Skip to main content
Log in

The whitehead hemorrhoidectomy

An unjustly maligned procedure

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The Whitehead technique of hemorrhoidectomy has developed a reputation as an undesirable procedure since its description in 1882. The chief criticisms have been considerable blood loss, disturbance of continence, formation of an ectropion, and poor healing of the mucocutaneous junction followed by stricture formation. Five hundred fifty-six patients underwent a modified Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy, performed by one author (C.E.C.), between 1963 and 1983. Seventy-two of these patients had unclaimed follow-up letters, leaving 484 patients available for review. Four hundred forty of these patients were followed for over three years. Postoperative complications included fistula or abscess in 1.1 percent, flap loss in 6.9 percent, and a nonhealing wound in one patient. There were no recurrences and there was no ectropion formation, or “Whitehead deformity”. Mortality was zero and total morbidity, including 7.2 percent flap detachment, was 12.2%. A modified Whitehead technique has become the authors' procedure of choice for circumferential prolapsing and bleeding hemorrhoids and mucosa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitehead W. The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Br Med J (Clin Res) 1882;1:148–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whitehead W. Three hundred consecutive cases of haemorrhoids cured by excision. Br Med J (Clin Res) 1887;1:449–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews E. Disastrous results following Whitehead's operation and the so-called American operation. Columbus Med J 1895; 15:97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews E. Some of the evils caused by Whitehead's operation and by its modification, the American operation. Trans Ill Med Soc. 1895:433–46.

  5. Mathews JM. A treatise on diseases of the rectum, anus, and sigmoid flexure. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelsey CB. Diseases of the rectum and anus: their pathology, diagnosis, and treatment, New York: William Wood, 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buie LA Sr. Quoted by Bonello JC. Who's afraid of the dentate line? The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy: its controversial past, quiescent present and capricious future. Am J Surg (in press).

  8. Burchell MC, Thow GB, Manson RR. A “modified Whitehead” hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:225–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrios G, Khubchandani M. Whitehead operation revisited. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:330–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khubchandani M. Results of Whitehead operation Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:730–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rand AA. The sliding skin-flap graft operation for hemorrhoids: a modification of the Whitehead procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1969;12:265–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg SM, Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S. Other forms of hemorrhoidectomy. In: Essential of anorectal surgery. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1980:82–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Wolff, B.G. The whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 587–590 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556790

Key words

Navigation