Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic Colorectal Surgery

  • Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery has many potential benefits, and the application of recently developed robotic technology to patients with colorectal diseases is rapidly gaining popularity.

Quality and Outcomes

However, the literature evaluating such techniques, including the outcomes, risks, and costs, is limited. In this review, we evaluate and summarize the existing information, calling attention to areas where future investigation should occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs, M., J.C. Verdeja, and H.S. Goldstein, Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy, 1991. 1(3): p. 144–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2004. 350(20): p. 2050–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayne, D.G., et al., Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 2010. 97(11): p. 1638–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayne, D.G., et al., Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(21): p. 3061–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Pas, M.H., et al., Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 2013. 14(3): p. 210–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, J.C., et al., Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy—a multi-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012. 27(4): p. 527–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson, C.Y., et al., Technical aspects of robotic proctectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2012. 22(3): p. 189–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jimenez-Rodriguez, R.M., et al., Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012. 28(6): p. 815–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ragupathi, M., et al., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011. 25(1): p. 199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Hoog, D.E., et al., Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case–control study. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009. 24(10): p. 1201–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong, M.T., et al., Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2011. 54(3): p. 342–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ragupathi, M., et al., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic “salvage” rectopexy for recurrent ileoanal J-pouch prolapse. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2010. 2010: p. 790462.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McLemore, E.C., et al., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2012. 8(2): p. 178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, A.T., et al., Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012. 16(3): p. 587–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Surveillance Research Program, N.C.I. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results—Cancer Statistics. April 11, 2013; Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html.

  16. Asgeirsson, T. and A.J. Senagore, Colon Cancer, in Current Surgical Therapy, J.L. Cameron and A.M. Cameron, Editors. 2011, Elsevier Inc.: Philadelphia.

  17. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer, Version 3.2013. 2012 April 11, 2013; Available from: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf.

  18. Kim, H. and M.R. Weiser, Rectal Cancer, in Clinical Scenarios in General Surgery: Decision Making and Operative Technique, J.B. Dimick, Editor. 2012, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beets, G.L. and R.G. Beets-Tan, Pretherapy imaging of rectal cancers: ERUS or MRI? Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 2010. 19(4): p. 733–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Rectal Cancer, Version 4.2013. 2012 April 11, 2013; Available from: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/rectal.pdf.

  21. Sauer, R., et al., Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2004. 351(17): p. 1731–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapiteijn, E., et al., Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2001. 345(9): p. 638–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MacFarlane, J.K., R.D. Ryall, and R.J. Heald, Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet, 1993. 341(8843): p. 457–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang CY, H.W., Luo R, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ., Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends. Arch Surg, 2012. 147(8): p. 724–731.

  25. Scarpinata, R. and E.H. Aly, Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2013. 56(2): p. 253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, J.L. and G.D. Zhang, Risk factors analysis and scoring system application of conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2011. 21(5): p. 322–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patriti, A., et al., Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2009. 13(2): p. 176–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. deSouza, A.L., et al., Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2010. 53(12): p. 1611–7.

  29. D'Annibale, A., et al., Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013. 27(6): p. 1887–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baik, S., et al., Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009. 16(6): p. 1480–1487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pigazzi, A., et al., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy, 2006. 20(10): p. 1521–1525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park, Y., et al., Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup. Surgical Endoscopy, 2010. 24(3): p. 715–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hellan, M., H. Stein, and A. Pigazzi, Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009. 23(2): p. 447–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jafari, M.D., et al., The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013. 27(8): p. 3003–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Adamina, M., et al., Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection. British Journal of Surgery, 2011. 98(12): p. 1703–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramamoorthy, S. and V. Obias, Unique complications of robotic colorectal surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America, 2013. 93(1): p. 273–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hung, C.F., et al., Bowel complication during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Anticancer Research, 2011. 31(10): p. 3497–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ou, Y.C., et al., The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. BJU International, 2011. 108(3): p. 420–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wedmid, A., et al., Rectal injury during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: incidence and management. Journal of Urology, 2011. 186(5): p. 1928–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Patel, C.B., et al., A three-arm (laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic) matched-case analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2011. 54(2): p. 144–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pigazzi, A. RObotic Versus LAparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer (ROLARR). April 12, 2013; Available from: www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01736072.

  42. Collinson, F.J., et al., An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012. 27(2): p. 233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Memon, S., et al., Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012. 19(7): p. 2095–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin, S., et al., Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011. 17(47): p. 5214–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Trastulli, S., et al., Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Disease, 2012. 14(4): p. e134-56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, Y., et al., Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012. 19(12): p. 3727–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tyler, J.A., et al., Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2013. 56(4): p. 458–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kang, J., et al., The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison—open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Annals of Surgery, 2013. 257(1): p. 95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. deSouza, A.L., et al., A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2011. 54(3): p. 275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Leitao, M.M., Jr., et al., Introduction of a computer-based surgical platform in the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer: outcomes and impact on approach. Gynecologic Oncology, 2012. 125(2): p. 394–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim, J.Y., et al., A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012. 19(8): p. 2485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Alemozaffar, M., et al., Technical refinement and learning curve for attenuating neurapraxia during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve sexual function. European Urology, 2012. 61(6): p. 1222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sng, K.K., et al., The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2909-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Woelk, J.L., et al., The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013. 121(1): p. 87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kilic, G.S., et al., Effect of residents' previous laparoscopic surgery experience on initial robotic suturing experience. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012. 2012: p. 569456.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Perrenot, C., et al., The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer((R)) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012. 26(9): p. 2587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. deSouza, A.L., et al., Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2010. 53(7): p. 1000–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Park, J.S., et al., Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 2012. 99(9): p. 1219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Trastulli, S., et al., Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012. 28(6): p. 807–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Huettner, F., et al., One hundred and two consecutive robotic-assisted minimally invasive colectomies--an outcome and technical update. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011. 15(7): p. 1195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bokhari, M.B., et al., Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011. 25(3): p. 855–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Luca, F., et al., Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2011. doi: 10.1002/rcs.398.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Rawlings, A.L., et al., Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 2007. 21(10): p. 1701–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Room C-1075, New York, NY, 10065, USA

    Carrie Y. Peterson & Martin R. Weiser

Authors
  1. Carrie Y. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin R. Weiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin R. Weiser.

Additional information

Support: No grants or funding used in support of this article

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, C.Y., Weiser, M.R. Robotic Colorectal Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 398–403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2313-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2313-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation