Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study compared the experience and cost of the DaVinci Robotic system and laparoscopy for colon resections.

Methods

For this study, 30 consecutive robotic and 27 consecutive laparoscopic colectomies were divided into right and sigmoid colectomies for analysis. Comparisons included indications for surgery, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of operation, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, operating room (OR) cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, OR time cost, and total hospital cost.

Results

The comparison groups were similar in indications for surgery, gender, age, BMI, EBL, and LOS. The right colectomies included 17 robotic and 15 laparoscopic procedures. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the robotic cases, and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the laparoscopic cases. The total case time was 218.9 min for the robotic and 169.2 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.002). The total hospital cost was $9,255 for the robotic and $8,073 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.430). The total OR cost was $5,823 for the robotic and $4,339 for the laparoscopic procedures (p < 0.000). The sigmoid colectomies included 13 robotic and 12 laparoscopic procedures. The robotic and laparoscopic cases were managed in similar sequence. The total case time was 225.2 min for the robotic and 199.4 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.128). The total hospital cost was $12,335 for the robotic and $10,697 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.735). The total OR cost was $6,059 for the robotic and $4,974 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.068). The complications in the robotic groups were more numerous, but were not attributable to equipment.

Conclusions

The comparison groups were similar. The robotic cases were significantly longer for right colectomies because of the intracorporeal anastomosis instead of the extracorporeal anastomosis performed in the laparoscopy cases. Every cost category was higher for the robotic cases. The right colectomies showed significant increases in total OR cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, and OR time cost. The sigmoid colectomies had significant increases in OR personnel cost and OR supply cost. The total hospital cost was higher for the robotic groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anvari M, Birch D, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballantyne G, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83: 1293–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braumann C, Jacobi C, Menenakos C, Borchert U, Rueckert J, Mueller J (2005) Computer–assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the DaVinci system: our first experiences. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1820–1827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cadiere G, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467–1477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Camarillo D, Krummel T, Salisbury J (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188: 2S–15S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 117–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 2162–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delaney C, Lynch A, Senagore A, Fazio V (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1633–1639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanly E, Talamini M (2004) Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 188: 19S–26S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hazey J, Melvin W (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Lap Surg 11: 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11: 415–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Melvin W, Needleman J, Krause K, Schneider C, Wolf R, Michler R, Ellison E (2002) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery: initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1790–1792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez A, Zinner M, Ashley S, Brooks D, Whang E (2003) What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? Surg Endosc 17: 811–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rawlings A, Woodland J, Crawford D (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20: 1713–1718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Talamini M, Campbell K, Stanfield C (2002) Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: early experience and system description. J Laparendosc Adv Surg Tech 12: 225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin W (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17: 1521–1524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1689–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. L. Crawford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rawlings, A.L., Woodland, J.H., Vegunta, R.K. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21, 1701–1708 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y

Keywords

Navigation