Abstract
Introduction
One of the main uses of robotic assisted abdominal surgery is the mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of the present study is to analyse the learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer.
Patients and methods
We included in our study 43 consecutive rectal cancer resections (16 females and 27 males) performed from January 2008 through December 2010. Mean age of patients was 66 ± 9.0 years. Surgical procedures included both abdomino-perineal and anterior resections. We analysed the following parameters: demographic data of the patients included in the study, intra- and postoperative data, time taking to set up the robot for operations (set-up or docking time), operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rates and pathological specimen features. The learning curve was analysed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology.
Results
The procedures understudied included seven abdomino-perineal resections and 36 anterior resections. In our series of patients, mean robotic set-up time was 62.9 ± 24.6 min, and the mean operative time was 197.4 ± 44.3 min. Once we applied CUSUM methodology, we obtained two graphs for CUSUM values (operating time and success), both of them showing three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (the initial 9–11 cases), phase 2 (the middle 12 cases) and phase 3 (the remaining 20–22 cases). Phase 1 represents initial learning; phase 2 plateau represents increased competence in the use of the robotic system, and finally, phase 3 represents the period of highest skill or mastery with a reduction in docking time (p = 0.000), but a slight increase in operative time (p = 0.007).
Conclusion
The CUSUM curve shows three phases in the learning and use of robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery which correspond to the phases of initial learning of the technique, consolidation and higher expertise or mastery. The data obtained suggest that the estimated learning curve for robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery is achieved after 21–23 cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Herold A, Lehur P, Matzel K, O’conell P (2008) Coloproctology (European Manual of Medicine), 1st edn. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K ed
Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, Tanaka J, Okuda J, Watanabe M (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Surg Endosc 23:113–118
Liakakos T, Kopanakis K, Schizas D (2010) Favorable outcomes with laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:1217–1218
Staudacher C, Vignali A (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: the state of the art. World J Gastrointest Surg 2:275–282
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Van de Paas MHGM, Te Velde EA, Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ (2011) Favorable outcomes with laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25(6):2060–2061. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1457-4
Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275–281
Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91
Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222
Son GM, Kim JG, Lee JC, Suh YJ, Cho HM, Lee YS, Lee IK, Chun CS (2010) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:609–617
Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525
Jiménez Rodríguez RM, Díaz Pavón JM, De la Portilla De Juan F, Prendes Sillero E, Cadet Dussort JMH, Padillo J (2011) Prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparosocpic surgery in colorectal carcinoma resection. Cir Esp 89:432–438
Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case–control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156
Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J (2012) Robot-assisted total mesorrectal excisión: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2216-5
Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, McKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383
Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Francon D, Mokart D, Houvenaeghel G, Giovannini M, Delpero JR (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorrectal excision for rectal cancer. Lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 251:249–253
Son G, Kim J, Lee J, Suh Y, Cho H, Lee Y, Lee I, Chun C (2010) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 20:609–617
Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120:413–418
Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U (2009) The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 62(91):93–95
Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J, Cheng CL, Patel VR (2011) Learning curve of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with 60 initial cases by a single surgeon. Asian J Surg 34:74–80
Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J, Cheng CL, Patel VR (2010) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: learning curve of first 100 cases. Int J Urol 17:635–640
Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54
Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214
Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20:947–951
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery offers multiple advantages for surgeons, and it seems to yield the same clinical outcomes as regards the short-time follow-up of patients compared to conventional laparoscopy. The aim of the present study is to determine whether the learning curve for this surgical technique can be extrapolated to the well-known conventional laparoscopic technique or whether it enhances laparoscopic surgical performance offering further advantages.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiménez-Rodríguez, R.M., Díaz-Pavón, J.M., de la Portilla de Juan, F. et al. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 815–821 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1620-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1620-6