Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extending the social influence factor: behavioural intention to increase the usage of information and communication technology-enhanced student-centered teaching methods

  • Cultural and Regional Perspectives
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study extends the social influence factor in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model by delineating it into coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures based on institutional theory. It investigates the role of each institutional pressure in influencing the behavioural intention of accounting lecturers in Malaysia’s public universities to use Information and Communications Technology (ICT)-enhanced student-centred teaching methods. Using a purposive sampling method, self-report questionnaires were distributed to accounting lecturers in Malaysia’s public universities offering undergraduate accounting programmes. This resulted in 114 usable questionnaires. The hypothesized relationships were tested using structural equation modeling via Smart-PLS software. Only coercive and normative pressures were found to have a significant and positive influence on behavioural intention. Mimetic pressures had an insignificant influence on behavioural intention. The findings of this study are useful to authorities in the higher education sector and practitioners who have been encouraging the student-centred teaching movement. This study provides further enlightenment on which social factors yield the most effects at the present moment and which social factors need greater work to yield better effects on increasing lecturers’ behavioural intentions as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer.

  • Akhiar, A., Mydin, A. & Kasuma, S. A. A. (2017). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards the use of Instagram in English language writing. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), (S.I.), 47–72.

  • Albrecht, W. S., & Sack, R. J. (2000). Accounting education: Charting the course through a perilous future. Retrieved April 9, 2014, from https://aaahq.org/pubs/AESv16/toc.htm

  • Al-Qeisi, K., Dennis, C., Hegazy, A., & Abbad, M. (2015). How viable is the UTAUT model in a non-western context? International Business Research, 8(2), 204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Accounting Association. (1986). Committee on the future structure, content and scope of accounting education (The Bedford Committee). Future of accounting education: Preparation for the expanding profession. Issues in Accounting Education, I(1), 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Accounting Association. (1989). "The Big 8 White Paper"—Perspectives on education: Capabilities for success in the accounting profession. In Resources on change in accounting education. Accounting Education Change Commision.

  • Azahar, W. (2016). Unemployment among Malaysian graduates beats national average. Retrieved July 27, 2018 from http://www.humanresourcesonline.net/unemployment-among-malaysian-graduates-beats-national-average/

  • Azman, N., Che Omar, I., Md Yunus, A. S., & Zain, A. N. M. (2016). Academic promotion in Malaysian public universities: A critical look at issues and challenges. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2013). Student-centred teaching methods: Can they optimise students’ approaches to learning in professional higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 659–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher (education). The New Media Consortium.

  • Bozan, K., Davey, B., & Parker, K. (2015). Social influence on health IT adoption patterns of the elderly: An institutional theory based use behavior approach. Procedia Computer Science, 63, 517–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozan, K., Davey, B., & Parker, K. R. (2017). Social forces that influence health IT use behavior of the elderly. In N. Wickramasinghe (Ed.), Handbook of research on healthcare administration and management (pp. 369–383). IGI Global.

  • Cumming, T. M., Strnadova, I., & Singh, S. (2014). iPads as instructional tools to enhance learning opportunities for students with developmental disabilities: An action research project. Action Research, 12(2), 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. A. (2002). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Hunter, E., & Klofsen, M. (2006). Institutional forces: The invisible hand that shapes venture ideas? International Small Business Journal, 24(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). What do intention scales measure? The Journal of General Psychology, 119(4), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomophism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Madden, M. (2005). Internet use and email. Pew Internet and American Life Project.

  • Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(4), 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, M. (2013). Mind the gap. Accountants Today, May/June, 2013, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grapragasem, S., Krishnan, A., & Mansor, A. N. (2014). Current trends in Malaysian higher education and the effect on education policy and practice: An overview. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

  • Hassan, A., & Jamaludin, N. S. (2010). Approaches & values in two gigantic educational philosophies: East and West. Online Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, D. H. M., & Mahyuddin, M. Z. (2017). Youth unemployment in Malaysia: Developments and policy considerations. Outlook and Policy in 2017, Annual Report 2016, 99–106.

