2, 3, and 7, and at first defecation. The rate of urgency was 9.1%. No patients developed anal incontinence or stenosis. The 1-year recurrence rate of prolapsing hemorrhoids was 2.3%.

Conclusions

Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy appears to be a safe and effective technique for grade III–IV hemorrhoids. Encouragingly, PSH is associated with mild postoperative pain, few urgency episodes, and no stenosis or anal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSH:

Conventional stapled hemorrhoidopexy

PSH:

Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy

SW:

Single-window

BW:

Bi-window

TW:

Tri-window

MMH:

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

CAD:

Circular anal dilator

VAS:

Visual analog scale

References

  1. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:477–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitehead W. The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Br Med J. 1882;1:148–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff BG, Culp CE. The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. An unjustly maligned procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:587–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ommer A, Wenger FA, Rolfs T, Walz MK. Continence disorders after anal surgery—a relevant problem? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1023–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Lond MB, Officer R, Melb BS. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937;2:1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khubchandani IT. Operative hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Clin N Am. 1988;68:1411–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1998:777–84.

  8. Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:147–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:335–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hachiro Y, Kunimoto M, Abe T, Kitada M, Ebisawa Y. Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) injection as the mainstay of treatment for internal hemorrhoids. Surg Today. 2011;41:806–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:204–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F, Marniga G, Mazzeo P, Brandara F, et al. Surgical treatment of anal stenosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1921–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salvati EP. Nonoperative management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:989–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z’graggen K, Maurer CA, Birrer S, Giachino D, Kern B, Büchler MW. A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection. Ann Surg. 2001;234:780–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katdare MV, Ricciardi R. Anal stenosis. Surg Clin N Am. 2010;90:137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomson WHF. The nature of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 1975;62:542–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000;356:730–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao XH, Fu CG, Nabieu PF. Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence. World J Surg. 2010;34:344–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerjy R, Nyström PO. Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:754–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg. 2005;242:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mlakar B, Kosorok P. Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:164–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yao LQ, Zhong YS, Xu JM, Zhou PH, Xu MD, Song LJ, et al. Rectal stenosis following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44:897–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brisinda G. How to treat haemorrhoids. Prevention is best; haemorrhoidectomy needs skilled operators. BMJ. 2000;321:582–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Hong-Cheng Lin and co-authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Lin Ren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, HC., He, QL., Ren, DL. et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids. Surg Today 42, 868–875 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0085-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0085-5

Keywords

Navigation