  • Ilyas, H. P. (2018). The quest for critical thinking framework in ELT. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 18(2), 310–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan, P. T., Lu, H. P., & Chou, T. C. (2012). The adoption of e-learning: An institutional theory perspective. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, A. S. (2015). 70% of Malaysian employers disappointed with the quality of fresh graduates. Retrieved December 28, 2015 from http://www.humanresourcesonline.net/70-malaysian-employers-disappointed-quality-fresh-graduates/

  • Kocaleva, M., Stojanovic, I., & Zdravev, Z. (2014). Research on UTAUT application in higher education institutions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Technology and Developement of Education Zrenjanin, Serbia.

  • Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2010). The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 372–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, M. M. (2005). Towards a definition of the integration of ICT in the classroom. In AARE 2005 & AARE (Eds.), Proceedings AARE '05 education research—Creative dissent: Constructive solutions, Parramatta, New South Wales.

  • Loogma, K., Kruusvall, J., & Ümarik, M. (2012). E-learning as innovation: Exploring innovativeness of the VET teachers’ community in Estonia. Computers & Education, 58(2), 808–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. (2015). Emerging trends in ICT for Education & training. UNESCO.

  • Marchewka, J. T., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masrom, M. (2007). Technology acceptance model and e-learning. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Education, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education, Brunei.

  • Meyer, K. A., & Xu, Y. J. (2009). A causal model of factors influencing faculty use of technology. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2007). Hala Tuju 2: Laporan penilaian semula program perakaunan institusi pengajian awam Malaysia 2006. Jawatankuasa Halatuju Program Perakaunan IPTA.

  • Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2011). Laporan statistik pelajar: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. Retrieved December 1, 2011, from http://www.mohe.gov.my/web_statistik/

  • Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2015). Hala Tuju 3: Laporan penilaian semula program sarjana muda perakaunan institusi pendidikan. Malaysia Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi.

  • Ministy of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2015. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Pyschometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  • Osman, S. Z. M., Jamaludin, R., & Iranmanesh, M. (2015). Student centred learning at USM: What lecturer and students think of this new approach? Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 264–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oye, N. D., Iahad, N. A., & Rahim, N. A. (2014). The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas, Á., Nussbaum, M., Herrera, O., Solarte, M., & Aldunate, R. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of information and communication technologies in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2175–2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. Wiley.

  • Siegel, G., Sorensen, J. E., Klammer, T., & Richtermeyer, S. (2010). The ongoing preparation gap in accounting education: A call to action. Management Accounting Quarterly, 11(3), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 449–460). Springer.

  • Sommer, L. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour and the impact of past behaviour. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T., & Marsden, S. (2012). Problem-based learning: Does accounting education need it? Journal of Accounting Education, 30(3), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeng, B., & Suryani, A. W. (2018). Presentation-based learning and peer evaluation to enhance active learning and self-confidence in financial management classroom. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Committee to Strengthen the Accountancy Profession. (2014). Report on the strengthening of the accountancy profession in Malaysia (p. 64). Securities Commission Malaysia.

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2003). Qualitative difference in university teaching. Access and Exclusion, 2, 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K.-T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2013). Interactive whiteboard acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT model to student teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. W., Yu, P. Y., & Weng, Y. C. (2012). Study on user behavior for I Pass by UTAUT: Using Taiwan’s MRT as an example. Asia Pacific Management Review, 17(1), 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017). Implications of the fourth industrial age for higher education. The Thinker Issue, 73(3), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap, W. L. (2016). Transforming conventional teaching classroom to learner-centred teaching classroom using multimedia-mediated learning module. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work that led to the publication of this paper was supported and funded by the Research University Grant (RUI) 1001/PMGT/8011118, Universiti Sains Malaysia and School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Special thanks were extended to the section editor and anonymous reviewers for providing valuable suggestions. This research is conducted while the third author is on sabbatical leave.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Ping Leow.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leow, L.P., Phua, L.K. & Teh, S.Y. Extending the social influence factor: behavioural intention to increase the usage of information and communication technology-enhanced student-centered teaching methods. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 1853–1879 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10017-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10017-4

Keywords

Navigation